Shut 'em Down!

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
Shut 'em down!
First Page 2 3 ... 17 18 19 ... 99 100 101
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2013-10-06 22:59:44  
YouTube Video Placeholder


At least Alex Jones is entertaining.
[+]
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:01:23  
What discussion? Is there a discussion going on here? Because Amandarius posting random *** backed up with no facts is not a discussion, its just his usual behavior.
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2013-10-06 23:04:53  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
What discussion? Is there a discussion going on here? Because Amandarius posting random *** backed up with no facts is not a discussion, its just his usual behavior.

It's like trying to speak to a jihadist.

Red is right, Blue is wrong. Red can do no wrong, Blue does nothing right. DEATH TO OBAMACARE.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:05:51  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »

Sharing partisan ideals is one thing, but no, the Senate has actually taken a more liberal stance on virtually everything in this term, often ignoring Obama's recommendations even within the same mindset. The Senate is not an arm of the Executive.

OK buddy

Care to respond to the fact that you made an erroneous statement about voting along party lines? Or are you ok with being the tinfoil hat guy?

No I said nothing erroneous. I'm sorry if you think Senate Democrats only voting 94.9% of the time along party lines isn't a solid voting block. And I'm not going to hammer out those number but if you throw out the lowest member Joe Manchin it's a lot higher. All except 10 of them were over 90%. That's ridiculous. That's Borg.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:08:21  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
No I said nothing erroneous. I'm sorry if you think Senate Democrats only voting 94.9% of the time along party lines isn't a solid voting block. And I'm not going to hammer out those number but if you throw out the lowest member Joe Manchin it's a lot higher. All except 10 of them were over 90%. That's ridiculous. That's Borg.

random ***.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:08:37  
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
What discussion? Is there a discussion going on here? Because Amandarius posting random *** backed up with no facts is not a discussion, its just his usual behavior.

It's like trying to speak to a jihadist.

Red is right, Blue is wrong. Red can do no wrong, Blue does nothing right. DEATH TO OBAMACARE.

Yes your opinions are always so diverse here. Look around you are no better than what you accuse me of.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:11:10  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »

Sharing partisan ideals is one thing, but no, the Senate has actually taken a more liberal stance on virtually everything in this term, often ignoring Obama's recommendations even within the same mindset. The Senate is not an arm of the Executive.

OK buddy

Care to respond to the fact that you made an erroneous statement about voting along party lines? Or are you ok with being the tinfoil hat guy?

No I said nothing erroneous. I'm sorry if you think Senate Democrats only voting 94.9% of the time along party lines isn't a solid voting block. And I'm not going to hammer out those number but if you throw out the lowest member Joe Manchin it's a lot higher. All except 10 of them were over 90%. That's ridiculous. That's Borg.

So 80% of senate democrats voted along party lines over 90% is your benchmark for lockstep.... 89% of house republicans voted along party lines over 90% of the time.

You're wrong. And, as usual, you make a wild claim, pick an incredibly small part of the evidence proving you wrong and try to eek out a niche of ambiguity, then stick your fingers in your ears and run around screaming OBAMA OBAMA.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:14:51  
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
YouTube Video Placeholder


At least Alex Jones is entertaining.


Did he actually say "cancer viruses"?
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:14:54  
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:24:11  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:25:32  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »

Sharing partisan ideals is one thing, but no, the Senate has actually taken a more liberal stance on virtually everything in this term, often ignoring Obama's recommendations even within the same mindset. The Senate is not an arm of the Executive.

OK buddy

Care to respond to the fact that you made an erroneous statement about voting along party lines? Or are you ok with being the tinfoil hat guy?

No I said nothing erroneous. I'm sorry if you think Senate Democrats only voting 94.9% of the time along party lines isn't a solid voting block. And I'm not going to hammer out those number but if you throw out the lowest member Joe Manchin it's a lot higher. All except 10 of them were over 90%. That's ridiculous. That's Borg.

So 80% of senate democrats voted along party lines over 90% is your benchmark for lockstep.... 89% of house republicans voted along party lines over 90% of the time.

You're wrong. And, as usual, you make a wild claim, pick an incredibly small part of the evidence proving you wrong and try to eek out a niche of ambiguity, then stick your fingers in your ears and run around screaming OBAMA OBAMA.

