Shame on you Nausi fat is offensive term the term is "body positive"
Just like being HIV positive is a good thing right ?
Meanwhile, At The Huffington Post:
Meanwhile, at the Huffington Post:
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you. **
Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
** since you are having reading comprehension issues, this statement was sarcastic
[+]
fonewear said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
fonewear said: »
Not going to like posting this as an excuse to look at "plus sized women"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/05/plussizeappreciation-body-love_n_7212972.html?utm_hp_ref=women&ir=Women
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/05/plussizeappreciation-body-love_n_7212972.html?utm_hp_ref=women&ir=Women
Oh god, can we halt P&R to talk about Dad-bods and fat chicks?
You act like that isn't 99.9% of what Huff Post is !
Perhaps its the same people who are trying to again mainstream high-waisted shorts. If so, (*** gun).
Gimmie my highschool JNCOs!
[+]
16 minutes of "body positive" image you are welcome !
YouTube Video Placeholder
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.
Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
You just need to take a "sensitive training" course Nausi then everything will make sense !
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Still waiting to hear about how Abbott being disabled had anything to do with that earlier conversation KN.
I only brought up his disability to show the common excuse used by liberals when defending against an argument against a specific head of government. Zahrah went further, and even posted an article reporting the disclosed lawsuit we were discussing (but failed to mention who is actually paying it, which was insurance), but regardless, anything I say, you are just going to distort it or nitpick/cherrypick a specific word and run with it as far as you can.
AKA you usual trolling tactics.
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
I even take the time to explain it to you like you ask me to and then all you can tell me is that it too is a dodge or deflection or whatever is running through that head of yours at the time lol
And? Quit flipping the script. You placed it only one the homeowner's when that was blatantly false.
You tried to wiggle your way out of acknowledging that Abbott *** a small business!
Is that business still running? Yup, still is. Is this the right tree trimming company? According to the legal documents given to the Texas Tribune, it is.
Oh hey, looky there, the insurance companies paid. How again is that screwing over a small business?
Oh, a professional negligence is really screwing over a small business in your mind, isn't it? Remember that next time anything were to happen to you that could have been prevented if a company did what it was supposed to do. But according to you, you would never take legal action over professional negligence because that would be screwing over the company, unless it is a larger company of course. Then sue them for everything they own I guess.
And you think neither suffered higher premiums? :/
You've also really got a knack for putting words in people's mouths!
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.
Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
Quote:
Wait, no. That makes about as much sense as your disabled comment. Which is to say, none whatsoever. It looks like you are trying to deflect the topic.
Seriously. Do you skip paragraphs?
Sadly this is probably what it would actually be like:
YouTube Video Placeholder
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Still waiting to hear about how Abbott being disabled had anything to do with that earlier conversation KN.
I only brought up his disability to show the common excuse used by liberals when defending against an argument against a specific head of government. Zahrah went further, and even posted an article reporting the disclosed lawsuit we were discussing (but failed to mention who is actually paying it, which was insurance), but regardless, anything I say, you are just going to distort it or nitpick/cherrypick a specific word and run with it as far as you can.
AKA you usual trolling tactics.
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
I even take the time to explain it to you like you ask me to and then all you can tell me is that it too is a dodge or deflection or whatever is running through that head of yours at the time lol
And? Quit flipping the script. You placed it only one the homeowner's when that was blatantly false.
You tried to wiggle your way out of acknowledging that Abbott *** a small business!
Is that business still running? Yup, still is. Is this the right tree trimming company? According to the legal documents given to the Texas Tribune, it is.
Oh hey, looky there, the insurance companies paid. How again is that screwing over a small business?
Oh, a professional negligence is really screwing over a small business in your mind, isn't it? Remember that next time anything were to happen to you that could have been prevented if a company did what it was supposed to do. But according to you, you would never take legal action over professional negligence because that would be screwing over the company, unless it is a larger company of course. Then sue them for everything they own I guess.
And you think neither suffered higher premiums? :/
You've also really got a knack for putting words in people's mouths!
Unless you are talking about that snip about you suing large companies only that is. Cause, to be honest, going by your stance on this, I would see that happening.
If you guys could go ahead and take the semantics argument to the semantics part of P and R that would be great !
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.
Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
Quote:
Wait, no. That makes about as much sense as your disabled comment. Which is to say, none whatsoever. It looks like you are trying to deflect the topic.
Seriously. Do you skip paragraphs?
Go ahead and skew that.
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
Not only that but this whole conversation started with your comment about me yesterday on an article you posted.
Seriously sounds like
Not only that but this whole conversation started with your comment about me yesterday on an article you posted.
Seriously sounds like
[+]
Look you guys should settle the score. Just say you hate each other and move one !
fonewear said: »
If you guys could go ahead and take the semantics argument to the semantics part of P and R that would be great !
I thought nonsensical arguments would fit right in with HuffPo, in your estimation...
Normally this thread is ***but today it is worse than usual !
We have high standards here in the Huff Post section they are: feminism body image raping etc.
They are not random arguments about butt hurt feels !
We have high standards here in the Huff Post section they are: feminism body image raping etc.
They are not random arguments about butt hurt feels !
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
fonewear said: »
Normally this thread is ***but today it is worse than usual !
Chicken wings and beer make everything better.
[+]
You know it is messed up when I'm trying to moderated a pointless thread !
I'm seriously thinking about making a thread just called Feels.
The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !
The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Better not question her, she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say.
Like Mil and Zah for example.
Like Mil and Zah for example.
Edit: Also, I find it amusing that someone refers to a woman's husband as part of her "gang". What kind of ***husbands do you know that don't stand by their wives?
Edit2: You know what, don't answer that. I'm well aware there are plenty of ***husbands out there (***wives, too).
Linky.
[+]
fonewear said: »
I'm seriously thinking about making a thread just called Feels.
The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !
The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !
No-one will notice page 3, because it'll be at page 9 before anyone realizes.
[+]
The dream of every user is to bring ***from other threads into every thread in every section. Till the ***is so pure and real you can almost smell it !
It's like a recently divorced woman that is trying to date again. The bitterness is strong !
It's like a recently divorced woman that is trying to date again. The bitterness is strong !
Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Better not question her, she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say.
Like Mil and Zah for example.
Like Mil and Zah for example.
Linky.
Quote:
Shiva.Nikolce said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say. Like Mil and Zah for example.
so... Kara has a "whole gang of people" in her employ? that stalk you on a third party hack website for a fourteen year old japanese video game waiting for you to make a clerical error? so they can all simultaneously pounce on you?
maybe they are all just easily offended by stupidity....
Yours was first...
Ugh. You know what, you're in full-on unreasonable mode today. You just want to fight everything. You tell yourself whatever you need to, you're clearly stressed about your new job, or someone badmouthing Texas, or whatever else.
Ugh. You know what, you're in full-on unreasonable mode today. You just want to fight everything. You tell yourself whatever you need to, you're clearly stressed about your new job, or someone badmouthing Texas, or whatever else.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Hey, you wanted to argue about a specific argument I never made, how does it feel when the reverse happens?
Go ahead and skew that.
Go ahead and skew that.
An argument that I guess you believe since you didn't use sarcasm tags.
I was pointing out how nonsensical your argument was. But this seems to be a seriously hard concept for you to grasp even when explicitly stated that the argument made no sense.
[+]
I really want an answer to my dad-bods question.
I would say this argument is pointless but in terms of P and R pointlessness it is mild at worse !
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.