When I'm President, The Things I'll Change.

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » When I'm President, the things I'll Change.
When I'm President, the things I'll Change.
First Page 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 11
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 16:55:07  
Jetackuu said: »
Altimaomega said: »
When I am President.

Borders will be closed and all soldiers will be recalled. If somebody screws with us we have the worlds most powerful Navy and Air-Force. There is no reason for troops to be on the ground shooting at anyone.

If a country wants to trade with us they will pay a hefty tax. The #1 main reason the USA has no jobs is we buy stuff oversea's for cheaper than we can make stuff here. Imagine the USA having to start making everything its citizens need again.

If you can't speaky de ENGLISH you will be deported!! Chance's are if you cant the taxpayers are supporting you in some way. Also, I'd rather pay more people to round up a deport illegals, than pay for the illegals to be here.

Last but not least REPEAL ObamaCare and DEPORT anyone who thought it was a good idea.
Nice way to be a racist and ignorant ***.

It's racist for you to associate illegal immigrants with a race.
[+]
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 17:00:16  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Here we go, Aman is going to start arguing his Fox News talking points, demanding we prove him wrong, while offering absolutely nothing of substance himself.

I'm sorry what? Are you denying that North Korea has nukes or that they have nukes and aren't a threat to anyone? Your Fox New Derangement Syndrome is beyond amusing. No matter what the subject, when presented with a contrary opinion, your reaction is the typical liberal reaction, disengage and start shouting FOX NEWS FOX NEWS FOX NEWS.

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

It is irresponsible to blow off a nuclear dictatorship as nothing especially one in dire need of money.
[+]
 Valefor.Sehachan
Guide Maker
Offline
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
user: Seha
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-02-10 17:04:59  
He's a threat to a city or two at best, cause he wouldn't have time to touch more before being wiped out.

Is he a threat to some people? Yes, like any lunatic with weapons. Is he a threat to the world? Lolnope.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 17:05:23  
If I were President I would delay the employer mandate in Obamacare until a month after the 2016 Presidential election.

Sorry strike that. Obama just did with the stroke of a pen. I wonder what the law will be tomorrow.
[+]
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2014-02-10 17:13:26  
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Phoenix.Josiahfk said: »
You can start with separating the head of state and the head of government. They're supposed to keep each other in check people, not be the same guy.
Wut? We don't have a head of government, we have a chimera. Every branch of government can check the other. Our so-called head of state is primarily our military commander-in-chief. That is the job that the President largely fills. He happens to also shill for his party in the legislature, heads up the diplomatic arm of government, and handles a lot of, well, let's call it "human resources."

Phoenix.Josiahfk said: »
Next work with the overseparation of power problem you guys have that delays ***in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Since everyone cannot fulfil multiple roles, the president could end up stuck helpless with his legislation or policies being delayed, against a majority opposition party control in one of them, since the president has no power to disolve either house and they're all in elected terms like him the ***could go on near endlessly.
a.) You want to split the Executive branch in two but are complaining that the Legislative branch is binary?

b.) The President doesn't produce legislation. The fact that our Presidents campaign on it is because the voting public are morons. People genuinely complain when Presidential candidates go outside the country to campaign even when international diplomacy is a core part of the job.

People need to f*cking listen to this. The PoTUS is a glorified figure head, on domestic issues he has next to no real power. He has two primary duties, one is leading the US Military the other is managing foreign diplomacy. He has no power to create or recommend legislation, the man can't legally write a single sentence of a law. He acts as a figure head for this party, "Obamacare" has nothing to do with Obama and should be referred to as "United Democrat-Republican Healthcare Plan". The Republicans were amazingly successful at pulling a switch job and branding a legislation that they wrote nearly half of with their opponents name, then campaigning against that very same legislation. Outside of those two things the PoTUS can't do jack sh!t without congress first approving him to do so. He can't even wage a war as congress must approve funds for it, the most he can do is small engagements that there is already money budgeted for (combat contingency's). And as Onorgul said, he's mostly doing HR stuff with recommending people for various positions, people that congress has to debate and approve.

Anyhow PoTUS Obama has actually been amazingly good at his two primary duties. He's relied extensively on senior military advisers, especially generals who have decades more experience then he does. Early on the Democrats wanted him to go in heavy handed and do things by fiat, which as the PoTUS is something he can actually do in regards to the Military. He didn't do that, much to the chagrin of his own party and instead asked recommendations from the Senior folks on how to go about stuff. He's also started touring the globe immediately after being elected, shaking hands and trying to generate international goodwill from other countries. Internationally Obama is well liked and viewed favorably, similiar to Bill Clinton. Americans get pissed that he does that but that's just cause their ignorant and don't even know their own political system and separation of powers.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42698
By Jetackuu 2014-02-10 17:21:01  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Altimaomega said: »
When I am President.

