Let's Start A Riot?!?!

Ok well PM him about it or something. Idk, you can't just make an illogical leap and assume that since someone just MENTIONED the drugs that means they necessarily think, "Welp, had drugs. F 'em."

The discussion wasn't about our personal feelings, it was about how COURTS tend to handle these things and what lawyers can and will use. How defense lawyers FOR the cops MAY use that autopsy info against the prosecution, not that we agreed with it. Whole different thing.

Only thing I can think of is this is probably a cashier-level paid person with minimal training on HOW to spot a fake note so maybe they were not 100% certain, may have confirmed with another employee or supervisor, then called police. Forgers are really good these days and honestly, I doubt I'd be able to even spot a fake note.

Its interesting because I never heard of it prior to him saying that and was curious on the source. You love to read into things to try and make it about your agenda

Based off the discussions I've had with certain people (that all tend to share Draylo's exact views) that actually IS what some people outside of the court case are going to believe. It's also a typical police tactic to go over such details. Meanwhile, Chauvin has been involved in multiple on-duty deaths and has I believe 18 complaints against him. Which I imagine will mostly counter any claims about Floyd's health/drug use being the main factors.

Your most certainly correct that better is expected of a police officer and they should be held accountable for such failure in their duties, which is why they got dismissed from the police force.

Law in the USA is about what you can prove not what makes people feel better. Prosecutors take the lawfully gathered evidence provided by the police, then find which law would be applicable and attempt to prove every and every point of that charge to a jury where every member must agree. The "crime" of the other officers is "Failure to stop Officer Chauvin from accidentally killing Mr Floyd". I use the word "accidentally" because that is what is going to be argued in court as intent in virtually impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, without self incrimination. Their other "Crime" is being white police officers, although two of them aren't white.

Well the issue here, too, is not all the old currency without all the new markings/effects has been taken out of circulation, so even though the new notes have plenty of specific things that supposedly cannot be duplicated by counterfeiters (yet), there still are plenty of old notes out there that pass as legit currency.

Good Samaritan laws are the exact opposite of what was quoted.

They are so that a good Samaritan doesn't get sued by a victim or their family if the Samaritan was trying to help someone, but accidentally made an injury, or death worse.

Believe it or not, people would sue other people for attempting to help total strangers and it still ending tragically.

Ah, that's right. I forgot about that. They are to protect people when being, "Good Samaritans."

For some reason and I don't know why, I was for sure there was some discussion a couple years back about certain states adopting laws that require people who are able to help others in life or death type situations, but I don't know my mind may just be making it up.

IIRC, there was a situation where a guy witnesses some teens who rolled their car and it set ablaze and instead of helping them get out, he sat across the road in his car and video taped it. He was arrested and charged with something like "gross indifference" or something and I thought that spurred on the laws I was thinking of.

Sooooooo........... yeah...........

How many people were gunned down last night by the military?

What what what?

Gaslighting.

See the military isn't killing americans you're all over reacting, nothing to see here.

(yet)

several places, and the actual report itself. here is a NPR segment on the preliminary findings on the autopsy

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/04/869278494/medical-examiners-autopsy-reveals-george-floyd-had-positive-test-for-coronavirus


as for his criminal background - you wont find any news outlets talking about it. hes a repeat violent offending felon. the police chief who mentioned this was basically deleted from the internet. (i can get you a copy of the arrest report if i try hard enough im sure).

i did more digging today and found out that my suspicions are correct: the minneapolis PD DOES allow for neck restraints in the case of an active resistor. They actually called for a code 3 ambulance - a code 3 being an urgent ambulance request - BEFORE he went unresponsive. I also found that the initial 911 call stated that the man was uncontrollably drunk, stumbling and slurring his speech as per the person who called the cops. this goes in line with his fentanyl use.... given everything in my previous post, and a lawyer worth their salt: Unless these cops are given an unfair trial - they're going to walk and the country needs to be ready for this.

If the cops walk, expect more riots. If he goes to jail expect riots. They want all 4 cops in jail. Dont forget the cop that was guarding Floyd's car. Hes just as guilty. Get him too

They want them all hung, not in jail, that's the problem. When people think with their emotions they can't think logically, that is why I said putting Ellison as the prosecuting attorney was real dumb. All that guy cares about is the cameras. He already charged the 3 other cops with something they can't be convicted of unless the jury basically ignores the Constitution.

I'm still waiting for the realization to set in with people on the left at what they are doing, at that point they will say it's Trump supporters and Russia who were causing the riots.

Waiting on it.

Mind specifying who these "people" are that you're referring to?

my thoughts on the rioting unfortunately are not nice. you NEVER acquiesce to violence - you cannot condone violence. Look at this situation rationally: its like dealing with children - if a child pitches a fit over not having their way, and then you give in and let them have their way, the child now knows , that you're a punk *** ***, and all he has to do is pitch a fit to get whatever he wants.

Think im being hyperbolic? This is the exact mentality we employ with terrorist hostage takers. We dont give into them trying to employ violence for nefarious means - we literally just drop a seal team up their *** and kill everyone involved- and the vast majority of time, rescue the hostage in the process.

you cannot placate rioters - end of story.

people blaming trump for not deploying the military to stop these rioters: Shame on you. he has no power to use military force in the provenance of a state without the expressed permission of that states governor due to posse comitatus. if we had a more rational house, i'd be ok with him saying *** the law in that regard and doing it anyway - it wouldnt be the first time a president has had to sideline law for order; but if he were to do it, he'd be impeached for sure, or bought up on criminal charges should he lose the election in the fall.

BLAME CANADA!

You would be surprised, maybe, at how little people know what's in the constitution. So, lawyers absolutely love an ignorant juror. The judge should prevent unconstitutional jury choices, but that's only if the judge chooses to be fair. Once the decision is reached, you are now stuck having to appeal and then you are really scrambled up in the ***.

We need to do this more often, goddamn syrup suckers! (It's a joke)

So, I guess the looters were out protesting police brutality during Hurricane Katrina/Rita then, right?

Or nearly every major tornado incident in a large city, right?

We had a T1 F1 tornado land in San Antonio not too long ago. Want to take a guess at what the looters were "protesting" about then? Hint: Floyd was still alive at the time.

Edit: Classification issue with Tornado systems.

Disgusting, reproachful, shameful opportunistic *** will always exist. they do not care about the issue, they just want ***to burn and for everyone to be as miserable as they are.

WTH is a T1 tornado, is it the Schwarzenegger version, and if so, will the T2 shift from a tornado into an earthquake, maybe even a blizzard just for shiggles?

Our protest yesterday had three officers present, two were brass, and a PIO, no riots, no looting, barely some raised voices. The force remained inside watching, but never showed a presence.

Some times the best option to deal with rioters is to not give them a reason to riot.

Sorry, mistake on the classification system. Tornadoes are so rare in South Texas that I don't have the classification system memorized.

Corrected the original post.

T1 = EF 1



example of an F5/ EF 5 Tornado