Gunmen Storm Office Of Satirical Magazine In Paris

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Gunmen storm office of satirical magazine in Paris
Gunmen storm office of satirical magazine in Paris
First Page 2 3 ... 12 13 14 ... 17 18 19
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 15:55:44  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ?
It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.

Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ?
Which one?
Do you mean this one?Or this one?Or this one?

There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors
[+]
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 15:57:05  
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 15:58:43  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:02:57  
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ?
It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.

Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ?
Which one?
Do you mean this one?Or this one?Or this one?

There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors
[+]
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:03:40  
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-01-21 16:05:03  
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Asura.Ccl said: »
I asked about doing something useless beside making people mad; now we know it will just create riot and risk attack for ZERO reward on our side so why are we still doing it ?
It isn't something that is useless besides making people mad. False premise is false.

Ok enlight me then what was the point of those drawing ?
Which one?
Do you mean this one?Or this one?Or this one?

There's that good ol' racist rage coming out to spite the world.
Was wondering how long it would take you to show your true colors
How is there any sense of racist rage in this post?

He was replying to the post showing that the magazine had made other satirical drawings of other major religions.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:06:14  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?

You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
 Lakshmi.Flavin
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: Flavin
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-01-21 16:07:31  
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.

Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.
[+]
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-01-21 16:08:14  
Blazed1979 said: »
There most certainly is. I can attest to that. I can think of at least 10 different major hollywood productions that poke at Jesus and a ton of TV shows that poke at Jews.

Its not that I don't see your point Milibar, its that you are refusing to see mine is not based on if it is right or wrong, but that at the current time, with the current global geopolitical situation such actions serve to further wedge differences between peoples and empower fundementalists on BOTH SIDES, not just ours, instead of allowing for a climate of progress and discourse.

I said at the start of this thread, we have A LOT of work to do in the muslim world so that entities such as ISIS never get a foothold at all.

I'll take that gladly. Its being more honest and objective than 99% of the people on these forums who really feel no accountability or responsibility for civility.

Freedom of speech should not be repressed because of bad timing. That's when it should be used the most.

For instance: The comedians who were arrested and others after the attacks in Paris was stupid. Many Western media publications stated the crack down on free speech by French authorities was wrong.

I've stated something like this previously in this thread:

Civility is not required by private businesses nor private people. If you don't like them boycott, protest, and educate others on why they are wrong. That's part of having free speech, the ability to counter the ideas you don't agree with.

Civility is absolutly required by government officials and government entities.

There is a vast difference between the two.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:10:30  
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.

Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.

and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.

Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.

You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42775
By Jetackuu 2015-01-21 16:11:46  
Some of us think that all Muslims are crazy, along with all followers of religion.

Don't forget about that.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:12:30  
Its starting to feel like those of us who are normal are trying to break up a fight between two idiots.

One insists on offending, and the other insists on not allowing the other to offend him. While everyone with a shroud of intelligence is thinking "what is motivating each idiot, and why do they insist on being right when it does neither of them any good" - that's the mainstream muslim stance on this.
[+]
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:14:04  
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?

You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:15:11  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
You state that you neither agree nor disagree
He makes that claim whenever he's challenged with basic facts. It's a tactic born of desperation.
Offline
Posts: 42775
By Jetackuu 2015-01-21 16:16:13  
Blazed1979 said: »
Its starting to feel like those of us who are normal are trying to break up a fight between two idiots.

One insists on offending, and the other insists on not allowing the other to offend him. While everyone with a shroud of intelligence is thinking "what is motivating each idiot, and why do they insist on being right when it does neither of them any good" - that's the mainstream muslim stance on this.
The issue with this line of thinking is that you think you are not an idiot as well.

People inherently have the right to offend, just as people have the right to be offended.

Watch, pay attention and learn:

YouTube Video Placeholder
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:18:11  
Blazed1979 said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.

Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.

and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.

Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.

You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too.
But you aren't questioning the magazine, its tactics, or motives. You (or at least CCL) is claiming why is it right or OK for it to even be done or allowed.
You are entitled to do that the former. Boycott the magazine. Don't buy it. But don"t try to say that they can't do it.

*Edit* Or rather, you have the right to try to say they can't do it, but don't expect people in societies with free press to understand or accept your stance.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:20:07  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?

You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?

I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.

Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:21:55  
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
You state that you neither agree nor disagree
He makes that claim whenever he's challenged with basic facts. It's a tactic born of desperation.
Oh look, a person who has experienced me enough to make assertions about what I do and don't as a matter of habit based on less than 1000 words.

bravo! lol
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:24:00  
Well, you see, I'm a genius. Just like you. Since you claim to be spectacular and perfect and expect to be taken seriously, I do hope you'll extend me the same courtesy. Wouldn't want to offend me, right?
[+]
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:24:08  
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?

You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?

I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.

Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling.
I would say that social progress is decoupled from scientific progress.
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-21 16:25:03  
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Well, you see, I'm a genius. Just like you. Since you claim to be spectacular and perfect and expect to be taken seriously, I do hope you'll extend me the same courtesy. Wouldn't want to offend me, right?
Look out. He might draw you.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:26:47  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Its a drawing... there was in no way any justification for anyone to come and kill these people.

