Random Politics & Religion #00

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #00
Random Politics & Religion #00
First Page 2 3 ... 685 686 687 ... 1375 1376 1377
Offline
Posts: 3206
By Enuyasha 2015-06-21 16:17:06  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Get rid of all guns in the world, gun violence ceases, but non-gun violence skyrockets.

Because people are very creative in how to kill one another....
Well, when people become creative enough to kill a large amount of people effectively with a knife or other close range weapon, I think we will have evolved past the need for firearms in general at that point.

But anyway, contextual point made.

Also like, we'd have to question psychological health and what those people did to trigger that response, since killing someone with bludgeoning or stabbing is more of a thing with extreme feelings. Normal people wont exactly stab someone unless they have a "good" reason to. Its more emotionally separated when one uses a weapon at range to mow down people.

Edit: I CLAIM THIS PAGE IN THE NAME OF OUR FURTHER EVOLVED SPEED STABBING OVERLORDS!!!!
Offline
Posts: 42696
By Jetackuu 2015-06-21 16:22:23  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Or do you think mass shootings are just fine and you don't care?
Or some find that it's the price one pays to have the freedom that they'd rather die for than to let go.

I wish these nut bags would start using explosions more, then we could stop having this stupid discussion.
Offline
Posts: 3206
By Enuyasha 2015-06-21 16:25:56  
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Or do you think mass shootings are just fine and you don't care?
Or some find that it's the price one pays to have the freedom that they'd rather die for than to let go.

I wish these nut bags would start using explosions more, then we could stop having this stupid discussion.
The obvious answer here would be to make mental health care more accessible and equip people with the necessary tools to handle themselves without violence. But yea, dont take muh guns bro, i need them to defend myself against the other psychopaths with guns.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42696
By Jetackuu 2015-06-21 16:27:59  
Enuyasha said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Or do you think mass shootings are just fine and you don't care?
Or some find that it's the price one pays to have the freedom that they'd rather die for than to let go.

I wish these nut bags would start using explosions more, then we could stop having this stupid discussion.
The obvious answer here would be to make mental health care more accessible and equip people with the necessary tools to handle themselves without violence. But yea, dont take muh guns bro, i need them to defend myself against the other psychopaths with guns.

Did you just assert that every gun owner is a psychopath? (rhetorical).

I suggested the bold awhile ago, well alluded it, didn't state it outright.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 16:32:50  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Get rid of all guns in the world, gun violence ceases, but non-gun violence skyrockets.

Because people are very creative in how to kill one another....

Other types do sometimes go up, but not remotely as much as to fill the void. Total violent crime is lower in virtually all countries that don't guarantee the right to own guns.

Besides, you are almost as likely to have your home invaded by the police as an armed criminal. The same goes for being a victim of a mass shooting vs being shot by police. Unless you're an affluent white person of course.
Offline
Posts: 3206
By Enuyasha 2015-06-21 16:35:14  
Jetackuu said: »
Enuyasha said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Or do you think mass shootings are just fine and you don't care?
Or some find that it's the price one pays to have the freedom that they'd rather die for than to let go.

I wish these nut bags would start using explosions more, then we could stop having this stupid discussion.
The obvious answer here would be to make mental health care more accessible and equip people with the necessary tools to handle themselves without violence. But yea, dont take muh guns bro, i need them to defend myself against the other psychopaths with guns.

Did you just assert that every gun owner is a psychopath? (rhetorical).

I suggested the bold awhile ago, well alluded it, didn't state it outright.
You can take it that way, if you want to jump to that conclusion when the context is "Nutbags using guns instead of explosives"

But really, if we want to like, make The Second Amendment relevant again: Its purpose is to arm people and train them so they can be used effectively in a local militia to check the military. So like, instead of forcing people to mandatory agree to be drafted at 18 lets make it mandatory voluntary to register with your local militia instead. You know, if we could actually form militias...because the Supreme Court was like "No, thats not what that says".

