Random Politics & Religion #08 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #08
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Aaand again. If you're one of the 12 jurors at least you're guaranteeing a hung jury, but you cannot state this as fact because it is an assumption. Evidence was pretty solid on the Juice, too. Ramyrez said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Clinton didn't even go on trial. FBI decided, for political purposes only, to not prosecute her. Only if you assume they're lying. Which is your right. But they clearly stated they felt evidence was not sufficient to take a case to trial and reasonably expect they could argue for a conviction. Again. You're entitled to say that's *** and assume it was political. But then you've got to prosecute the FBI too. If that's not an excuse for political reasons, then you really need to take your blinders off. Anna Ruthven said: » *looks around, glaring at everyone* Well, at least Russia doesn't have their hands in Hillary's pocket. I bet a few months ago when Trump's campaign funds were in the record lows, I bet he sold out to Russia. What's worse, having Russia in your pocket or most of the Middle East?
[+]
Yatenkou said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » I seriously doubt that Trump would get Clinton convicted. Last thing any person in power would want to do is arrest the opposition right after an election. It would incite a riot and discord more than any terrorist group can do. She deserves a trial. A large majority of Americans believe she unfairly escaped justice. Should we all start crying out until they get put behind bars or do we just follow the path the legal system set up to deal with this ***whether we like the outcome of not... Innocent until proven guilty and whether they're actually guilty or not it hasn't proven to be so unless that is we are back in the court of your feels... Aman you're a broken freaking record spouting the same two things about Hillary over and over and over and yeah over again... Give your feels a rest already man... Look I had my books and wallet stolen back when I was in school and the police had a witness and video of them using my credit cards and they still decided not to press charges against the group of people that did it... So yeah... That was their decision On how to proceed with that... You guys have been hyped up to the point that you barely know what you're talking about anymore and the rage flows over you into a ball of shot that you keep throwing at the wall hoping it sticks to Hillary... I know you guys will refuse to give it a rest but yeah... Hell I even wanted her to go down in flames so they had a better chance to beat trump this year lol... Sarah Palin was nice to look at but her speeches were all soccer mom-ish
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Anna Ruthven said: » *looks around, glaring at everyone* Well, at least Russia doesn't have their hands in Hillary's pocket. I bet a few months ago when Trump's campaign funds were in the record lows, I bet he sold out to Russia. What's worse, having Russia in your pocket or most of the Middle East? Can't I think they're equally reprehensible? +(
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: » Sarah Palin was nice to look at Hooray for objectivity!
[+]
Ramyrez said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Anna Ruthven said: » *looks around, glaring at everyone* Well, at least Russia doesn't have their hands in Hillary's pocket. I bet a few months ago when Trump's campaign funds were in the record lows, I bet he sold out to Russia. What's worse, having Russia in your pocket or most of the Middle East? Can't I think they're equally reprehensible? +( No, that's my shtick. Asura.Kingnobody said: » If that's not an excuse for political reasons, then you really need to take your blinders off. Okay, yes, but here's the thing. You have to take them at face value or try them also at this point. I'm not saying you're right or wrong. I'm talking facts and things you can prove in a court of law. You feel all the things you're saying to be true, but clearly the people doing the prosecuting did a) not agree or b) colluded otherwise. If option "B" (again, possible!) then you've got to go further down the rabbit hole. Ramyrez said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Aaand again. If you're one of the 12 jurors at least you're guaranteeing a hung jury, but you cannot state this as fact because it is an assumption. Evidence was pretty solid on the Juice, too. And last I checked, lack of intent is not a legal defense. Far from it. Ramyrez said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » If that's not an excuse for political reasons, then you really need to take your blinders off. Okay, yes, but here's the thing. You have to take them at face value or try them also at this point. I'm not saying you're right or wrong. I'm talking facts and things you can prove in a court of law. You feel all the things you're saying to be true, but clearly the people doing the prosecuting did a) not agree or b) colluded otherwise. If option "B" (again, possible!) then you've got to go further down the rabbit hole. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Should we all start crying out until they get put behind bars or do we just follow the path the legal system set up to deal with this ***whether we like the outcome of not... Innocent until proven guilty and whether they're actually guilty or not it hasn't proven to be so unless that is we are back in the court of your feels... OJ/Anthony/Zimmerman all did go on trial and were found not guilty. Clinton didn't even go on trial. FBI decided, for political purposes only, to not prosecute her. She was never followed the path of the legal system. All we ask is that she does. If she is exonerated then, then nobody will have a chance to complain about her skirting the law. Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Funny that you leave the cops out of it and those are just a few of the examples anyways... It's not the exclusive group of only these people got away with it... It's also funny to me because you guys are usually the ones that are against the court of public opinion you know those women's always be accusing us guys of raping em and we lose even if we don't go to court it can destroy our lives! Our lives I tells you!!!! You have no problem convicting Hillary on said court even though the authorities decided not to pursue charges.... It's also funny how the republicans were praising comey up until the point he didn't give them what they wanted then went on to try to crucify him... Lol... This is just all so ridiculous...
