|
|
Official BLM epeen vs SCH epeen thread!! Keep these fights clean!
Phoenix.Psion
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24
By Phoenix.Psion 2009-10-28 05:23:22
Did someone say... attercops?!? :O
Without any bonuses:
With abs-int used and burn on the fat spidaaaar ,,(,,;;,,),, :
If only I had that last 10 pet MAB from random tenshodo chest/fey weapon fight... I could break 2k. /cry
Oh hey, I didn't know I could do image links. gonna turn those direct links to images on first post then. (/ o.o)/
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 06:34:19
Seraph.Zoey said: I just went outside in the game and ran a quick and inbiased test between BLM and SCH on nuke damage. It was water day so I didn't bother with Sorc pants or Obi on BLM. I made sure to nuke enouph to varify the basic value of the spell. On SCH I used weather Obi, Morgana's Cotehardie, and basic good nuke gear and Ebullience each time. Mob = Aht Urghan Attercop: they take regular magic damage and are close to mog. Spell = Thunder IV
BLM/RDM = 1286
SCH/RDM = 1315
SCH/BLM 1447
In past posts I have indicated that it takes sch/blm to over damage BLM on a nuke but it is apparent to me that /rdm can pull it off after this quick test. Note: Since I was using Morgana's Cotehardie for this on SCH half of the spells were resisted.
1286... wow. Seriously.
As you can see this first one is no day no enchantment nothing but food and sanction solo on light day wind weather
This 2nd and 3rd one were done with spirit on lightningday still neutral day and same food. Mostly did both burst and thunder cause I forget was comparing thunder at first lol.
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6310
By Garuda.Wooooodum 2009-10-28 07:18:03
I dislike liars too, Princemercury, but the only person who loses when you start insulting in a discussion is the person doing the insulting, not the person you think is wrong. Keep it clean as per the thread title because it's a lot easier to provoke good debate from a positive post rather than a string of insults.
PS. Psion, take your PUP trolling somewhere else.
(That was sarcasm btw, lolpup. I'm on the bandwagon... ***, I AM the bandwagon.)
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 07:19:47
Garuda.Wooooodum said: (That was sarcasm btw, lolpup. I'm on the bandwagon... ***, I AM the bandwagon.)
Oh Oh does that mean I can ride you mister bandwagon?
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6310
By Garuda.Wooooodum 2009-10-28 07:20:22
Ramuh.Dasva said: Garuda.Wooooodum said: (That was sarcasm btw, lolpup. I'm on the bandwagon... ***, I AM the bandwagon.)
Oh Oh does that mean I can ride you mister bandwagon?
No, I'm sorry, that seat is reserved for Alyria.
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 07:25:24
Garuda.Wooooodum said: Ramuh.Dasva said: Garuda.Wooooodum said: (That was sarcasm btw, lolpup. I'm on the bandwagon... ***, I AM the bandwagon.) Oh Oh does that mean I can ride you mister bandwagon? No, I'm sorry, that seat is reserved for Alyria.
She can sit on my lap. Neither of us would mind that I think.
Gilgamesh.Alyria
VIP
サーバ: Gilgamesh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13080
By Gilgamesh.Alyria 2009-10-28 09:13:47
>.>;
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 09:41:16
Gilgamesh.Alyria said: >.>;
See she agrees
Asura.Korpg
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 7782
By Asura.Korpg 2009-10-28 10:25:53
Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore...
サーバ: Kujata
Game: FFXI
Posts: 928
By Kujata.Argettio 2009-10-28 10:35:00
Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore...
I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it)
I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used.
Asura.Korpg
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 7782
By Asura.Korpg 2009-10-28 10:41:02
Kujata.Argettio said: Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore... I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it) I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used.
I wish I could show you the original screenshots, but since it was over a month ago (at least) I don't have it anymore. Even if I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't take the screenshot with my gears on because I only took the screenshot just to get the numbers off and save it in a file showing max damage so far.
