Random Politics & Religion #22 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #22
But keep crying Vic, those tears roll off the back of your legs pretty well.
This page has got some laughs that are on par with the last 24hrs of r/the_donald
NBC being clueless again
"Why does Syria still have chemical weapons?" Well, it's because we had a president who never cared enough about people longer than the votes he collected from them. He would have used chemical weapons on them (and us) if he could get away with it. Just imagine the "surprise" the media will have when Iran starts shooting off nukes.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » This page has got some laughs that are on par with the last 24hrs of r/the_donald I'm the wiz
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Viciouss said: » Lol, well #1 didn't happen at all, Susan Rice did nothing wrong and you haven't shown anything indicating she did. The NSC has a right to request unmasking for security purposes, and only on foreign affairs. Tell us, why would Rice unmask conversations between American citizens talking about their family? Or are you still keeping your head up your posterior? Viciouss said: » And #3 didn't really happen either, we have to see what Trump's next move regarding Syria is. So, yes, the world got to see what a real leader looks like. You didn't vote for him, but he is still your president. Have you read the intel reports? How do you know what was inside them? Have they been released to the public? Or is this you making things up again? Just like you made up Trump was unmasked by Rice? Yeah, what happened to that? Did you ever prove that one? No? Didn't think so. Keep it up tho KN, your ignorance is always entertaining. Its been amusing to read all the tears from the alt-right about the Syria attack. The hard liners are condemning it. Did Trump just betray his base? Asura.Kingnobody said: » NBC being clueless again "Why does Syria still have chemical weapons?" Well, it's because we had a president who never cared enough about people longer than the votes he collected from them. He would have used chemical weapons on them (and us) if he could get away with it. Did you even read the article? If we acknowledge that Syria having chemical weapons is actually a failure on Putins end of the deal we won't get paid by the Kremlin. Let alone tip off the fact that it's evidence that Syria is more aligned to Iran than it is to Russia. That also affects payouts. Viciouss said: » Have you read the intel reports? How do you know what was inside them? Have they been released to the public? Or is this you making things up again? Just like you made up Trump was unmasked by Rice? Yeah, what happened to that? Did you ever prove that one? No? Didn't think so. Keep it up tho KN, your ignorance is always entertaining. Again, proven wrong Vic. Maybe one of these days you can be somewhat coherent towards reality. You know the saying: Given an infinite amount of time, a monkey would eventually type the complete works of Shakespeare. Keep on typing. Viciouss said: » Did you even read the article? Viciouss said: » Its been amusing to read all the tears from the alt-right about the Syria attack. The hard liners are condemning it. Did Trump just betray his base? I wouldn't say "betray" per se, but the people who bought into his non interventionist rhetoric are having a "wtf" moment. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Three men jumped out from the lorry and opened fire before trying to stab pedestrians, witnesses said. Two men were tackled to the ground and arrested - but a third suspect went on the loose - immediately making him Europe's most wanted man. Bahamut.Ravael said: » fonewear said: » What is wrong with giving Russia advanced notice. We aren't at war with Russia. But yes. Only question here is did we have to give them 48 hours notice? Asura.Kingnobody said: » ... And I highly doubt we gave Russia enough warning for Russia to remove much in terms of weapons. This was a surprise attack. But yes, the rest of were surprised. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » It is fun to remind supporters and detractors of their previous stances. I understand that. But it can get old, which is part of the reason I have partially abandoned my "both sides" schtick. It's not that I don't still see it, it's just that there are so many similarities in the stupid things Democrats and Republicans do, and so much selective outrage being directed only at the other side and never at your (proverbial) own side, that I just realized that it's easier and more fun to play sides than point out blatant hypocrisy constantly and hear "false equivalence" nine million times. You know, as if people literally believe their political party could never do anything wrong, or the things they actually do wrong are minor, insignificant, and never the things the opposition actually points out. Garuda.Chanti said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » fonewear said: » What is wrong with giving Russia advanced notice. We aren't at war with Russia. But yes. Only question here is did we have to give them 48 hours notice? Not really. Personally, 1 hour would have been enough. 20 minutes would still be plenty, as all you could remove is the people in the base. Garuda.Chanti said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » ... And I highly doubt we gave Russia enough warning for Russia to remove much in terms of weapons. This was a surprise attack. But yes, the rest of were surprised. Oh, its nice to know KN thinks Fox News is a real news source. I'm sure its because it is a conservative website.