The idea that just anyone can own guns for their own purposes is what leads us to this whole debacle, because not everyones own agenda is to hunt, defend, or use for sport. Some people like, you know, kill people with guns because they want to kill people.
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 19:36:20  
Enuyasha said: »
But really, if we want to like, make The Second Amendment relevant again: Its purpose is to arm people and train them so they can be used effectively in a local militia to check the military. So like, instead of forcing people to mandatory agree to be drafted at 18 lets make it mandatory voluntary to register with your local militia instead.

How do you get that out of this?

Quote:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Enuyasha said: »
You know, if we could actually form militias...because the Supreme Court was like "No, thats not what that says".

How are so many people in the militia then? You know since you say they don't exist?

Enuyasha said: »
The idea that just anyone can own guns for their own purposes is what leads us to this whole debacle, because not everyones own agenda is to hunt, defend, or use for sport.

Exactly what part of Shall not be Infringed do you not understand?
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 20:08:55  
The constitution has been amended 33 times. The point of the amendment process is to make it a living document, able to change with the times. We've added and repealed amendments. We've even passed laws and amendments to limit some of the original ten. The supreme court decision that affirmed the second amendment in the sense of private citizens being able to own guns outside the purpose of securing the state noted the original purpose. Some people would call you a hypocrite for saying the supreme court doesn't have the power to interpret the constitution but cling to one of those interpretations. The fact is that the 2nd amendment is already infringed by background checks and felony exclusions and you propose further infringing it by excluding people with mental illnesses.

You care about civil liberties when they're yours. Why are all the other amendments subject to change? What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process? Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?
Offline
Posts: 42696
By Jetackuu 2015-06-21 20:15:50  
It's the only one that says "shall not be infringed." But quite frankly as far as I'm concerned all attempts to infringe on rights should be met with the same resistance.

1st amendment violations through the 10th. It's also why I find that those that signed the patriot act are traitors, but hey.
[+]
 Bahamut.Omael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Omael
Posts: 400
By Bahamut.Omael 2015-06-21 20:18:08  
Odin.Jassik said: »
You care about civil liberties when they're yours. Why are all the other amendments subject to change? What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process? Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?

According to the FW:FW:FW:FW:FW: emails I keep getting from my family, if something happens to the 2nd amendment we'll all be retroactively gay married under Socialist-Sharia law.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42696
By Jetackuu 2015-06-21 20:18:55  
Bahamut.Omael said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
You care about civil liberties when they're yours. Why are all the other amendments subject to change? What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process? Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?

According to the FW:FW:FW:FW:FW: emails I keep getting from my family, if something happens to the 2nd amendment we'll all be retroactively gay married under Socialist-Sharia law.
*** it, let's repeal that ***then!
 Bahamut.Omael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Omael
Posts: 400
By Bahamut.Omael 2015-06-21 20:21:35  
Jetackuu said: »
Bahamut.Omael said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
You care about civil liberties when they're yours. Why are all the other amendments subject to change? What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process? Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?

According to the FW:FW:FW:FW:FW: emails I keep getting from my family, if something happens to the 2nd amendment we'll all be retroactively gay married under Socialist-Sharia law.
*** it, let's repeal that ***then!

I'll get the cakes.

[+]
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-06-21 20:30:22  
Enuyasha said: »
Well, when people become creative enough to kill a large amount of people effectively with a knife or other close range weapon, I think we will have evolved past the need for firearms in general at that point.
Kaczynski says hi.

And I'm sure that every single person who purposefully and maliciously kills people "creatively" without the use of firearms would also say hi too.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Other types do sometimes go up, but not remotely as much as to fill the void. Total violent crime is lower in virtually all countries that don't guarantee the right to own guns.


And I'm certain a study has been produced by now on this...

Odin.Jassik said: »
Besides, you are almost as likely to have your home invaded by the police as an armed criminal.