Borders will be closed and all soldiers will be recalled. If somebody screws with us we have the worlds most powerful Navy and Air-Force. There is no reason for troops to be on the ground shooting at anyone.

If a country wants to trade with us they will pay a hefty tax. The #1 main reason the USA has no jobs is we buy stuff oversea's for cheaper than we can make stuff here. Imagine the USA having to start making everything its citizens need again.

If you can't speaky de ENGLISH you will be deported!! Chance's are if you cant the taxpayers are supporting you in some way. Also, I'd rather pay more people to round up a deport illegals, than pay for the illegals to be here.

Last but not least REPEAL ObamaCare and DEPORT anyone who thought it was a good idea.
Nice way to be a racist and ignorant ***.

It's racist for you to associate illegal immigrants with a race.

I was actually referencing the English speaking crack, which for the most part CAN be associated with race.
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-02-10 17:23:13  
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
but that's just cause their ignorant

I'm not typically a grammar Nazi, but I found that statement to be ironic.
[+]
 Lakshmi.Feint
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: feint2021
Posts: 332
By Lakshmi.Feint 2014-02-10 17:46:25  
Jetackuu said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Altimaomega said: »
When I am President.

Borders will be closed and all soldiers will be recalled. If somebody screws with us we have the worlds most powerful Navy and Air-Force. There is no reason for troops to be on the ground shooting at anyone.

If a country wants to trade with us they will pay a hefty tax. The #1 main reason the USA has no jobs is we buy stuff oversea's for cheaper than we can make stuff here. Imagine the USA having to start making everything its citizens need again.

If you can't speaky de ENGLISH you will be deported!! Chance's are if you cant the taxpayers are supporting you in some way. Also, I'd rather pay more people to round up a deport illegals, than pay for the illegals to be here.

Last but not least REPEAL ObamaCare and DEPORT anyone who thought it was a good idea.
Nice way to be a racist and ignorant ***.

It's racist for you to associate illegal immigrants with a race.

I was actually referencing the English speaking crack, which for the most part CAN be associated with race.
Exactly, screw those Cubans.
 Ragnarok.Zeig
Offline
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Zeig
Posts: 1619
By Ragnarok.Zeig 2014-02-10 17:47:15  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
but that's just cause their ignorant

I'm not typically a grammar Nazi, but I found that statement to be ironic.
Your first time reading a post by Saevel?

Edit: not trying to bash him, the guy's posts are half a page in length on average, and he probably never spell-check.
[+]
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
サーバ: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2014-02-10 18:14:04  
The lack of knowledge in reference to NK is astounding.

It's very simple, NK has zero chance of winning any conflict and it's not for lack of manpower. They have a very large relatively well equipped (for the environment) ground force and a moderately sized air / navy force. Those are all tactical assets though, they have very little in the way of strategic assets. So while they could chose to win a particular battle, they could never win the war as they lack the ability to shape the war, all the battles would be of their opponents choosing.

As for SK, again we see the same thing, they have a large better equipped ground force and a small but better equipped air / navy force. And similiar to NK they lack strategic assets. Their entire military is designed around stopping a ground invasion and defending their borders, it has nearly no long range offensive capability.

Now here is where the USA comes in. The US has nearly no combat force on peninsula, 2ID was gutted awhile back to fight in OIF/OEF and they kept the majority of the tactical power back stateside after their deployment. What the US does have in the region is tons of strategic assets. Those include numerous C4I and logistics systems along with a modern carrier battle ground (USS George Washington) complete with escort and tomahawk missile boats (Guided Missile Cruisers). Some of those missiles are nuclear btw. Some subs and various other naval assets. Then there is the air superiority the US has deployed to the region, in both SK and Japan.

Now the key to understanding the relationships between all these is that the USA will *NEVER* cross over into NK in the case of hostilities. We can fire across the line but can't move across it, this is due to us not wanting a nuclear conflict with China. Instead we sort of "loan" to SK our strategic assets. Both military commanders work side by side and there is extensive coordination between them. In that way SK's large tactical ground force is augmented by the USA's strategic force.

As for you isolationist folks, that doesn't work. After personal costs, maintaining that strategic superiority is the next biggest cost for the US Military. Your not the first people throughout history to think "hey we don't need that", and every time they go to cutting they quickly realize what the bulk of the money is really for. And while there is indeed quite a bit of waste happening, the costs of that waste pale in comparison to the total budget of 700bn. Your chasing maybe 1bn of wasted money, which is significant but wouldn't but a dent in the budget itself.

Now why does the US spend so much developing and maintaining a monstrously superior strategic edge? To ensure we win all wars before they spiral into another World War. WWI and WWII were easy to see coming, aggressive nations lead by leaders who desired to make an empire for themselves, each thinking they were the next coming of Alexander the Great. In both cases everyone sat on their ***'s until sh!t got real and by then it was too late to prevent the larger conflict from happening. Now in theory this cost SHOULD be shared, but no European nor Asian country will do that and instead it's shouldered, almost entirely, by the USA. It's why I like to laugh at European snobs who hate on the USA. So if we were to suddenly cut the USA military budget in half (350bn), there would most certainly be a major war within a few decades. The Gulf War was the last one that could of easily spiraled into WWIII had it not been cut off. That all being said, the last administration were idiots going into Iraq like that, we had no business messing with that country.

