|
deadly tap water
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-01-30 08:25:30
Don't worry everyone soon Obama will once again save us all.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/01/30/dr-manny-should-obama-make-vaccines-mandatory-for-all-children/
Just wondering btw.. Its perfectly okay to abort a baby because pro-choice.. But soon as that baby is born you people want to force vaccines on them.. The hypocrisy is astonishing in this forum.
My children have gotten only the most basic and helpful vaccines they was over a year old before any. I'm not totally against them, they have gotten what I have gotten. However, the doctors "suggest" about 2-4 other vaccines w/e its time for the basic ones.. Getting all those shots that are not really needed before the child can even speak is insane. To even suggest that all vaccines be mandated.. A lot of parents would stop going to the doctor all together, would you people consider that a good thing? What then? Start arresting people and putting them in jail? Taking away children? I swear you people lack certain thought processes.
If parents dont follow approved liberal protocols, they are putting their kid's lives in danger and deserve to have their kids taken away.
The state will do a much better job raising them.
Valefor.Sehachan
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-30 08:26:17
Good Nausi, you're learning!
[+]
By Ramyrez 2015-01-30 08:27:46
I don't know about in Canada, but we don't have separate supplies for what goes to the sink and what goes to the shower, of course there's separate for what comes in and what goes out, but you get the idea.
I'd be less worried about fluoride and more worried about what it picks up in the pipes in the case of old homes, as minimum code differs for drinking and non-drinking taps.
[+]
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 08:31:17
You actually ingest more fluoride from toothpaste, once, without intentionally ingesting it, than you could manage to do in month with tap water, just from proper use.
The cells and pores in the mouth, are more open than the multitudes of layers of skin covering your body.
Fluoride also happens naturally in water, as a means of water purification to keep it clean of contaminants and pollutants.
It's actually a salt compound that is formed when the element fluorine combines with soil/sediment, or rocks.
By Jetackuu 2015-01-30 08:32:47
I don't know about in Canada, but we don't have separate supplies for what goes to the sink and what goes to the shower, of course there's separate for what comes in and what goes out, but you get the idea.
I'd be less worried about fluoride and more worried about what it picks up in the pipes in the case of old homes, as minimum code differs for drinking and non-drinking taps. Oh most certainly, good 'ol lead pipes.
If the water pressure here didn't already suck, I'd throw another filter on at the tap, the water coming in is already filtered (well water) and most would probably feel sick if they looked at the filter.
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2020
By Siren.Lordgrim 2015-01-30 08:33:08
bring back state banks owned by the people. watch this lovely video
YouTube Video Placeholder
By Jetackuu 2015-01-30 08:33:53
You actually ingest more fluoride from toothpaste, once, without intentionally ingesting it, than you could manage to do in month with tap water, just from proper use.
The cells and pores in the mouth, are more open than the multitudes of layers of skin covering your body.
Fluoride also happens naturally in water, as a means of water purification to keep it clean of contaminants and pollutants.
It's actually a salt compound that is formed when the element fluorine combines with soil/sediment, or rocks. We know, well some of us know.
By Jetackuu 2015-01-30 08:34:23
bring back state banks owned by the people. watch this lovely video
YouTube Video Placeholder no
Valefor.Sehachan
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-30 08:35:08
Thread about water.
Talks about banks.
By Jetackuu 2015-01-30 08:36:14
Thread about water.
Talks about banks.
Well, you can swim in money, don'tya know?
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-30 08:37:12
I suppose water banks are also a thing, but the leap in his brain has been huge.
By Ramyrez 2015-01-30 08:38:13
Fluoride also happens naturally in water,
To the point that in some municipalities the "fluoridation team", so to speak, actually does what they need to filter fluoride out to bring it down to the appropriate level.
[+]
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 08:39:19
Error displaying youtube video. Thread about water.
Talks about banks.
Well, you can swim in money, don'tya know?
YouTube Video Placeholder
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-30 08:39:28
Thread about water.
Talks about banks. On that note: Let's move the bank topic to a different thread.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-01-30 08:39:56
You know you're not suppose to swallow toothpaste, in part because it has flouride in it.
I think I saw a cursory comparison somewhere that the amount of fluoride you drink in water is equivalent to what you'd get if you swallowed toothpaste.
I'm not really sure what the dosages are in water or toothpaste, but it's kinda irrelevant. It really doesn't take much to trigger dental fluorosis, we should stop putting it into the water for that reason alone. If any of you bought a flouride rinse, used it as directed and ended up with that (albeit cosmetic) result, you'd probably have a pretty meaty lawsuit on your hands.
