|
Dancing Salvage Bans.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-15 22:03:20
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »However, if he had the proof of me being actually guilty
Even the so-called GM uses the word proof. What possible proof could they possibly have when there is none to be had?
How does one determine "idle/afk" without actually asking if you are indeed afk. As far as I'm concerned it's impossible.
All the ***I say refers to main, every dumb thing I do is on Valli. No one, literally no one knows I have a third account. Have you ever heard of IPs? Or the fact that you may have sent things between those characters, allowing SE to understand that it's YOU playing all of them?
As I explained in an earlier post, this isn't a GM based investigation, the STF got you. They have different tools which allow for more accuracy. People who cheat will get *** by the STF.
Sure, a GM can come box you if you're fishbotting, or simply put you in jail if you're flee hacking, but if many people report you to the STF (or to GMs, which in turn report you to the STF or redirect players), you'll get banned automatically, GMs are never involved past the report point.
All in all, it's very easy to track players and their multiple accounts. The same way, it's very easy to know what people do. People have a bad habit of talking too much on forums and such, or even in game for the least intelligent.
If you were banned on the same IP/communicating characters, it's perfectly normal and I have no idea why you'd be wondering why you got caught.
Quetzalcoatl.Valli
サーバ: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2015-02-15 22:13:02
You didn't answer the question. If any of that was remotely true, why would the main not be banned as well.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-15 22:39:57
If a character isn't banned, it means that either 1) they made a mistake or 2) they couldn't reach 100% status.
I already answered your question in a previous post, I assumed you had read it.
Quetzalcoatl.Valli
サーバ: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2015-02-15 22:47:13
No, actually you didn't.
If I'm watching the screen while a program runs, I'm not afk, so there's no legit way to know whether the inputs are from a human or not.
Short of running a search of the processes on the computer you can't verify use of a third party tool. (in this context). Obviously running fast/sliding on the ground etc is pretty easy to spot.
I just want to see some form of legitimacy. It's not required. I'm still going to complain about it regardless. No proof. No crime.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-15 23:03:51
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »No, actually you didn't.
If I'm watching the screen while a program runs, I'm not afk, so there's no legit way to know whether the inputs are from a human or not.
Short of running a search of the processes on the computer you can't verify use of a third party tool. (in this context). Obviously running fast/sliding on the ground etc is pretty easy to spot.
I just want to see some form of legitimacy. It's not required. I'm still going to complain about it regardless. No proof. No crime. > Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »How does one determine "idle/afk" without actually asking if you are indeed afk. As far as I'm concerned it's impossible. Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Other than the GM box, none.
As for the rest, you're right. If you're running a fishbot while you're watching a movie on the same computer and answer the GM tells/box, you're safe.
There are many ways to not get punished without necessarily lying, this is one example.
SE won't search your processes, so once again, you're safe.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 802
By Asura.Hoshiku 2015-02-15 23:17:35
The thing that I'm finding concerning here is the possibility that they aren't checking to see if you're there. What if a group of people decide to report you every time you step foot into a field? By your logic the STF might ban you for that even though you weren't doing anything wrong.
[+]
Cerberus.Anjisnu
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2803
By Cerberus.Anjisnu 2015-02-15 23:45:47
i kinda still believe the think tank at se hq is deadpool and sheogorath at a tea session
By anik 2015-02-15 23:46:14
cool story bro
By Bloodrose 2015-02-15 23:47:03
i kinda still believe the think tank at se hq is deadpool and sheogorath at a tea session Wrong. It's Deadpool and Spiderman. They exchange witty retorts, quips, and silent monologues with each other as they beat each other with banhammer balloons.
By anik 2015-02-15 23:47:39
yeah totally
Cerberus.Anjisnu
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2803
By Cerberus.Anjisnu 2015-02-15 23:51:33
i kinda still believe the think tank at se hq is deadpool and sheogorath at a tea session Wrong. It's Deadpool and Spiderman. They exchange witty retorts, quips, and silent monologues with each other as they beat each other with banhammer balloons. and now i have a ***
[+]
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-16 00:07:26
The thing that I'm finding concerning here is the possibility that they aren't checking to see if you're there. What if a group of people decide to report you every time you step foot into a field? By your logic the STF might ban you for that even though you weren't doing anything wrong. As shown in my own experience example, if you have 20 people reporting you daily and you're innocent, you're fine.
