Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant.
[+]
Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? It's about as relevant as the religious beliefs of any other elected official. But the same question could be said of many things that have been asked over the years. Here's a picture for it:  Shiva.Viciousss said: » Who cares where Hillary is "from?" Asura.Floppyseconds said: » Hold on, so we are now saying that democrats planted some trailer park trash But yeah, keep calling voters who vote Republicans "trailer park trash" while ignoring the fact that your horse came from the trailer park capital of America. No contradictory statements there... Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. Then there's this, damn I am tired. Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. My word, you're not very good at this. If a Christian thinks a Muslim shouldn't be president, not only are they a pathetic excuse for a Christian, but they're also a hypocrite and display really poor judgement. The answer to the question asked of Trump and Carson is relevant to all those things. Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. How did you deduce that from what was typed? As that's not what was typed. Shiva.Viciousss said: » And now you're getting why the question was planted loudly and clearly at Trump's event. Look at the narrative that the media created. Now every single Republican candidate must prove that they aren't Islamaphobic. Personally, who gives a flying flip what religion a person is? All that matters is what sort of job they are fit to do and how they do it.
Jetackuu said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. How did you deduce that from what was typed? As that's not what was typed. Why does being Christian play a role in Jassik's decision. Since he said "especially" it appears to be a major role. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Personally, who gives a flying flip what religion a person is? All that matters is what sort of job they are fit to do and how they do it. If someone is legislating because god told them something, it matters a lot. Tell me you wouldn't be at least a little concerned if a president went on about how his imaginary friend Larry told him to ban Polka music. Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jetackuu said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. How did you deduce that from what was typed? As that's not what was typed. Why does being Christian play a role in Jassik's decision. Since he said "especially" it appears to be a major role. For a number of reasons.
[+]
Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jetackuu said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Jassik said: » Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Again, what is the relevance? Why is that being asked? I wouldn't vote for a person who said a Muslim shouldn't be president, especially if that person claimed to be a Christian. It's a litmus test for hypocrisy and xenophobia. THAT'S why it's relevant. So you in turn disqualify someone from being Predident based on his religion. How did you deduce that from what was typed? As that's not what was typed. Why does being Christian play a role in Jassik's decision. Since he said "especially" it appears to be a major role. Any religious person saying a person of a different faith shouldn't be allowed to be president BECAUSE of that faith is a hypocrite. How is this so hard to wrap your head around? Jassik said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Personally, who gives a flying flip what religion a person is? All that matters is what sort of job they are fit to do and how they do it. If someone is legislating because god told them something, it matters a lot. Tell me you wouldn't be at least a little concerned if a president went on about how his imaginary friend Larry told him to ban Polka music. Seriously, ever single president has been "religious" some way or another. If you are going to accuse Christians or Muslims of following their religion to rule America, you are as bad as Trump and Carson is.
[+]
Contain your glee Vic.
We all know you hate Walker because he is anti-union/pro-growth, but you don't have to bask in his failure. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Jassik said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Personally, who gives a flying flip what religion a person is? All that matters is what sort of job they are fit to do and how they do it. If someone is legislating because god told them something, it matters a lot. Tell me you wouldn't be at least a little concerned if a president went on about how his imaginary friend Larry told him to ban Polka music. Seriously, ever single president has been "religious" some way or another. If you are going to accuse Christians or Muslims of following their religion to rule America, you are as bad as Trump and Carson is. Is this seriously supposed to make sense? Nah, I don't need to contain anything, I'm glad this fiscally irresponsible candidate is out. His war on education and unions won't see the light of day on the national stage, and thats a good thing.
Shiva.Viciousss said: » Nah, I don't need to contain anything, I'm glad this fiscally irresponsible candidate is out. His war on education and unions won't see the light of day on the national stage, and thats a good thing. Hell, there is no fiscally responsible democrat running for president! Hardly any Republicans either, but certainly no liberals/democrats in existence. Oh, and before you retort, spending without caps is not considered responsible....
[+]
There are no fiscally responsible candidates in existence, but Scott Walker sure tried to pretend to be one, didn't fool a soul. One look at his latest state budget shows how terrible he is, won't be missed at all!
Shiva.Viciousss said: » There are no fiscally responsible candidates in existence, but Scott Walker sure tried to pretend to be one, didn't fool a soul. One look at his latest state budget shows how terrible he is, won't be missed at all! Oh, and it would help you out a lot if you source the budget itself... |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
