|
|
Gunmen storm office of satirical magazine in Paris
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 15:55:44
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ? It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.
Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ? Which one?
Do you mean this one? Or this one? Or this one?
There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors
[+]
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 15:57:05
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
[+]
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 15:58:43
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:02:57
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ? It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.
Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ? Which one?
Do you mean this one? Or this one? Or this one?
There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:03:40
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-01-21 16:05:03
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ? It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.
Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ? Which one?
Do you mean this one? Or this one? Or this one?
There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors How is there any sense of racist rage in this post?
He was replying to the post showing that the magazine had made other satirical drawings of other major religions.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:06:14
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
Lakshmi.Flavin
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-01-21 16:07:31
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.
Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-01-21 16:08:14
There most certainly is. I can attest to that. I can think of at least 10 different major hollywood productions that poke at Jesus and a ton of TV shows that poke at Jews.
Its not that I don't see your point Milibar, its that you are refusing to see mine is not based on if it is right or wrong, but that at the current time, with the current global geopolitical situation such actions serve to further wedge differences between peoples and empower fundementalists on BOTH SIDES, not just ours, instead of allowing for a climate of progress and discourse.
I said at the start of this thread, we have A LOT of work to do in the muslim world so that entities such as ISIS never get a foothold at all.
I'll take that gladly. Its being more honest and objective than 99% of the people on these forums who really feel no accountability or responsibility for civility.
Freedom of speech should not be repressed because of bad timing. That's when it should be used the most.
For instance: The comedians who were arrested and others after the attacks in Paris was stupid. Many Western media publications stated the crack down on free speech by French authorities was wrong.
I've stated something like this previously in this thread:
Civility is not required by private businesses nor private people. If you don't like them boycott, protest, and educate others on why they are wrong. That's part of having free speech, the ability to counter the ideas you don't agree with.
Civility is absolutly required by government officials and government entities.
There is a vast difference between the two.
[+]
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:10:30
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.
Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.
and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.
Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.
You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2015-01-21 16:11:46
Some of us think that all Muslims are crazy, along with all followers of religion.
Don't forget about that.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:12:30
Its starting to feel like those of us who are normal are trying to break up a fight between two idiots.
One insists on offending, and the other insists on not allowing the other to offend him. While everyone with a shroud of intelligence is thinking "what is motivating each idiot, and why do they insist on being right when it does neither of them any good" - that's the mainstream muslim stance on this.
[+]
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:14:04
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question. You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar. That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:15:11
You state that you neither agree nor disagree He makes that claim whenever he's challenged with basic facts. It's a tactic born of desperation.
By Jetackuu 2015-01-21 16:16:13
Its starting to feel like those of us who are normal are trying to break up a fight between two idiots.
One insists on offending, and the other insists on not allowing the other to offend him. While everyone with a shroud of intelligence is thinking "what is motivating each idiot, and why do they insist on being right when it does neither of them any good" - that's the mainstream muslim stance on this. The issue with this line of thinking is that you think you are not an idiot as well.
People inherently have the right to offend, just as people have the right to be offended.
Watch, pay attention and learn:
YouTube Video Placeholder
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:18:11
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.
Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.
and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.
Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.
You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too. But you aren't questioning the magazine, its tactics, or motives. You (or at least CCL) is claiming why is it right or OK for it to even be done or allowed.
You are entitled to do that the former. Boycott the magazine. Don't buy it. But don"t try to say that they can't do it.
*Edit* Or rather, you have the right to try to say they can't do it, but don't expect people in societies with free press to understand or accept your stance.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:20:07
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question. You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar. That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?
I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.
Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:21:55
You state that you neither agree nor disagree He makes that claim whenever he's challenged with basic facts. It's a tactic born of desperation. Oh look, a person who has experienced me enough to make assertions about what I do and don't as a matter of habit based on less than 1000 words.
bravo! lol
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:24:00
Well, you see, I'm a genius. Just like you. Since you claim to be spectacular and perfect and expect to be taken seriously, I do hope you'll extend me the same courtesy. Wouldn't want to offend me, right?
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:24:08
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question. You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar. That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?
I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.
Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling. I would say that social progress is decoupled from scientific progress.
Bahamut.Milamber
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:25:03
Well, you see, I'm a genius. Just like you. Since you claim to be spectacular and perfect and expect to be taken seriously, I do hope you'll extend me the same courtesy. Wouldn't want to offend me, right? Look out. He might draw you.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:26:47
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.
Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.
and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.
Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.
You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too. But you aren't questioning the magazine, its tactics, or motives. You (or at least CCL) is claiming why is it right or OK for it to even be done or allowed.
You are entitled to do that the former. Boycott the magazine. Don't buy it. But don"t try to say that they can't do it.
*Edit* Or rather, you have the right to try to say they can't do it, but don't expect people in societies with free press to understand or accept your stance.
Thank you for asserting my rights for me. Taking into account that I have condemned the terrorist attacks, what on earth did you think I was doing in the first place?
Ccl questions the benefit of publications that utilize freedom of speech as freedom to insult in such scenarios where there is a large portion of people on earth that will be offended by it, and will not generate any tangible benefit.
I question the motive behind it and speculate that it drives a wedge between cultures. I also, as a muslim, find it to be vulgar and offensive. The worst thing I can imagine being done is buying the magazine and firing the staff. But my choice of response to it would have been to publish facts and media about the Prophet.
A far bit away from shooting them.
[+]
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-01-21 16:27:27
Freedom of speech should not be repressed because of bad timing. That's when it should be used the most.
I agree! GIVE GILBERT GODFRIED HIS JOB BACK!!!
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:28:32
But my choice of response to it would have been to publish facts and media about the Prophet. Complete with traditional icons, right?