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 489
By Odin.Lowblow 2009-10-28 10:44:23
Ramuh.Dasva said: Odin.Lowblow said: Im reading people claiming a blm has full use of Strategems with /SCH. /Sch will only have 2 charges with 2 minute recharge timer. Sch main @ 70 has 4 charges on 1minute Recharge. Also saying you can use sublimation. Again no where near as effecient as a scholar with AF head and relic body to increase the MP per tick. So if your trying to say a /sch job is effecient on MP as Sch main. Then i dunno what ive been doing wrong :P Just in case anyone has fail to note it to get similar dmg the schs needed ebullience. To get the same efficieny per spell if the blm is using parsimony they need parsimony. So if your using charges twice as fast and getting the twice as fast evens out. Yes you can get 4 sublimation vs our 2!?! Really though well be wearing a refresh body so its more like 3 vs 4. Well really more like 3something to 4 since you will miss tics waiting on reusing sublimation and if the blm has morrigan when your casting you'll miss a tic possibly over them. Then if both players get refresh or can you get exactly the same. And what happens when both players blow there load doing to big nukes in 1 2min period and have 0-1 and 0 strats? Who is more mp efficient without any strats yeah blm easily.
This is true i guess. But im gonna throw a random sorta theory out.
If a sch and blm were to stick to Bliz and Thunder IV and rotate between the 2 for maximum (And effecient dmg). Both using Only Parsimony, who do you think would output the most dmg from start to finish.
Would sch having a charge always ready for every nuke = more dmg in the long run? + Helix on top vs w.e dot blm has.?
Not that it mtters at all ,because its all about Epeen in this thread. Im just curious because i lke to read and learn all this jazz.
Also ive been told for maximum effieciency. A blm would stick to TII~III spells and Stack INT for max dmg over MAB. (Due to the formula's working different on those tiers)
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2400
By Garuda.Hypnotizd 2009-10-28 10:44:28
Asura.Korpg said: Kujata.Argettio said: Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore... I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it) I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used.
I wish I could show you the original screenshots, but since it was over a month ago (at least) I don't have it anymore. Even if I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't take the screenshot with my gears on because I only took the screenshot just to get the numbers off and save it in a file showing max damage so far.
Instead of wasting our time defending it, why not reproduce it with a screenshot showing your gear and buffs like you said in the OP.
サーバ: Kujata
Game: FFXI
Posts: 928
By Kujata.Argettio 2009-10-28 10:48:10
Garuda.Hypnotizd said: Asura.Korpg said: Kujata.Argettio said: Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore... I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it) I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used.
I wish I could show you the original screenshots, but since it was over a month ago (at least) I don't have it anymore. Even if I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't take the screenshot with my gears on because I only took the screenshot just to get the numbers off and save it in a file showing max damage so far.
Instead of wasting our time defending it, why not reproduce it with a screenshot showing your gear and buffs like you said in the OP.
Because then he would have to get another spirit lantern, a COR for wizard's roll, or INT potion.
Asura.Korpg
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 7782
By Asura.Korpg 2009-10-28 10:48:20
Garuda.Hypnotizd said: Asura.Korpg said: Kujata.Argettio said: Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore... I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it) I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used. I wish I could show you the original screenshots, but since it was over a month ago (at least) I don't have it anymore. Even if I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't take the screenshot with my gears on because I only took the screenshot just to get the numbers off and save it in a file showing max damage so far. Instead of wasting our time defending it, why not reproduce it with a screenshot showing your gear and buffs like you said in the OP.
And I would, but unfortunally I have not had any free time to do so.
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 489
By Odin.Lowblow 2009-10-28 10:49:07
so are you admiting to other buffs then shown?
edit: its not my fight~ just asking ^^
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2400
By Garuda.Hypnotizd 2009-10-28 10:50:08
Asura.Korpg said: Garuda.Hypnotizd said: Asura.Korpg said: Kujata.Argettio said: Asura.Korpg said: Love how those who disagree with me about my damage are those who don't play the game anymore... I play the game, and I agree with your damage (you obviously did it) I don't agree with the gear you clam to have used. I wish I could show you the original screenshots, but since it was over a month ago (at least) I don't have it anymore. Even if I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't take the screenshot with my gears on because I only took the screenshot just to get the numbers off and save it in a file showing max damage so far. Instead of wasting our time defending it, why not reproduce it with a screenshot showing your gear and buffs like you said in the OP.
And I would, but unfortunally I have not had any free time to do so.