And those number posted are admittedly vague.

from the site:
"All votes are weighted equally in this ranking, so a non-binding resolution honoring a collegiate sports team, for example, is considered equal to a vote on passing health care reform. Since the vast majority of the hundreds of votes factored in are routine in nature, the result is that even highly-independent senators have a seemingly high score on voting with their party. But it's the context that matters, and this ranking attempts to provide that. Obviously, this gives only a partial picture of the ideological spectrum."
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:27:23  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.

Your case doesn't exist, it applies to both parties, by singling out the Dems and ignoring the GOP, you continue to live in your own little world. Good try tho.
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2013-10-06 23:28:34  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »

Sharing partisan ideals is one thing, but no, the Senate has actually taken a more liberal stance on virtually everything in this term, often ignoring Obama's recommendations even within the same mindset. The Senate is not an arm of the Executive.

OK buddy

Care to respond to the fact that you made an erroneous statement about voting along party lines? Or are you ok with being the tinfoil hat guy?

No I said nothing erroneous. I'm sorry if you think Senate DemocrTuesdayats only voting 94.9% of the time along party lines isn't a solid voting block. And I'm not going to hammer out those number but if you throw out the lowest member Joe Manchin it's a lot higher. All except 10 of them were over 90%. That's ridiculous. That's Borg.

But its ok for the congressional republicans to be borg like?

Actually burden of proof is on any person who makes a claim that is refuted in any capacity. Its on the reufting party to back their claim up as well. To say I'm not going to do the work like you just did and have done in the past to prove your assertion is narcissistic and cowardly.
[+]
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:29:03  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.

Your case doesn't exist, it applies to both parties, by singling out the Dems and ignoring the GOP, you continue to live in your own little world. Good try tho.


But the whole argument liberals have been making is there are factions fighting a civil war in the Republican party. Good try tho.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:31:23  
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2013-10-06 23:32:45  
What did you do? Go to the straw man shool of argumentation?
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:33:07  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.

Your case doesn't exist, it applies to both parties, by singling out the Dems and ignoring the GOP, you continue to live in your own little world. Good try tho.


But the whole argument liberals have been making is there are factions fighting a civil war in the Republican party. Good try tho.

Uh, Republicans have been saying the same thing. It's a fact, not a viewpoint.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:33:55  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.


OK so now you are shredding your own reference. Dig it.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:35:03  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.


OK so now you are shredding your own reference. Dig it.

Do you speak English?
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:35:13  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.

Your case doesn't exist, it applies to both parties, by singling out the Dems and ignoring the GOP, you continue to live in your own little world. Good try tho.


But the whole argument liberals have been making is there are factions fighting a civil war in the Republican party. Good try tho.

Uh, Republicans have been saying the same thing. It's a fact, not a viewpoint.

So how do you want it; they march in lockstep or there is a civil between factions in the Republican party? Can't have it both ways, brah. Checkmate?
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:37:18  
Yeah, what happens when the GOP says there is a lot of infighting going on in their own party like they are doing now? Hmm. Another failed attempt. Liberals are not saying anything, they are sitting back and enjoying the show.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:38:19  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Lets not even get into the fact that defecting on any vote is always a huge risk to the defector, potentially causing irreparable damage to your standing and possible re-election. And yet, Amandarius wonders why its so rare.

I don't wonder why it's so rare and you make my case.

Your case doesn't exist, it applies to both parties, by singling out the Dems and ignoring the GOP, you continue to live in your own little world. Good try tho.


But the whole argument liberals have been making is there are factions fighting a civil war in the Republican party. Good try tho.

Uh, Republicans have been saying the same thing. It's a fact, not a viewpoint.

So how do you want it; they march in lockstep or there is a civil between factions in the Republican party? Can't have it both ways, brah. Checkmate?

I never said that they march in lockstep, the Tea Party has the real threat of running primary candidates against moderates to intimidate the rest of the party to follow suit. Several incumbents that had TP candidates run against them in primaries spoke out publicly about it.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:39:06  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.


OK so now you are shredding your own reference. Dig it.

Do you speak English?

