Random Politics & Religion #28: The Last One

excellent

Eslim is John Travolta in.... PnR !

Evidence?

Because there are just as many Never-Trump Republicans as there are who actually openly support Trump.

That number doesn't even make sense. There are over 65 million people who voted for Hillary, and almost 7 million who didn't vote for either. I don't know about you, but I would say that the 72,519,875 people who didn't vote for Trump (election results + me, since I voted for Ann Richards but my vote wasn't counted in the results) wouldn't say that they are supportive of him.

The hell? How in the hell are there more independents than those who voted for either candidates? Even if you did a proportional allocation, the number wouldn't come close to the 100 million you are saying.

No he didn't. You are just as blind to the analysis as Hollywood is.

Trump won because he was able to resonate more with voters in certain states (Penn., Wis., etc.) than Clinton did. It had little to do with his base and more to do about what he proposed to do (and what Clinton also proposed, which people rejected).

Among other factors.

that kind of talk will get trump re-elected for sure. we keep you yuppie city folk fed yo.

There's people who support trump who didn't vote for him (conservatives in liberal states, liberals in conservative states).

They only people he absolutely cannot get anymore of are the TDS liberals. He can draw more independents by being successful and he can draw more loose democrats who are disillusioned with the party by pointing out how flawed their ideology is.

Also there aren't very many Never-Trumpers. Romney got 61 million votes, Trump got 63 million votes. How many millions of Romney's voters didn't vote for Trump?

my parents were republican/democratic and i will die as a "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" !

sounds like every household possible..

my parents were republican/democratic and i will die as a "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" !

sounds like every household possible..

I just now noticed the thread title change /slowbro

Random Politics & Religion #28: The Last One


well... it's been a real slice kids... nice meeting you all...don't let the door hit you in the *** on the way out...don't take any wooden nickles...don't forget to tip your waitress...

The site has been updated.

• Ads are currently disabled on forum pages.

• FFXI Gamer Escape wiki links have been removed.

• Due to extensive changes to their skill tree, Shitposters have had their talent points refunded.

Nausi said: »
There's people who support trump who didn't vote for him (conservatives in liberal states, liberals in conservative states).
A) That doesn't make sense.
B) Did you just say that there are liberals who would have voted for Trump?
C) It doesn't matter. You think that there were no Clinton voters in Texas? Trump voters in California?

I guarantee you that if somebody were to run that's not a super-liberal, or even if Trump gets primary and they aren't super-tea party, then Trump will lose 2020.

I just now noticed the thread title change /slowbro

Random Politics & Religion #28: The Last One


well... it's been a real slice kids... nice meeting you all...don't let the door hit you in the *** on the way out...don't take any wooden nickles...don't forget to tip your waitress...

The diarrhea will just spill out of the sewer into other forums.

I meant that there's people who support a candidate who don't always vote for them. Lib or Conservative

Wouldn't that be Jeb or Kaisich, or Rubio? Didn't they lose last round? The left's problem last round wasn't Hillary, it was liberalism. The only one who could sell that ***sandwich was Obama, and he's long gone.

1) There is no way libs aren't running farther left, that's what they're doing now.

2) Trump isn't going to be ousted because he's unpolished, that's just another liberal wet dream/narrative. He got there by BEING unpolished.

Every thread looks like PnR so why send us to the Monk job guide...