Then you cannot expect anyone to take your numbers seriously. I posted my numbers earlier in this thread on page2 I think and you clearly said that they cannot be used because I was not showing gear. That's fine and I respect that. However you trying to defend YOUR numbers against your own rules is silly.
Edit: Page3
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 10:50:53
Odin.Lowblow said: This is true i guess. But im gonna throw a random sorta theory out. If a sch and blm were to stick to Bliz and Thunder IV and rotate between the 2 for maximum (And effecient dmg). Both using Only Parsimony, who do you think would output the most dmg from start to finish. Would sch having a charge always ready for every nuke = more dmg in the long run? Helix on top vs w.e dot blm has.? Not that it mtters at all ,because its all about Epeen in this thread. Im just curious because i lke to read and learn all this jazz. Also ive been told for maximum effieciency. A blm would stick to TII~III spells and Stack INT for max dmg over MAB. (Due to the formula's working different on those tiers)
Well sure probably could do better dmg/mp on lower tier spells. You'll also just be feeding the mob tp which is kinda the point of getting max nukes. Also if a sch is rotating between thunder and blizz that would hurt there dmg due to weather.
Asura.Korpg
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 7782
By Asura.Korpg 2009-10-28 11:04:10
Garuda.Hypnotizd said: Then you cannot expect anyone to take your numbers seriously. I posted my numbers earlier in this thread on page2 I think and you clearly said that they cannot be used because I was not showing gear. That's fine and I respect that. However you trying to defend YOUR numbers against your own rules is silly. Edit: Page3
You are right, I am defending it just because I have hit it, but I can't go out and prove straight away that I had help or not (for all I know I did, I don't remember having any SCHs in that BLM burn party or not, I'm pretty sure I didn't though)
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 489
By Odin.Lowblow 2009-10-28 11:09:49
Ramuh.Dasva said: Odin.Lowblow said: This is true i guess. But im gonna throw a random sorta theory out. If a sch and blm were to stick to Bliz and Thunder IV and rotate between the 2 for maximum (And effecient dmg). Both using Only Parsimony, who do you think would output the most dmg from start to finish. Would sch having a charge always ready for every nuke = more dmg in the long run? Helix on top vs w.e dot blm has.? Not that it mtters at all ,because its all about Epeen in this thread. Im just curious because i lke to read and learn all this jazz. Also ive been told for maximum effieciency. A blm would stick to TII~III spells and Stack INT for max dmg over MAB. (Due to the formula's working different on those tiers) Well sure probably could do better dmg/mp on lower tier spells. You'll also just be feeding the mob tp which is kinda the point of getting max nukes. Also if a sch is rotating between thunder and blizz that would hurt there dmg due to weather.
Soo Your saying stick to one spell? Thus having a longer wait inbetween nukes? Thus allowing the sch to use more strat's ?
Seems like you just handed sch a point there.
either way for the Lower tier spells, was more based on End game situations for a blm being 100% more effecient.
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 11:14:25
Odin.Lowblow said: Soo Your saying stick to one spell? Thus having a longer wait inbetween nukes? Thus allowing the sch to use more strat's ?
Seems like you just handed sch a point there.
either way for the Lower tier spells, was more based on End game situations for a blm being 100% more effecient
Well efficiency can be looked at as a matter of time too. Sure to keep up the dmg you can stick to one spell and cast it what ever 30 sec or so? While blm cast 2-4 spells in that time and /heals
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 489
By Odin.Lowblow 2009-10-28 11:19:29
/sigh now your just twisting everything away from what i first stated.
/end discussion
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 11:20:32
Damn right I am! Seriously though there are choices but in the end they kinda just balance out.
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6473
By Odin.Blazza 2009-10-28 11:24:12
Porkg, if you'd said that 21 pages ago we might have believed this was an honest mistake, but instead you've been trying to claim that it was unsupported this whole time when we all know damn well it wasn't. Nice try.
Lowblow, technically yes, but at the same time, very much no. It's "more efficient" because you'll do (pulls numbers out of his arse) 20 damage per MP with a T1 nuke (would make stone for 8mp do 40 damage), but only 10 damage per MP for a TIV nuke, (would make stone4 for 138mp do 1380 damage).
