Random Politics & Religion #03 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #03
I don't think I've ever seen two people's hands repel each other like that.
They were merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it.
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » They were merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it. If anyone ever uses that "Twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!" line they've got my vote. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » They were merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it. Nice! And without a Youtube clip or a .gif. Snaps to you, sir. Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Anticapitalist protests in Seattle. Now, tell me I am not the only one impressed with the fact the police show up to protests on their bicycles. I mean, how environmentally friendly and secure in ones masculinity is that? I'm more impressed it looks like more than half of them are actually in shape. That kneepad shin combo is the business.
It scared that person out of their shoe. Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Anticapitalist protests in Seattle. James Farley, Postmaster under FDR, 1936 said: There are 47 states in the Union, and the Soviet of Washington. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Referring to the chain of subtle additions of Simpsons quotes, rather than serving them up on a silver platter. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Referring to the chain of subtle additions of Simpsons quotes, rather than serving them up on a silver platter.
Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. But it's just the horrible food and safety regulations keeping them down. Jetackuu said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. But it's just the horrible food and safety regulations keeping them down. I mean, most startups don't know what the hell they are doing, business-wise. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Jetackuu said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. But it's just the horrible food and safety regulations keeping them down. I mean, most startups don't know what the hell they are doing, business-wise. Mmm, health regulations. Unless F-grade establishments are your thing.
Oddly enough, most restaurants that fail don't do so because of food and safety regulations. They fail due to the lack of self-sustainability.
It's almost as if upstart projects don't exist in a vacuum and have to try to pull guests away from long standing and (usually) well reputed restaurants. AND as it turns out, when you don't have a good flow of cash, you can't really afford risky moves like massive discounts to draw in people from other restaurants. Another reason is location, but what are you going to do? Evict one of the already running restaurants in that prime location? Let me know how the hell that's supposed to work. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Jetackuu said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. But it's just the horrible food and safety regulations keeping them down. I mean, most startups don't know what the hell they are doing, business-wise. people think restaurants that dont serve edible food would stay in business?
Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Oddly enough, most restaurants that fail don't do so because of food and safety regulations. They fail due to the lack of self-sustainability. It's almost as if upstart projects don't exist in a vacuum and have to try to pull guests away from long standing and (usually) well reputed restaurants. AND as it turns out, when you don't have a good flow of cash, you can't really afford risky moves like massive discounts to draw in people from other restaurants. Another reason is location, but what are you going to do? Evict one of the already running restaurants in that prime location? Let me know how the hell that's supposed to work. Restaurant industry is rough, got a friend who has made a mint off commercial kitchen supplies. In city like Los Angeles you're lucky to last a year or two. That's if you're lucky enough to be trendy for a few months. Established spots that have been around 20yrs+ are miracles. Probably should have gone with 'safe' instead of edible.
I mean, Taco Bell is still going strong. Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Jetackuu said: » Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Altimaomega said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » How can you not see that not everyone can be successful? At the very least, 60% of restaurant projects crash and burn within the first year. But it's just the horrible food and safety regulations keeping them down. I mean, most startups don't know what the hell they are doing, business-wise. Not particularly well. If you want to pretend poorly handled/stored/prepared food isn't really *** dangerous, be my guest.
I, personally, am going to sit here being very thankful there are massive penalties for trying to cut corners during food preparation, storage and handling. Oh, and labeling potential allergens is a regulation. Can guarantee that's saved a few lives.
Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Not particularly well. If you want to pretend poorly handled/stored/prepared food isn't really *** dangerous, be my guest. I, personally, am going to sit here being very thankful there are massive penalties for trying to cut corners during food preparation, storage and handling. No one is saying unsafe food isn't unsafe, just that restaurants wouldn't survive if they only served bad food. Look at chipotle. Ragnarok.Raenil said: » Not particularly well. If you want to pretend poorly handled/stored/prepared food isn't really *** dangerous, be my guest. Ragnarok.Raenil said: » I, personally, am going to sit here being very thankful there are massive penalties for trying to cut corners during food preparation, storage and handling. You are making it sound like people were dying in the streets due to poorly made food from restaurants. I didn't know the Black Plague was created by Taco Bell. /themoreyouknow.jpg You mean the same Chipotle that is still up and running, despite two e.coli outbreaks and a salmonella outbreak?
Ragnarok.Raenil said: » You mean the same Chipotle that is still up and running, despite two e.coli outbreaks and a salmonella outbreak? Just imagine if they did it again. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||