fonewear said: »
Even Trump was on WWF so you know it was legit.

idk :\
Random Politics & Religion #35: It's Turtle Time! |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #35: It's Turtle Time!
Who we should get as a Judge.
fonewear said: » Worst Halloween costumes ever: ![]() If you dont let us murder our unborn, we’re no different than slaves. Tbf, no politician wants to ban abortion, the numbers of illegitimate children would skyrocket.
Odin.Slore said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » 100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination Fortune Quote: A group representing 100,000 congregations and 45 million churchgoers across an array of Christian denominations in the U.S. has called for the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to be withdrawn. The National Council of Churches statement said, “Judge Kavanaugh exhibited extreme partisan bias and disrespect towards certain members of the committee and thereby demonstrated that he possesses neither the temperament nor the character essential for a member of the highest court in our nation.” The statement also alleged misstatements and “outright falsehoods” in his testimony. A later addition to the statement, as reported by the Religious News Service, added a call for a full and “unhindered investigation into allegations of sexual assault.”... Aren't you and others all calling for separation of church and state? Now you want church to intervene in government and dictate who is appointed where? Come on libs you cannot have it both ways. They only want power. Whatever way they can get it is a-ok with them. Nausi said: » They only want power. Whatever way they can get it is a-ok with them. Nausi said: » They only want power. ![]() Be nice if the Senate doesn't flip. Or lands 50/50. One thing for certain, lets pray I never get that power. Odin.Slore said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » 100,000 U.S. Christian Churches Demand Withdrawal of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination Fortune Quote: A group representing 100,000 congregations and 45 million churchgoers across an array of Christian denominations in the U.S. has called for the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to be withdrawn. The National Council of Churches statement said, “Judge Kavanaugh exhibited extreme partisan bias and disrespect towards certain members of the committee and thereby demonstrated that he possesses neither the temperament nor the character essential for a member of the highest court in our nation.” The statement also alleged misstatements and “outright falsehoods” in his testimony. A later addition to the statement, as reported by the Religious News Service, added a call for a full and “unhindered investigation into allegations of sexual assault.”... Aren't you and others all calling for separation of church and state? Now you want church to intervene in government and dictate who is appointed where? Come on libs you cannot have it both ways. They only want power. Whatever way they can get it is a-ok with them. Anna Ruthven said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » So put yourself in his seat, don't you think you'd be pissed about such allegations ONLY now showing up at the Cusp of your elevation to SCJ? Lol, someone ever legitimately accuses me of being a serial gang rapist in front of my family, they’ll be lucky if they have any teeth afterwards. The expectation that men are unfit because they get angry at false allegations, especially false allegations of rape, is just crazy man. I mean how cucked can you get? Anna Ruthven said: » fonewear said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » So put yourself in his seat, don't you think you'd be pissed about such allegations ONLY now showing up at the Cusp of your elevation to SCJ? Not like he was pissed the entire time. Or did I miss his hours of going on yelling at Senators? I saw him respectful at times. Democratic Senators behaved worse than he. By that I don't exclusively mean proving his innocence, he also needed to prove he was fit for the job, he failed to do so and I stead acted with partisanship, belligerence, disrespect, and arrogance. The look on his face at some points reminded me of the typical spoiled fat kid that just about every live action kids movie has. He has been a judge for many years you don't find it a little odd...that all of the sudden when he is about to be confirmed...all these accusations come about ? Or are you that naive ? Anna Ruthven said: » But I do agree, both sides play the game. Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » But I do agree, both sides play the game. I don't know who exactly leaked the accusations though. https://globalnews.ca/news/4515734/canada-world-trade-organization-meeting-u-s-invite/
Damn Canada tell US how you really feel! Anna Ruthven said: » There was actual reasoning behind Kavanaugh's issue, Garland's was purely political, in other words; for power. Full Southern Accent: I agree that Garland was purely political, I don't agree with this NOT being a stunt from the Democrats. If they wanted it to not be political, they should have investigated it correctly not wait to the 11th hour. Those allegations of Dr Ford's are serious and they should have been investigated the NEXT DAY that the Senator received them. It could have been investigated PRIVATELY and THOROUGHLY. And now we don't get that since it was held back, for what can only be now seen as a political ploy. Zerowone said: » https://globalnews.ca/news/4515734/canada-world-trade-organization-meeting-u-s-invite/ Damn Canada tell US how you really feel! Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » There was actual reasoning behind Kavanaugh's issue, Garland's was purely political, in other words; for power. Full Southern Accent: I agree that Garland was purely political, I don't agree with this NOT being a stunt from the Democrats. If they wanted it to not be political, they should have investigated it correctly not wait to the 11th hour. Those allegations of Dr Ford's are serious and they should have been investigated the NEXT DAY that the Senator received them. It could have been investigated PRIVATELY and THOROUGHLY. And now we don't get that since it was held back, for what can only be now seen as a political ploy. When did republicans coordinate false allegations of rape against Garland?
