Newer Players Need To Step Up Their Game

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » FFXI » General » Newer players need to step up their game
Newer players need to step up their game
First Page 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 9 10 11
Offline
Posts: 8977
By Afania 2024-09-25 23:48:22  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
Oh, what's the command to have a parse tell you that someone was using tools?

I think you just said my point again? The parse will not tell you why someone out-parsed you, you have to figure it out yourself.


WS frequency, obviously. If someone has abnormally high WS frequency compare with previous data, then it is easy to suspect this person uses tools.

Parse can tell you someone is winning because their WS hits harder or they WS faster. Tools don't help your WS dmg, it only helps WS frequency. Then you can tell.

It's barely a "puzzle" that needs to be figured out by comparing WS frequency and average.
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 00:56:40  
There's a huge difference between

Afania said: »
it is easy to suspect this person uses tools.

and

Afania said: »
Parse does tell that, you know.

How do you tell the difference between a player who's just playing better than you vs one who's using "tools" to improve their DPS?

Assuming a sheol C full clear seg farm, what's the WS count for a SAM using tools? What about one without? How about a WAR with/without? DRG?
Offline
Posts: 8977
By Afania 2024-09-26 01:14:33  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
How do you tell the difference between a player who's just playing better than you vs one who's using "tools" to improve their DPS?


How much "better" can people do with normal auto target? I can see people WS a few times faster with better reaction speed. But not way faster.

I also use the combination of parse and animation to tell. If I am playing I'm not going to stare at other people's animation all day. If I noticed abnormally high frequency on parse then I can start watching the animation to confirm. So parse does help you spot tool users even if you eventually need to watch animation to confirm.
 Asura.Sechs
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Akumasama
Posts: 10086
By Asura.Sechs 2024-09-26 03:19:48  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
Assuming a sheol C full clear seg farm
Sorry to barge in but I wanted to underline a thing.
I'm not claiming it's completely irrelevant -because it's not- but at the same time I wouldn't say Sheol C parses are a particularly effective way to measure how "good" a player is on a certain job.

I mean, it does tell you something for sure, and some situations are overly clear with that.
But at the same time there are so many variables at play in Sheol C runs that, I dunno, I would take it with a grain of salt.
Especially if it's someone you met/parsed just once.
[+]
Offline
By Dodik 2024-09-26 04:22:46  
Addons don't make you WS more frequently, let's be real here.

A human being with autotarget off manually switching targets is quicker than any addons that target for you or the built in autotarget. Source - self.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 1133
By Seun 2024-09-26 05:12:22  
Dodik said: »
Addons don't make you WS more frequently, let's be real here.

Most players are are using addons to control their alt accounts. Would they really WS as frequently if they had to alt-tab between each instance and manually use their macro?


Dodik said: »
A human being with autotarget off manually switching targets is quicker than any addons that target for you or the built in autotarget. Source - self.

I thought we were being real?

'Human being' describes less than half of our playerbase. The majority is controlled by addons or scripts. They don't care that manual target works fine for a real person playing, they want something that addresses their issue.
VIP
Offline
Posts: 774
By Lili 2024-09-26 05:37:08  
Seun said: »
Most players are are using addons to control their alt accounts. Would they really WS as frequently if they had to alt-tab between each instance and manually use their macro?

The send addon and all its variations still count as "manual" and lets the user set up macros that are 500% more effective[*] than any sort of bot.

Seun said: »
'Human being' describes less than half of our playerbase. The majority is controlled by addons or scripts. They don't care that manual target works fine for a real person playing, they want something that addresses their issue.

That issue is entirely self-inflicted. If "users" want maximum efficiency, manual control with clever macroing is the solution. If they want to afk while their addons fight for them, inefficiency is basically[*] mandatory.

(some people are proficient enough that they're able to write bots that are more efficient than any hyooman can be. Those people also understand why they shouldn't share, and in fact they do not)

[*]for certain meanings of the term.
 Phoenix.Gavroches
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: gavroches
Posts: 165
By Phoenix.Gavroches 2024-09-26 05:44:59  
Guys… come on….

First you taking up on newbies to step it up but it took you years to get to that point, so what’s your point?!?

Then you take it on on people to out parse you on fictional add on… (you can’t TP/WS faster with addon…) and plenty of vanilla player might disagree with you

Regular blaming of naegling overkilling but not the 2 step SC which is also overkill

Some dudes are better because they play better, that’s it. I met plenty of folks with nyame 20-25 and some just s u c k - a s s . Sometimes luck buff will change that parse, but if it’s consistent, ask then what they doing, they will answer if you not a ***. Maybe it’s the controller vs keyboard (I’m a keyboard) maybe it’s lining/facing the mob the right way, left or right, maybe it’s just having the next target selected and switching as the last swings goes, maybe he’s more focus/OCD than you are. There’s tons of reason but addon doesn’t WS faster as TP come from SE, they send you the amount, you send the request from WS that get approved, send you back it you and apply it, your game answer by an animation. The JA0 can allow you move characters because it’s skipping the animation lock but doesn’t allow you to swing either, can’t TP, can’t cast, can’t JA… your bitterness towards whatever will prevent you from great thing, because you don’t understand it
[+]
Offline
By Dodik 2024-09-26 05:56:35  
Seun said: »
I thought we were being real?