What happened to its facts I don't like unless its been independently verified? Believe anything you want KN, it doesn't make it fact. Viciouss said: » Oh, its nice to know KN thinks Fox News is a real news source. We have, on one hand, a news source that would investigate conservatives and liberals and report findings period, and we have, on the other hand, a news "source" that would only investigate conservatives and ignore the rest. Which one is doing it's job? Viciouss said: » What happened to its facts I don't like unless its been independently verified? Believe anything you want KN, it doesn't make it fact. But hey, keep believing that Trump and Russia are buddies. That Syria attack is all a conspiracy to throw off suspicions, right? http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/15727044
HUFFPOST!!!!!! Arrrhhhhgggg Nooo But "Fox News for Entertainment purposes only" is totally going to boost ratings. Viciouss said: » Oh, its nice to know KN thinks Fox News is a real news source. I'm sure its because it is a conservative website. What happened to its facts I don't like unless its been independently verified? Believe anything you want KN, it doesn't make it fact. From the guy who thinks CNN is a legitimate news source.... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » fonewear said: » What is wrong with giving Russia advanced notice. We aren't at war with Russia. But yes. Only question here is did we have to give them 48 hours notice? I really can't think of a sillier thing than to pull that agreement. Unless Putin wants a war. Yeah, Fox News, the outlet that will print anything to take the lens off its own sex scandal, lawsuits, investigations, settlements, defections. Very credible right now. They made up the Rice story based on "anonymous sources" and various alt-right websites ran with it. Nothing on the Rice story has been independently verified.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/15727044 HUFFPOST!!!!!! Arrrhhhhgggg Nooo But "Fox News for Entertainment purposes only" is totally going to boost ratings. Garuda.Chanti said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » fonewear said: » What is wrong with giving Russia advanced notice. We aren't at war with Russia. But yes. Only question here is did we have to give them 48 hours notice? I really can't think of a sillier thing than to pull that agreement. Unless Putin wants a war. Or the appearance of one! Then they kiss and make up and ride off into the sunset...after nuking Iran, Syria And North Korea Garuda.Chanti said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/15727044 HUFFPOST!!!!!! Arrrhhhhgggg Nooo But "Fox News for Entertainment purposes only" is totally going to boost ratings. Ssssssssssshhhhhhh it's better when they get to the end. Asura.Kingnobody said: » I'm more inclined to believe a real news source Weren't you citing the daily mail in the last chat about climate change?
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Just imagine the "surprise" the media will have when Iran starts shooting off nukes. Iron won't go around shooting off nukes, that's a sure fire way to get oneself turned into a radioactive pile of ash. They will test them internally, and design a delivery platform with associated payload, but they'll never actually use them. Nuclear weapons are one of those Awesome but Impractical items. On paper they sound great, yet in practice they cause the possessor far more harm in the form of strategic paralysis. Quote: Another man was arrested in Hjulsta late Friday night. Neighbors in the area say the man knows the 39-year-old suspected of the truck attack on Drottninggatan. A large number of police officers participated in the operation. Police declined to comment if there is a connection with the suspected terrorist attack. The police task force was also in place at an address in Farsta, southern Stockholm at 5 AM on Saturday. According to Aftonbladet photographer on the spot, the National Task Force cracked down on an apartment. Both civil and on duty police cars were there. The police were equipped with shields and a door ram. One person was questioned in place outside the building, but according to Aftonbladet photographer no one was arrested. - We will not comment on exactly what we have done or what we will do in this investigation, says Towe Hägg, spokesperson for the police. Asura.Saevel said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Just imagine the "surprise" the media will have when Iran starts shooting off nukes. Iron won't go around shooting off nukes, that's a sure fire way to get oneself turned into a radioactive pile of ash. They will test them internally, and design a delivery platform with associated payload, but they'll never actually use them. Nuclear weapons are one of those Awesome but Impractical items. On paper they sound great, yet in practice they cause the possessor far more harm in the form of strategic paralysis. I think KN meant "shooting off nukes" in a way similar to North Korea testing and developing their own WMD's. If by "awesome but impractical" you meant mutual assured destruction then I'm pretty sure there's already decades of theory behind your analysis. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||