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 08:52:50
You know you're not suppose to swallow toothpaste, in part because it has flouride in it.
I think I saw a cursory comparison somewhere that the amount of fluoride you drink in water is equivalent to what you'd get if you swallowed toothpaste.
I'm not really sure what the dosages are in water or toothpaste, but it's kinda irrelevant. It really doesn't take much to trigger dental fluorosis, we should stop putting it into the water for that reason alone. If any of you bought a flouride rinse, used it as directed and ended up with that (albeit cosmetic) result, you'd probably have a pretty meaty lawsuit on your hands. Yeah... no you wouldn't.
You'd get a health advisory, and the maximum doses have already been specified for water, which is a maximum of 4.00PPM, or 4.00mg per liter, where as the average amount found in water is already under 2.00PPM, or 2.00mg per liter, with recommendations by the EPA to drop the maximum amount down to 1.4PPM. (and how to find them for your community), and for toothpaste.
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
This would mean that toothpaste contains between 3-6 times as much sodium fluoride in a single use, than what you could possibly manage from 2-3 liters of ingested water a day. And that's just with proper use. Never mind the accidental ingestion that occurs from time to time.
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-01-30 09:06:52
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
Ok granted, whatever the dosage rates are, you eventually swallow the amount of fluoride in an accidental toothpaste swallowing as you do in water, right? My point is that there's a warning label on toothpaste, but not on water.
Caffeine is natural, but bad for you in high enough dosages. Fluoride doesn't get some pass because it's "natural".
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Whatever it takes, dental fluorosis is " prevalent" in children, nearly doubling its rates from 1987 to 2003.
Before you jump on the notion that it isn't the fluoridated water that's doing it, I would ask that:
If fluoride is so common in toothpaste AND rinses that those sources alone are enough to account for the increase rates in fluorosis, why do we need to put any of it into the water?
[+]
By charlo999 2015-01-30 09:07:33
What on earth are you all talking about where did I say you would absorb 50 litres of water.
You can't.
You absorb the chemicals in the water whilst your bathing in it. It's not hard to understand.
In a shower the water gets heated into steam and evaporated the intake of fluoride through vapour is 90-100%.
Water naturally vaporises from all sources and can build up if you have no windows open.
Washing clothes that dry has the chemicals left in that can be absorbed into your dermis.
Your attempts at over overblowing concepts to belittle are pathetic.
Tests on these absorption rates have ever been done.
So at best your riding on blind hope.
Personally I'd rather see the evidence before admitting fluoride is right.
Your doing it the other way round.
Cerberus.Pleebo
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2015-01-30 09:10:12
POW! Right in the genetics!
[+]
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 09:15:35
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
Ok granted, whatever the dosage rates are, you eventually swallow the amount of fluoride in an accidental toothpaste swallowing as you do in water, right? My point is that there's a warning label on toothpaste, but not on water.
Caffeine is natural, but bad for you in high enough dosages. Fluoride doesn't get some pass because it's "natural".
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Whatever it takes, dental fluorosis is " prevalent" in children, nearly doubling its rates from 1987 to 2003.
Before you jump on the notion that it isn't the fluoridated water that's doing it, I would ask that:
If fluoride is so common in toothpaste AND rinses that those sources alone are enough to account for the increase rates in fluorosis, why do we need to put any of it into the water? No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
Which means, in an accidental ingestion, you would end up swallowing almost a month's worth of sodium fluoride at once.
Why is fluoride still in water? Because it's found to happen through deliverance naturally from rock and sediment, and as Ramyrez pointed out, there are teams of fluoridation experts that actually have to filter it down.
So in essence, the over consumption of sodium fluoride is more greatly attributed to the over-abundance of it in anti-septic oral care products. Not the water. Also, Bottled water is ozonized, not fluoridated. Of course, reading basic facts presented by the EPA would help.
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 09:21:11
We've gone over the health benefits of fluoridated water.
We've gone over it's history.
We've gone over it's uses.
We've gone over what it really is. (it's a salt compound called sodium fluoride)
We've gone over information that has shown a marked reduction in the amounts of fluoride in drinking water since anti-septic oral care products became prevalent.
We've gone over why it's still necessary, albeit at reduced amounts.
You've shown us... a tinfoil hat.
I mean, Even Nausi is beginning to sound like a seasoned debated in comparison.
But you want "proof" you can agree with, rather than what's staring you in the face, that fluoride is A-OK!
[+]
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 09:26:21
What on earth are you all talking about where did I say you would absorb 50 litres of water.
You can't.
your looking at 50+ litres of possible absorbtion into the body. That's 199.5 mg/l+. You mean the part where you said this on the last page?