Because your reference was vague and weighed "fluff" legislation equally to major politically charged legislation with massive consequences. Then did I see you just invent you own statistics? How many votes were fluff legislation? Can you at least provide that number you started with when calculating your "statistics."
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:43:07  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Yeah, what happens when the GOP says there is a lot of infighting going on in their own party like they are doing now? Hmm. Another failed attempt. Liberals are not saying anything, they are sitting back and enjoying the show.


Good so it took you and Jassick two pages but at least you finally verified my claim that there is actually debate in the Republican party whereas there is none among Democrats. I guess you were just arguing to argue, used to it.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:44:52  
Can you provide any evidence that there is no debate with the democratic party? Or are you just throwing out wild accusations like we are used to?
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:44:58  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.


OK so now you are shredding your own reference. Dig it.

Do you speak English?

Because your reference was vague and weighed "fluff" legislation equally to major politically charged legislation with massive consequences. Then did I see you just invent you own statistics? How many votes were fluff legislation? Can you at least provide that number you started with when calculating your "statistics."

Once again, fluff legislation almost always passes with overwhelming consensus regardless of party lines.

If 98% of pubs and 98% of dems vote yes on a fluff bill, you can subtract the entirety of that bill from the total on both sides and the statistic remains unchanged.

You don't get to pick apart even the most basic portions of fields you know nothing about. And this is 7th grade Algebra, so I'm guessing you didn't make it to 8th grade.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-10-06 23:46:35  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Yeah, what happens when the GOP says there is a lot of infighting going on in their own party like they are doing now? Hmm. Another failed attempt. Liberals are not saying anything, they are sitting back and enjoying the show.


Good so it took you and Jassick two pages but at least you finally verified my claim that there is actually debate in the Republican party whereas there is none among Democrats. I guess you were just arguing to argue, used to it.

Apples and oranges, bubba.
 Cerberus.Pleebo
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Pleebo
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2013-10-06 23:50:33  
Yes, internal debate within the Republican party consists of whether or not to destroy the US economy in order to... save it(?). It's like having a debate about whether or not to smear feces on your own face.

BUT OMG AT LEAST THEY'RE DEBATING THIS MEANS SOMETHING
[+]
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2013-10-06 23:56:22  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Here's what you said.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

the only radical party is the Democrats. They march in lockstep on every single issue, a solid voting block in all matters. Not once does a Democrat in the Senate buck his party. That's radical. You have Senators like Joe Manchin, a supposed moderate from West Virginia toeing the party line and voting 100% with Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is a self avowed Socialist. That's radical. There are no individuals in the Democratic party. There is no debate in the Democratic party. There are no "other ideas" in the Democratic party. They do whatever they are told extreme left. That's radical.

I'm curious where you mentioned anything about it only being important issues? Also, what makes you think that those unimportant issues split the vote at all? Fluff legislation usually passes with overwhelming majority on both sides. So an actual statistician would throw out all of those votes on both sides and you'd arrive at nearly the exact same numbers with just a smaller sample size. Not only do you have no grasp on the US legislative process, you don't know anything about statistics you claim support your moronic opinions.


OK so now you are shredding your own reference. Dig it.

Do you speak English?

Because your reference was vague and weighed "fluff" legislation equally to major politically charged legislation with massive consequences. Then did I see you just invent you own statistics? How many votes were fluff legislation? Can you at least provide that number you started with when calculating your "statistics."

Once again, fluff legislation almost always passes with overwhelming consensus regardless of party lines.

If 98% of pubs and 98% of dems vote yes on a fluff bill, you can subtract the entirety of that bill from the total on both sides and the statistic remains unchanged.

You don't get to pick apart even the most basic portions of fields you know nothing about. And this is 7th grade Algebra, so I'm guessing you didn't make it to 8th grade.

OK here is statistics by Jassick. Let's take a look at these numbers then of course ignore them and forget about numbers entirely. Now let's throw out this, this and a bunch of this and voila see both sides are equal. Throw in comment about grade school.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2013-10-06 23:58:46  
OK here is stats by Aman: [Blank Space] Followed by a challenge to fill in the blank space that he left.
First Page 2 3 ... 17 18 19 ... 99 100 101
Log in to post.