'Human being' describes less than half of our playerbase. The majority is controlled by addons or scripts. They don't care that manual target works fine for a real person playing, they want something that addresses their issue.

You are arguing a point no one brought up but you, therefor you are arguing with yourself. Have fun with that.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 1133
By Seun 2024-09-26 06:19:32  
Lili said: »
The send addon and all its variations still count as "manual"

Automatic that self-identifies as manual. Sure, why not.


Dodik said: »
You are arguing a point no one brought up but you, therefor you are arguing with yourself. Have fun with that.

I agreed with what you said Dodik, but a single person manually controlling one account isn't an accurate reflection of FFXI.
VIP
Offline
Posts: 774
By Lili 2024-09-26 08:53:13  
Seun said: »
Lili said: »
The send addon and all its variations still count as "manual"

Automatic that self-identifies as manual. Sure, why not.

You're either thinking about a different addon, or don't know what send does, or know something that I don't about the addon even tho I rewrote it.

Send doesn't do anything automatically, it just lets you send text commands to another character running on the same PC. So you can make a Fire macro that casts on your character or another Fire macro that casts on your other character. There's no automation of any sort.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 1133
By Seun 2024-09-26 10:11:27  
Lili said: »
There's no automation of any sort.

You're right. It's not automatic, but it's also not manual. I should have been more specific.
 Fenrir.Niflheim
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Tesahade
Posts: 706
By Fenrir.Niflheim 2024-09-26 10:14:21  
Seun said: »
You're right. It's not automatic, but it's also not manual. I should have been more specific.

It is manual it is just not "direct input" which might better describe your argument. You want people to directly input actions into the game through the intended mechanism or put another way you want them to play the game the way it was intended.
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3867
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-09-26 10:16:51  
I hope you dont use macros with more than one line, because thats not manual.
[+]
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 10:29:40  
If I have 18 instances of ffxi up, how many commands would //send @all cure <me> create?
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3867
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-09-26 10:42:54  
You are MANUALLY sending a command to all 18 instances

If you want to argue that it is an action not native to the vanilla client, thats another thing, but citing it as "automation" is incorrect.

A macro consisting of:
/equipset #wsgear
/ws “weaponskill” <t> <wait 1>
/equipset #tpgear

Is more automation than using send.
[+]
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 10:45:02  
I am manually sending 1 command and some kind of computer software is duplicating my command between 1 and infinity times on my behalf.
Offline
Posts: 685
By Drayco 2024-09-26 11:04:07  
[+]
Offline
Posts: 1133
By Seun 2024-09-26 11:18:37  
Fenrir.Niflheim said: »
Seun said: »
You're right. It's not automatic, but it's also not manual. I should have been more specific.

It is manual it is just not "direct input" which might better describe your argument. You want people to directly input actions into the game through the intended mechanism or put another way you want them to play the game the way it was intended.

Personally, I would call cycling through instances and inputting commands, manual. It doesn't have anything to do with how I would or wouldn't want people to play the game.

I think if we wanted to be technical about it, we could probably just call it IBS.
 Fenrir.Niflheim
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Tesahade
Posts: 706
By Fenrir.Niflheim 2024-09-26 11:58:08  
Seun said: »
we could probably just call it IBS.
Clarification needed, what do you mean by IBS? i assume you are not referring to the unfortunate chronic illness


Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
I am manually sending 1 command and some kind of computer software is duplicating my command between 1 and infinity times on my behalf.
I am not sure what point you are arguing, the phrasing makes it sound like you are for send = bot/automatic but the statement does not really say anything related to the argument it just states a fact but does not argue how that fact supports your stance.
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 12:03:01  
OK, let's try this again.

Imagine there's a crafting addon that allows you to do /craft 100 chocobo fletchings. Is this automation? All it does is convert your 1 *manual* input into 100 inputs.

All send does is turn your 1 *manual* input into 18 inputs. Not automation, somehow?

Or is the crafting addon also not automation? Does the inputs being in serial vs parallel somehow make a difference?

You explain how it's NOT automation, please.
Offline
Posts: 685
By Drayco 2024-09-26 12:03:47  
If you walk away, send will not do anything.

automation
noun
1
: the technique of making an apparatus, a process, or a system operate automatically

*I pulled that from Webster, but I really don't like they used the root word in the definition. It should define what automatic(automatically) means as well.
[+]
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3867
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-09-26 12:09:27  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
OK, let's try this again.

