*cackles maniacally*
A giant F-You and your damn dogs, Capra Demon!
Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking? |
||
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Bismarck.Dreadnot
Offline
*cackles maniacally*
A giant F-You and your damn dogs, Capra Demon! Trying to think of a term in the IT industry.
Kinda like how accounting has GAAP. Stuff like naming conventions for computers and stuff like that. A baseline administrative standard. I forget what we call it. GAISP?
Something like that, I basically want a reference to slap someone in the face with when I have to tell some higher-ups how stupid our naming conventions are.
Right now we are using building-location-serialnumber for image names and computer names in system properties. So for example HS-CT10-555ABCD Highschool, Cart 10, Serial number. Then we have the label for teachers/students on it with something like HS-CT10-06 with 06 being laptop #6. ***of it is though that people have been screwing up and we have machines with HS-CT10-555ABCD with top labels of like HS-LTOP14-06. Then look at the image server and the images have been named "HS-LTOP14-06" and are in the same cart as the ones registered as CT10 (it actually is cart 10). So this is confusing as ***when trying to inventory anything, which is more hassle than problem until (in this case) 2 laptops go missing, and guess what they are ones imaged as HS-LTOP14-06 etc so no serial number information has been saved anywhere. It comes down to having too many people trying to manage it, with higher-ups changing naming conventions randomly and no one updating info correctly and relying on the image server thinking it will inventory it automatically. How an organization can screw up something this simple so badly is beyond me. The current place I work at just names the devices by serial#.
The previous place I worked at (after "merger") did site:type:number, before "merge" did Site:number:type, but unlike the first it actually broke sites up by department instead of by overall network location, so it was easier to tell where a device should be by it's name. Any of those sound like a better solution, and easier to keep track of. I feel like using the serial number in the name of the machine is a security issue, no? Someone gets a peak at your network map and suddenly they know make, model, what OS ships with it etc.
Either way, things should have 1 name, not 3-4 lol. Quote: Welsh government responds in Klingon to UFO airport query Nice to see they have a sense of humour. Grumpy Cat said: » I feel like using the serial number in the name of the machine is a security issue, no? Someone gets a peak at your network map and suddenly they know make, model, what OS ships with it etc. Either way, things should have 1 name, not 3-4 lol. I doubt any of that information is actually relevant, especially what OS ships with something, as most business environments use their own image anyway. But personally I'd rather use a naming convention like site:device:number, and yeah multiple names is silly. edit: the one thing I don't like about not changing the name is when you replace a PC, some systems use the client name for things, and you'd have to go in each of those systems and change what name is attached, etc and then wait for those systems to propagate with the new information. Question about FFXIV lore, sorta spoiler
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Question about FFXIV lore, sorta spoiler Here are some of the things known, it's not much at this point They were only recently mentioned, in 3.1's sightseeing log I believe
Picked up a Red Knight dark souls III funko today
I'm in that random Car park agian
Bömp
Oh yeah... that Fallout 4 DLC...
Do I make a new character or do I blow through it with my level 87? Hmmm. Grumpy Cat said: » Oh yeah... that Fallout 4 DLC... Do I make a new character or do I blow through it with my level 87? Hmmm. If you're in it for the story, just use your current character. I spent all of yesterday trying to figure out how to beat Fallout 4, the missions have so many stupid non explained things. I wanted to finish with the Minute Men but had to do a set of certain quests, one even bugged, with other factions, before even touching the minute men. It's pretty silly but at least I figured it out.
Another night, another disappointing movie.
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Another night, another disappointing movie. Spread, with Kutcher.
Thinking about trying to find a copy of The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly sometime soon. Maybe watch Dirty Harry again.
Think the only thing on BG wiki i've updated in the last month on BG was where skaoi boots came from on the Escha reward page. Couldn't be bothered to add it to the acctual NM spoils.
Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Sylph.Shadowlina said: » Think the only thing on BG wiki i've updated in the last month on BG was where skaoi boots came from on the Escha reward page. Couldn't be bothered to add it to the acctual NM spoils. I will update it right now. EDIT: None of the drops from the NM were anywhere but his page. All have been updated. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|