Firearms manufactures are protected by statute from such suits. By the simple fact that the NRA and firearms manufactures lobbied for that protection and got it I assume that this suit is not without merit.
But yes, it is a political move as well.
Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
fonewear said: » The chance of this lawsuit winning is ridiculously low. So it is a political move not an actual lawsuit. Firearms manufactures are protected by statute from such suits. By the simple fact that the NRA and firearms manufactures lobbied for that protection and got it I assume that this suit is not without merit. But yes, it is a political move as well. Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » The chance of this lawsuit winning is ridiculously low. So it is a political move not an actual lawsuit. Chances of the lawsuit winning may be slim. Chances of it enacting some sort of legislation regarding the sale of massive ammounts of ammunition or military/police-grade equipment to unqualified individuals, however, may be higher. Edit: And hey. If "lawsuits as political moves" are bad, then everyone voting Republican better be ready to oust their incumbents in the primaries. it's going to be a tough fight. the NRA has had it up to their hairline with progressive liberal incrementalism Shiva.Nikolce said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » The chance of this lawsuit winning is ridiculously low. So it is a political move not an actual lawsuit. Chances of the lawsuit winning may be slim. Chances of it enacting some sort of legislation regarding the sale of massive ammounts of ammunition or military/police-grade equipment to unqualified individuals, however, may be higher. Edit: And hey. If "lawsuits as political moves" are bad, then everyone voting Republican better be ready to oust their incumbents in the primaries. it's going to be a tough fight. the NRA has had it up to their hairline with progressive liberal incrementalism Yeah. But I've had it up to the hairline with the NRA. And I'm a former member and someone who still firmly believes in exercising the rights granted by the second amendment. So the anti-gun people must be flipping their ***these days. Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » I'm a former member. that's ok, I'll go sign up to balance the universe back out... >.> Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » How dare you sell ammo. Everyone knows that gun owners are "crazed homicidal killers..." Quote: 4,000 rounds of ammunition 4,000 rounds to a private buyer is pretty excessive. Not when you consider the armies of zombies marching down on you in the upcoming zombie apocalypse. I'm a terrible shot, it's the damn stick sensitivity... Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » How dare you sell ammo. Everyone knows that gun owners are "crazed homicidal killers..." Quote: 4,000 rounds of ammunition 4,000 rounds to a private buyer is pretty excessive. Not when you consider the armies of zombies marching down on you in the upcoming zombie apocalypse. I'm a terrible shot, it's the damn stick sensitivity... The fact that there are people in the world who actually fear for a zombie apocalypse...ugh. Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » How dare you sell ammo. Everyone knows that gun owners are "crazed homicidal killers..." Quote: 4,000 rounds of ammunition 4,000 rounds to a private buyer is pretty excessive. Not when you consider the armies of zombies marching down on you in the upcoming zombie apocalypse. I'm a terrible shot, it's the damn stick sensitivity... The fact that there are people in the world who actually fear for a zombie apocalypse...ugh. Ever see the movie "Contagion"? Mrs Paltrow's finest. Would it even take ebola becoming airborne to break society down? Thanks to basic biology a zombie outbreak -- even if it were remotely possible -- would not be sustainable. Everyone lock yourself in your homes and wait for rigor mortis to kick it.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Would it even take ebola becoming airborne to break society down? no, it takes less than three days without basic services (electric, gas, water etc.) for a major city to collapse in on itself. nawlins after katrina is a good/recent example Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » How dare you sell ammo. Everyone knows that gun owners are "crazed homicidal killers..." Quote: 4,000 rounds of ammunition 4,000 rounds to a private buyer is pretty excessive. Not when you consider the armies of zombies marching down on you in the upcoming zombie apocalypse. I'm a terrible shot, it's the damn stick sensitivity... The fact that there are people in the world who actually fear for a zombie apocalypse...ugh. Ever see the movie "Contagion"? Mrs Paltrow's finest. Would it even take ebola becoming airborne to break society down? Also, Contagion was a HORRIBLE movie. Outbreak was better. Both awful. The Psych episode "Death Is in the Air" is way better than both.
Clearly, you don't appreciate the fact Death is in the Air was partly based on Outbreak, which has one of the best performances by Dustin Hoffman (aside from Rainman), and Morgan Freeman.
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Clearly, you don't appreciate the fact Death is in the Air was partly based on Outbreak, which has one of the best performances by Dustin Hoffman (aside from Rainman), and Morgan Freeman. Clearly you don't appreciate that I am well aware that's how Psych works on many, many episodes. Also, you clearly forget that I work in hyperbole the way Rembrant worked in oils. Also that I think Dustin Hoffman is overrated. Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » You do realize that shooting a person affected by an airborne disease, that the disease would become further airborne through aerosolization of the target's blood,. (I can't see a flame thrower without posting this. I just can't.) Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » How dare you sell ammo. Everyone knows that gun owners are "crazed homicidal killers..." Quote: 4,000 rounds of ammunition 4,000 rounds to a private buyer is pretty excessive. Not when you consider the armies of zombies marching down on you in the upcoming zombie apocalypse. I'm a terrible shot, it's the damn stick sensitivity... The fact that there are people in the world who actually fear for a zombie apocalypse...ugh. Ever see the movie "Contagion"? Mrs Paltrow's finest. Would it even take ebola becoming airborne to break society down? Also, Contagion was a HORRIBLE movie. Outbreak was better. Contagion is Paltrow's finest cause she dies almost immediately <rimshot>! just throw one of your earthquake causing grenades at it nausi
Offline
Posts: 35422
I just assumed he needed 4000 rounds cause he was a terrible shot...
