Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Siren.Lordgrim said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Siren.Lordgrim said: » I bet if america was still in the year 1776 KN would be a loyalist to the British empire. it is just a hunch the way he opposes freedom. yeah i do, you won't fly your own nations flag. its in one of these sites forums you mentioned. Remember, when we had this argument, I made this very case Historical does back it up, and what school of economy are you referencing the one that backs central banking practice and Monopolies? Which business scholars as well ? the ones that loved the Rockefeller and j.p Morgans ? because they did not like competition no they wanted it all. thats not fair for a free market is it ?
[+]
Soooooooo.. How about that state of the union last night?
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Soooooooo.. How about that state of the union last night? Yeah but that thread is lame and reeks of a biased title.
[+]
Siren.Lordgrim said: » Historical does back it up Siren.Lordgrim said: » what school of economy are you referencing the one that backs central banking practice and Monopolies? But what monopolies are you referring to? Care you elaborate on that? Siren.Lordgrim said: » the ones that loved the Rockefeller and j.p Morgans ? because they did not like competition no they wanted it all. thats not fair for a free market is it ? I ask these questions because I question your idea of historical facts. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Soooooooo.. How about that state of the union last night? It was just like most other state of the union addresses I guess?
[+]
Nah he clowned on his political opponents and the rebuttal was a disgrace. It was good stuff you don't get that very often these days.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Nah he clowned on his political opponents and the rebuttal was a disgrace. It was good stuff you don't get that very often these days. Weren't you just complaining about something reeking of bias? I think it might have been you.
[+]
Not often does somebody forget what they just posted....
Rockefeller is the founder of Standard Oil. Was running Standard Oil when the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was passed. Standard Oils aggressive actions of buying out companies and creating monopolies is the heart of the creation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. JP Morgans Steel manufacturing monopoly was also busted by Sherman.
To question someone's assertion about Rockefeller and JP Morgan with respect to monopolies, goes to show the lack of knowledge one has on historical facts. Especially when it pertains to American business and economic policies.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Nah he clowned on his political opponents and the rebuttal was a disgrace. It was good stuff you don't get that very often these days. Weren't you just complaining about something reeking of bias? I think it might have been you. Oh snaps but the truth is he took jabs and the freshman Senator from Iowa's rebuttal was stale and regurgitated talking points that have been proven inaccurate. Just a fact. As a Republican it was disappointing. She didn't even attempt to rebuff any of the points made in the SoTU. Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » stale and regurgitated talking points that have been proven inaccurate. So, just like pretty much everything that comes out of Obama's teleprompter.
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Rockefeller is the founder of Standard Oil. Was running Standard Oil when the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was passed. Standard Oils aggressive actions of buying out companies and creating monopolies is the heart of the creation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. JP Morgans Steel manufacturing monopoly was also busted by Sherman. To question someone's assertion about Rockefeller and JP Morgan with respect to monopolies, goes to show the lack of knowledge one has on historical facts. Especially when it pertains to American business and economic policies. Asura.Kingnobody said: » I ask these questions because I question your idea of historical facts. If someone makes an assertion that is in line with historical facts their understanding was demonstrated and does not need to be questioned.
To demand them to tell you comes off as either you truly don't know or are just being a ***.
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » If someone makes an assertion that is in line with historical facts their understanding was demonstrated and does not need to be questioned. That entire thread is based on fallacies and misconceptions that is easily proven wrong. Those who have proven him wrong were topicbanned from that thread to prevent further truths from arising from that "Truth" thread. Those posts were also deleted to prevent the facts from contradicting those so-called "Truths" I know you have this insatiable need to attack me, but do you have to do it while defending Lordgrim? I mean come on, you can do better than that. Points can be mutually exclusive. A person can be wrong on one topic but be 100% accurate on an other.
Now we all know you have an insatiable need to play the victim when called out on your antics. You also have an insatiable need to disrespect people and take jabs every chance you get. Its amazing when you do both in the same post.