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-01-30 09:45:19
How does Altimaomega still manage to breathe.
his mom doesn't let him have any gum. and she makes him sit down to drink water.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-01-30 09:49:55
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
Ok granted, whatever the dosage rates are, you eventually swallow the amount of fluoride in an accidental toothpaste swallowing as you do in water, right? My point is that there's a warning label on toothpaste, but not on water.
Caffeine is natural, but bad for you in high enough dosages. Fluoride doesn't get some pass because it's "natural".
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Whatever it takes, dental fluorosis is " prevalent" in children, nearly doubling its rates from 1987 to 2003.
Before you jump on the notion that it isn't the fluoridated water that's doing it, I would ask that:
If fluoride is so common in toothpaste AND rinses that those sources alone are enough to account for the increase rates in fluorosis, why do we need to put any of it into the water? No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
Which means, in an accidental ingestion, you would end up swallowing almost a month's worth of sodium fluoride at once.
Why is fluoride still in water? Because it's found to happen through deliverance naturally from rock and sediment, and as Ramyrez pointed out, there are teams of fluoridation experts that actually have to filter it down.
So in essence, the over consumption of sodium fluoride is more greatly attributed to the over-abundance of it in anti-septic oral care products. Not the water. Also, Bottled water is ozonized, not fluoridated. Of course, reading basic facts presented by the EPA would help.
I'm not talking about flouride's natural existance in water. I know it exists naturally. I'm talking about us putting it into water.
Clearly it's pretty unnecessary if almost half of children have dental fluorosis.
No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
I read, you're not reading today. If you accidentally swallow toothpaste you get a months supply of drinking water fluoride. Everyday you get between 3-6 times the drinking water level of fluoride in toothpaste that you do in water. My point is you still eventually ingest the accidental swallowing amount through drinking water. The frequency in which you do, is entirely irrelevant.
The point is that people get plenty of fluoride. So why are we putting more of it in drinking water? All it does is contribute to the increasing problem of fluorosis.
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 09:52:46
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
Ok granted, whatever the dosage rates are, you eventually swallow the amount of fluoride in an accidental toothpaste swallowing as you do in water, right? My point is that there's a warning label on toothpaste, but not on water.
Caffeine is natural, but bad for you in high enough dosages. Fluoride doesn't get some pass because it's "natural".
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Whatever it takes, dental fluorosis is " prevalent" in children, nearly doubling its rates from 1987 to 2003.
Before you jump on the notion that it isn't the fluoridated water that's doing it, I would ask that:
If fluoride is so common in toothpaste AND rinses that those sources alone are enough to account for the increase rates in fluorosis, why do we need to put any of it into the water? No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
Which means, in an accidental ingestion, you would end up swallowing almost a month's worth of sodium fluoride at once.
Why is fluoride still in water? Because it's found to happen through deliverance naturally from rock and sediment, and as Ramyrez pointed out, there are teams of fluoridation experts that actually have to filter it down.
So in essence, the over consumption of sodium fluoride is more greatly attributed to the over-abundance of it in anti-septic oral care products. Not the water. Also, Bottled water is ozonized, not fluoridated. Of course, reading basic facts presented by the EPA would help.
I'm not talking about flouride's natural existance in water. I know it exists naturally. I'm talking about us putting it into water.
Clearly it's pretty unnecessary if almost half of children have dental fluorosis.
No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
I read, you're not reading today. If you accidentally swallow toothpaste you get a months supply of drinking water fluoride. Everyday you get between 3-6 times the drinking water level of fluoride in toothpaste that you do in water. My point is you still eventually ingest the accidental swallowing amount through drinking water. The frequency in which you do, is entirely irrelevant.
The point is that people get plenty of fluoride. So why are we putting more of it in drinking water? All it does is contribute to the increasing problem of fluorosis. Obviously you *can't* read, as we're putting in *less* fluoride than ever.
And no, you don't ingest the same amount. You would need to drink a month's supply of water, in a single day, to reach that amount swallowed by a single accident. The frequency and amount are both relevant.
By charlo999 2015-01-30 09:56:02
What on earth are you all talking about where did I say you would absorb 50 litres of water.
You can't.
your looking at 50+ litres of possible absorbtion into the body. That's 199.5 mg/l+. You mean the part where you said this on the last page?
Wow reaching.
Obviously 199.5mg/l = 50 litres of water right?
Btw it doesn't
It means an average of 50 litres a day of the chemical mixture of water you get which has 199.5mg/l of floride in it. There's also other stuff like chlorine left from cleaning it too. That's about 1mg/l.
