Garuda.Chanti said: »
P.S. spell checkers are your friend.
Lies!
Lies and slander!
Random Pish-Posh And Dribblety-Poop #12 |
||
|
Random Pish-Posh and Dribblety-Poop #12
...somewhat ironically, I intentionally spelled "slander" incorrectly and it autocorrected on me before I realized it and posted.
-.-; Calling Trump white trash might be the most hyperbolic thing I've read sense going to the Huff Post saying all men are rapists !
since *
Ramyrez said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » According to the FBI she did not delete them in response to being subpoenaed. But some people believe what Trump and media outlets tell them. Let's not fool ourselves. Both sides has people that are believing a bit more than is probably true about their opposing candidate at this point, and spreading that information. That's what we get for letting two *** terrible options win the primaries. That's what we get for letting ignorance, apathy, and entertainment-level grandstanding run the country. Hillary *** up with the e-mails, one way or another, the legality is questionable depending upon who you ask, but it was a *** up either way. Donald Trump is just a talking colostomy bag stacked on top of sentient ambulating ***. The man has never had a thought that originated above the waist (or waste, really, either works), it's always been about his wallet or his *** with him. Which is like 70% of the men in this country, and is why he's doing as well as he is. Unfortunately Nik is right. A large portion of the democrat base is people who can't or won't go vote for whatever reason, and a good portion of the republican base is motivated to vote because they're scared of becoming part of whatever economic class is immediately below them...which, let's be honest, is pretty good motivation because in this country, without money you are f-to-the-ucked. But do you go with biased opinions from either side to fit their respective narratives or the conclusions presented by the F.B.I? Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » But do you go with biased opinions from either side to fit their respective narratives or the conclusions presented by the F.B.I? I suppose that depends on whether you think the FBI is a bias opinion of its own. Clearly some do. I don't doubt they have an agenda but agency wide corruption in order to fit or create a narrative is reaching or possibly flailing.
Then again we got politicians claiming Hurricanes are liberal conspiracies these days... or that there was not enough communication about the international fallout of overriding a veto etc.
I guess that's how it works these days. Garuda.Chanti said: » But please admit that you are, indeed, supporting one no mater how begrudgingly. P.S. spell checkers are your friend. But apparently they're not your friend. fonewear said: » Calling Trump white trash might be the most hyperbolic thing I've read sense going to the Huff Post saying all men are rapists ! He's white. And he's trash. But he's not really what you would classically consider "white trash," you're right. Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » Calling Trump white trash might be the most hyperbolic thing I've read sense going to the Huff Post saying all men are rapists ! He's white. And he's trash. But he's not really what you would classically consider "white trash," you're right. Not to mention the hypocrisy in claiming someone is a racist and then using terms like "white trash" to classify him. Asura.Kingnobody said: » But hey, thanks for admitting that she willfully and unlawfully deleted/destroyed said records knowingly. If you didn't want to admit that, your defense would have been "she didn't know and/or didn't delete it on purpose." Also, thanks for admitting that she broke yet anotherr law. But I guess you will still support her anyway, because what does law matter to you, right? Except the Civil Rights Act that is.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Garuda.Chanti said: » But please admit that you are, indeed, supporting one no mater how begrudgingly. P.S. spell checkers are your friend. But apparently they're not your friend. Oh pish-posh and dribblety-poop. Obviously, she's using the Latin form of mother in reference to Fone's post earlier. :P Garuda.Chanti said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » I'm not talking about Trump though. Look at CJ's words again: Candlejack said: » It's hard for a white trash xenophobic misogynist to lose the support of other white trash xenophobic misogynists. Just like Clinton's "deplorables" comment, all CJ has to address these people, including me, is that the qualifier being that we don't agree with either Clinton or CJ.... And just because you, personally, support a "white trash xenophobic misogynist" doesn't make you one. But please admit that you are, indeed, supporting one no mater how begrudgingly. P.S. spell checkers are your friend. Also, and again, I'm not supporting Trump as much as I am against Clinton. I have, again, and many times, have stated that I wouldn't even consider Trump if Clinton wasn't the other choice. I would have more than likely voted for Sanders if he was on the ticket. But yes, keep going the Clinton route. Keep calling a quarter of the nation, or half of Trump's supporters (or in your case, more than half) names, even though you do not even know for a fact that they are the "white trash xenophobic misogynists" that you assume they are (through liberal media). Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Oh pish-posh and dribblety-poop. can we please change RP&R to "Random Pish-Posh and Dribblety-Poop" Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » But hey, thanks for admitting that she willfully and unlawfully deleted/destroyed said records knowingly. If you didn't want to admit that, your defense would have been "she didn't know and/or didn't delete it on purpose." Also, thanks for admitting that she broke yet anotherr law. But I guess you will still support her anyway, because what does law matter to you, right? Except the Civil Rights Act that is. ![]() Seriously, why are you even attempting to have a conversation with anyone if all you are going to do is go back to childish retorts? Bahamut.Ravael said: » Not to mention the hypocrisy in claiming someone is a racist and then using terms like "white trash" to classify him. I wouldn't have entirely agreed with your sentiment, because I was under the impression that it classically was a classist phrase, not a racist one. But apparently it does originate as a term used by slaves for poor whites. Still not really sure it's a phrase I would classically define as "racist," but there are certainly racial overtones at play. Ramyrez said: » Still not really sure it's a phrase I would classically define as "racist," Sooner you realize that, the better you will understand actual racism in this country. Where most of the racism actually occurs. What is the preferred nomenclature? Whiskey Tangos? Eastern Kansan? El Camino hobbyists? Anglo Arkansawyers? Pale sand-hillers? Corncrackers? Pennamite Hillies?
Before anyone goes hit the report button many of those are accepted demonyms for state residents. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Ramyrez said: » Still not really sure it's a phrase I would classically define as "racist," Sooner you realize that, the better you will understand actual racism in this country. Where most of the racism actually occurs. There's really no way to have this conversation with someone who is already convinced they are without guilt or error. I tried once in the past week and you didn't get it, I'm not going to waste my time again. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » What is the preferred nomenclature? Whiskey Tangos? Eastern Kansan? El Camino hobbyists? Anglo Arkansawyers? Pale sand-hillers? Corncrackers? Pennamite Hillies? Before anyone goes hit the report button many of those are accepted demonyms for state residents. All of those are more acceptable than something that's a combination of "(skin color) (derogatory noun)". Seriously, when would that be acceptable for a person to use for any other race? Ramyrez said: » There's really no way to have this conversation with someone who is already convinced they are without guilt or error. Wait, are you saying that you are without guilt or error? Because I've got some bad news for you. Now go on, tell me that's not what you expect to see as reply. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » What is the preferred nomenclature? I prefer "diabolically evil sinister cabal" but I don't mind being called white trash bigotted homophobic racist or any other names name calling indicates that you have run out of intelligent things to say. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Ramyrez said: » There's really no way to have this conversation with someone who is already convinced they are without guilt or error. Wait, are you saying that you are without guilt or error? Because I've got some bad news for you. Now go on, tell me that's not what you expect to see as reply. "Wait, are you saying, you expected a conversation that flows in two directions?" Asura.Kingnobody said: » That's all you have to come back on? Seriously, why are you even attempting to have a conversation with anyone if all you are going to do is go back to childish retorts? Shiva.Nikolce said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » What is the preferred nomenclature? I prefer "diabolically evil sinister cabal" but I don't mind being called white trash bigotted homophobic racist or any other names name calling indicates that you have run out of intelligent things to say. Unless of course you come with something clever that's never been heard before and is contextually relevant. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » That's all you have to come back on? Seriously, why are you even attempting to have a conversation with anyone if all you are going to do is go back to childish retorts? "Are you saying, you've been talking to my cat over the Internet?" |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||