When Holmes is stuck in a mental hospital at least he can watch One Flew Over's the Cuckoo's Nest ! Offline
Posts: 35422
Shiva.Nikolce said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Would it even take ebola becoming airborne to break society down? no, it takes less than three days without basic services (electric, gas, water etc.) for a major city to collapse in on itself. nawlins after katrina is a good/recent example Kayne West doesn't care about black people ! Shiva.Nikolce said: » just throw one of your earthquake causing grenades at it nausi Or saddle up a dino and RIDE! In other news, no big surprise here:
Quote: The Federal Reserve signaled Wednesday that it plans to keep a key interest rate at a record low for a considerable period because a broad range of U.S. economic measures remain subpar. The Fed said it intends to keep its benchmark rate near zero as long as inflation remains under control, until it sees consistent gains in wage growth, long-term unemployment and other gauges of the job market. The central bank retained language signaling its plans to keep short-term rates low "for a considerable time" after it ends its monthly bond purchases after its next meeting in October. Found this on FB today. If Mitt Romney was a chola! The lure of North Korea continues.
Quote: One shouted about God's love as he crossed a frozen river, clutching a Bible. Another swam, drunk and naked. Several U.S. soldiers dashed around land mines. Time and again, Americans over the years have slipped illegally into poor, deeply suspicious, fervently anti-American North Korea, even as it has become increasingly easy to enter legally as a tourist. It's incomprehensible to many, especially since tens of thousands of desperate North Koreans have crossed in the opposite direction, at great risk. Sneaking into autocratic, cloistered North Korea has proven a strange and powerful temptation for some Americans. Sometimes the spur is deep religious conviction. Sometimes it's discontent with America and a belief that things will be different in a country that can seem like its polar opposite. Quite often, analysts say, it's mental or personal problems — or simply a case of a person acting upon a very, very bad idea. ... Other defector soldiers had problems in their military units or issues with family at home. One was reportedly lured north by a female North Korean agent. In the decades after the war, some Americans harbored "glamorous notions of North Korea as a socialist paradise," said John Delury, an Asia expert at Yonsei University in Seoul. "But that's just not part of the mix any more. Even in the furthest fringes of American online culture, you don't find that notion." ... North Korea officially guarantees freedom of religion, but outside analysts and defectors describe the country as militantly anti-religious. The distribution of Bibles and secret prayer services can mean imprisonment or execution, defectors have said. Socialist paradise, anti-religious, who wouldn't want to go there? Socialist?
If you (and, in turn, millions of others) think North Korea is actually socialist then no wonder people hate the idea of socialism so much. I mean, they don't understand it. But if they're dumb enough to think that's anything but a dictatorship... Bismarck.Ramyrez said: » Socialist? If you (and, in turn, millions of others) think North Korea is actually socialist then no wonder people hate the idea of socialism so much. I mean, they don't understand it. But if they're dumb enough to think that's anything but a dictatorship... Socialism is an economic model, a dictatorship is a form of government. Socialism: Merriam-Webster Dictionary said: 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods 2a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state 3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done The only difference between communism and a social democracy is the former only has one political party. A dictatorship is merely power condensed into one person. I can't think of any dictatorship that doesn't run a socialist society. Can you? A dictatorship would not work unless the government has full control over the economy. Socialism is required for a dictatorship to work. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » By definition a socialist state is one in which the government owns and controls everything. Everything? Not even close. Socialist states have PUBLIC ownership (you can call it government if you like, it's public owned as well) of certain things: infrastructure, energy, healthcare, social economic programs, and some other basic services. SOME socialist countries have public ownership of more extensive things like housing, but you have to dip pretty deep into communism before you start seeing the state owning even close to "everything". N.Korea is plainly a military dictatorship, fascism if you need an "ism" label for it. A socialist state would be something like Sweden, where people retain private property and can establish discretely private businesses, but where infrastructure and healthcare are public. Even capitalist states have some control over their economies through regulation or price fixing. You can blur the lines if it makes you feel better, but socialism and a fascist dictatorship have less in common than socialism and capitalism. Odin.Jassik said: » A socialist state would be something like Sweden, where people retain private property and can establish discretely private businesses, but where infrastructure and healthcare are public. Even capitalist states have some control over their economies through regulation or price fixing. You can blur the lines if it makes you feel better, but socialism and a fascist dictatorship have less in common than socialism and capitalism. A dictatorship and a fascism regime are synonymous, no need to put the two together. A dictatorship implies fascism and socialism. Not sure why you think two opposing economic models, capitalism and socialism, have more in common than a necessary economic model for a dictatorship to thrive. Socialism doesn't necessarily cause a dictatorship, but you need government control over the entire economy before someone can rise to power and take on a dictatorship or single party government. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Jassik said: » A socialist state would be something like Sweden, where people retain private property and can establish discretely private businesses, but where infrastructure and healthcare are public. Even capitalist states have some control over their economies through regulation or price fixing. You can blur the lines if it makes you feel better, but socialism and a fascist dictatorship have less in common than socialism and capitalism. A dictatorship and a fascism regime are synonymous, no need to put the two together. A dictatorship implies fascism and socialism. Not sure why you think two opposing economic models, capitalism and socialism, have more in common than a necessary economic model for a dictatorship to thrive. Socialism doesn't necessarily cause a dictatorship, but you need government control over the entire economy before someone can rise to power and take on a dictatorship or single party government. Capitalism and socialism are not opposing systems, they're just different systems. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|