AGW Theory - Discussion |
||
|
AGW Theory - Discussion
How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò
Valefor.Sehachan said: » How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò Earth is getting warmer something something liberals something something Scandinavia something something Hitler. Standard progression of internet discussions. Valefor.Sehachan said: » How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò Collective off-topic posts by a few individuals. Shiva.Nikolce said: » Asura.Saevel said: » Poor people, of any ethnicity, introduced into a new economy will damage that economy. then how do you explain the US? the vast majority of our ancestors that immigrated here didn't have two nickels to rub together. ![]() At least that's what I heard.... Valefor.Sehachan said: » How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò Saevel. Valefor.Sehachan said: » How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò I derailed it like a big fat jerk... Back to AGW I'm looking at all these graphs and lines and colors and numbers and trying to make some sense out of it. let me see if I have this right... 97% of climate scientists agree 50% of a warming trend of .8 of a degree over the last 100 years < half a degree is probably caused by people increasing the amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere? Valefor.Sehachan said: » How did AGW turn into Scandinavia in WW2? ò_ò Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber!
So quick everyone lets forget individual freedoms and get back to living in the stone age! Oh and just in case you ever though China actualy was on board with the struggle, they're ending their one child policy. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! Oxygen deprivation has no impact on cognitive functions, everyone knows it's just a liberal scam. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I was being facetious. You really are a one-trick pony. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! And yet military studies that were focused more on human safety than an agenda used much higher concentrations of CO2 and didn't get the same results. Surprise! Not to mention the Harvard study tested CO2 levels higher than what glober worming is giving us, so I'm not sure why that was tied in to begin with. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! And yet military studies that were focused more on human safety than an agenda used much higher concentrations of CO2 and didn't get the same results. Surprise! Not to mention the Harvard study tested CO2 levels higher than what glober worming is giving us, so I'm not sure why that was tied in to begin with. Garuda.Chanti said: » Bahamut.Kara said: » Seriously, open a history book. Norway was bombed and occupied during WWII, Finland fought 3 wars, Denmark was bombed and occupied during WWII, Sweden was neutral but accepted thousands of refugees and lost trade, even Iceland was invaded. Bunkers still exist in Denmark and parts of beaches are still closed because of landmines. Did as many people die per capitia as other parts of Europe? No. Was Scandinavia largely ignored? Hell no. As to your economic assertions they are just as accurate as your historical analysis. Scandinavia has been totally ignored by WWII movies. Right? Civilian perspectives and Hahns, Manns, Battenbergs, Badens and Fischers don't make good TV material either, or they don't fit the narrative. Who knows? EDIT: Actually, Princess Alice of Greece and Denmark and her children's paths would make an epic saga that would rival GoT. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! And yet military studies that were focused more on human safety than an agenda used much higher concentrations of CO2 and didn't get the same results. Surprise! Not to mention the Harvard study tested CO2 levels higher than what glober worming is giving us, so I'm not sure why that was tied in to begin with. The tie-in is implied in the tweet from Al Gore. Which may be accurate, but it kind of overshadows the fact that good building/home ventilation (and removing the presence/use of non volatile organic compounds) has some impacts. Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry.
Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry. Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> Bahamut.Milamber said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! And yet military studies that were focused more on human safety than an agenda used much higher concentrations of CO2 and didn't get the same results. Surprise! Not to mention the Harvard study tested CO2 levels higher than what glober worming is giving us, so I'm not sure why that was tied in to begin with. The tie-in is implied in the tweet from Al Gore. Which may be accurate, but it kind of overshadows the fact that good building/home ventilation (and removing the presence/use of non volatile organic compounds) has some impacts. I took a moment to read into it more. The article sucked, but looking at the actual study cleared things up. I'm curious about the discrepancies between it and the military studies, but I guess we can depend on Gore and the "Al"armists to take something completely out of context and exploit it. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Oh the next chapter in global warming will consist of flawed and bogus tie-ins to more ridiculous alarmism in order to jump start public panic again. The latest iteration is that CO2 will make everyone dumber! And yet military studies that were focused more on human safety than an agenda used much higher concentrations of CO2 and didn't get the same results. Surprise! Not to mention the Harvard study tested CO2 levels higher than what glober worming is giving us, so I'm not sure why that was tied in to begin with. The tie-in is implied in the tweet from Al Gore. Which may be accurate, but it kind of overshadows the fact that good building/home ventilation (and removing the presence/use of non volatile organic compounds) has some impacts. I took a moment to read into it more. The article sucked, but looking at the actual study cleared things up. I'm curious about the discrepancies between it and the military studies, but I guess we can depend on Gore and the "Al"armists to take something completely out of context and exploit it. You can read the NRC's study and see that the effects aren't not necessarily consistent either, with some being affected at significantly different concentrations. The screening process for submariners is also generally a bit more specific than your average office worker as well. Hell, you could even speculate that claustrophobia might be triggered by sensitivity to CO2 levels; as lack of claustrophobia is one of the screening criteria (for obvious reasons). And that's the hard thing about experiments. People want to extrapolate results to other environments, but doing so is generally not scientifically sound unless your factors are controlled extremely well, and even then it's still no guarantee.
Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry. Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> I do, it's sort of linked to something called "sick building syndrome". But that bears no relevance in Gore & co's desperate attempt to get AGW in front of the news cycle again. "Sound the alarm! Global warming is going to make you stupid!" Do you always start chugging any drink as long as someone calls it kool-aid? Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry. Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> I do, it's sort of linked to something called "sick building syndrome". But that bears no relevance in Gore & co's desperate attempt to get AGW in front of the news cycle again. "Sound the alarm! Global warming is going to make you stupid!" Do you always start chugging any drink as long as someone calls it kool-aid? The ThinkProgress article Gore referenced is somewhat alarmist, but that isn't the paper that was published. The article makes a rather invalid point (we should keep CO2 as low as possible), but also does make a pertinent one (we don't really know well what minimum concentration is required to have an impact, nor have the understanding behind why). Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry. Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> I do, it's sort of linked to something called "sick building syndrome". But that bears no relevance in Gore & co's desperate attempt to get AGW in front of the news cycle again. "Sound the alarm! Global warming is going to make you stupid!" Do you always start chugging any drink as long as someone calls it kool-aid? The ThinkProgress article Gore referenced is somewhat alarmist, but that isn't the paper that was published. The article makes a rather invalid point (we should keep CO2 as low as possible), but also does make a pertinent one (we don't really know well what minimum concentration is required to have an impact, nor have the understanding behind why). Warming waters in Gulf of Maine devastating cod fishery
