Meanwhile, At The Huffington Post:

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Meanwhile, at the Huffington Post:
Meanwhile, at the Huffington Post:
First Page 2 3 ... 44 45 46 ... 56 57 58
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:30:26  
Shame on you Nausi fat is offensive term the term is "body positive"

Just like being HIV positive is a good thing right ?
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-05-08 13:31:31  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
We are basing this off of all the opinions you've shared here before...
You are projecting an argument just to have one.

Like how Kara is projecting an argument I never made this morning.
What argument was that?
This one, the one you projected your argument on
You mean the one with sarcasm tags and then the paragragh below it saying it made no sense just like your disability argument?

Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you. **

Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg

** since you are having reading comprehension issues, this statement was sarcastic
[+]
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-05-08 13:31:45  
fonewear said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
fonewear said: »

Oh god, can we halt P&R to talk about Dad-bods and fat chicks?

You act like that isn't 99.9% of what Huff Post is !
What's the deal with mainstreaming "dad-bods"? Are people with dad bods doing it you think or is it someone else?

Perhaps its the same people who are trying to again mainstream high-waisted shorts. If so, (*** gun).

Gimmie my highschool JNCOs!
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:34:14  
16 minutes of "body positive" image you are welcome !

YouTube Video Placeholder
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:35:00  
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
We are basing this off of all the opinions you've shared here before...
You are projecting an argument just to have one.

Like how Kara is projecting an argument I never made this morning.
What argument was that?
This one, the one you projected your argument on
You mean the one with sarcasm tags and then the paragragh below it saying it made no sense just like your disability argument that you brought up?

Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.

Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
Wait, you mean the part that wasn't in sarcasm tags was sarcastic too? Sounds like a backpedal excuse to me.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:35:26  
You just need to take a "sensitive training" course Nausi then everything will make sense !
 Caitsith.Zahrah
Offline
サーバ: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
user: zahrah
By Caitsith.Zahrah 2015-05-08 13:36:57  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Still waiting to hear about how Abbott being disabled had anything to do with that earlier conversation KN.
Because no matter what I say, it won't make a difference.

I only brought up his disability to show the common excuse used by liberals when defending against an argument against a specific head of government. Zahrah went further, and even posted an article reporting the disclosed lawsuit we were discussing (but failed to mention who is actually paying it, which was insurance), but regardless, anything I say, you are just going to distort it or nitpick/cherrypick a specific word and run with it as far as you can.

AKA you usual trolling tactics.

Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
I even take the time to explain it to you like you ask me to and then all you can tell me is that it too is a dodge or deflection or whatever is running through that head of yours at the time lol
Sure, whatever you say. Maybe in your mind you think you do, but really, you never answer anything, you just change the subject/resort to your trolling tactics.

And? Quit flipping the script. You placed it only one the homeowner's when that was blatantly false.

You tried to wiggle your way out of acknowledging that Abbott *** a small business!
I saw that his payments were from insurance settlements and assumed that it was homeowners (since it happened on a private residential property). I did not see that he sued the tree trimming company, but guess what, they had insurance to cover it, which did.

Is that business still running? Yup, still is. Is this the right tree trimming company? According to the legal documents given to the Texas Tribune, it is.

Oh hey, looky there, the insurance companies paid. How again is that screwing over a small business?

Oh, a professional negligence is really screwing over a small business in your mind, isn't it? Remember that next time anything were to happen to you that could have been prevented if a company did what it was supposed to do. But according to you, you would never take legal action over professional negligence because that would be screwing over the company, unless it is a larger company of course. Then sue them for everything they own I guess.

And you think neither suffered higher premiums? :/

You've also really got a knack for putting words in people's mouths!
[+]
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-05-08 13:37:39  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
We are basing this off of all the opinions you've shared here before...
You are projecting an argument just to have one.

Like how Kara is projecting an argument I never made this morning.
What argument was that?
This one, the one you projected your argument on
You mean the one with sarcasm tags and then the paragragh below it saying it made no sense just like your disability argument that you brought up?

Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.

Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
Wait, you mean the part that wasn't in sarcasm tags was sarcastic too? Sounds like a backpedal excuse to me.
Which is why this was also stated immediately afterwards.

Quote:
Wait, no. That makes about as much sense as your disabled comment. Which is to say, none whatsoever. It looks like you are trying to deflect the topic.

Seriously. Do you skip paragraphs?
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:37:51  
Sadly this is probably what it would actually be like:

YouTube Video Placeholder
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:39:01  
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Still waiting to hear about how Abbott being disabled had anything to do with that earlier conversation KN.
Because no matter what I say, it won't make a difference.

I only brought up his disability to show the common excuse used by liberals when defending against an argument against a specific head of government. Zahrah went further, and even posted an article reporting the disclosed lawsuit we were discussing (but failed to mention who is actually paying it, which was insurance), but regardless, anything I say, you are just going to distort it or nitpick/cherrypick a specific word and run with it as far as you can.

AKA you usual trolling tactics.

Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
I even take the time to explain it to you like you ask me to and then all you can tell me is that it too is a dodge or deflection or whatever is running through that head of yours at the time lol
Sure, whatever you say. Maybe in your mind you think you do, but really, you never answer anything, you just change the subject/resort to your trolling tactics.

And? Quit flipping the script. You placed it only one the homeowner's when that was blatantly false.

You tried to wiggle your way out of acknowledging that Abbott *** a small business!
I saw that his payments were from insurance settlements and assumed that it was homeowners (since it happened on a private residential property). I did not see that he sued the tree trimming company, but guess what, they had insurance to cover it, which did.

Is that business still running? Yup, still is. Is this the right tree trimming company? According to the legal documents given to the Texas Tribune, it is.

