Random Politics & Religion #09

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #09
Random Politics & Religion #09
First Page 2 3 ... 27 28 29 ... 53 54 55
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:01:39  
I miss when we talk about things besides politics !
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2016-08-04 13:02:03  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
She's got quite a few rich voters (like 'Bam) who don't mind paying more taxes if they'll get relative stability from her tenure.
They should vote for Trump if they want stability, and he is considered a wild card!
They should vote for trump if they want to pay 40-80% more money on imported goods.
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2016-08-04 13:02:08  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
She's got quite a few rich voters (like 'Bam) who don't mind paying more taxes if they'll get relative stability from her tenure.
They should vote for Trump if they want stability, and he is considered a wild card!
This is almost as funny as trump stating the republican campaign has never been so well United...
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:03:28  
fonewear said: »
I miss when we talk about things besides politics !

Can we talk about how you really should go about finding a new large-breasted avatar?
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:04:00  
Bloodrose said: »
They should vote for trump if they want to pay 40-80% more money on imported goods.

But taxes will go down, so as long as we're funding someone else's government or economy, it's okay.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:04:06  
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:04:21  
But wait, I forgot, Trump is going to manage to push people into slave labor right here at home!
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:04:45  
Fone, I'm not gonna ***.

That .gif is mesmerizing.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:05:14  
Ramyrez said: »
Fone, I'm not gonna ***.

That .gif is mesmerizing.

One more:
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:06:08  
I mean, both good, but it's not even a sexual thing with that first one. It's just a very mesmerizing thing.
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:06:23  
Ramyrez said: »
I mean, both good, but it's not evenonly a sexual thing with that first one. It's just a very mesmerizing thing.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:06:31  
A woman's *** cheeks fluttering is not sexual ok !
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:06:57  
Bloodrose said: »
They should vote for trump if they want to pay 40-80% more money on imported goods.
He isn't going to repeal any trade agreements. You should know that by now.

Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
This is almost as funny as trump stating the republican campaign has never been so well United...
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:06:59  
fonewear said: »
A woman's *** cheeks fluttering is not sexual ok !

I corrected for clarity and/or honesty.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:07:17  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?

It's a bipartisan trait these days.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:07:46  
Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?

It's a bipartisan trait these days.
It is, but Sparth's assertion is that Republicans are the only ones not united...
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:07:49  
*note to self* watch women's running thing.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:08:57  
fonewear said: »
*note to self* watch women's running thing from behind...with binoculars.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2016-08-04 13:09:32  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
It is actually really depressing hearing people talk about building a wall like it is the most impossible feat of engineering imaginable. You all best just stay on your computers. Hopeless.

Why America Sucks Anymore 101
They aren't saying it's impossible, or even implausible.

They are saying it's impractical. Because of the cost of the material, the legal issues in land acquisition, severe overreach of the government, illegal use of eminent domain, and of course, the ongoing, skyrocketing cost of maintaining the wall, simply from a logistics stand. It's not fiscally responsible, or even fiscally achievable. Trump would have to wipe his *** with the US constitution, and flush several state constitutions down with it, in order to make it happen.

Look at the projected cost from an engineering standpoint. Just on materials, never mind the cost of hiring design firm to draw up the plans needed to cover the entire US/Mexico border, and any land discrepancies or fortifications needed, to keep the wall secure. Trump has been looking at this much like a Wile E. Coyote cartoon, where stacking bricks without mortar will solve the entire issue, until it falls over on him. But in this case, it would be falling on the American Taxpayers to cover the construction, and subsequent removal of the debris, since forcing Mexico to pay for it is just bait and fodder for the land of the loony tunes.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:10:16  
Bloodrose said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
It is actually really depressing hearing people talk about building a wall like it is the most impossible feat of engineering imaginable. You all best just stay on your computers. Hopeless.

Why America Sucks Anymore 101
They aren't saying it's impossible, or even implausible.

They are saying it's impractical. Because of the cost of the material, the legal issues in land acquisition, severe overreach of the government, illegal use of eminent domain, and of course, the ongoing, skyrocketing cost of maintaining the wall, simply from a logistics stand. It's not fiscally responsible, or even fiscally achievable. Trump would have to wipe his *** with the US constitution, and flush several state constitutions down with it, in order to make it happen.

Look at the projected cost from an engineering standpoint. Just on materials, never mind the cost of hiring design firm to draw up the plans needed to cover the entire US/Mexico border, and any land discrepancies or fortifications needed, to keep the wall secure. Trump has been looking at this much like a Wile E. Coyote cartoon, where stacking bricks without mortar will solve the entire issue, until it falls over on him. But in this case, it would be falling on the American Taxpayers to cover the construction, and subsequent removal of the debris, since forcing Mexico to pay for it is just bait and fodder for the land of the loony tunes.

Can we build a wall to keep Canadians out too ?
[+]
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2016-08-04 13:12:20  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bloodrose said: »
They should vote for trump if they want to pay 40-80% more money on imported goods.
He isn't going to repeal any trade agreements. You should know that by now.

Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
This is almost as funny as trump stating the republican campaign has never been so well United...
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?
It wasn't about the trade agreements, it's about imposing tariffs on countries who don't want to "play ball" with his brand of "business politics". Which is what will hurt EVERYONE, and the country as a whole.
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:12:49  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?

It's a bipartisan trait these days.
It is, but Sparth's assertion is that Republicans are the only ones not united...

A bit of an artifact of the fact that Donald won the primary and Bernie didn't -- and subsequent e-mail hack aids in this as well -- is that it's clear and almost accepted the Dems aren't all exactly on the same page, where the GOP seems to be in a bit of denial about it.