Bangor Daily News To long to copypasta in its entirety and too complex for a TLDR. Selected paragraphs. Quote: A new scientific study says extremely rapidly warming waters off the New England coast have had a severe consequence — the collapse of a cod fishery that saw too many catches, even as overall cod numbers declined because of warmer seas. It’s just the latest in a series of findings and occurrences — ranging from gigantic snows in Boston earlier last winter, which scientists partly linked with warm seas, to a sudden and “extreme” sea level rise event in 2009-2010 — suggesting that this particular stretch of water is undergoing profound changes. “[In] 2004 to 2013, we ended up warming faster than really any other marine ecosystem has ever experienced over a 10 year period,” said Andrew Pershing of the Gulf of Maine Research Institute, lead author of the new study just out in the journal Science.... “[In] 2004 to 2013, we ended up warming faster than really any other marine ecosystem has ever experienced over a 10 year period,” ... The paper reports that during the decade-long period in question, the Gulf of Maine, the ocean region extending from Cape Cod northeast to the southern tip of Nova Scotia, warmed up by a truly stunning 0.41 degrees Fahrenheit per year. That’s faster warming than occurred in 99.9 percent of the rest of the world ocean, the scientists say. What’s most intriguing is what is causing the dramatically warm waters — and how this may relate to other observed changes in the region. Clearly, part of the cause is the overall ocean warming trend that has been seen around the globe due to climate change. But at the same time, the researchers say, the warm and salty Gulf Stream has moved northward more throughout the last century — a change that also has been linked to a warming climate but for more complex reasons. In late 2011, in fact, there was a dramatic northward movement that led to the warming of some New England lobster traps by more than 6 degrees Celsius, or over 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Among other factors, the northward shift of the Gulf Stream appears tied to a larger change in Atlantic ocean circulation — the slowing of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, or AMOC, which carries warm surface water northward and cold water southward at depth and is driven by differences in temperature and salinity of these waters. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Maybe Gore is just paving his way into the home ventilation industry. Move over tool time Al Gore is the new Bob Villa! <assorted humorous grunting> I do, it's sort of linked to something called "sick building syndrome". But that bears no relevance in Gore & co's desperate attempt to get AGW in front of the news cycle again. "Sound the alarm! Global warming is going to make you stupid!" Do you always start chugging any drink as long as someone calls it kool-aid? The ThinkProgress article Gore referenced is somewhat alarmist, but that isn't the paper that was published. The article makes a rather invalid point (we should keep CO2 as low as possible), but also does make a pertinent one (we don't really know well what minimum concentration is required to have an impact, nor have the understanding behind why). Heck, your own link references this particular subject as being under debate: Quote: MRI The hypercapnic state is routinely used to calibrate blood-oxygen-level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI), a modality that is sensitive to changes in blood oxygenation. However, this calibration crucially relies on the assumption that hypercapnia has no effect on neuronal function, which is a matter of debate.[17] Still no proof of Global warming yet huh.. Well damn, guess I just went solar/wind to save money then. Imagine if they made it even more efficient and cheaper to get off the grid instead of wasting all the time and energy fear mongering people while pushing for regulations that will hurt whats left of the economy. Hades.Altimaomega said: » Still no proof of Global warming yet huh.. Well damn, guess I just went solar/wind to save money then. Imagine if they made it even more efficient and cheaper to get off the grid instead of wasting all the time and energy fear mongering people while pushing for regulations that will hurt whats left of the economy. If they did that then they couldn't take over the economy and use it to punish their political rivals while rewarding their allies. Anyone who still thinks this is about the environment is a naive fool. It's been a power grab from the beginning. Hades.Altimaomega said: » Still no proof of Global warming yet huh.. Well damn, guess I just went solar/wind to save money then. Imagine if they made it even more efficient and cheaper to get off the grid instead of wasting all the time and energy fear mongering people while pushing for regulations that will hurt whats left of the economy. Surprising amount of sense in that post. Just leave out the first sentence. Garuda.Chanti said: » Hades.Altimaomega said: » Still no proof of Global warming yet huh.. Well damn, guess I just went solar/wind to save money then. Imagine if they made it even more efficient and cheaper to get off the grid instead of wasting all the time and energy fear mongering people while pushing for regulations that will hurt whats left of the economy. Surprising amount of sense in that post. Just leave out the first sentence. Why? Every single prediction they have made over the past 60 years has turned out wrong. Hell, even conspiracy theorists require better information than that! Hades.Altimaomega said: » Still no proof of Global warming yet huh.. Well damn, guess I just went solar/wind to save money then. Imagine if they made it even more efficient and cheaper to get off the grid instead of wasting all the time and energy fear mongering people while pushing for regulations that will hurt whats left of the economy. It's actually illegal in a lot of places to be off the grid for public health and safety reasons, although, they have enforced it in a really stupid way in the case of green housing. In any case, diversifying our energy infrastructure can only serve to strengthen it, and it shouldn't require fearmongering to move that direction. The pushback is from energy interests that stand to lose a lot of government handouts and influence when people have greater choice and access to energy they don't control. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||