I had the same people report me 4 times per week when I was doing HNM and 6 months of doing so didn't yield any punishment for me.
VIP
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-16 00:18:35
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »No, actually you didn't.
If I'm watching the screen while a program runs, I'm not afk, so there's no legit way to know whether the inputs are from a human or not.
Short of running a search of the processes on the computer you can't verify use of a third party tool. (in this context). Obviously running fast/sliding on the ground etc is pretty easy to spot.
I just want to see some form of legitimacy. It's not required. I'm still going to complain about it regardless. No proof. No crime.
Server logs likely contain timestamps and can easily be referenced to show a predicable and consistent loop. Character does these 5 things in order at these time intervals, character travels between exact coordinates at these time intervals, etc. If every 8 seconds exactly, your character crafts an item, then travels exactly the same path to trade materials, then travels exactly the same path back and does the same synths at exact intervals, it's pretty obvious. STF likely has tools that look for patterns that could be bots. If you were as clever as you claim with your scheme, they wouldn't have banned the character.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-16 01:26:00
is this *** still pretending to be a gm I'm not anymore.
Made this clear as I'm just informing/helping/telling people, I'm not here to tell people that I'm watching their *** or anything, as I'm not.
And as someone already asked me in PM, I'm not going to forward people who deserve their *** banned. I don't care.
Quetzalcoatl.Valli
サーバ: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2015-02-16 01:36:18
If every 8 seconds exactly, your character crafts an item, then travels exactly the same path to trade materials, then travels exactly the same path back and does the same synths at exact intervals, it's pretty obvious. STF likely has tools that look for patterns that could be bots. If you were as clever as you claim with your scheme, they wouldn't have banned the character.
It doesn't matter how "obvious" you think it is. There is no such thing as actual obvious botting. well, that's a lie. There are some shitty programs that make it blatantly obvious.
However, regardless of a "pattern" it's still 100% ***. It's simply called being efficient.
There wouldn't be this issue if they were honest. Tell me what you think I did, allow me to call your ***. But that's not how they operate. Anything that even remotely resembles efficiency is now botting.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-02-16 01:38:43
Yeah, this kind of tool doesn't exist at SE. I don't think any company uses this, it's highly unpractical (the one about patterns).
The timestamps, positions etc are a given.
The game itself doesn't let you zone if you run too fast to the other area. Or at least it didn't several years ago. You'd get a specific message telling you that you can't zone, and unless you'd log off, you wouldn't be able to zone. This message never triggered anything at SE to my knowledge and was never specifically investigated.
Ragnarok.Ejiin
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 528
By Ragnarok.Ejiin 2015-02-16 01:48:47
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »It doesn't matter how "obvious" you think it is. There is no such thing as actual obvious botting. well, that's a lie. There are some shitty programs that make it blatantly obvious.
However, regardless of a "pattern" it's still 100% ***. It's simply called being efficient.
There wouldn't be this issue if they were honest. Tell me what you think I did, allow me to call your ***. But that's not how they operate. Anything that even remotely resembles efficiency is now botting.
Where are the scores of falsely banned efficient players that don't bot? It seems like it's just you crying right now.
Just because you're ignorant to the methods SE uses to detect bots now doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Your only defense of SE not having one is that they'd be falsely banning people left and right, which clearly isn't the case.
By all means, keep crying, though. Your tears are delicious.
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »Can't wait till one of you whiteknighting *** get banned because you outcamped some aggravated jp. Then come back and continue to praise square.
No one is whiteknighting SE. We're just calling you out on how stupid you're being and to let legitimate players know there's no reason to be worried about being falsely banned.
[+]
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4307
By Asura.Ackeronll 2015-02-16 02:32:37
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
By Pantafernando 2015-02-16 02:41:31
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
Is magic the new name of cheats?
By anik 2015-02-16 02:50:30
Magic the Bannering
Ragnarok.Orlind
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 303
By Ragnarok.Orlind 2015-02-16 03:03:47
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »If every 8 seconds exactly, your character crafts an item, then travels exactly the same path to trade materials, then travels exactly the same path back and does the same synths at exact intervals, it's pretty obvious. STF likely has tools that look for patterns that could be bots. If you were as clever as you claim with your scheme, they wouldn't have banned the character.
