Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
fonewear said: » I do have a sudden urge to play FF VIII now though. Harry Potter is the Anti-Christ, and Islam tells you to marry your one true love/soul mate . I skimmed through the videos hoping he'd at least provide an entertaining conspiracy theory..nope. Just random rambling about elements you find in pretty much every JRPG (FF8 is actually pretty subtle about its take on God/organized religion). He actually shows himself in part 3, second minute I believe. In case someone wanted to know what he looks like, lol. I'll have to check that out, right now I'm on part 4/9 of his 'How the Illuminati Made Obama Present.'
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » I'll have to check that out, right now I'm on part 4/9 of his 'How the Illuminati Made Obama Present.' Like, gift wrap or timeline? Gift wrapped of course.
After watching that video I think I've come to the conclusion that I need to take a break from youtube, it's filled with too many morons.
Jetackuu said: » After watching that video I think I've come to the conclusion that I need to take a break from youtube, it's filled with too many morons. You didn't see the "Truth and Justice" thread, didn't you? YouTube is better than reality TV any day.
I know better than to click on videos with Alex Jones.
Here's a good video.
YouTube Video Placeholder Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Here's a good video. YouTube Video Placeholder Jetackuu said: » I've been watching a lot of videos like this (well not in the race comparison part) lately, this one was rather interesting. In other news: Quote: She learned at the feet of a master. Shakedown artist Al Sharpton’s eldest child wants $5 million from city taxpayers after she fell in the street and sprained her ankle, court records show. Dominique Sharpton, 28, says she was “severely injured, bruised and wounded” when she stumbled over uneven pavement at the corner of Broome Street and Broadway downtown last year, according to a lawsuit. Currently on vacation in Bali, the membership director for her gadfly dad’s National Action Network claims she “still suffers and will continue to suffer for some time physical pain and bodily injuries,” according to the suit filed against the city departments of Transportation and Environmental Protection. “I sprained my ankle real bad lol,” she wrote in a post to Instagram after the Oct. 2 fall. She was pictured in a walking boot in the weeks following the tumble, but by December, Dominique was good to go for NAN’s Justice for All march in Washington, DC, and for a New Year’s Eve jaunt to Miami Beach. And despite claiming “permanent physical pain” in a breathless notice of claim in December, at around the same time there were social-media shots of her in high heels and fancy dresses and climbing a ladder to decorate a Christmas tree. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Let's see 'em. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Jetackuu said: » I've been watching a lot of videos like this (well not in the race comparison part) lately, this one was rather interesting. In other news: Quote: She learned at the feet of a master. Shakedown artist Al Sharpton’s eldest child wants $5 million from city taxpayers after she fell in the street and sprained her ankle, court records show. Dominique Sharpton, 28, says she was “severely injured, bruised and wounded” when she stumbled over uneven pavement at the corner of Broome Street and Broadway downtown last year, according to a lawsuit. Currently on vacation in Bali, the membership director for her gadfly dad’s National Action Network claims she “still suffers and will continue to suffer for some time physical pain and bodily injuries,” according to the suit filed against the city departments of Transportation and Environmental Protection. “I sprained my ankle real bad lol,” she wrote in a post to Instagram after the Oct. 2 fall. She was pictured in a walking boot in the weeks following the tumble, but by December, Dominique was good to go for NAN’s Justice for All march in Washington, DC, and for a New Year’s Eve jaunt to Miami Beach. And despite claiming “permanent physical pain” in a breathless notice of claim in December, at around the same time there were social-media shots of her in high heels and fancy dresses and climbing a ladder to decorate a Christmas tree. The question isn't whether or not you could hold the city liable and sue. The question is whether or not it's ethical to extort millions of dollars in tax money over a minor injury by lying about and/or exaggerating "permanent physical pain". There's a difference between being a legitimate victim and being a con artist.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » The question isn't whether or not you could hold the city liable and sue. The question is whether or not it's ethical to extort millions of dollars in tax money over a minor injury by lying about and/or exaggerating "permanent physical pain". There's a difference between being a legitimate victim and being a con artist. Not even to mention the article is definitely from a biased writer (Aggressive language, references to ones own projected idea of Al Sharpton, use of derivative quoting to characterize the quoted statement). If it wasnt Al Sharptons daughter, im sure it wouldnt get an article written about it (Or maybe its the fact that its Al Sharptons daughter and its a huge sum of money, which will prolly be settled out of court for a lesser sum anyway as all claims of negligence may against a city). Let's see, claiming permanent pain after only two months, climbing ladders and wearing high heels with the supposed ankle injury, and suing for enough money to support your average person for life (and then some) when her father is famously known for being sue-happy. Yeah, I see lots of reasons to defend her.