/incoming "I'm not doing your research for you" excuse.

Odin.Jassik said: »
The same goes for being a victim of a mass shooting vs being shot by police.
I'll give you that one.

But you are much much much more likely to be shot by a thug and/or criminal than by being a victim in a mass shooting and being shot by police together.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Unless you're an affluent white person of course.
[+]
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 20:35:53  
Odin.Jassik said: »
The constitution has been amended 33 times. The point of the amendment process is to make it a living document, able to change with the times. We've added and repealed amendments. We've even passed laws and amendments to limit some of the original ten.

Why even mention this? Congress is so divided nowadays nothing, especially the 2nd amendment would ever go through this process now. Nobody even said anything was wrong with the amendment process anyways. More deflection?

Odin.Jassik said: »
The supreme court decision that affirmed the second amendment in the sense of private citizens being able to own guns outside the purpose of securing the state noted the original purpose.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Some people would call you a hypocrite for saying the supreme court doesn't have the power to interpret the constitution but cling to one of those interpretations.
Those people would be lying since I've never said that... Ever..


Odin.Jassik said: »
The fact is that the 2nd amendment is already infringed by background checks and felony exclusions and you propose further infringing it by excluding people with mental illnesses.
That is called compromise. Something any rational person should never be against. Also, something anti-gun, anti-rights people take for granted.

Odin.Jassik said: »
You care about civil liberties when they're yours.
Assumptions and lies.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Why are all the other amendments subject to change?
Because that is the way our Founding Fathers made it.

Odin.Jassik said: »
What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process?
The 2nd protects the 1st.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?
It's not, as stated above. It is just harder to change sense "Thank God" More rational minded people believe it is needed.
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 20:51:46  
Just for fun. Let us say that the 2nd amendment somehow gets repealed tomorrow. Wanna take a guess on what would happen?

"Inb4: Nothing." That's just lazy.
 Siren.Fattynoob
Offline
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: Dreamasky
Posts: 88
By Siren.Fattynoob 2015-06-21 20:56:31  
tldr: don't keep a fire extinguisher in your home if you aren't expecting a fire. safety precautions are stupid.
 Caitsith.Zahrah
Offline
サーバ: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
user: zahrah
By Caitsith.Zahrah 2015-06-21 20:57:26  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »

Kind of like baiting an argument over gender in a Father's Day thread, huh? Shameless.
[+]
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 21:07:25  
Jetackuu said: »
It's the only one that says "shall not be infringed." But quite frankly as far as I'm concerned all attempts to infringe on rights should be met with the same resistance.

1st amendment violations through the 10th. It's also why I find that those that signed the patriot act are traitors, but hey.

Actually, several amendments have near identical language, including the word infringed. But whatever.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 21:14:10  
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
The constitution has been amended 33 times. The point of the amendment process is to make it a living document, able to change with the times. We've added and repealed amendments. We've even passed laws and amendments to limit some of the original ten.

Why even mention this? Congress is so divided nowadays nothing, especially the 2nd amendment would ever go through this process now. Nobody even said anything was wrong with the amendment process anyways. More deflection?

Odin.Jassik said: »
The supreme court decision that affirmed the second amendment in the sense of private citizens being able to own guns outside the purpose of securing the state noted the original purpose.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Some people would call you a hypocrite for saying the supreme court doesn't have the power to interpret the constitution but cling to one of those interpretations.
Those people would be lying since I've never said that... Ever..


Odin.Jassik said: »
The fact is that the 2nd amendment is already infringed by background checks and felony exclusions and you propose further infringing it by excluding people with mental illnesses.
That is called compromise. Something any rational person should never be against. Also, something anti-gun, anti-rights people take for granted.

Odin.Jassik said: »
You care about civil liberties when they're yours.
Assumptions and lies.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Why are all the other amendments subject to change?
Because that is the way our Founding Fathers made it.