[+]
Even if she did go to trial I doubt anyone against Hillary would change their tune if she was found not guilty... It be the same ***anyways...
Also KN it is not fact that she sold be found guilty and it is also not fact that she wasn't brought to trial fr political reasons I mean unless you have proof to back that up or just more feels...
more feels from you I knew it! Lol... Asura.Kingnobody said: » I seriously doubt that Trump would get Clinton convicted. Last thing any person in power would want to do is arrest the opposition right after an election. It would incite a riot and discord more than any terrorist group can do. Watch a few reruns of the apprentice. "This is a dictatorship and I am the dictator." - Donald Trump Lakshmi.Flavin said: » It's also funny to me because you guys are usually the ones that are against the court of public opinion you know those women's always be accusing us guys of raping em and we lose even if we don't go to court it can destroy our lives! Our lives I tells you!!!! Poor comparison. We don't want the court of public opinion to convict Hillary, we want an actual court to do it. It won't happen, but that doesn't mean that we have to ignore everything Comey said that proved her a liar simply because he didn't recommend charges. It's going to haunt her until November, as well it should.
[+]
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » She did follow the path of the legal system Was she brought to trial? Were OJ Simpson/Casey Anthony/George Zimmerman brought on trial? How about the officers who killed all those people that started the riots all over America, were they brought to trial? You will see a difference between the two answers above (if you are truthful that is). Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Part of the legal system is launching an investigation and determining if you have enough evidence to actuall pursue charges... Jesus Christ you guys are ignorant when you really want to be... Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Funny that you leave the cops out of it and those are just a few of the examples anyways... It's not the exclusive group of only these people got away with it... Lakshmi.Flavin said: » It's also funny to me because you guys are usually the ones that are against the court of public opinion you know those women's always be accusing us guys of raping em and we lose even if we don't go to court it can destroy our lives! Our lives I tells you!!!! Lakshmi.Flavin said: » You have no problem convicting Hillary on said court even though the authorities decided not to pursue charges.... It's also funny how the republicans were praising comey up until the point he didn't give them what they wanted then went on to try to crucify him... Lol... It is pretty obvious that Comey didn't file charges solely on political reasons. Stop being a hack for once. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » This is just all so ridiculous...
[+]
Hey how dare you say anything bad about the apprentice that is quality entertainment. It's D list celebrities playing for charity !
[+]
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Also KN it is not fact that she sold be found guilty and it is also not fact that she wasn't brought to trial fr political reasons I mean unless you have proof to back that up or just more feels... more feels from you I knew it! Lol...
[+]
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Should we all start crying out until they get put behind bars or do we just follow the path the legal system set up to deal with this ***whether we like the outcome of not... Innocent until proven guilty and whether they're actually guilty or not it hasn't proven to be so unless that is we are back in the court of your feels... OJ/Anthony/Zimmerman all did go on trial and were found not guilty. Clinton didn't even go on trial. FBI decided, for political purposes only, to not prosecute her. She was never followed the path of the legal system. All we ask is that she does. If she is exonerated then, then nobody will have a chance to complain about her skirting the law. Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Funny that you leave the cops out of it and those are just a few of the examples anyways... It's not the exclusive group of only these people got away with it... It's also funny to me because you guys are usually the ones that are against the court of public opinion you know those women's always be accusing us guys of raping em and we lose even if we don't go to court it can destroy our lives! Our lives I tells you!!!! You have no problem convicting Hillary on said court even though the authorities decided not to pursue charges.... It's also funny how the republicans were praising comey up until the point he didn't give them what they wanted then went on to try to crucify him... Lol... This is just all so ridiculous... She deserves a trial. The authorities not pursuing a trial when they would have for every other American is the exact problem I am discussing.