Or 50mg in this case of 50 litres of tap water.
Ragnarok.Nausi
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-01-30 09:57:35
Sodium Fluoride, for a 75ml bottle of Pronamel toothpaste, is 0.254%. It's also the same fluoride found naturally, and used in purifying water of contaminants.
Ok granted, whatever the dosage rates are, you eventually swallow the amount of fluoride in an accidental toothpaste swallowing as you do in water, right? My point is that there's a warning label on toothpaste, but not on water.
Caffeine is natural, but bad for you in high enough dosages. Fluoride doesn't get some pass because it's "natural".
But it really does take a lot of it to trigger dental fluorosis.
Whatever it takes, dental fluorosis is " prevalent" in children, nearly doubling its rates from 1987 to 2003.
Before you jump on the notion that it isn't the fluoridated water that's doing it, I would ask that:
If fluoride is so common in toothpaste AND rinses that those sources alone are enough to account for the increase rates in fluorosis, why do we need to put any of it into the water? No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
Which means, in an accidental ingestion, you would end up swallowing almost a month's worth of sodium fluoride at once.
Why is fluoride still in water? Because it's found to happen through deliverance naturally from rock and sediment, and as Ramyrez pointed out, there are teams of fluoridation experts that actually have to filter it down.
So in essence, the over consumption of sodium fluoride is more greatly attributed to the over-abundance of it in anti-septic oral care products. Not the water. Also, Bottled water is ozonized, not fluoridated. Of course, reading basic facts presented by the EPA would help.
I'm not talking about flouride's natural existance in water. I know it exists naturally. I'm talking about us putting it into water.
Clearly it's pretty unnecessary if almost half of children have dental fluorosis.
No, you're actually swallowing *more*, or do you not read? A single use of toothpaste in proper care, is between 3-6x what you could possibly get from a full day's supply of water.
I read, you're not reading today. If you accidentally swallow toothpaste you get a months supply of drinking water fluoride. Everyday you get between 3-6 times the drinking water level of fluoride in toothpaste that you do in water. My point is you still eventually ingest the accidental swallowing amount through drinking water. The frequency in which you do, is entirely irrelevant.
The point is that people get plenty of fluoride. So why are we putting more of it in drinking water? All it does is contribute to the increasing problem of fluorosis. Obviously you *can't* read, as we're putting in *less* fluoride than ever.
And no, you don't ingest the same amount. You would need to drink a month's supply of water, in a single day, to reach that amount swallowed by a single accident. The frequency and amount are both relevant. Seriously? OK, this is as simple as I can make my point.
We still put fluoride into drinking water.
We get plenty of fluoride from toothpaste and fluoride rinses.
Why should we continue to put fluoride into drinking water?
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-30 09:58:02
What on earth are you all talking about where did I say you would absorb 50 litres of water.
You can't.
your looking at 50+ litres of possible absorbtion into the body. That's 199.5 mg/l+. You mean the part where you said this on the last page?
Wow reaching.
Obviously 199.5mg/l = 50 litres of water right?
Btw it doesn't
It means an average of 50 litres of the chemical mixture of water you get which has 199.5mg/l of floride in it. There's also other stuff like chlorine left from cleaning it too. That's about 1mg/l.
Or 50mg in this case of 50 litres of tap water.
Answer this please:
If you use 10 liters of water a day, and the PPM of fluoride in that water is 4, and the PPM proven to have harmful effects to you is 32 PPM, did you receive a harmful dose in one day?
By Bloodrose 2015-01-30 09:59:59
Aside from health effects?
Did you not read that it was also used to purify contaminants in the water, along with the known health benefits?
But you incorrectly stated in the previous post that we were putting more fluoride into it, when the opposite is true - we're reducing the amounts as set out by the EPA guidelines for the very reason that there's such an abundance of sources for it commercially.
[+]
By charlo999 2015-01-30 10:03:40
What on earth are you all talking about where did I say you would absorb 50 litres of water.
You can't.
your looking at 50+ litres of possible absorbtion into the body. That's 199.5 mg/l+. You mean the part where you said this on the last page?
Wow reaching.
Obviously 199.5mg/l = 50 litres of water right?
Btw it doesn't
It means an average of 50 litres of the chemical mixture of water you get which has 199.5mg/l of floride in it. There's also other stuff like chlorine left from cleaning it too. That's about 1mg/l.
Or 50mg in this case of 50 litres of tap water.
Answer this please:
If you use 10 liters of water a day, and the PPM of fluoride in that water is 4, and the PPM proven to have harmful effects to you is 32 PPM, did you receive a harmful dose in one day?
