Post deleted by User.
Planned Parenthood Video Makers Indicted |
||
Planned Parenthood video makers indicted
Except law is reality, and the definition of what constitutes a murder is legally defined. To state that X is murder when it clearly doesn't fit the definition is factually incorrect.
If you want to have a discussion as to why it should or shouldn't fit the definition then you would have a point, but that's not the discussion that was at hand. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » What's the basis for a one month cutoff? I don't know but I'm sure most people with an unwanted pregnancy don't know they are pregnant until after the first month so it'd still be pointless regardless of the reasoning. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-rejects-north-dakota-appeal-abortion-restrictions-n503741 I'm just curious about the seemingly arbitrary one month. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » I'm just curious about the seemingly arbitrary one month. Offline
Posts: 4394
Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » What's the basis for a one month cutoff? I don't know but I'm sure most people with an unwanted pregnancy don't know they are pregnant until after the first month so it'd still be pointless regardless of the reasoning. Phoenix.Demonjustin said: » If it's murder, how would rape or incest change anything? All I hear is it is a "choice" and that it should not be up to anyone but the person having the abortion. Well it is also a choice to have sex and it is not the child's fault you are a horrible person. If you are somehow unaware that you could possibly be pregnant with all the birth control now available perhaps you shouldn't be having a baby anyways. I'm actually on the fence about the whole thing, because the people that choose to have an abortion that is not rape, incest, mothers health, or under a month old don't need to be procreating anyways. It is kinda horrible though that so many people that want to have a baby can't and people are killing theirs. Anyways, continue on with your morally superior conversation. not like anything I've ever said has changed your twisted minds anyways. Asura.Ina said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » I'm just curious about the seemingly arbitrary one month. The earliest detection of pregnancy is about a week after ovulation. (I forgot how long sperm can survive.) You can still have spotting, which may appear as though you are on your normal cycle just a little lighter, during the first trimester of your pregnancy. A month is unrealistic in most circumstances. EDIT: Maybe a thorough study in menstruation, which would include boys rather than separating the sexes, is what is needed in truly comprehensive sex education if FFXIAH is any indication. Altimaomega said: » It is kinda horrible though that so many people that want to have a baby can't and people are killing theirs. /end Altimaomega said: » Anyways, continue on with your morally superior conversation. not like anything I've ever said has changed your twisted minds anyways. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...ha. Offline
Posts: 4394
Jetackuu said: » A fetus is not a baby. I do find it interesting that the democrat minded people find this mindset perfectly fine. Ever wonder why the same people are always against each other on just about every subject. The mindset that it's none of my *** business what a parent or parents decide to do within legal boundaries is fine. The mindset where judgement and arbitrary definitions of life are used to rationalize control over the fundamental decisions of reproduction and personal health is a problem.
Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Maybe a thorough study in menstruation, Cerberus.Pleebo said: » The mindset that it's none of my *** business what a parent or parents decide to do within legal boundaries is fine. The mindset where judgement and arbitrary definitions of life are used to rationalize control over the fundamental process of reproduction and personal health is a problem. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Maybe a thorough study in menstruation, Think it's called "The Story of Menstruation." I'm sure as hell not googling it though. I just got done googling Wire hangers for this thread. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » The mindset that it's none of my *** business what a parent or parents decide to do within legal boundaries is fine. The mindset where judgement and arbitrary definitions of life are used to rationalize control over the fundamental process of reproduction and personal health is a problem. Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Maybe a thorough study in menstruation, Yeah, I know. I'm sorry. The culmination of abortion/birth control threads over the years have just left me gob-smacked by some of the commentary here. "Hidden ovulation" was probably the most laughable. :/ Phoenix.Demonjustin
Offline
Altimaomega said: » All I hear is it is a "choice" and that it should not be up to anyone but the person having the abortion. Quote: Well it is also a choice to have sex and it is not the child's fault you are a horrible person. If you are somehow unaware that you could possibly be pregnant with all the birth control now available perhaps you shouldn't be having a baby anyways. Even with how you meant it though, in all honestly I can't help but disagree. People make mistakes, some mistakes need be lived with, others not so much. To force someone to live with a mistake they've made and potentially cause the offspring to suffer as well seems more cruel than kind. Quote: I'm actually on the fence about the whole thing, because the people that choose to have an abortion that is not rape, incest, mothers health, or under a month old don't need to be procreating anyways. I mean, if a couple thought they were ready to have a child and thus, conceived, but only a month later found their life in tatters, their finances ruined, and