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Let's see, claiming permanent pain after only two months, climbing ladders and wearing high heels with the supposed ankle injury, and suing for enough money to support your average person for life (and then some) when her father is famously known for being sue-happy. Yeah, I see lots of reasons to defend her. If it werent Al Sharptons daughter, it wouldnt be relevant either way, nor have any reason to show up here. Also, specific injuries can be kept from further injury with medical techniques, claiming that she isnt allowed to air her grievances because she wears high heels with an ankle injury is just arguing for the sake of arguing and making a point where there isnt one. Enuyasha said: » If it werent Al Sharptons daughter, it wouldnt be relevant either way, nor have any reason to show up here. Uhh, that could be said about anything that a politician does or says that we discuss in here. A sleazebag's daughter suing for millions over practically nothing is pertinent, because it means we could be seeing Al Sharpton 2.0 here. Also, do you think for a minute that you'd be defending some rich Republican's daughter if she were in the exact same situation? Enuyasha said: » Also, specific injuries can be kept from further injury with medical techniques, claiming that she isnt allowed to air her grievances because she wears high heels with an ankle injury is just arguing for the sake of arguing and making a point where there isnt one. I'd like to ask a personal injury lawyer if those types of things are taken into account when a judge makes his or her decision. I bet you that the wearing of high heels would absolutely be usable as evidence against her case, especially when high heels can increase your risk for ankle sprain. Gee, you'd think that would be a problem for a recent ankle sprain victim. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Enuyasha said: » If it werent Al Sharptons daughter, it wouldnt be relevant either way, nor have any reason to show up here. Uhh, that could be said about anything that a politician does or says that we discuss in here. A sleazebag's daughter suing for millions over practically nothing is pertinent, because it means we could be seeing Al Sharpton 2.0 here. Also, do you think for a minute that you'd be defending some rich Republican's daughter if she were in the exact same situation? Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking?
It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." Jetackuu said: » Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking? It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." ***happens, but if you can prove it was Negligence then...yea? Thats why you pay for flat streets and sidewalks, so you like, dont get injured from uneven surfaces. God bless America!
The only place where you can collect $5 million for being a putz. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » God bless America! The only place where you can collect $5 million for being a putz. Enuyasha said: » Jetackuu said: » Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking? It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." ***happens, but if you can prove it was Negligence then...yea? Thats why you pay for flat streets and sidewalks, so you like, dont get injured from uneven surfaces. Jetackuu said: » Enuyasha said: » Jetackuu said: » Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking? It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." ***happens, but if you can prove it was Negligence then...yea? Thats why you pay for flat streets and sidewalks, so you like, dont get injured from uneven surfaces. The judge needs to throw it out of court, as she's wasting the courts time and taxpayer money.
No, I pay for streets to drive on, and sidewalks to keep people out of the streets, at no point are either guaranteed to not have holes in them, or other defects, it's why I watch where I walk, and where I drive. But as logic is going to escape this argument, wait until either the judge throws it out or the case is heard, as this is fruitless. Enuyasha said: » Jetackuu said: » Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking? It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." ***happens, but if you can prove it was Negligence then...yea? Thats why you pay for flat streets and sidewalks, so you like, dont get injured from uneven surfaces. a business with a machine that has a faulty thermometer that was known to be faulty, but never fixed which resulted in an elderly woman receiving third degree burns (melting her skin off) across her legs and crotch, is not at all the same as normal wear and tear on a road. Enuyasha said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » God bless America! The only place where you can collect $5 million for being a putz. Jetackuu said: » logic Ragnarok.Hevans said: » Enuyasha said: » Jetackuu said: » Am I the only one who doesn't see an issue of negligence when the dumb *** should watch where she's walking? It's like getting upset when a sidewalk is slippery while it's snowing/freezing-rain, it's like "no ***you ***, it's wet." ***happens, but if you can prove it was Negligence then...yea? Thats why you pay for flat streets and sidewalks, so you like, dont get injured from uneven surfaces. a business with a machine that has a faulty thermometer that was known to be faulty, but never fixed which resulted in an elderly woman receiving third degree burns (melting her skin off) across her legs and crotch, is not at all the same as normal wear and tear on a road. It'd still be negligence if the problem existed, it being known about, and then someone gets hurt because the city itself decided that it would forgo repairs. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Enuyasha said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » God bless America! The only place where you can collect $5 million for being a putz. Jetackuu said: » logic Incidentally, theres precedent for "Common Sense type injury" suits that could very well be called up. And then, if she made the injury worse the case would be looked at in that respect, its a normal thing personal injury cases deal with every day. She probably wont win, and then she may be charged with some form of a misdemeanor or a felony (perjury) in the process. So it REALLY doesnt matter lol. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|