First Official GOP President Announcement

Flavin and Jassik have spent pages trying to change the subject in a vain attempt to deflect. I'm done with defending myself. If someone with more than half a brain like Kara wants to continue the discussion I'm down for that, but beyond this point I'm done arguing with bozos.

In topic related news:

RUBIO IS READY.

So is this the "resorting to insults because you have nothing to actually say" that you speak of? lol...

Did being called a bozo really hurt your feelings?

Cause I got a few words that may make you cut yourself in that case....

and
morals, are sooo not the same.. Too even suggest it, is quite humorous.

Here we've only got one rule. Never ever let it cool!

The only rules are when it doubt argue about semantics forever. Appeal to emotion. Derail. etc.

Yeah I mean at least when you kill off kids INSIDE the womb, they don't complain amirite? You're argument is flacid, they're dead either way. I guess we shouldn't risk letting them starve, so lets just kill em off before they're born.

I feel (Yep! That word.) as though this is a segue for a 'Fight Club' quote.

Did I say it hurt my feelings? Is that how you guys feel about it when you say stuff like that that we hurt your feelings by tossing out what you consider to be insults? Is that why you see it that way? lol...

An insult can be an insult whether it actually bothers you or not. You guys throw around that line about not having anything to actually contribute to a topic so you insult. Funny when those who accuse others of doing it do it themselves.

You are acting like it did.

I mean, if you weren't so heartbroken about your feels, you wouldn't have responded to my little jibe....

I for one look forward to Empress Clinton ascending to the throne. She should pick Barack Obama as her running mate for the ultimate rage-inducing pair. Failing that, get Al Gore out of his fortress of Global Warming.

Then we can have Jeb Bush afterwards followed by Chelsea and then Neil, Marvin or Dorothy Bush.

Because, if you were to really look at it, you would notice that the federal funding is either in the "unrestricted" or "temporary restricted" categories. The problem is, if it was to be restricted by law, the funding itself should be in the "permanently restricted" category, wouldn't you think?

Permanently restricted net assets
The part of the net assets of a not-for-profit organization resulting (a) from contributions
and other inflows of assets whose use by the organization is limited by donor-imposed
stipulations that neither expire by passage of time nor can be fulfilled or otherwise
removed by actions of the organization, (b) from other asset enhancements and
diminishments subject to the same kinds of stipulations, and (c) from reclassifications
from (or to) other classes of net assets as a consequence of donor-imposed stipulations
(Concepts Statement 6, paragraph 92).
Temporarily restricted net assets
The part of the net assets of a not-for-profit organization resulting (a) from contributions
and other inflows of assets whose use by the organization is limited by donor-imposed
stipulations that either expire by passage of time or can be fulfilled and removed by
actions of the organization pursuant to those stipulations, (b) from other asset
enhancements and diminishments subject to the same kinds of stipulations, and (c) from
reclassifications to (or from) other classes of net assets as a consequence of
donor-imposed stipulations, their expiration by passage of time, or their fulfillment and
removal by actions of the organization pursuant to those stipulations (Concepts Statement
6, paragraph 93).

Did being called a bozo really hurt your feelings?

Cause I got a few words that may make you cut yourself in that case....

But it isn't restricted by a permanent law, it is restricted by a temporary rider attached to an appropriations bill. It just happens to have been re-issued for each allocation in the past almost-40 years.

I'm not an accountant, but you certainly could argue that it meets temporary restricted asset.
One would argue that the stipulation expires by the passage of time.

You just quoted Balance Sheet Temporary Restricted Net Assets rules.

So, it would fall under the guidelines of permanent restrictions, as those funds donated each year are permanently restricted with no date of expiration to them (grandfathered in).