[+]
So basically you don't undertake the legal process and instead of actually addressing reality you just try to mock me? Typical response I guess...
Also, it's innocent until proven guilty... I don't have to prove to you that she is not guilty... You're the one that has to prove it and so far authorities have stated there is not enough to to even bring her to trial... So I guess you can continue to cry into your pillow at night and the like but yeah... I still don't understand why you guys aren't happy about this as trump has the best shot of winning against Hillary... Lols... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Ramyrez said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Aaand again. If you're one of the 12 jurors at least you're guaranteeing a hung jury, but you cannot state this as fact because it is an assumption. Evidence was pretty solid on the Juice, too. And last I checked, lack of intent is not a legal defense. Far from it.
[+]
Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Choosing Sarah plain is what *** McCain over lol... While she may have found popularity in a niche crowd she was dumber than most people thought bush was... I have said this before. Running with Sarah was a stroke of genius. She single handedly turned a rout into a mere loss. Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Yatenkou said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » I seriously doubt that Trump would get Clinton convicted. Last thing any person in power would want to do is arrest the opposition right after an election. It would incite a riot and discord more than any terrorist group can do. She deserves a trial. A large majority of Americans believe she unfairly escaped justice. Should we all start crying out until they get put behind bars or do we just follow the path the legal system set up to deal with this ***whether we like the outcome of not... Innocent until proven guilty and whether they're actually guilty or not it hasn't proven to be so unless that is we are back in the court of your feels... Aman you're a broken freaking record spouting the same two things about Hillary over and over and over and yeah over again... Give your feels a rest already man... Look I had my books and wallet stolen back when I was in school and the police had a witness and video of them using my credit cards and they still decided not to press charges against the group of people that did it... So yeah... That was their decision On how to proceed with that... You guys have been hyped up to the point that you barely know what you're talking about anymore and the rage flows over you into a ball of shot that you keep throwing at the wall hoping it sticks to Hillary... I know you guys will refuse to give it a rest but yeah... Hell I even wanted her to go down in flames so they had a better chance to beat trump this year lol... http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/zimmerman1/zimmermanaccount.html (This one is Zimmerman's trial) http://www.cnn.com/US/OJ/ (Here's OJ) http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/04/us/casey-anthony-trial-fast-facts/ (And Casey Anthony) Yeah they all got trials.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Your Honor, I'd like to submit my Google search results as evidence. Your honor, I sincerely request you ignore the ever-loving *** out of my Google searches, they do not represent me as a person. I was searching for midgets fighting each other for a friend.
[+]
Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Lakshmi.Flavin said: » Should we all start crying out until they get put behind bars or do we just follow the path the legal system set up to deal with this ***whether we like the outcome of not... Innocent until proven guilty and whether they're actually guilty or not it hasn't proven to be so unless that is we are back in the court of your feels... OJ/Anthony/Zimmerman all did go on trial and were found not guilty. Clinton didn't even go on trial. FBI decided, for political purposes only, to not prosecute her. She was never followed the path of the legal system. All we ask is that she does. If she is exonerated then, then nobody will have a chance to complain about her skirting the law. Which, if she did go on trial, she would be found guilty. That is a fact. Intent doesn't change the fact that she did break the law. All it would change is her sentence. Funny that you leave the cops out of it and those are just a few of the examples anyways... It's not the exclusive group of only these people got away with it... It's also funny to me because you guys are usually the ones that are against the court of public opinion you know those women's always be accusing us guys of raping em and we lose even if we don't go to court it can destroy our lives! Our lives I tells you!!!! You have no problem convicting Hillary on said court even though the authorities decided not to pursue charges.... It's also funny how the republicans were praising comey up until the point he didn't give them what they wanted then went on to try to crucify him... Lol... This is just all so ridiculous... She deserves a trial. The authorities not pursuing a trial when they would have for every other American is the exact problem I am discussing. Garuda.Chanti said: » Following W was what screwed McCain over. The GOP could have run a Jesus and his daddy ticket and still lost. Ineligible for the same reason as Arnie! Valefor.Sehachan said: » The rebels money is going to dry up once Obama is out of office and the civil war may actually come to an end. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
