Quote:
Lol, enjoy your gridlock with Senate/Obama.
I do not have an agenda. If I did then a gridlock in both chambers would be a problem. For me, this is about Checks and Balances and in the wonderful bicameral government that we enjoy here in the U.S. means that all this crazy crap that gets pushed through is going to get holed up by the House of Representatives and debated. For those that do have an agenda you'll have to wait two more years for anything major to be passed. Yay Checks and Balances!
Quote:
Also you're kinda slow on the uptake-- be it Democrats or Republicans, people want change... that's why people are biting Obama's head off.
Yes, people want change. Look what has "changed" so far.
A medicare bill was passed with the American people still angry about how it was handle. There was really not a debate on a senate and house floor or 'Transparency' when the massive 5000 page essay was provided to us. It was crammed in our face when the voter was dealing with a 10% Unemployment Rate and $13Trillion Debt was our main priority.
The gays are still pissed that the DADT policy is still in place as well as Gay Marriage hasn't been formally and properly addressed.
There is ire by both sides on how to deal with the Mexico border policy or how it was handle thus far.
Guantanamo is not closed yet (Campaign promise; although there is improvement)
We still have Troops serving on two fronts overseas (One is hopefully beginning to wrap up, the other is nowhere close to being finished)
The bailout money is sitting in a coffer at the moment and is waiting to be either spent or sent back to the U.S. Treasury to be reabsorbed.
The Whites are pissed that the unemployment rate is still hovering at numbers near preobama rates.
Seems the only people that are happy are the blacks because they got their Black president and even then, some of the blacks are dealing with one of the above issues in some form or fashion.
People wanted change and in a government where Democrats hold super-majorities in both Legislative and Executive branches of government they were not able to meet many of the promises that voters voted him in to office to do.
Quote:
If this was McCain he would be getting his own head bitten off, and we would continue to see a Democrat-ran House (albeit not as bad due to being white, lol) However, change doesn't come fast at all, Obama said this full well knowing MANY times before he won and immediately after. Also the fact that the economy is *** to hell and worse than that of 60 years ago.
I do hope that if the situation we're reversed and it was McCain and the Republicans back in the hot seat that he and the rest of his lackeys would be held accountable. Its not about party affiliation or color. If you get voted into office and are making $174,000.00 yearly as a representative in the house, you better be doing something that can be measured in the form of progress.
Quote:
You sound like one of this idiot pundits that like to speak your dumbass opinions and commentary with no real solution to anything.
That makes sense. Because being given options and knowing which of the options you are given is incorrect makes you an idiot. I will remember that the next time:
A thief robs me on the street at gunpoint demanding my wallet and I am given the option of:
A.) Reaching for my knife and fighting
B.) Running
C.) Give the wallet over
D.) Call his mom and *** and a wh0re
I don't know which of the options will get me out of the situation without me getting shot and killed but I sure as hell know which of these options would likely lead me to getting shot and killed.
I know what Obama shouldn't have done. After rereading his press conference transcript a 4th time I can tell you that I think he might have gotten it too. He shouldn't have pushed party agenda through the system without first taking care of the economy and jobs. We had a "LOLJobSummit" last December when the Unemployment Expension Benefits was brought back to the forefront and that was his solution; and Job Summit.
Quote:
Mind you, I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas and planning, nor do I agree with him trying the bi-partisan thing (he shoulda just ran in with some "I run ***now ***, we gonna do ***like this, lets go"), but some of you are really blunt, and won't listen to anything.
Sounds like a Dictatorship to me. From his Election in 2008 up until yesterday, a super-majority which he had was about as close as you can get in the US to a dictatorship and that is why I like opposing parties to hold one of the houses opposite to the executive branch.