Bismarck.Dracondria said: »
Why would anyone think Birmingham, ALABAMA? Come on
*** Alabama
*** Alabama
You're asking why would someone think an understaffed US prison could be taken over by inmates? Really?
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16 |
||
Random Politics & Arguments Over Nothing #16
Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Why would anyone think Birmingham, ALABAMA? Come on *** Alabama You're asking why would someone think an understaffed US prison could be taken over by inmates? Really? Google translated because I don't wanna find a proper article:
Quote: The riot at the privately run prison HMP Birmingham started on Friday morning when the inmates should have been denied watching television and going to the gym. According to other media, the origin, however, be due to the lack of hot water in the prison. When the guards tried to get around the 400 inmates in their cells again, a guard have been threatened with a used syringe, then an internal grabbed his keys. Then the situation escalated and the prisoners took over several parts of the prison building, including the gym, pharmacy and safety equipment. Inmates must also have broken several lights and set fire to several places and he broke into an office where they managed to erase parts of his criminal record. The startled prison staff had to quickly retreat and they escaped prisoners could therefore move freely between the different parts. A spokesperson at the security company G4S, who works at the prison, told the Birmingham Mail that you are currently working with colleagues from all parts to get control of the situation. According to the newspaper, one of the prisoners to be seriously hurt, but a spokesman for West Midlands Ambulance Service said they have several strengths in place at the prison but there are no details of any casualties or damages. The national task force has been called in to take control of the event and even a crisis team with expertise in the prison incidents is in place. Meanwhile, the rest of the prison, which total includes more than 1450 male prisoners, locked and all inmates who are not involved in the riot are being held. The riot is the third in an English prison in less than two months. On November 6 was 200 inmates involved in a brawl at a prison in Bedford and 29 November occurred another event at the prison HMP Lewes, East Sussex. The leader of the jailer unions POA, Mike Rolfe, telling the Birmingham Mail that previously warned that serious incidents may occur and that sent a sharp warning to the Justice Department that the country's prisons are in crisis. - The ongoing bloodshed in the prisons of this minute. The staff is on its knees, is dejected and lost all motivation. Low staff numbers and that people in droves are leaving their jobs is really a bad combination, and it is dangerous for everyone, both for staff and for prisoners, he told BBC Radio Four. In a recent report also criticized the relationship especially at the prison in Bedford, where inmates stated that it is easier to get drugs than to get clean clothes and sheets. Valefor.Sehachan said: » No, he's asking why anyone would think of the less famous one. Because of the exact reason I said! :( Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ramyrez said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). No, he's sort of spot on here based on your own example. We're all pretty *** sure OJ did it in spite of no conviction. We're all pretty sure Bill Cosby is a big date raping jerk, despite his claiming it was all "consensual." We're all pretty sure Trump is a big con, swindler, and law breaker despite all his various settlements to keep his name technically clean. We're all pretty sure the Clintons are dirty as hell despite no convictions. It's all the bloody same, people just don't want to apply it universally. A lot of what you said has little to do with feels. Just because you get it doesn't mean that the person you're white-knighting does. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Coming from someone who lives in Mormonland <.< Good point. It's eerily pleasant here. *gives Ravael the opportunity to do it*
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ramyrez said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). No, he's sort of spot on here based on your own example. We're all pretty *** sure OJ did it in spite of no conviction. We're all pretty sure Bill Cosby is a big date raping jerk, despite his claiming it was all "consensual." We're all pretty sure Trump is a big con, swindler, and law breaker despite all his various settlements to keep his name technically clean. We're all pretty sure the Clintons are dirty as hell despite no convictions. It's all the bloody same, people just don't want to apply it universally. A lot of what you said has little to do with feels. Just because you get it doesn't mean that the person you're white-knighting does. Bro. BRO. U mad? Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ramyrez said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). No, he's sort of spot on here based on your own example. We're all pretty *** sure OJ did it in spite of no conviction. We're all pretty sure Bill Cosby is a big date raping jerk, despite his claiming it was all "consensual." We're all pretty sure Trump is a big con, swindler, and law breaker despite all his various settlements to keep his name technically clean. We're all pretty sure the Clintons are dirty as hell despite no convictions. It's all the bloody same, people just don't want to apply it universally. A lot of what you said has little to do with feels. Just because you get it doesn't mean that the person you're white-knighting does. Bro. BRO. U mad? Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Google translated because I don't wanna find a proper article: Quote: The riot at the privately run prison HMP Birmingham started on Friday morning when the inmates should have been denied watching television and going to the gym. According to other media, the origin, however, be due to the lack of hot water in the prison. When the guards tried to get around the 400 inmates in their cells again, a guard have been threatened with a used syringe, then an internal grabbed his keys. Then the situation escalated and the prisoners took over several parts of the prison building, including the gym, pharmacy and safety equipment. Inmates must also have broken several lights and set fire to several places and he broke into an office where they managed to erase parts of his criminal record. The startled prison staff had to quickly retreat and they escaped prisoners could therefore move freely between the different parts. A spokesperson at the security company G4S, who works at the prison, told the Birmingham Mail that you are currently working with colleagues from all parts to get control of the situation. According to the newspaper, one of the prisoners to be seriously hurt, but a spokesman for West Midlands Ambulance Service said they have several strengths in place at the prison but there are no details of any casualties or damages. The national task force has been called in to take control of the event and even a crisis team with expertise in the prison incidents is in place. Meanwhile, the rest of the prison, which total includes more than 1450 male prisoners, locked and all inmates who are not involved in the riot are being held. The riot is the third in an English prison in less than two months. On November 6 was 200 inmates involved in a brawl at a prison in Bedford and 29 November occurred another event at the prison HMP Lewes, East Sussex. The leader of the jailer unions POA, Mike Rolfe, telling the Birmingham Mail that previously warned that serious incidents may occur and that sent a sharp warning to the Justice Department that the country's prisons are in crisis. - The ongoing bloodshed in the prisons of this minute. The staff is on its knees, is dejected and lost all motivation. Low staff numbers and that people in droves are leaving their jobs is really a bad combination, and it is dangerous for everyone, both for staff and for prisoners, he told BBC Radio Four. In a recent report also criticized the relationship especially at the prison in Bedford, where inmates stated that it is easier to get drugs than to get clean clothes and sheets. #4 Bahamut.Ravael said: » Valefor.Sehachan said: » Coming from someone who lives in Mormonland <.< Good point. It's eerily pleasant here. Progressives believe all rural area's / non-Progressive areas are filled with scenes straight out of deliverance. It's part of their universal condescension and rude treatment of the rural voters which is what fueled Trumps election campaign from the very beginning. Asura.Saevel said: » Progressives believe all rural area's / non-Progressive areas are filled with scenes straight out of deliverance. It's part of their universal condescension and rude treatment of the rural voters which is what fueled Trumps election campaign from the very beginning. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » The justice system doesn't determine reality, it just determines punishment. A murderer's a murderer whether a judge says so or not, and as long as people act within the law they have a right to think whatever they want. Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » The justice system doesn't determine reality, it just determines punishment. A murderer's a murderer whether a judge says so or not, and as long as people act within the law they have a right to think whatever they want. Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). I mean, that's what I'm getting from the bolded statement.... Valefor.Sehachan said: » You're implying that Americans wouldn't ping Birmingham, Alabama given it's history? Birmingham, Alabama is pretty famous. We can do this all day. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » You're implying that Americans wouldn't ping Birmingham, Alabama given it's history? Birmingham, Alabama is pretty famous. I'm implying that the one in the UK is more famous and that Ramyrez' provocative question towards Draco was completely off target and missed the point by miles. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » We can do this all day. And now, ladies and gentlemen, we have finally come to the point of the title of this thread.