It doesn't matter how "obvious" you think it is. There is no such thing as actual obvious botting. well, that's a lie. There are some shitty programs that make it blatantly obvious.
However, regardless of a "pattern" it's still 100% ***. It's simply called being efficient.
There wouldn't be this issue if they were honest. Tell me what you think I did, allow me to call your ***. But that's not how they operate. Anything that even remotely resembles efficiency is now botting.
With all this going on, have you tried calling SE and asking yet? Or was this over the weekend and you're waiting for The Monday, that most hated day of the week? =)
Quetzalcoatl.Valli
サーバ: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2015-02-16 03:19:14
Have you ever called square? lol. The biggest waste of time and the WORST customer service on the planet. Worse than AT&T and Comcast combined. It's miserable.
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4307
By Asura.Ackeronll 2015-02-16 03:49:52
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
Is magic the new name of cheats? Quote: Dynamis quote after saying he averages 800
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »I got 817 the last time I went, tagging. (all single, no 100). Truesolo.
Dunno why he's so surprised.
how the hell do you get 800 in dynamis? That's 2x as much as me on my best days. They buff the proc rate or something since I quit last year?
I hope it isn't. I wanna learn Meteor!
Odin.Tamoa
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 197
By Odin.Tamoa 2015-02-16 04:25:04
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »Have you ever called square? lol. The biggest waste of time and the WORST customer service on the planet. Worse than AT&T and Comcast combined. It's miserable.
You can use live chat, doesn't cost anything either. I did that when I found myself LMed one morning, and was told it was a 72 hour suspension and the reason why.
Either way, I really don't know why you're so worked up over your alt's ban. It was even quoted for you in a previous post how SE has the right to terminate an account for any reason, or no reason at all.
Ragnarok.Orlind
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 303
By Ragnarok.Orlind 2015-02-16 04:39:06
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »Have you ever called square? lol. The biggest waste of time and the WORST customer service on the planet. Worse than AT&T and Comcast combined. It's miserable.
I used to call for all my hot-headed friends all the time and as someone who has worked mainly in customer service, not only have I seen worse, I usually get results from the SE line. Even AT&T and Comcast have nothing on what I've seen =D
By Pantafernando 2015-02-16 05:11:55
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
Is magic the new name of cheats? Quote: Dynamis quote after saying he averages 800
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »I got 817 the last time I went, tagging. (all single, no 100). Truesolo.
Dunno why he's so surprised.
how the hell do you get 800 in dynamis? That's 2x as much as me on my best days. They buff the proc rate or something since I quit last year?
I hope it isn't. I wanna learn Meteor!
Good for you, meteor costs only 80k.
(And in the past i bought meteor for all my chars for 2m each...)
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4307
By Asura.Ackeronll 2015-02-16 05:29:16
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
Is magic the new name of cheats? Quote: Dynamis quote after saying he averages 800
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »I got 817 the last time I went, tagging. (all single, no 100). Truesolo.
Dunno why he's so surprised.
how the hell do you get 800 in dynamis? That's 2x as much as me on my best days. They buff the proc rate or something since I quit last year?
I hope it isn't. I wanna learn Meteor!
Good for you, meteor costs only 80k.
(And in the past i bought meteor for all my chars for 2m each...) 80k is what $800.00ish after conversion right?
By Pantafernando 2015-02-16 05:38:03
I'm still waiting on the how to get 800 currency in 1 dynamis run w/o a white proc solo. Or does magic really exist?!
Lightning Bolt!
Is magic the new name of cheats? Quote: Dynamis quote after saying he averages 800
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »I got 817 the last time I went, tagging. (all single, no 100). Truesolo.
Dunno why he's so surprised.
how the hell do you get 800 in dynamis? That's 2x as much as me on my best days. They buff the proc rate or something since I quit last year?
I hope it isn't. I wanna learn Meteor!
Good for you, meteor costs only 80k.
(And in the past i bought meteor for all my chars for 2m each...) 80k is what $800.00ish after conversion right?
Valli is more suitable to answer that.
Quetzalcoatl.Valli
サーバ: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2015-02-16 05:39:17
How the hell would I know lol. I cheat but I'm not stupid enough to pay money for gil.
So I hear SE banned peeps for cheating in Salvage. Damn SE you mad bruh?
|
|