It's satire by people known to be anti-religion. I don't know why you keep pretending that you're interested in their motives when their motives were known 30 years ago.
Edit:
Was anything about this cover ambiguous? I think it sums up the magazine's motive readily.
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:29:50
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.
Fail fail fail.
I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?
give me a break lol They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.
How exactly does social progress link with science?
Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory? Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question. You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar. That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?
I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.
Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling. I would say that social progress is decoupled from scientific progress.
Is Evolution science?
How about Morality? Science has no say on moral matters?
Can one talk about social progress and not take into account morality and be taken seriously?
Are you a catholic?
Asura.Ccl
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1998
By Asura.Ccl 2015-01-21 16:31:48
Yup; I think anything that can trouble peace should be avoided unless it has a huge benefit and I just can't see the benefit in this papers.
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:32:21
How about Morality? Science has no say on moral matters? Morals are things found lying in gutters. It's moral to stone an adulterer or sell your daughter into slavery if that's what you believe.
Science is about ethics.
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-01-21 16:33:02
I also, as a muslim, find it to be vulgar and offensive.
then you should look into yourself & try to figure out why that is.
Bahamut.Kara
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-01-21 16:35:32
Yup; I think anything that can trouble peace should be avoided unless it has a huge benefit and I just can't see the benefit in this papers. Who gets to decide what the benefit is or how much it is worth?
You? The government? Extremists?
Example:
Snowden files, I would argue, have been insanely beneficial especially in getting the judicial branch to actually do its job in the US. The DoJ, NSA, and many others in official capacity don't think so and claim they have caused serious harm. Who is right and who is wrong?
[+]
Caitsith.Zahrah
By Caitsith.Zahrah 2015-01-21 16:35:55
I probably should just dump it here. Anyone notice that the person most offended by Western satire used a Voltaire quote out of context in an argument with Kara?
[+]
On today's episode of P&R we take a trip to France.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/1/7/at-least-10-deadinshootingatparissatiricalmagazine.html
Quote: Gunmen stormed the offices of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in central Paris on Wednesday, leaving at least 12 people dead and sparking a massive manhunt for the killers.
Clad all in black with hoods and machine guns and speaking flawless French, the three attackers, who are now believed to be on the run, forced one of the publication's cartoonists, Corinne Rey, who was at the office with her young daughter, to open the door. In an interview with the newspaper L'Humanité, she said the entire shooting, which left 10 journalists and two police officers dead, lasted about five minutes.
Staff members of the magazine, which has courted controversy and the offense of some Muslims for publishing cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, were in an editorial meeting at the time. The gunmen headed straight for the paper's editor, Stéphane Charbonnier — widely known by his pen name, Charb — killing him and his police bodyguard, said Christophe Crepin, a police union spokesman on the scene.
Minutes later, gunmen were seen walking to a black car waiting below, calmly firing on a police officer, with one of the killers shooting him in the head as he writhed on the ground.
"Hey! We avenged the Prophet Muhammad! We killed Charlie Hebdo," one of the men shouted, according to a video shot from a nearby building and broadcast on French television. The video could not immediately be confirmed by Al Jazeera.
Large numbers of police and ambulances rushed to the scene, where shocked residents spilled into the streets. Reporters also saw bullet-riddled windows and people being carried out on stretchers.
Bernard Cazeneuve, France's interior minister, vowed to "track down the three criminals." He added that "all of our resources will be mobilized so that we can find out who committed this act and make sure they are punished for this act of barbarity." French authorities have said that all school trips and outdoor activities have been canceled while the gunmen are at large.
French President François Hollande headed to the scene shortly after Wednesday's shooting and said that the dead were "cowardly assassinated" and that four others were critically injured. He described the shooting as a "terrorist operation against a newspaper that has been threatened several times." He added that 40 people were being protected in the aftermath of the shooting.
Charlie Hebdo as drawn repeated threats for its caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, among other controversial features. The newspaper's offices were firebombed in 2011 after a spoof issue featuring a caricature of Muhammad on its cover.
A year later, the magazine published more Muhammad drawings amid an uproar over an anti-Muslim film. The cartoons depicted Muhammad naked and in demeaning or pornographic poses. The French government defended free speech even as it rebuked Charlie Hebdo for fanning tensions.
"We treat the news like journalists. Some use cameras. Some use computers. For us, it's a paper and pencil," the Muhammad cartoonist, who goes by the name Luz, told The Associated Press in 2012. "A pencil is not a weapon. It's just a means of expression."
Charbonnier, among the 10 journalists killed Wednesday, also defended the Muhammad cartoons.
He told Le Monde newspaper two years ago, "I'd rather die standing than live on my knees." One of his last cartoons, published in this week's issue, seemed an eerie premonition. "Still no attacks in France," an extremist fighter says. "Wait — we have until the end of January to present our New Year's wishes."
The attack, for which no one has yet claimed responsibility, comes amid what a number of commentators have identified as rising xenophobia in Europe, with thousands of protesters in several German cities rallying earlier this week against Muslim immigration. France's Muslim population of 5 million is Europe's largest.
"I am extremely angry. These are criminals, barbarians. They have sold their soul to hell. This is not freedom. This is not Islam, and I hope the French will come out united at the end of this," said Hassen Chalghoumi, imam of the Drancy mosque in Paris' Seine-St.-Denis northern suburb.
New York–based advocacy group the Committee to Protect Journalists condemned what its deputy director, Robert Mahoney, called "a brazen assault on free expression in the heart of Europe."
I fear this will only continue to stir the growing xenophobia in Europe against Muslims worldwide. People can keep saying this 'isn't their Islam' but the extremists are the ones dominating the court of public opinion and that can only spell disaster.
|
|