Mississippi Passes "Right To Discriminate" Bill...
フォーラム » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
Mississippi passes "Right to Discriminate" bill...
Mississippi passes "Right to Discriminate" bill...
Didn't you say the same crap on page 1 nausi, or was that another thread you got wooshed on? I can't keep up with your spam, its a good thing you aren't a business owner. Businesses don't want these laws, so why are they being passed, other than to make neocons look stupid? They don't need any help in that area.
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
I think its already been established that Nausi is a homophobic bigot, any attempt to further reason is just an exercise in posturing. Thrice in this thread alone he's regurgitated the same tired arguments about bestiality, lack of control etc etc.
Peddling assumptions as established facts. That is just sad...
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Peddling assumptions as established facts. That is just sad...
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Pleebo you are welcome to keep posting, k?
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Or at least, one that wasn't made that he doesn't agree with. For example:
Shiva.Gib said: »
Wait wait wait, the South is filled with a bunch of Racist Trailer trash rednecks?!?!
WHODATHUNKIT?
WHODATHUNKIT?
He more than likely won't call that a racist comment.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Go go Civil Rights Act! Bringing society down since 1957.
It's a very racist comment given what the Civil Rights Act of 1957 established.
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Go go Civil Rights Act! Bringing society down since 1957.
It's a very racist comment given what the Civil Rights Act of 1957 established.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Go go Civil Rights Act! Bringing society down since 1957.
It's a very racist comment given what the Civil Rights Act of 1957 established.
Uh yeah, making a comment that a Civil Rights bill enacted to protect peoples right to vote from discrimination based on race, religion, and national origin as the cause of bringing down society is in no way racist...
you're dishonest,racist, and a xenophobe.
[+]
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
By that logic, I should move to Australia and start stabbing people in the throat. It was founded and populated by convicted criminals.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Hey now! We even had a few penal colonies here. No need to travel to upside-down land.
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Beating a dead horse and making racist comments at the same time. Good job AH, good job.
Can you at least quote what you think is a racist comment, or are you just here to make wild accusations?
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Go go Civil Rights Act! Bringing society down since 1957.
It's a very racist comment given what the Civil Rights Act of 1957 established.
Uh yeah, making a comment that a Civil Rights bill enacted to protect peoples right to vote from discrimination based on race, religion, and national origin as the cause of bringing down society is in no way racist...
you're dishonest,racist, and a xenophobe.
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
To lament (as king did) that there are negative consequences involved with the passage of any particular piece of legislation, or that the intentions of such legislation might become perverted or misused, does not conform to any particular definition above.
[+]
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
By that logic, I should move to Australia and start stabbing people in the throat. It was founded and populated by convicted criminals.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Hey now! We even had a few penal colonies here. No need to travel to upside-down land.
Wait, what? Sorry, must go get my head checked.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
You'd sound smarter if you omitted definition #2 especially with respect to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and what it addressed.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
You'd sound smarter if you omitted definition #2 especially with respect to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and what it addressed.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
You'd sound smarter if you omitted definition #2 especially with respect to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and what it addressed.
You're still not comprehending what I'm saying. Where did King advocate for such a policy?
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
You'd sound smarter if you omitted definition #2 especially with respect to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and what it addressed.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA @ your deflection skills due to the fact you're uncomfortable with the label of a racist yet make overtly racist comments.
Ok so if you didnt mean Civil Rights Act 1957? Why did you even mention the year while coupling the phrase Civil Rights Act?
If we play you're game every subsequent Civil Rights Act did the same thing to protect groups from institutionalized racism. So yeah you definitely made a racist comment since those acts all addressed institutionalized racism.
You can't even play it off with intellectual dishonesty.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Pleebo, I know it is hard for you to understand this, but if you aren't going to contribute to the argument, you should probably, you know, not post.
[+]
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
By that logic, I should move to Australia and start stabbing people in the throat. It was founded and populated by convicted criminals.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Damnit, there I go acknowledged a HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE argument by responding to it. Ah well.
Hey now! We even had a few penal colonies here. No need to travel to upside-down land.
Wait, what? Sorry, must go get my head checked.
Well, supposedly, you might run into a man from Brussels. They say he's 6'4" and full of muscles. Not totally sure if he speak-a our language, but he's kind enough to dole out Vegemite sandwiches along with a smile!
These Aussies sound quite hospitable. I'd have second thoughts about it.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Do you even know what racism is?
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
Racism is:
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
You'd sound smarter if you omitted definition #2 especially with respect to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and what it addressed.
You're still not comprehending what I'm saying. Where did King advocate for such a policy?
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
You're still not comprehending what I'm saying. Where did King advocate for such a policy?
I and pretty much the rest of the P&R forum readers besides your buddies KN and Amanda comprehend quite well, however, we suspect your comprehension is suspect to say the least.
[+]
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ok so if you didnt mean Civil Rights Act 1957? Why did you even mention the year while coupling the phrase Civil Rights Act?
Apparently Zero didn't.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
If we play you're game every subsequent Civil Rights Act did the same thing to protect groups from institutionalize racism. So yeah you definitely made a racist comment since those acts all addressed institutionalized racism.
