Here Is Your Holy Man, Bathed In The Blood Of Inno

It is, pay attention.

Just like you and logical thought.
What do you know anyway, you live at home with mommy.
:P
Did a hot Christian girl tell you your *** was small?
Did they tell you that you were going to hell!?
Awwwww.

Wrong, Atheists are the ones who do no believe period..

Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable.

Which means since I don't discount the possibility of there being a God, and agree that there is no way to prove it one way or another, I am Agnostic.

For me to be Atheist, I'd have to believe 100% there is no, and can be no higher power, deity, God or Gods, however you wish to label it.

lol on the logical thought part, since you can't be more wrong sir.

So?
no
I've heard that more times than you can count.

Personally, a mysterious space wizard with no origin using his magic and creating everything we know the universe to be when we, as a species, were still young and ignorant desperately seeking any answer makes a lot sense.

What makes even more sense is how a young girl, traveling alone with a man, through the power of magic, got impregnated somehow, in a time when unwed girls who got pregnant got stoned to death.

But you know what makes the most sense to me. How a large, international corporation to this day still takes advantage of all this, makes tens, maybe hundreds of billions of dollars every year, retaining world-wide power, by doing nothing more than convincing you that it isn't only a wonderful thing that will make you feel good if you give them money and give them power, but also, to raise your children to feel and do the same way. To top it off, they never have to provide any proof or evidence of what they say it true. All they have to do is throw around the word 'faith'.

edit: typo

You've heard a girl telling you your *** was small more times than I can count?
I can count up to a million man :/

I'm sorry if you don't like the definition of the word "atheist" but that's how it is, if you lack the belief in a deity then you are an atheist, regardless of whatever other crap you do or don't believe it is irrelevant to the point.

Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable.

No, but funny.

You can? prove it, video nao. Be drunk while you do it too.

Atheism, in a broad sense, is the rejection of belief in the existence of deities

I'm sorry you don't like being proven wrong, re-read the two definitions. You can keep arguing that I'm Atheist until you're blue in the face, it doesn't change the definitions of Agnostic and Atheist.

Atheism is the lack of belief in a deity, not a rejection.

why?
it would be illogical to do so since you wouldn't believe it anyway.
i bet it feels bad that you've had girls laugh at your *** though.

From where are you getting this definition?

oh wow lol

I'm not wrong (at least on this note) you are an atheist if you don't have an expressed belief in a deity, I'm reading the definitions, you sir have it wrong.

you have no proof of that.

a·the·ism
   /ˈeɪθiˌɪzəm/ Show Spelled[ey-thee-iz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
the doctrine or belief that there is no god.
2.
disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.


ag·nos·tic
   /ægˈnɒstɪk/ Show Spelled[ag-nos-tik] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as god, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience.
2.
a person who denies or doubts the possibility of ultimate knowledge in some area of study.

Huge difference. Please remember that.

sure I do.
your tiny ***.

You're defining atheistic agnosticism.

Edwards, Paul (2005) [1967]. "Atheism". In Donald M. Borchert. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). MacMillan Reference USA (Gale). p. 359. ISBN 0028657802. "On our definition, an 'atheist' is a person who rejects belief in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. It is common among contemporary philosophers, and indeed it was not uncommon in earlier centuries, to reject positions on the ground that they are meaningless. Sometimes, too, a theory is rejected on such grounds as that it is sterile or redundant or capricious, and there are many other considerations which in certain contexts are generally agreed to constitute good grounds for rejecting an assertion.". (page 175 in 1967 edition)


that said, many dictionaries list the definition of agnostic under the definition of atheist

just as dictionaries often list ain't

atheist can be informally used interchangably with agnostic

but at that point we're Equivocating

I'll admit there is some dispute about the correction definition, but on Merriam-Webster, dictionary.com and a few others have this definition as an acceptable one, however what is the definition of theism?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theism?show=0&t=1290641991

now an atheist is not a theist, and if a theist has a belief in a god, an atheist lacks that belief.

here's an about.com article on the matter
http://atheism.about.com/od/definitionofatheism/a/definition.htm

so I'll conceded that the other definition can be used, however (warning stating opinion here) I find that definition to be inaccurate.

na, I'm defining atheism, he's defining the other.

theism:

You must not believe in much then lol...

Why?

Nope, there's no reason to.