Oh hey, looky there, the insurance companies paid. How again is that screwing over a small business?

Oh, a professional negligence is really screwing over a small business in your mind, isn't it? Remember that next time anything were to happen to you that could have been prevented if a company did what it was supposed to do. But according to you, you would never take legal action over professional negligence because that would be screwing over the company, unless it is a larger company of course. Then sue them for everything they own I guess.

And you think neither suffered higher premiums? :/

You've also really got a knack for putting words in people's mouths!
Putting what in people's mouths?

Unless you are talking about that snip about you suing large companies only that is. Cause, to be honest, going by your stance on this, I would see that happening.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:39:43  
If you guys could go ahead and take the semantics argument to the semantics part of P and R that would be great !
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:40:31  
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
We are basing this off of all the opinions you've shared here before...
You are projecting an argument just to have one.

Like how Kara is projecting an argument I never made this morning.
What argument was that?
This one, the one you projected your argument on
You mean the one with sarcasm tags and then the paragragh below it saying it made no sense just like your disability argument that you brought up?

Yeah, I totally projected that argument on you.

Obligatory readingcomprehension.jpg
Wait, you mean the part that wasn't in sarcasm tags was sarcastic too? Sounds like a backpedal excuse to me.
Which is why this was also stated immediately afterwards.

Quote:
Wait, no. That makes about as much sense as your disabled comment. Which is to say, none whatsoever. It looks like you are trying to deflect the topic.

Seriously. Do you skip paragraphs?
Hey, you wanted to argue about a specific argument I never made, how does it feel when the reverse happens?

Go ahead and skew that.
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-05-08 13:42:22  
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.

Not only that but this whole conversation started with your comment about me yesterday on an article you posted.

Seriously sounds like

[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:43:21  
Look you guys should settle the score. Just say you hate each other and move one !
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2015-05-08 13:44:19  
fonewear said: »
If you guys could go ahead and take the semantics argument to the semantics part of P and R that would be great !

I thought nonsensical arguments would fit right in with HuffPo, in your estimation...
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:44:47  
Normally this thread is ***but today it is worse than usual !

We have high standards here in the Huff Post section they are: feminism body image raping etc.


They are not random arguments about butt hurt feels !
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:45:32  
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
I never made that claim, Nik did. Go *** at him for saying that, not at me.
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2015-05-08 13:46:07  
fonewear said: »
Normally this thread is ***but today it is worse than usual !




Chicken wings and beer make everything better.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:46:29  
You know it is messed up when I'm trying to moderated a pointless thread !
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:47:49  
I'm seriously thinking about making a thread just called Feels.


The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2015-05-08 13:48:15  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
I never made that claim, Nik did. Go *** at him for saying that, not at me.

Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Better not question her, she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say.

Like Mil and Zah for example.

Edit: Also, I find it amusing that someone refers to a woman's husband as part of her "gang". What kind of ***husbands do you know that don't stand by their wives?

Edit2: You know what, don't answer that. I'm well aware there are plenty of ***husbands out there (***wives, too).

Linky.
[+]
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:48:38  
fonewear said: »
And it will turn into a ***fest by the second post !
ftfy
[+]
 Fenrir.Atheryn
Offline
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Temptaru
Posts: 1665
By Fenrir.Atheryn 2015-05-08 13:49:45  
fonewear said: »
I'm seriously thinking about making a thread just called Feels.


The point being discuss your true feels towards every poster you don't like. And it will turn into a ***fest by page 3 !

No-one will notice page 3, because it'll be at page 9 before anyone realizes.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:50:01  
The dream of every user is to bring ***from other threads into every thread in every section. Till the ***is so pure and real you can almost smell it !

It's like a recently divorced woman that is trying to date again. The bitterness is strong !
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-08 13:50:38  
Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bahamut.Kara said: »
Also for someone who claims I and my *gang* stalk you in other threads you are the one pulling my name into other threads.
I never made that claim, Nik did. Go *** at him for saying that, not at me.

Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Better not question her, she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say.

Like Mil and Zah for example.

Linky.
Quote:
Shiva.Nikolce said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
she might snap and get her whole gang of people here to nitpick at every single word you say. Like Mil and Zah for example.

so... Kara has a "whole gang of people" in her employ? that stalk you on a third party hack website for a fourteen year old japanese video game waiting for you to make a clerical error? so they can all simultaneously pounce on you?

maybe they are all just easily offended by stupidity....
Who said what about stalking people and coming from other threads to do so again?
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2015-05-08 13:51:51  
Yours was first...

Ugh. You know what, you're in full-on unreasonable mode today. You just want to fight everything. You tell yourself whatever you need to, you're clearly stressed about your new job, or someone badmouthing Texas, or whatever else.
[+]
 Bahamut.Kara
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Kara
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-05-08 13:51:56  
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Hey, you wanted to argue about a specific argument I never made, how does it feel when the reverse happens?

Go ahead and skew that.
......I did the same thing you did with your disability comment in response to me. Your entire "I must be threatened of the man who really isn't trying to annex Denmark" argument that you projected on me.

An argument that I guess you believe since you didn't use sarcasm tags.

I was pointing out how nonsensical your argument was. But this seems to be a seriously hard concept for you to grasp even when explicitly stated that the argument made no sense.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-05-08 13:53:04  
I really want an answer to my dad-bods question.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:53:11  
I would say this argument is pointless but in terms of P and R pointlessness it is mild at worse !
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-05-08 13:53:25  
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
I really want an answer to my dad-bods question.

I don't even know what a dad bod is ! My guess a way of women criticizing men without looking like *** that they are ?
First Page 2 3 ... 44 45 46 ... 56 57 58
Log in to post.