Ever thought that these acts have created worse acts of racism than ever before? Oh, not from us Whities vs. the rest of the world, but from the rest of the world vs. the rest of the world and so on. Or are you going to say that racism has improved since 1957?
All the Civil Rights Act has done is given minorities a larger voice to complain. Everyone still gets ignored at the end, it just that minorities are now starting to become annoying. At the end of the day, racism will forever exist because we are all humans.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
You're still not comprehending what I'm saying. Where did King advocate for such a policy?
I and pretty much the rest of the P&R forum readers besides your buddies KN and Amanda comprehend quite well, however, we suspect your comprehension is suspect to say the least.
At the best you're putting words in his mouth. At worst you're dishonest and slanderous. To be a racist statement it would look more like.
"Things would be alot better if there were rules in place to keep black people from voting".
Now, you can make whatever argument you want, but King didn't say anything like that. He didn't even say "I wish the civil rights act was repealed." But even if he did, that still wouldn't have been racist.
What you're doing is inferring the racism from what you believe to be his intentions, If people can be labeled racist from your inference, then well I think you're a racist too.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Apparently Zero did and caught my racist lament.
FTFY
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Ever thought that these acts have created worse acts of racism than ever before? Oh, not from us Whities vs. the rest of the world, but from the rest of the world vs. the rest of the world and so on. Or are you going to say that racism has improved since 1957?
Institutionalized Racism has steadily declined since the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Brown v Board ruling that propelled it along with the subsequent acts.
Now we even have a black president as a result of those Civil Right Acts that you have attributed to the down fall of society.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
All the Civil Rights Act has done is given minorities a larger voice to complain. Everyone still gets ignored at the end, it just that minorities are now starting to become annoying. At the end of the day, racism will forever exist because we are all humans.
Then we both agree, you're a racist.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
At the best you're putting words in his mouth. At worst you're dishonest and slanderous. To be a racist statement it would look more like.
"Things would be alot better if there were rules in place to keep black people from voting".
Now, you can make whatever argument you want, but King didn't say anything like that. He didn't even say "I wish the civil rights act was repealed." But even if he did, that still wouldn't have been racist.
What you're doing is inferring the racism from what you believe to be his intentions, If people can be labeled racist from your inference, then well I think you're a racist too.
"Things would be alot better if there were rules in place to keep black people from voting".
Now, you can make whatever argument you want, but King didn't say anything like that. He didn't even say "I wish the civil rights act was repealed." But even if he did, that still wouldn't have been racist.
What you're doing is inferring the racism from what you believe to be his intentions, If people can be labeled racist from your inference, then well I think you're a racist too.
Not really since his words were along the lines of say:
"Things have gotten a lot worse since they stopped discriminating against black people's right to vote".
ITT: Zero still thinks that I'm talking about one particular Act, and not the issues that arose since then.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
At the best you're putting words in his mouth. At worst you're dishonest and slanderous. To be a racist statement it would look more like.
"Things would be alot better if there were rules in place to keep black people from voting".
Now, you can make whatever argument you want, but King didn't say anything like that. He didn't even say "I wish the civil rights act was repealed." But even if he did, that still wouldn't have been racist.
What you're doing is inferring the racism from what you believe to be his intentions, If people can be labeled racist from your inference, then well I think you're a racist too.
"Things would be alot better if there were rules in place to keep black people from voting".
Now, you can make whatever argument you want, but King didn't say anything like that. He didn't even say "I wish the civil rights act was repealed." But even if he did, that still wouldn't have been racist.
What you're doing is inferring the racism from what you believe to be his intentions, If people can be labeled racist from your inference, then well I think you're a racist too.
Not really since his words were along the lines of say:
"Things have gotten a lot worse since they stopped discriminating against black people's right to vote".
Except he didn't say that. You're inferring that from what he did say. As I just said if we can label people racist from inferences then you're a racist too.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
ITT: Zero still thinks that I'm talking about one particular Act, and not the issues that arose since then.
Uh huh yeah, you pretty stupid if you think anyone outside of Nausi is buying your ***.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Except he didn't say that. You're inferring that from what he did say. As I just said if we can label people racist from inferences then you're a racist too.
This is an example of why we think you're an idiot. You obviously can't put what the Civil Rights act did with regard to limiting Institutionalized Racism and what lamenting against them means together.
I think we're done today children. But please do continue to try and deflect while putting the proverbial foot in your mouths. All of us are having a great time at your expense.
Lakshmi.Zerowone said: »
But please do continue to try and deflect while putting the proverbial foot in your mouths. All of us are having a great time at your expense.
Good job, not only did you insult yourself with your own stupidity, but you insulted yourself by insulting yourself.
First I saw that before.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Good for Mississippi!
What problems do people have again with the free exercise of religious beliefs?
What problems do people have again with the free exercise of religious beliefs?
businesses aren't entitled to freedom of religion, other than that, only when practicing your religion effects other people negatively.
There is NOTHING in this bill about denying service to LGBT. By that I mean there is no language indicating such.
Aren't you discriminating against businesses by assuming everyone will use this as a club to beat up on gays? That's mighty bigoted of you!
I don't believe I said anything about corporate personhood or LGBT. A company is entitled to the rights upon which they can be persecuted. That doesn't mean that the Bill of Rights extends universally to businesses or that any portion of it applies depending on public or private. lern2rede
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.