[+]
joni earst is the whitest woman I have ever seen.
[+]
Siren.Mosin said: » joni earst is the whitest woman I have ever seen. She was like a stepford wife incarnate. They really could have picked a better person to respond with but I guess after Cruz screwed the pooch the RNC brass didn't want any front runners to potentially gaff them self out of pole position so close to 2016.
[+]
I enjoyed Rubio, all awkward & cotton-mouthed. lol. who ever is making the decisions for their camp needs a swift kick in the nuts. you'd think after Obama winning x2 they'd start to realize it's all a high school popularity contest anymore, & just find a good looking used car salesman with some charm & no soul. how *** hard can it be? I could find you 2-3 just around town here, I'm sure.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Points can be mutually exclusive. A person can be wrong on one topic but be 100% accurate on an other. Now we all know you have an insatiable need to play the victim when called out on your antics. You also have an insatiable need to disrespect people and take jabs every chance you get. Its amazing when you do both in the same post. So I guess hydras are your go-to retort after you've lose an argument. Why hydras, btw? Also, are you talking about ffxi-style hydras and greek hydras or some other type?
[+]
Siren.Mosin said: » I enjoyed Rubio, all awkward & cotton-mouthed. lol. who ever is making the decisions for their camp needs a swift kick in the nuts. you'd think after Obama winning x2 they'd start to realize it's all a high school popularity contest anymore, & just find a good looking used car salesman with some charm & no soul. how *** hard can it be? I could find you 2-3 just around town here, I'm sure. Seriously, that's the vibe he gave off to me when I first saw him. I mean look at the other guys they picked though, it was a no-win scenario. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Lakshmi.Zerowone said: » Points can be mutually exclusive. A person can be wrong on one topic but be 100% accurate on an other. Now we all know you have an insatiable need to play the victim when called out on your antics. You also have an insatiable need to disrespect people and take jabs every chance you get. Its amazing when you do both in the same post. As opposed to thinking the slaves could have just run away? On a scale of 1 to delusional, I'd put you and lordgrim on about the same rung.
[+]
Honestly..it never crossed my mind backreading that thread that he mentioned the monster when he said hydra. You just failed to grasp it.
Now whether these hydra corps nazi he spoke about were real or he confused reality with Vana'diel, I don't know, but still it was quite obvious he wasn't talking of the dragon.
[+]
Bismarck.Ihina said: » So I guess hydras are your go-to retort after you've lose an argument. Why hydras, btw? Also, are you talking about ffxi-style hydras and greek hydras or some other type? It's in relation to a post made about a military operation in WWII, and a lot of poor communication.
[+]
No, he actually said that hydra (referring to the Captain America series) is historically real
Siren.Lordgrim said: » I laughed when you showed that picture of Captain America. Hydra is historically real we had American families and corporations deal with Nazi Germany before during and even after the war. When we have granted safe harbor to those snakes within our own country. Don't believe me ? Look it up there is facts and sources. I guess we can say Hollywood did not lie all the time just a half truth lol. Yes he said that, and he wasn't talking about the monster hydra, but of nazi operations ffs!
edit: even in Captain America it's about terrorists: click
[+]
Jetackuu said: » Pretty sure they tried that with Romney, it didn't work. Seriously, that's the vibe he gave off to me when I first saw him. I mean look at the other guys they picked though, it was a no-win scenario. I don't think the words 'Romney' & 'Charm' have ever been used in a sentence together before this one.... that's an important cog in the gear. Siren.Mosin said: » Jetackuu said: » Pretty sure they tried that with Romney, it didn't work. Seriously, that's the vibe he gave off to me when I first saw him. I mean look at the other guys they picked though, it was a no-win scenario. I don't think the words 'Romney' & 'Charm' have ever been used in a sentence together before this one.... that's an important cog in the gear.  :P |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||