themselves unable to even keep a roof over their heads I think it's understandable to want an abortion. Who wouldn't want to spare someone a life of potential poverty and misery? But, due to this choice, you'd have them never parent a child, even if one day years later things once again looked up and they could support a family? That seems extreme to me. Don't get me wrong, that's obviously a very narrow scenario, but I think it makes my point fine. Just because a couple mistakes themselves for being ready to take care of a child and chooses to terminate the pregnancy as a method of escaping it for the time being, doesn't seem to justify the idea that they never be able to accept such responsibility. This is exemplified by couples who separate during the pregnancy, causing increased doubt in the ability to raise a child where they once thought they were prepared. Quote: It is kinda horrible though that so many people that want to have a baby can't and people are killing theirs. Quote: Anyways, continue on with your morally superior conversation. not like anything I've ever said has changed your twisted minds anyways. Ackeron said: » I just got done googling Wire hangers for this thread. Not sure whether to plus the spirit of the joke, but that's just harsh, dude. Either way, messaged received. OMG! PERIODS ARE ICKY! Yeay! Coat hanger jokes! That's where this is at. Offline
Posts: 35422
Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Asura.Ina said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » I'm just curious about the seemingly arbitrary one month. The earliest detection of pregnancy is about a week after ovulation. (I forgot how long sperm can survive.) You can still have spotting, which may appear as though you are on your normal cycle just a little lighter, during the first trimester of your pregnancy. A month is unrealistic in most circumstances. EDIT: Maybe a thorough study in menstruation, which would include boys rather than separating the sexes, is what is needed in truly comprehensive sex education if FFXIAH is any indication. Comprehensive sex I like the sounds of that ! Offline
Posts: 35422
How long can sperm survive long enough to get the job done !
Offline
Posts: 35422
Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Ackeron said: » I just got done googling Wire hangers for this thread. Not sure whether to plus the spirit of the joke, but that's just harsh, dude. Either way, messaged received. OMG! PERIODS ARE ICKY! Yeay! Coat hanger jokes! That's where this is at. A bit harsh and what is an abortion a summer breeze ? fonewear said: » How long can sperm survive long enough to get the job done ! How the Planned Parenthood Video Mastermind Got Charged
What to know about the anti-abortion activist's indictment Time Quote: Three years after David Daleiden launched his plot against Planned Parenthood, and six months after the release of his undercover videos triggered a national political tempest, the first criminal indictments were finally handed down Monday in connection with the sting. Prosecution was one of the goals of the intricate caper from the beginning, Troy Newman, a Daleiden associate and fellow antiabortion activist, told TIME in an interview last year. But in a surprise twist, it’s Daleiden, not Planned Parenthood, on the business end of criminal charges. A grand jury in Harris County, Tex., indicted Daleiden, 27, on two counts: one second-degree felony charge of tampering with a governmental record, and a misdemeanor charge related to the prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs. Under Texas law, the felony charge carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison. The allegations stem from a visit Daleiden made last April to the Houston offices of Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, an affiliate housed in a gleaming new building of blue-tinted glass near the University of Houston. At this point, Daleiden was nearing the end of a 30-month caper, which saw him train a team of undercover activists to help him infiltrate Planned Parenthood by posing as representatives of a fake tissue-procurement company. The goal was to surreptitiously record videos that could prove the organization had illegally sold fetal tissue for profit. Daleiden and an associate breezed past the building’s metal detector, and allegedly presented as identification a phony California drivers license with the name of an alias, Robert Sarkis. In normal cases, the use of a fake ID would not warrant felony charges; a grand jury would not, for example, throw the book at an underage kid using a phony government ID to pick up a six-pack of beer. But Texas state law includes a provision that elevates this transgression—knowingly using a fake government document—to a second-degree felony if “the intent is to defraud or harm another.” The grand jury decided that Daleiden’s goal was to do just that, by using his cover story to make a covert recording designed to damage Planned Parenthood’s reputation. At first the plan seemed to be working. Daleiden’s nonprofit organization, the Center for Medical Progress, began releasing its surreptitious footage in July. Soon after, 11 states launched investigations into Daleiden’s allegation that Planned Parenthood profits from the sale of aborted fetal tissue to medical researchers. (Fetal-tissue research is a long-standing and legitimate field of scientific inquiry, but providers are only allowed to recoup their costs.) One of those states was Texas, where a spate of Republican politicians, including Gov. Greg Abbott, called for a criminal probe into the organization’s practices. Harris County District Attorney Devon Anderson began that investigation last August, according to a spokesman, collaborating with law enforcement on a probe with subpoena power that stretched well into the fall. In December, the case was referred to the grand jury—but by that time, the Planned Parenthood affiliate was no longer the target. The grand jury never even took