Zerowone said: »
DON'T YOU RAGE-SHAME ME!
Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy Edition |
||
Random Politics & Religion #29: Hypocrisy edition
Offline
Posts: 9772
Don't call me bro, chief.
Zerowone said: » Not this ***again... that was half my fault... chanti has a friend the size of Andre the Giant and I was asking her if her friend ever had her thyroid checked... before I could ask about her pituitary gland... it triggered some long dormant damp 'there is no such thing as hyperthyroidism' rant in Remo... We weren't talking about your average walmart fatty in this case... but my brief medical curiosity in gigantism was quickly drowned out and I quit caring about it.... YouTube Video Placeholder
Offline
Posts: 35422
Shiva.Nikolce said: » Zerowone said: » Not this ***again... that was half my fault... chanti has a friend the size of Andre the Giant and I was asking her if her friend ever had her thyroid checked... before I could ask about her pituitary gland... it triggered some long dormant damp 'there is no such thing as hyperthyroidism' rant in Remo... We weren't talking about your average walmart fatty in this case... but my brief medical curiosity in gigantism was quickly drowned out and I quit caring about it.... YouTube Video Placeholder I heard Rob Schneider is playing Rob Schneider in a Rob Schneider movie ! Offline
Posts: 35422
I imagine this it what it is like to have kids:
YouTube Video Placeholder Bahamut.Ravael said: » It's not a zero-sum game. Economic improvement can make up the difference. St. Ronald the president gave GHW Bush raised taxes and kicked off the explosive growth of the '90s that Clinton credit for. GWB gave the savings that had accrued during the Clinton years away to the donor class in, you guessed it, another tax cut. The economy stagnated and then imploded. Fortunately for the economy it looks like this tax cut is going the way of repeal and replace. Offline
Posts: 35422
Garuda.Chanti said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » It's not a zero-sum game. Economic improvement can make up the difference. St. Ronald the president gave GHW Bush raised taxes and kicked off the explosive growth of the '90s that Clinton credit for. GWB gave the savings that had accrued during the Clinton years away to the donor class in, you guessed it, another tax cut. The economy stagnated and then imploded. Fortunately for the economy it looks like this tax cut is going the way of repeal and replace. Let's not ! Offline
Posts: 35422
YouTube Video Placeholder Libs having another bad day as Trump's tax plan comes out and gives everyone a break. Shoring up their good ol lie about "trickle down economics never worked" is a harder and harder job for them every day.
Secondly they're peddling the lie that this will forever add to the debt, which is only true if you refuse to consider the dynamic increases in tax revenue that will be achieved once the cuts go into effect. Finally, Donna Brazil flips on Hillary (what's this about). I can't decide to what degree they're legitimately throwing her overboard. I'd like to say that they've finally realized what a liability she is refusing to get over her loss and with her being the most corupt swamp creature ever, but I'm fairly certain she could have them all killed with a 20 second phone call. Offline
Posts: 35422
So Trump says to Hillary:
YouTube Video Placeholder Nausi said: » Shoring up their good ol lie about "trickle down economics never worked" is a harder and harder job for them every day. Well it does and it doesn't. It's a very bad line because it doesn't really address what's going on. Giving money to wealthy people doesn't add ***to the economy, reducing business expenses does add to the economy. Leftists tend to group those two entities together, furthermore they label anyone making over $100K a year as "wealthy", without realizing their talking to the professional middle class and not the wealthy. Right now the middle class pays a disproportionate amount in taxes, the lower class's pay nearly nothing and when benefits are taken into account they are tax negative. The wealthy class pays as ***ton in taxes but even that is a small portion of their total wealth because they functionally operate under a different set of economic rules then everyone else. I'll illustrate. Person A is a lower class wage worker who's primary income is from their working wage and primary wealth is their car and house. Person B is a middle class worker who's primary income is their working wage and primary wealth is car, home and a retirement account. Person C is a wealthy business owner who's primary income is the profits from their business combined with passive income from investments. In the first two cases the primary form of wealthy was in consumer possessions. In the last the wealth is in their ownership interests in business's and investments. Those serve to be economic drivers that enable consumers to enter the free market. That wealth is static and can only be tapped if the owner sells their interests and then they pay taxes on the profits from the sale. Enabling their business's to act more freely and invest more into the market will drive an economic benefit. Offline
Posts: 9772
According to this new tax plan, anything less than 450k/yr is low-middle income. Fuzzy maths.