So while yes, you're getting more damage out of every last mp by using lower tier nukes, you'll never spend enough MP fast enough to make that "efficiency" work out for you. If you stand there cycling through stone > water > aero as fast as you can and being completely unresisted on all of them, by the time you've emptied your tank once, another BLM will have blown his load with AMII and TIV, rested to full and done it again, probably twice. So even ignoring the massive amounts of comparative tp you're feeding the mob compared to higher tiers, you're a long way behind in actuality.
Remora.Bikpik
サーバ: Remora
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10
By Remora.Bikpik 2009-10-28 11:24:17
Quote:
Well efficiency can be looked at as a matter of time too. Sure to keep up the dmg you can stick to one spell and cast it what ever 30 sec or so? While blm cast 2-4 spells in that time and /heals
You just didn't say that Blm can cast 2-4 spells in the same amount of time that Sch casts 1 did you?
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 11:26:03
Remora.Bikpik said: Quote: Well efficiency can be looked at as a matter of time too. Sure to keep up the dmg you can stick to one spell and cast it what ever 30 sec or so? While blm cast 2-4 spells in that time and /heals You just didn't say that Blm can cast 2-4 spells in the same amount of time that Sch casts 1 did you?
I said a blm can cast 2-4 in the time it takes waiting for the recast on 1. And no I wont consider using the fast cast strat!
Midgardsormr.Sectumsempra
サーバ: Midgardsormr
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3723
By Midgardsormr.Sectumsempra 2009-10-28 11:26:14
Has anyone answered my previous question yet? Looking for it now.
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 11:29:55
Odin.Blazza said: Lowblow, technically yes, but at the same time, very much no. It's "more efficient" because you'll do (pulls numbers out of his arse) 20 damage per MP with a T1 nuke (would make stone for 8mp do 40 damage), but only 10 damage per MP for a TIV nuke, (would make stone4 for 138mp do 1380 damage). So while yes, you're getting more damage out of every last mp by using lower tier nukes, you'll never spend enough MP fast enough to make that "efficiency" work out for you. If you stand there cycling through stone > water > aero as fast as you can and being completely unresisted on all of them, by the time you've emptied your tank once, another BLM will have blown his load with AMII and TIV, rested to full and done it again, probably twice. So even ignoring the massive amounts of comparative tp you're feeding the mob compared to higher tiers, you're a long way behind in actuality.
There's also endgame mobs tend to have more int so lower tier spells become not as efficient even loading up on int due to the low dint you can get. Just watch a sch helixing kirin lol. Also you could stick to nothing but alacrity drain. A blm should be able to get 300+ per drain ever 30sec for only 22mp each!
Ramuh.Dasva
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 40469
By Ramuh.Dasva 2009-10-28 11:30:27
Midgardsormr.Sectumsempra said: Has anyone answered my previous question yet? Looking for it now.
Question?
Remora.Bikpik
サーバ: Remora
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10
By Remora.Bikpik 2009-10-28 11:30:39
Ramuh.Dasva said: Remora.Bikpik said: Quote: Well efficiency can be looked at as a matter of time too. Sure to keep up the dmg you can stick to one spell and cast it what ever 30 sec or so? While blm cast 2-4 spells in that time and /heals You just didn't say that Blm can cast 2-4 spells in the same amount of time that Sch casts 1 did you?
I said a blm can cast 2-4 in the time it takes waiting for the recast on 1. And no I wont consider using the fast cast strat!
And why wouldn't you? That's the best strat of them all. Alacrity T4 > T3 > Alacrity T4 > T3... empty MP pool with no waiting for recast timers. There's no way a blm can keep up with that dmg output
Since this has/will always be a hot topic.
Let this thread be the offical BLM vs SCH thread.
Rules in this thread:
1. Keep it nice and clean. No drama.
2. Back up your numbers. Show Screenshots if possible.
3. Show your gear. How in the hell would we know if that 1 SCH brought out that 10k Stone I if we don't know your gear.
4. Job setups are a must. If you had help getting that damage, show it.
5. Job Abilities are a must. Since SCH can't do anything without a JA backing it up, show it.
6. If you have numbers outside of damage, show your work. Where's your proof?
Follow these 6 simple rules, and lets try not to get this put in Flame Core!
I allow full authority to the Admins to nuke any posts that go off of subject, even if its my posts. Lets try to keep this on subject, and let the fight begin!
|
|