I could answer it.
But why is the number of 10 litres relevant in anyway?
This'll make you think twice about the water coming out of the faucet:
"A 4-year-old child who died of a rare brain infection in early August has led Louisiana health officials to discover that the cause is lurking in the water pipes of St. Bernard Parish, southeast of New Orleans.
It's a type of single-celled amoeba called Naegleria fowleri, about a tenth the width of a human hair. Some call it a "brain-eating" amoeba, although it does its damage by causing a devastating immune reaction rather than by actually devouring brain tissue.
Officials are pumping more chlorine into the municipal water supply to kill the bugs and advising the parish's 40,000 residents how to avoid infection. They say the risk is tiny.
As we'll discuss shortly, it's not easy to get infected, and drinking the water poses no risk. But still, finding such a dangerous microbe in the drinking water is troubling and noteworthy.
"This is the first time that it has been found in the drinking water in the United States," Louisiana state epidemiologist Raoult Ratard tells Shots.
But it won't be the last, he says — because health officials are now trying to pin down the cause of previously unexplained encephalitis cases. About 40 percent of cases of this dangerous brain inflammation have no known cause. "Five years ago, we would never have known that this recent case was caused by the amoeba," Ratard says.
Another new element: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now tests water supplies when a case of amoebic encephalitis is discovered, to see where the bug came from.
For instance, in 2011 two Louisiana residents — one a 20-year-old man from St. Bernard Parish — died of amoebic encephalitis after using tap water to rinse their nasal passages, using a popular device called a neti pot. Health officials assumed that contaminated tap water was the source of the infection, but it was never proved.
This summer the amoeba infected the brains of two other US children – a 12-year-old Florida boy, who died, and a 12-year-old Arkansas girl, who survived. She may be one of only three known to survive the infection in the United States.
These alarming deaths are likely to remain rare – but not quite as rare as health officials used to think.
"We're going to see more cases," Ratard says. Instead of three to five cases of amoebic encephalitis per year across the nation, "maybe we'll go to 10 a year," he says. "I don't expect we'll have a hundred."
The episode vividly illustrates how humans live in a sea of potentially lethal microbes that, amazingly, seldom kill.
In this case, it's because Naegleria fowleri is only dangerous when it gains entry into the brain. It does that when water containing the amoeba gets inhaled very deeply, into the area where the roof of the nasal passages meets the floor of the brain.
"To get infected, the amoeba has to get to the ceiling of your nose – way, way up there," Ratard says. "At the top of the nose you have a little paper-thin plate made of bone with a bunch of holes, a little bit like a mosquito net. The holes are for the olfactory nerve. So the amoeba is crawling up the nerve and gets into the brain."
Drinking amoeba-contaminated water poses no risk, presumably because the single-celled organisms can't survive in stomach acid. Normal bathing or showering isn't a risk because even if tap water is contaminated, it doesn't penetrate into the deepest nasal passages.
Brain infections from the amoeba usually pop up in late summer, when warm water favors its reproduction and many people are diving into ponds to escape the heat.
Since uncounted numbers of people swim in waters that undoubtedly contain amoebae, Ratard says, it's a wonder there aren't more infections. Public swimming pools pose no risk because chlorine kills the microbes.
The child who died last month in St. Bernard Parish while visiting from Mississippi, had been playing a long time on a Slip'n'Slide connected to a household water faucet.
It took about two weeks for the CDC to determine that the child had a Naegleria fowleri infection. Then state officials started investigating how.
"We collected the hose and got some samples from the outside faucet, water heater, and toilet tank water," Ratard says. After testing verified amoeba contamination, Louisiana officials put out a press release about the case.
Further testing of tap water in four nearby areas revealed the presence of Naegleria fowleri, as officials announced on Thursday.
Understandably, the announcement has sparked considerable local anxiety, even though health officials have stressed that the risk is low – and can be avoided entirely by common-sense precautions.
"In the old days, you would look at your faucet and it wouldn't scare you," Ratard says. "But these days, for some people, it looks menacing."
To avoid risk, officials are advising people not to put their heads under water while bathing in tap water — and to supervise young children who might. Flushing the water from household pipes before filling a child's wading pool decreases the risk, although some people might want to add some bleach to the water as an added precaution.
Local officials have shut off the water at school drinking fountains, although it's hard to imagine how schoolchildren could inject that water deep into their noses.
In a couple of weeks, officials will retest the St. Bernard Parish drinking water to ensure that added chlorine has eliminated the threat – for this season at least."
Deadly Amoeba Found for First Time in Municipal Water Supply
|
|