Zerowone said: » According to this new tax plan, anything less than 450k/yr is low-middle income. Fuzzy maths. WTF are you talking about? https://www.thebalance.com/trump-s-tax-plan-how-it-affects-you-4113968 Dude we know you hate anything from President Trump, but actually read stuff before you comment. Especially if your source of info is CNN, Slate or Mother Jones. http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/358449-trumps-tax-plan-is-out-and-low-income-americans-are-the-winners
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/358399-first-details-emerge-of-gops-sweeping-tax-bill Low middle class made out the best with the middle class doing well and the minimal pay class still doesn't pay taxes. "Papa" John Schnatter is blaming his 1% rise in sales on the NFL protests. (5.5% was apparently expected)
I dunno about the other people not buying from Papa John's, but we don't buy from there because 1. Other places are cheaper and better and 2. *Grabs megaphone* HE'S THE CEO OF A MOTHERFUCKING PIZZA CHAIN WHO TRIES TO PUSH HIS OWN POLITICAL BELIEFS WITH PIZZA he also comes off as a slime ball. I don't quite get people who see celebrities say something political and they instantly hate them but I also don't get people like John Schnatter who like to push their political views and it never crosses their mind that "Oh, maybe I'm sort of alienating some of my customers, I might lose sales for that." What does Papa Johns do with politics? We order them all the time and I've never seen or heard anything remotely political about it.
Asura.Saevel said: » What does Papa Johns do with politics? We order them all the time and I've never seen or heard anything remotely political about it. This week on "Why Do You Only Care About This Just Now?", after months of public figures staging left-wing protests, Kojo decides that the only one to get mad at is the CEO of a pizza chain who is concerned about how said protests are affecting his sales.
Offline
Posts: 9772
Asura.Saevel said: » Zerowone said: » According to this new tax plan, anything less than 450k/yr is low-middle income. Fuzzy maths. WTF are you talking about? https://www.thebalance.com/trump-s-tax-plan-how-it-affects-you-4113968 ... Quote: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/358425-read-the-house-gops-429-page-tax-bill Page 18: RATE THRESHOLDS DEFINED .—For purposes of this subsection— ... B) 20-PERCENT RATE THRESHOLD The 20-percent rate threshold shall be— (i) in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse, $479,000 1/2 such amount in the case of a married individual filing a separate return Page 19 (ii) in the case of an individual who is the head of a household (as defined in section 2(b)), $452,400, (iii) in the case of any other individual (other than an estate or trust), $425,800, and (iv) in the case of an estate or trust, $12,700 You should make a real effort to read the plan. Not posting opinion editorials in place of factual source. That’s how good sourcing works. It's also what people who think for themselves do. Asura.Saevel said: » Low middle class made out the best with the middle class doing well and the minimal pay class still doesn't pay taxes. Interesting. From the article you linked: Quote: https://www.thebalance.com/trump-s-tax-plan-how-it-affects-you-4113968 Trump's tax reform plan would help the wealthy more than the middle class. Once all the deductions and exemptions are factored in, the poorest fifth of the population receives a tax break of 0.5 percent to 0.2 percent. They were better off under Trump's Five-Part Plan, where they received a 0.6 percent boost. The tax break improves for each income level. The top 1 percent would get an 8.5 percent break. That's better for them than Trump's Five-Part plan, which gave a 6.5 percent break. This favoritism to the wealthy is why Trump's tax plan increases the debt so much. The most affluent Americans contribute the lion's share to total tax revenues. More than a third of taxpayers already have incomes that fall below their standard deduction and personal exemptions. They wouldn't benefit at all from the Framework plan, according to New York University law professor Lily Batchelder. The Framework hurts parents of school-age children because they lose the personal exemption for each child. That means almost 10 million parents will see their taxes increase. The Framework doesn't mention the head of household filing status. But Trump's earlier plan eliminated it. That would hurt single-parent families. Will Trump's Tax Cuts Work? The administration is relying on supply-side economics. That theory advocates giving tax cuts to businesses so they can create jobs. It worked during the Reagan administration because the highest tax rate was 70 percent. According to the Laffer Curve, that's in the prohibitive range. That's when taxes are high enough that cuts can boost the economy out of debt. But the 2017 tax rates are half what they were in the 1980s. For that reason, trickle-down economics no longer works. No matter how low taxes are, corporations won't add jobs to build products until they see demand for them. That's why it makes economic sense to give the most significant tax cuts to the poor and middle class. They are more likely to spend every dollar they get. The wealthy use tax cuts to save or invest. It helps the stock market but doesn't drive demand. Once demand is there, then businesses create jobs to meet it. That's the best way for tax cuts to create jobs. Intriguing since you were just advocating supply side economics. Dude we know you hate anything from Zerowone, but actually read stuff before you comment. Consider applying that advice to things you source too. Asura.Saevel said: » What does Papa Johns do with politics? We order them all the time and I've never seen or heard anything remotely political about it. Bahamut.Ravael said: » This week on "Why Do You Only Care About This Just Now?", after months of public figures staging left-wing protests, Kojo decides that the only one to get mad at is the CEO of a pizza chain who is concerned about how said protests are affecting his sales. Phoenix.Xantavia said: » Asura.Saevel said: » What does Papa Johns do with politics? We order them all the time and I've never seen or heard anything remotely political about it. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|