Random Politics & Arguing over Nothing. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » The justice system doesn't determine reality, it just determines punishment. A murderer's a murderer whether a judge says so or not, and as long as people act within the law they have a right to think whatever they want. Either you're intentionally missing the point or you actually think that it's feels to believe that OJ did it (in spite of, you know, the facts). I mean, that's what I'm getting from the bolded statement.... Obviously Her Majesty couldn't of done anything illegal. To accuse her of committing a crime would be to imply that she's human and therefor not a divine being sent down to earth to save the planet from "Evil White European Males" bent on destroying the world with their vile capitalist ways. And since they already know that she's a divine being, well it just goes to follow that any criminal actions must of been from the those vile conservatives instead. Think I laid it on a bit thick but it still outlines the point. Asura.Kingnobody said: » And now, ladies and gentlemen, we have finally come to the point of the title of this thread. Random Politics & Arguing over Nothing. No argument. Back to your regularly scheduled lunacy. Asura.Kingnobody said: » ...wait, did you say that this whole Clinton email thing never happened, and that there was no server in her house, nor almost 50k emails sent from a phantom server that was work related, nor over 2000 emails had classified information, nor was there an order back in March 2015 to prevent the deletion of said emails and that this whole thing was a GOP/Trump conspiracy from the beginning? I mean, that's what I'm getting from the bolded statement.... If you want to argue on the carelessness of using a private server, go nuts. But this "lock her up", above the law nonsense needs to go away. It did its purpose and even Trump has abandoned it. Asura.Saevel said: » Obviously Her Majesty couldn't of done anything illegal. To accuse her of committing a crime would be to imply that she's human and therefor not a divine being sent down to earth to save the planet from "Evil White European Males" bent on destroying the world with their vile capitalist ways. And since they already know that she's a divine being, well it just goes to follow that any criminal actions must of been from the those vile conservatives instead. Think I laid it on a bit thick but it still outlines the point Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » ...wait, did you say that this whole Clinton email thing never happened, and that there was no server in her house, nor almost 50k emails sent from a phantom server that was work related, nor over 2000 emails had classified information, nor was there an order back in March 2015 to prevent the deletion of said emails and that this whole thing was a GOP/Trump conspiracy from the beginning? I mean, that's what I'm getting from the bolded statement.... If you want to argue on the carelessness of using a private server, go nuts. But this "lock her up", above the law nonsense needs to go away. It did its purpose and even Trump has abandoned it. There's a difference between having an email server to do business in the private sector, and having an email server to do business for top-level federal business, especially business that requires top-secret security clearance. For one thing, it was more than just "2", and even more than what Clinton stated (zero). It was 110 that was classified as confidential (or higher) at the time, with well over 2,000 reclassified to confidential (or higher) after the fact. Either way, your defense is weaker than Obama's "get-out-the-vote-or-I-will-consider-this-as-an-insult-to-me-personally" plea. .... Seriously .... a few pages back I outlined exactly how this works from my personal expert experience. When you obtain a clearance you are read-on and sign lots of paperwork and receive several briefings about what you can and can't do. Storing, transmitting or processing classified material on a non approved non government owned system is right near the beginning. Doing such is a reason for revocation or suspension of said security clearance, doing it with the purpose to evade or avoid using government systems is a violation of multiple federal laws.
Hillary has done one of two things, either knowingly transmitted, stored and processed classified material on an unauthorized system, in which case she must definitely did break the law, or unknowingly transmitted, stored and processed classified material on an unauthorized system, in which case she didn't break the law but committed an act of gross negligence towards national security and is incompetent. And that's just about the classified emails thing, not the destroying evidence after receiving notification to hand it over nor the violations of federal record keeping laws. Government officials are forbidden, by law, from conducting government business on unauthorized systems and must maintain records of every communication involving government business. Asura.Saevel said: » And that's just about the classified emails thing, not the destroying evidence after receiving notification to hand it over nor the violations of federal record keeping laws. "Oh, we told the company who was supposed to Bismarck.Josiahfk said: » It is legit impressive any of you have enough patience that when you see any post catering pure pettiness that you do not just straight up close this tab like I do very often. But opt to reply sincerely. bravo. You know, there's doctors out there who can help you with the voices in your head.... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Asura.Saevel said: » And that's just about the classified emails thing, not the destroying evidence after receiving notification to hand it over nor the violations of federal record keeping laws. "Oh, we told the company who was supposed to Oh it gets really screwed up. The IT guy who actually executes the action demanded immunity before any form of testimony. Dude knew he was about to be made the fall guy. Back in December Hillary's staff asked for the archived data to be nuked, the guy rightfully didn't nuke this archived as it would likely violate Federal record keeping laws. When ***got real and he realized the behemoth over his head he nuked it and then later cocooned up. Pissing off Hillary and being the reason "Her Majesty" didn't ascend the throne would of been career suicide for him. The leaders of the Tech industry, in which this guy works, contributed heavily towards Hillary winning. So yeah, I feel sorry for that guy. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|