Odin.Jassik said: »
What makes owning a gun more important than free speech or due process?
The 2nd protects the 1st.

Odin.Jassik said: »
Why is the 2nd amendment the only one that's off limits to rational thought?
It's not, as stated above. It is just harder to change sense "Thank God" More rational minded people believe it is needed.

My reply was to jet, not you.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-06-21 21:16:26  
I was going to read but that always gets me into trouble !
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 21:42:10  
Odin.Jassik said: »
My reply was to jet, not you.

Obviously.
[+]
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 22:00:29  
It wasn't obvious... Obviously! ^_^
Offline
Posts: 42696
By Jetackuu 2015-06-21 22:09:50  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
It's the only one that says "shall not be infringed." But quite frankly as far as I'm concerned all attempts to infringe on rights should be met with the same resistance.

1st amendment violations through the 10th. It's also why I find that those that signed the patriot act are traitors, but hey.

Actually, several amendments have near identical language, including the word infringed. But whatever.
No, they don't. But whatever.
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-21 23:06:42  
I was going to say something about that but it seems I'm not allowed to comment if the post isn't directed at me.

I Shall not be Ignored.

They really liked Shall not be and just Shall. But only used Infringed once.

One would think someone who posts crap like this.
Odin.Jassik said: »
You're the last person who gets to question others' knowledge.
Would be a little more knowledgeable about important subjects such as this.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-21 23:51:35  
My apologies. Denied or abridged is used about a half a dozen times in the same manner and has the same meaning in legal context. Please continue to defend the right to bear arms based on the same logic you decry in virtually every other situation.

I just find it funny that you justify infringement when it doesn't affect you, but even the assertion that mass shootings don't take place with near the frequency anywhere else in the world gets you all up in arms about the 2nd amendment.

Asura.Kingnobody said: »


The statistic are easily found. In 2014 there were about 16,000 reported home invasions including burglary and assaults. There were almost 20,000 no-knock warrants served in the same year. I said almost as likely, it appears you're more likely.
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-22 01:09:59  
Odin.Jassik said: »
based on the same logic you decry in virtually every other situation.
Please name one.

Odin.Jassik said: »
I just find it funny that you justify infringement when it doesn't affect you
What are you going on about now?

"I sense you being a huge hypocrite incoming."
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-06-22 01:21:55  
Cerberus.Laconic said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
based on the same logic you decry in virtually every other situation.
Please name one.

Odin.Jassik said: »
I just find it funny that you justify infringement when it doesn't affect you
What are you going on about now?

"I sense you being a huge hypocrite incoming."

Still not talking to you, bud... Obviously
[+]
 Cerberus.Laconic
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 235
By Cerberus.Laconic 2015-06-22 01:35:38  
Ahh. Well then.. His thought patterns about this topic surprise me as well. Very how do you say.. hypocritical.
But in a good way, I guess.. He is confusing to say the least.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-22 01:57:39  
Back on topic, I'm still not seeing that mental health issue applying to the case in SC. I mean yeah he was a loner in his later years (had friends growing up so not a mental disorder), and was taking medication for heroin addiction, but no SSRI (or Prozac) link. Meaning worse case scenario he was perhaps a little depressed or lonely, did some recreational drugs, then got caught with the latest incarnation of methadone for his addiction. Really all you can accuse him of is being a hater of blacks, but even that only occurred within the past 1.5-2 years.

Unless his mental diagnosis has been released...?

I'm not seeing how a background check would have stopped him as for all intensive purposes he would have passed.
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-06-22 02:02:45  
So like what's the cut off point? If you have less than 3 friends and do not engage with them socially for at least 5 hours a week, you can't get a gun?

Smoke pot, but did cocaine, so no gun?

What drugs are you allowed to get caught with and with ones are you not allowed to get caught with to be denied a gun?

Should police be checking your Instagram and Facebook pages to determine if you get a gun?
[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 685 686 687 ... 1375 1376 1377
Log in to post.