No Longer Active Shooter Reported In San Bernadino, Calif. |
||
|
フォーラム » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
No longer Active shooter reported in San Bernadino, Calif.
No longer Active shooter reported in San Bernadino, Calif.
Oh America, you so crazy.
Except it does in other countries. It won't eliminate shootings but it will lower them by a great amount.
My mom lives in the general vicinity. My wife has a bad gut feeling and asked me to call Mom, who didn't pick up. More than likely she's fine, probably outside doing some gardening. The odds of her being one of the 20 wounded are pretty slim, but it still kinda sucks playing the waiting game and not knowing for sure.
Condolences to the wounded, dead, and their families and friends. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Except it does in other countries. It won't eliminate shootings but it will lower them by a great amount. But mah freedum! Quote: Update 4:14 p.m. San Bernardino police confirm the Regional Center was hosting some sort of event today when “multiple shooters came in and just started shooting.” They were reportedly dressed in “military style” attire. #SanBernardino shooter(s) opened fire at a meeting or party wearing camo & masks; police hunting for black Yukon SUV, says @RickSerranoLAT — Los Angeles Times (@latimes) December 2, 2015 Jassik said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Altimaomega said: » ABC says only 3 dead not 12 all of the sudden. They're all saying different things and it's best to just wait until it's over before reporting on how many are dead I get the need to report SOMETHING, but anytime you have to say "we're getting reports between x and x" it's time to just say "we aren't sure". Apparently, ethics is no longer taught in journalism. This is what they do here, they make sure people know what is confirmed and what is unconfirmed and that even some 'confirmed' things may change and that they will do their best to give the most accurate information. Jetackuu said: » That's as much to do with their wording and enforcement as anything else. I know where you're going with this, and the evidence doesn't support it. Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Jassik said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Altimaomega said: » ABC says only 3 dead not 12 all of the sudden. They're all saying different things and it's best to just wait until it's over before reporting on how many are dead I get the need to report SOMETHING, but anytime you have to say "we're getting reports between x and x" it's time to just say "we aren't sure". Apparently, ethics is no longer taught in journalism. This is what they do here, they make sure people know what is confirmed and what is unconfirmed and that even some 'confirmed' things may change and that they will do their best to give the most accurate information. I don't think that approach is uniquely american, but I'd be curious if you're talking about network news, commercial news, state news, just the news you watch? Quote: Update 4:25 p.m. NBC is reporting a developing SWAT situation nearby in Pasadena that’s believed to be related to the shooting. Update 4:30 p.m. According to ABC, the gunman or gunmen opened fire on some sort of county banquet that was being held in a rented conference room in the building. Banquet was held for county personnel where #SanBernardino gunman opened fire, SBPD says https://t.co/Ekf6Acw6jM pic.twitter.com/B4QxOOxIwH — ABC7 Eyewitness News (@ABC7) December 2, 2015 Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Except it does in other countries. It won't eliminate shootings but it will lower them by a great amount. Right, let's make it so the government is the only one with easy access to violent weapons. That worked so well in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany. Besides it isn't working so well in Chicago, way more that three people died last week from gun violence even though it's pretty hard to get a gun there. Let's get to he bottom of this. Why do you want people to be defenseless? Odin.Strummer said: » My mom lives in the general vicinity. My wife has a bad gut feeling and asked me to call Mom, who didn't pick up. More than likely she's fine, probably outside doing some gardening. The odds of her being one of the 20 wounded are pretty slim, but it still kinda sucks playing the waiting game and not knowing for sure. Condolences to the wounded, dead, and their families and friends. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Right, let's make it so the government is the only one with easy access to violent weapons. That worked so well in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany. Someone doesn't understand the difference between a constitutional republic and a dictatorship... Jassik said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Jassik said: » Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Altimaomega said: » ABC says only 3 dead not 12 all of the sudden. They're all saying different things and it's best to just wait until it's over before reporting on how many are dead I get the need to report SOMETHING, but anytime you have to say "we're getting reports between x and x" it's time to just say "we aren't sure". Apparently, ethics is no longer taught in journalism. This is what they do here, they make sure people know what is confirmed and what is unconfirmed and that even some 'confirmed' things may change and that they will do their best to give the most accurate information. I don't think that approach is uniquely american, but I'd be curious if you're talking about network news, commercial news, state news, just the news you watch? I'm not sure what the difference between network and commercial news is but what I'm watching is Aftonbladet, the evening newspaper. They have their own website with live feeds and live twitter feeds where they link relevant tweets from other news agencies. They also let you ask the journalists questions if there's anything you're wondering. State news does live coverage for things like the Paris attacks and it's similar to what I described but their evening news reports are facts with no or minimal speculation to best inform viewers. Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Right, let's make it so the government is the only one with easy access to violent weapons. That worked so well in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany. Someone doesn't understand the difference between a constitutional republic and a dictatorship... Why do you want people to be defenseless? Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Right, let's make it so the government is the only one with easy access to violent weapons. That worked so well in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany. Someone doesn't understand the difference between a constitutional republic and a dictatorship... Indeed. Mao wasn't as bad as Hitler or Stalin.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Right, let's make it so the government is the only one with easy access to violent weapons. That worked so well in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and Hitler's Germany. Someone doesn't understand the difference between a constitutional republic and a dictatorship... Why do you want people to be defenseless? LOL... You are defenseless, and if you think differently, you're insane. I'm gonna go lay down so no more updates from me.
Bismarck.Dracondria said: » Except it does in other countries. It won't eliminate shootings but it will lower them by a great amount. We're not other countries. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Hitler Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Is that why the tree isn't growing? Because the tree is drowning in the blood of innocents? Yes, and it's being poured on it by the tyrants. Your right, his statement wasn't an argument, nor anything to refute what I said.
Ackeron said: » I'm gonna go lay down so no more updates from me. Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Jetackuu said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Is that why the tree isn't growing? Because the tree is drowning in the blood of innocents? Yes, and it's being poured on it by the tyrants. By all means go fight those tyrants! Oh wait, you and the others aren't going to? Then stop with the "no laws against guns" routine while people die. Not going to fight a word war with guns, but I fight them with words all the time. More laws isn't going to save lives. Stop trying to infringe on the rights of others just because different others are infringing on their rights. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||