a vote on whether to charge Planned Parenthood with a crime. Instead, it concluded that Daleiden and his associate, identified as Sandra Merritt, 62, should be indicted. “As I stated at the outset of this investigation, we must go where the evidence leads us,” Anderson said. “All the evidence uncovered in the course of this investigation was presented to the grand jury. I respect their decision on this difficult case.” The additional misdemeanor charge against Daleiden stems from a letter he sent to the Planned Parenthood affiliate a few months after the meeting, according to Josh Schaffer, an attorney for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast. (A copy of the indictment was not yet available as of Tuesday afternoon.) Attaching a proposed contract, Daleiden offered to pay up to $1,600 per fetal tissue specimen, according to Schaffer, who suggests the steep price was designed to illustrate profit. In a statement released Monday night, the Center for Medical Progress said it had followed all applicable laws. “We respect the processes of the Harris County District Attorney,” the statement said, “and note that buying fetal tissue requires a seller as well.” But Schaffer, the Planned Parenthood lawyer, told TIME that Planned Parenthood officials never responded to the offer. “In Texas, the crime is the offer to buy,” he said. “The other party does not have to accept the offer.” Schaffer said Daleiden was “masterful” at networking his way into Planned Parenthood clinics, a process that involved creating a fake company, replete with state filings and business cards adorned with a bubbling beaker. And Daleiden was schooled in the science and terminology of fetal tissue research. (Daleiden told TIME that he drilled his collaborators using flash cards and vocabulary lists to avoid a misstep that could ruin the ruse.) But he was “borderline illiterate” on the research process, Schaffer says, and raised alarm bells after his visit to Houston by quickly advancing a contract offer. “He basically pulled out an engagement ring after the first date,” Schaffer said. Peter Breen, Daleiden’s lawyer, told TIME that the allegation Daleiden intended to buy fetal tissue was meritless. “Everybody in the country knows that Biomax [Procurement Services, the fake business Daleiden used as a backstory] was a front company meant to gather evidence of wrongdoing,” he said. As for the alleged use of a fake ID, Breen said the Center for Medical Progress followed standard conventions of investigative journalism, and was not aware a similar scenario that prompted a felony charge. “That law was not intended at all to apply to this sort of conduct,” he said. Planned Parenthood, which on Jan. 14 filed a civil suit against Daleiden and several alleged collaborators, called the indictment a vindication. “These people broke the law to spread malicious lies about Planned Parenthood in order to advance their extreme anti-abortion political agenda,” said Eric Ferrero, a Planned Parenthood spokesman. “As the dust settles and the truth comes out, it’s become totally clear that the only people who engaged in wrongdoing are the criminals behind this fraud, and we’re glad they’re being held accountable.” Prosecutors could still opt not to try Daleiden, or seek a plea bargain with attorneys. But in a way, a splashy trial would generate precisely the sort of publicity that Daleiden has sought to draw to a once-arcane issue. “Whether or not the case goes to trial depends on how much of a martyr he wants to be,” said Schaffer. As for Daleiden, he seemed to signal his appetite for a fight in an email to TIME after Planned Parenthood filed its suit earlier this month. “Game on,” he wrote. Offline
Posts: 4394
Josiahkf said: » Altimaomega said: » All I hear is it is a "choice" and that it should not be up to anyone but the person having the abortion. Well it is also a choice to have sex and it is not the child's fault you are a horrible person. I'm actually on the fence about the whole thing, because the people that choose to have an abortion that is not rape, incest, mothers health, or under a month old don't need to be procreating anyways. I don't agree with a lot of your choices but it doesn't mean you're a horrible person for them, it just means we disagree. Um, what forum do you reside in? I've been called every type of name from the people that are saying babies are fetuses and killing them isn't murder. As a matter of fact I don't give a ***what you think about my opinions and last I checked those posts are not even remotely directed at you personally. Jetackuu said: » Phoenix.Demonjustin said: » That seems a tad contradictory. Phoenix.Demonjustin said: » Were there any shortage of children waiting to be accepted into a home I'd be inclined to agree. Phoenix.Demonjustin said: » I tend not to post in P&R, or on the forum much at all. You've never changed my mind, but part of that is due to lack of opportunity. Many others have succeeded in such a goal whilst in conversations such as these with me, who knows, with the proper amount of effort you too may be among them. Writing it off as a meaningless attempt however is sure to fail. Altimaomega said: » .... Phoenix.Demonjustin said: » Were there any shortage of children waiting to be accepted into a home I'd be inclined to agree. Edit: The Atlantic's take on the thread topic: An Indictment for the Planned Parenthood Sting Videomakers A grand jury called to investigate the women’s-health organization opted to charge anti-abortion activists who sought to undermine it instead. The Atlantic is a known liberal leaning source. inb4:
1: "You're getting an abortion?!" 2: "NO! I'm donating my baby to science to save lives.." Offline
Posts: 4394
Candlejack said: » Likewise, there's a shortage of kittens and puppies at animal shelters, but adult and elder juvenile dogs and cats are in abundance, and most of them are good animals. My dog came from a shelter, for instance. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|