Muslims around the world should be criticizing the men that carried out this act of terror in their name rather than focusing on whether or not the entire world is as respectful as they might want them to be about their religion.

and Muslims are. But that does not mean #jesuischarlie.
Just because we can identify the crime of killing people doesn't mean we have to agree with the magazine, its tactics or refrain from questioning its motives.

Its seems we are more capable of critical and independent thought in this part of the world than yours.

You're actually at odds with the tiny minority in the muslim world that are crazies. Difference between you and us is that we recognize they're crazy, and are starting to think you all are too.
But you aren't questioning the magazine, its tactics, or motives. You (or at least CCL) is claiming why is it right or OK for it to even be done or allowed.
You are entitled to do that the former. Boycott the magazine. Don't buy it. But don"t try to say that they can't do it.

*Edit* Or rather, you have the right to try to say they can't do it, but don't expect people in societies with free press to understand or accept your stance.

Thank you for asserting my rights for me. Taking into account that I have condemned the terrorist attacks, what on earth did you think I was doing in the first place?

Ccl questions the benefit of publications that utilize freedom of speech as freedom to insult in such scenarios where there is a large portion of people on earth that will be offended by it, and will not generate any tangible benefit.

I question the motive behind it and speculate that it drives a wedge between cultures. I also, as a muslim, find it to be vulgar and offensive. The worst thing I can imagine being done is buying the magazine and firing the staff. But my choice of response to it would have been to publish facts and media about the Prophet.

A far bit away from shooting them.
[+]
 Siren.Mosin
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: BKiddo
By Siren.Mosin 2015-01-21 16:27:27  
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Freedom of speech should not be repressed because of bad timing. That's when it should be used the most.

I agree! GIVE GILBERT GODFRIED HIS JOB BACK!!!
[+]
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:28:32  
Blazed1979 said: »
But my choice of response to it would have been to publish facts and media about the Prophet.
Complete with traditional icons, right?

It's satire by people known to be anti-religion. I don't know why you keep pretending that you're interested in their motives when their motives were known 30 years ago.

Edit:
Was anything about this cover ambiguous? I think it sums up the magazine's motive readily.

Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-21 16:29:50  
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.

I think deep down inside they're just fooling themselves into thinking they're democratic and believe in equal rights. As soon as they encounter cultures that are different than theirs', out goes the equality, out goes the civility, out goes the respect.

Fail fail fail.

I mean... how insane is it that they are demonizing a religion, of which accounts for 2% of terrorist attacks, after they hosted the bloodiest wars in all of history?

give me a break lol
They aren't demonizing a religion. People claiming to be followers of the religion are what is demonizing it.

How exactly does social progress link with science?

Are you saying Social progress is void of any science in practice and theory?
Why would you ask that question in response to mine?

You seem to be under the impression that science has no impact on social progress. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just curious. So please do answer the question.
You state that you neither agree nor disagree, but also state:
Blazed1979 said: »
Insanity?
So many claim to appreciate science yet they keep choosing the same methodology for "progress" when the results haven't been stellar.
That appears to be a definative stance linking science with social progress, hence the question: exactly how does social progress link with science?

I was making note of one understanding of insanity to be doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results each time, which is at the opposite end of try and test->observe->make note->refine/innovate->try and test again.

Again, I ask you to answer the question and quit stalling.
I would say that social progress is decoupled from scientific progress.

Is Evolution science?
How about Morality? Science has no say on moral matters?
Can one talk about social progress and not take into account morality and be taken seriously?
Are you a catholic?
 Asura.Ccl
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: ccl
Posts: 1998
By Asura.Ccl 2015-01-21 16:31:48  
Yup; I think anything that can trouble peace should be avoided unless it has a huge benefit and I just can't see the benefit in this papers.
[+]
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-01-21 16:32:21  
Blazed1979 said: »
How about Morality? Science has no say on moral matters?
Morals are things found lying in gutters. It's moral to stone an adulterer or sell your daughter into slavery if that's what you believe.

Science is about ethics.
 Siren.Mosin
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: BKiddo
By Siren.Mosin 2015-01-21 16:33:02  
Blazed1979 said: »
I also, as a muslim, find it to be vulgar and offensive.

then you should look into yourself & try to figure out why that is.
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-01-21 16:35:32  
Asura.Ccl said: »
Yup; I think anything that can trouble peace should be avoided unless it has a huge benefit and I just can't see the benefit in this papers.
Who gets to decide what the benefit is or how much it is worth?

You? The government? Extremists?

Example:
Snowden files, I would argue, have been insanely beneficial especially in getting the judicial branch to actually do its job in the US. The DoJ, NSA, and many others in official capacity don't think so and claim they have caused serious harm. Who is right and who is wrong?
[+]
 Caitsith.Zahrah
Offline
サーバ: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
user: zahrah
By Caitsith.Zahrah 2015-01-21 16:35:55  
I probably should just dump it here. Anyone notice that the person most offended by Western satire used a Voltaire quote out of context in an argument with Kara?
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 12 13 14 ... 17 18 19
Log in to post.