Random Politics & Religion #00

>.> man that is riddled with spelling mistakes.

/neurotic tick before Onorgul goes nuts.

All the oil passing through the pipeline should and would be taxed. It would be huge revenue indefinitely.

i say solar panels because the left wing lunatics that want to cut off all fossil furks poste hadte and immediately transition to 100% renewable do not chip in right here, right now buy purchading solar panels or ekectric cars.

So giant hamster wheel then?

What exactly is my incentive to purchase expensive batteries and solar panels?

Alex Jones and Jesse Ventura go head to head on 9/11 attacks, censorship of the internet, invasion of Iraq, Jesse says initial invasion of Iraq was a mistake, hypothetical conversation, if the US was invaded by another country.

So giant hamster wheel then?

Currently I pay dirt cheap prices for natural gas from Gazprom. They have an abundant source. (800 dinara per month ~ $8/month during winter)

What exactly is my incentive to purchase expensive batteries and solar panels?

Giving a damn about the day after tomorrow?

***, there I go alluding to a right-wing philosopher again.

That all of Russia's natural gas deposits aren't depleted? Very unlikely.

Ample supply of gas in reserves? They have got plenty.

Giving a damn about what the day after tomorrow?

That all of Russia's natural gas deposits aren't depleted? Very unlikely.

Ample supply of gas in reserves? They have got plenty.

Price? Can't be beaten.

So exactly what then, CO2?

According to the EIA, natural gas releases the fewest particles of CO2 compared to all other sources.
http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.cfm

Out of curiosity, when do you buy laundry detergent? Do you keep an eye on when it goes on sale and you know you're likely to run out within the month, or are you like most people and frantically scrambling to get a new bottle halfway through loading the washer?

It makes the most sense for you, personally, today, to rely on natural gas. For the species as a whole, less so. Especially because as we seek more sources of natural gas, we run a really nasty risk of unleashing one of the many massive underground deposits of carbon dioxide. Of course, there are risks involved with acquiring and manufacturing the rare earths needed for solar cells. Assuming that tomorrow will be the same as today, though, is a pretty huge gamble to bet on.

I don't feel like doing any looking around, but I'd be curious to know if there are other viable uses for natural gas besides heating your home. I will admit that if I live long enough that we lose flame-based stovetops, I'll cry a small tear as electric coils are just not the same.

Out of curiosity, when do you buy laundry detergent? Do you keep an eye on when it goes on sale and you know you're likely to run out within the month, or are you like most people and frantically scrambling to get a new bottle halfway through loading the washer?

It makes the most sense for you, personally, today, to rely on natural gas. For the species as a whole, less so. Especially because as we seek more sources of natural gas, we run a really nasty risk of unleashing one of the many massive underground deposits of carbon dioxide. Of course, there are risks involved with acquiring and manufacturing the rare earths needed for solar cells. Assuming that tomorrow will be the same as today, though, is a pretty huge gamble to bet on.

I don't feel like doing any looking around, but I'd be curious to know if there are other viable uses for natural gas besides heating your home. I will admit that if I live long enough that we lose flame-based stovetops, I'll cry a small tear as electric coils are just not the same.

You can put up your solar panels if it makes you feel good. The amount of time it would take to save you in energy cost you may live long enough to see. Maybe.

ample supply

Oh, good, I was afraid you'd actually get the point of what I was saying. Thanks for meeting my expectations.

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore (R) wants to reform the rules of end-of-life medical care so that more cancer patients can simply flush out their disease using baking soda.

Fiore, who is also CEO of a healthcare company, told listeners to her weekly radio show on Saturday, that she will soon introduce a “terminally ill bill,” to allow more non-FDA-approved treatments for those diagnosed as having terminal illnesses.

As first reported by Jon Ralston, Fiore told listeners: “If you have cancer, which I believe is a fungus, and we can put a pic line into your body and we’re flushing, let’s say, salt water, sodium cardonate [sic], through that line, and flushing out the fungus… These are some procedures that are not FDA-approved in America that are very inexpensive, cost-effective.” The American Cancer Society warns that while cancer patients whose immune systems are weakened by high doses of chemotherapy can sometimes contract fungal infections, “there is no evidence that antifungal treatment causes the patients’ tumors to shrink.” Cancer Research UK dismisses the claim that sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) can cure cancer as a debunked “persistent cancer myth.”

Fiore added that Nevada is already “the capital of entertainment” and this bill could help “make it the medical capital of the world as well.”

Weeks after being removed from her position as Republican Majority Leader over allegations of more than $1 million in tax liens, Fiore made news last Wednesday for her assertion that “young, hot little girls on campus” need to be armed with guns to prevent themselves from being raped, saying that every citizen should “have the right to defend him or herself from sexual assault.”

In 2012, she proposed arming school officials and college students as a way of combating school shootings.

Although Fiore’s views on cancer are particularly fringe, the bill she is backing is gaining traction in a number of states. At least five states have now passed similar legislation that allows patients to use drugs not cleared by the FDA, dubbed so-called “right to try” bills. The campaign to pass these bills has been led by the libertarian Goldwater Institute.