Plenty of precedent on not voting for a SJC nomination in the last year of a presidency when different parties control he wh and senate.
I see how and why the right would think of this as a political stunt, but think about if everything was the same except Feinstein was a republican. Would Republicans be saying the same? Obviously Dems would accuse her of a cover up.
In such a case, the Republicans would simply accept Feinstein's explanation, their complaints about her explanation is also political. Nausi said: » When did republicans coordinate false allegations of rape against Garland? Anna Ruthven said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » There was actual reasoning behind Kavanaugh's issue, Garland's was purely political, in other words; for power. Full Southern Accent: I agree that Garland was purely political, I don't agree with this NOT being a stunt from the Democrats. If they wanted it to not be political, they should have investigated it correctly not wait to the 11th hour. Those allegations of Dr Ford's are serious and they should have been investigated the NEXT DAY that the Senator received them. It could have been investigated PRIVATELY and THOROUGHLY. And now we don't get that since it was held back, for what can only be now seen as a political ploy. A Canadian is owning you guys on American politics.
Nausi said: » Plenty of precedent on not voting for a SJC nomination in the last year of a presidency when different parties control he wh and senate. Nice lie, it had never happened before. Zerowone said: » https://globalnews.ca/news/4515734/canada-world-trade-organization-meeting-u-s-invite/ Damn Canada tell US how you really feel! Thats why Canada refused to give up on chapter 19 of nafta, it was a big loss for Trump. Its his own fault for not being trustworthy. Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Anna Ruthven said: » There was actual reasoning behind Kavanaugh's issue, Garland's was purely political, in other words; for power. Full Southern Accent: I agree that Garland was purely political, I don't agree with this NOT being a stunt from the Democrats. If they wanted it to not be political, they should have investigated it correctly not wait to the 11th hour. Those allegations of Dr Ford's are serious and they should have been investigated the NEXT DAY that the Senator received them. It could have been investigated PRIVATELY and THOROUGHLY. And now we don't get that since it was held back, for what can only be now seen as a political ploy. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » I agree that Garland was purely political, I don't agree with this NOT being a stunt from the Democrats. If they wanted it to not be political, they should have investigated it correctly not wait to the 11th hour. Those allegations of Dr Ford's are serious and they should have been investigated the NEXT DAY that the Senator received them. It could have been investigated PRIVATELY and THOROUGHLY. And now we don't get that since it was held back, for what can only be now seen as a political ploy. Everyone is fully aware it's a "stunt" made by the democrats, BUT ... it doesn't mean the allegations are false or should be ignored because they used it as a stunt, also let's not kid ourselves thinking the GOP wouldn't have rushed the confirmation process or controlled the scope of the investigation if they did bring that information up day 1. Both parties want power and will act like scumbags to have it. And you right, GOP wouldn't have not rushed it out too. But had they, it'd look worse on them. The anger to the Democratic Senator NOW would not exist. Amen to both sides being Scumbags. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||