Neither is really handling it well, though. For the GOP it's a problem because...it's fairly obvious there's a lot of unhappiness in the ranks and few are admitting it. For the Dems it's because despite admitting it, they're still left with no choice but to put all their chips in on Hilldawg and say "she's not Trump! Don't waste your vote on a third party who you like more or Trump will win!"

...which isn't the most convincing way to get me to like and/or vote for your candidate, honestly, but it's also not entirely false.
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2016-08-04 13:13:14  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Like how the DNC is united? Through corruption and discord?

It's a bipartisan trait these days.
It is, but Sparth's assertion is that Republicans are the only ones not united...

No it isn't.

It's my assertion that Hillary has alot of rich voters because they want stability rather than whatever diarrhea Trump is cooking up. Rich people and markets tend to favor stability.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2016-08-04 13:21:52  
To summarize

YouTube Video Placeholder
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:22:05  
Bloodrose said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bloodrose said: »
They should vote for trump if they want to pay 40-80% more money on imported goods.
He isn't going to repeal any trade agreements. You should know that by now.

It wasn't about the trade agreements, it's about imposing tariffs on countries who don't want to "play ball" with his brand of "business politics". Which is what will hurt EVERYONE, and the country as a whole.
Imposing tariffs is the same as repealing the trade agreements, which is supposed to remove said tariffs.

Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
No it isn't.

It's my assertion that Hillary has alot of rich voters because they want stability rather than whatever diarrhea Trump is cooking up. Rich people and markets tend to favor stability.
I mentioned the wrong person. I should have said Flavin.

I'm sorry.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:26:13  
Ramyrez said: »
For the GOP it's a problem because...it's fairly obvious there's a lot of unhappiness in the ranks and few are admitting it.
They don't want to admit it. The real problem is the Tea Party, which came to power so quickly so soon. If we can get rid of that fringe part of the Republican party, the party (and country) would be in a better place.

I for one wouldn't mind telling Ted Cruz to GTFO.

Ramyrez said: »
For the Dems it's because despite admitting it, they're still left with no choice but to put all their chips in on Hilldawg and say "she's not Trump! Don't waste your vote on a third party who you like more or Trump will win!"
Their problem is that they were so obvious about it, and so deceptive about it. The media helping them out didn't help matters any either.

Then again, the media is all about Clinton anyway. Who cares about being objective, when you can just make ***up about Trump and yell "First Amendment" when he sues you later?

Protip: Libel is not a First Amendment protected right.
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2016-08-04 13:31:09  
fonewear said: »
Bloodrose said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
It is actually really depressing hearing people talk about building a wall like it is the most impossible feat of engineering imaginable. You all best just stay on your computers. Hopeless.

Why America Sucks Anymore 101
They aren't saying it's impossible, or even implausible.

They are saying it's impractical. Because of the cost of the material, the legal issues in land acquisition, severe overreach of the government, illegal use of eminent domain, and of course, the ongoing, skyrocketing cost of maintaining the wall, simply from a logistics stand. It's not fiscally responsible, or even fiscally achievable. Trump would have to wipe his *** with the US constitution, and flush several state constitutions down with it, in order to make it happen.

Look at the projected cost from an engineering standpoint. Just on materials, never mind the cost of hiring design firm to draw up the plans needed to cover the entire US/Mexico border, and any land discrepancies or fortifications needed, to keep the wall secure. Trump has been looking at this much like a Wile E. Coyote cartoon, where stacking bricks without mortar will solve the entire issue, until it falls over on him. But in this case, it would be falling on the American Taxpayers to cover the construction, and subsequent removal of the debris, since forcing Mexico to pay for it is just bait and fodder for the land of the loony tunes.

Can we build a wall to keep Canadians out too ?
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2016-08-04 13:32:50  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Protip: Libel is not a First Amendment protected right.

Nothing said about him (that I've seen) has been even close to libelous. In fact, nothing even comes close to out of context in the way the right gripped "you didn't build that" and took it so far out of context that it practically was libelous/slanderous.

But it still wasn't, because that's not really how libel and slander work.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2016-08-04 13:36:58  
Bloodrose said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
It is actually really depressing hearing people talk about building a wall like it is the most impossible feat of engineering imaginable. You all best just stay on your computers. Hopeless.

Why America Sucks Anymore 101
They aren't saying it's impossible, or even implausible.

They are saying it's impractical. Because of the cost of the material, the legal issues in land acquisition, severe overreach of the government, illegal use of eminent domain, and of course, the ongoing, skyrocketing cost of maintaining the wall, simply from a logistics stand. It's not fiscally responsible, or even fiscally achievable. Trump would have to wipe his *** with the US constitution, and flush several state constitutions down with it, in order to make it happen.

Look at the projected cost from an engineering standpoint. Just on materials, never mind the cost of hiring design firm to draw up the plans needed to cover the entire US/Mexico border, and any land discrepancies or fortifications needed, to keep the wall secure. Trump has been looking at this much like a Wile E. Coyote cartoon, where stacking bricks without mortar will solve the entire issue, until it falls over on him. But in this case, it would be falling on the American Taxpayers to cover the construction, and subsequent removal of the debris, since forcing Mexico to pay for it is just bait and fodder for the land of the loony tunes.

You didn't actually say anything besides repeat that it's difficult and impractical so I'm going to + your post anyway.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-08-04 13:42:59  
Ramyrez said: »
Nothing said about him (that I've seen) has been even close to libelous.
Oh really?

You don't say?

I mean, seriously

And that 3 very easily accessible libel (although, that third one may be passed off as opinion, still doesn't change the fact that it's libel) articles just from the past 3 days.

Do I really need to post more? And no Nik, I won't if you ask.
First Page 2 3 ... 27 28 29 ... 53 54 55
Log in to post.