Imagine there's a crafting addon that allows you to do /craft 100 chocobo fletchings. Is this automation? All it does is convert your 1 *manual* input into 100 inputs.

All send does is turn your 1 *manual* input into 18 inputs. Not automation, somehow?

Or is the crafting addon also not automation? Does the inputs being in serial vs parallel somehow make a difference?

You explain how it's NOT automation, please.
/lastsynth<wait 24>
/lastsynth<wait 24>
/lastsynth<wait 24>
/lastsynth<wait 24>
/lastsynth<wait 24>
/lastsynth

I can now automate 6 synths while I take a piss or get a drink.

I'm pretty sure that should work atleast, I dont use windower macros in such a way.
 Fenrir.Niflheim
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Tesahade
Posts: 706
By Fenrir.Niflheim 2024-09-26 12:10:00  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
OK, let's try this again.

Imagine there's a crafting addon that allows you to do /craft 100 chocobo fletchings. Is this automation? All it does is convert your 1 *manual* input into 100 inputs.

All send does is turn your 1 *manual* input into 18 inputs. Not automation, somehow?

Or is the crafting addon also not automation? Does the inputs being in serial vs parallel somehow make a difference?

You explain how it's NOT automation, please.

swap out the craft command for a ingame macro that runs the ingame command lastsynth with some delay, do you feel that is still automated?

ultimately I do believe it is reasonable to argue craft is automation after all it actual does evaluate variables between each synth like space you have and materials you have to decide if it should continue.

but send does not do that it just passes a command to other instances.
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 12:10:23  
Quote:
Automation is the application of technology, programs, robotics or processes to achieve outcomes with minimal human input.

If you put a formula into Excel to calculate the difference between two cells it will AUTOMATICALLY update the difference if you change those two values. This setting in Excel is called formula calcuation with two options:
AUTOMATIC and manual.

If you walk away from the keyboard, it won't do anything. It's still defined by Microsoft as being automatic.
 Carbuncle.Nynja
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: NynJa
Posts: 3867
By Carbuncle.Nynja 2024-09-26 12:12:59  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
If you put a formula into Excel to calculate the difference between two cells it will AUTOMATICALLY update the difference if you change those two values.
Still requires the manual trigger of updating one of the cells with new information.

Unless you are pulling data from a third party source.


Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
If you walk away from the keyboard, it won't do anything. It's still defined by Microsoft as being automatic.
If you walk away from the keyboard, then the cell is not changing and the other cells with formulas have nothing to update accordingly.
 Fenrir.Niflheim
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Tesahade
Posts: 706
By Fenrir.Niflheim 2024-09-26 12:17:12  
The big line in the fuzzy grey sand for windower is,
  • if the action happens completely on it's own it is a bot.

  • if it takes a user input before initiating activity it is not a bot.



Under this, superwarp is not a bot, craft is not a bot, auto echoes is a bot.


For a clear example lets say we have an addon that rotates your char to avoid glare moves
If that addon rotates you when you send the command /lookaway, it is not a bot.
If that addon detects the monster using a glare move and AUTOMATICLLY rotates your char it is a bot.
[+]
 Carbuncle.Maletaru
Offline
サーバ: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: maletaru
Posts: 2521
By Carbuncle.Maletaru 2024-09-26 12:18:08  
Fenrir.Niflheim said: »
swap out the craft command for a ingame macro that runs the ingame command lastsynth with some delay, do you feel that is still automated?

Yes it is, obviously, automation. The difference, of course, being that I have never claimed that FFXI doesn't include automation, however:

Lili said: »
Send doesn't do anything automatically

Carbuncle.Nynja said: »
If you walk away from the keyboard, then the cell is not changing and the other cells with formulas have nothing to update accordingly.

You've just said my point again. This is automation (by definition) and yet it doesn't do anything if you're AFK. When you do inputs, however, it will AUTOMATE your calculations for you. It will, with minimal input from a human, do potentially incredibly complicated calculations, display charts, or whatever else you want it to do. AUTOMATICALLY. This is automation because the human isn't updating the charts, or the other cells, that's happening AUTOMATICALLY, without any additional action on the part of the human. The computer software is the thing taking those actions.

Have you got it yet?
Offline
Posts: 1133
By Seun 2024-09-26 12:20:54  
Fenrir.Niflheim said: »
Seun said: »
we could probably just call it IBS.
Clarification needed, what do you mean by IBS? i assume you are not referring to the unfortunate chronic illness

IBS - Input Broadcasting Software
 Fenrir.Niflheim
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Tesahade
Posts: 706
By Fenrir.Niflheim 2024-09-26 12:21:05  
Carbuncle.Maletaru said: »
Have you got it yet?
Your argument seems to imply that this is your stance:
a pilot flying a plane that uses fly by wire is not flying a plane, the computer is flying the plane "automatically", the pilot just inputs command into the computer that then controls how it flies the plane.
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 9 10 11
Log in to post.