And for the record, Medicare / Medicaid are both bigger then the Military. The next biggest is Social Security, but that's funded by a separate tax entirely.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2011.png
[+]
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2014-02-10 19:05:54  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Here we go, Aman is going to start arguing his Fox News talking points, demanding we prove him wrong, while offering absolutely nothing of substance himself.

I'm sorry what? Are you denying that North Korea has nukes or that they have nukes and aren't a threat to anyone? Your Fox New Derangement Syndrome is beyond amusing. No matter what the subject, when presented with a contrary opinion, your reaction is the typical liberal reaction, disengage and start shouting FOX NEWS FOX NEWS FOX NEWS.

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

It is irresponsible to blow off a nuclear dictatorship as nothing especially one in dire need of money.

Way to do exactly what I said. Post empty air, Good job doggie.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-02-10 19:15:44  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Here we go, Aman is going to start arguing his Fox News talking points, demanding we prove him wrong, while offering absolutely nothing of substance himself.

I'm sorry what? Are you denying that North Korea has nukes or that they have nukes and aren't a threat to anyone? Your Fox New Derangement Syndrome is beyond amusing. No matter what the subject, when presented with a contrary opinion, your reaction is the typical liberal reaction, disengage and start shouting FOX NEWS FOX NEWS FOX NEWS.

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

It is irresponsible to blow off a nuclear dictatorship as nothing especially one in dire need of money.

Way to do exactly what I said. Post empty air, Good job doggie.

To be fair, you do bring up Fox News way too often.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2014-02-10 19:48:16  
After he made that crap up about Obama not having a law license based on his fox news blogs, it's justified.
 Cerberus.Senkyuutai
Offline
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Yuffy
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2014-02-10 19:57:27  
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »
Stay in your Texas ranch with your friends the buffalos and the friend chickens, nobody will pull you out of it, don't worry.

Pssst! Hey, you! He's not in Texas. Thanks for the stereotype though. It's nice to get a gauge on people's real feelings, no matter how inaccurate and crude.
I like extreme stereotypes, I find them funny, they're not meant as something I actually think.

Lakshmi.Flavin said: »
Wow someone is angry lol. Your rage it confuses me!

You're right on the first part I can't really claim to know the full stance as I'm only going off some articles I read. It still seems to impose an infringement on personal religious freedom whether or not there are a number of muslims that agree it is not necassary to wear one. The ones that do want to wear one should not be allowed to? You can't be a respectful muslim that just wants to live a peaceful life in a burqa?

They can't be stopped for a number of reasons? Please enlighten my ignorant self.

Puppet of my government? Living in Texas? Am I a republican now too? I may be ignorant about some things i'll admit that but overall no. I don't live in texas either lol. It is truely easy for you to throw out baseless insults about things you have no idea about lol.

Sounds to me though more like you're ruled by emotion and have no grasp on what reality actually is. You really don't have much to say other than call me names do you?

Edit: Also, if you're going to accuse someone else of ignorance you shouldn't speak about things that blatantly show your own.
Well, the thing is, you aren't wrong on the base idea. It is wrong to forbid someone to wear a specific cloth, I'll agree on that.

However, there is something that you miss and I'm not completely blaming you as this concept is something I've only seen in France so far (it does exist in other countries I'm sure, I've just never seen it, maybe in Belgium, kind of?).
State and religion are two different things. France is a laïc country, religion is something personal. Yes, we do have mosques and churches, along with synagogues and so on. Yes, people have the "right of cult". You can express your religious feelings however you want in a closed space, or in front of said space (on your lawn, for example).

The problem starts when we talk about work and school. In school, we do not want children to have any influence on them. If parents want their children to follow their muslim way, or catholic or whatever, it is their right/choice. School is never supposed to be a place where a kid is appealed by religion, this is the mind set fo the country we live in, and this is law.

We do study the history of ALL religions (except maybe budhism, that's in higher levels of education I believe), accurately, from multiple point of view. The teachers aren't supposed to root for any of them, they are to be fair, each religion has to be fairly treated as it is a subject of history.

Now, you have these muslim kids who are allowed to skip school during ramadan (I don't care about that myself, but it's unfair toward their overall scholarship and other kids who aren't muslims) and on top of that, wear religious stuff. This is against the law in the second case, any children wearing anythign related to religion, any of them, is required to take it off and put it in his pockets/bag.

Burqa is merely a cloth in itself but one day, I can't remember well the incident that sparked the first issue with it, I just remember that a woman was wearing it and was asked not to. She refused, her right, I forgot if she was fired (right of the employer, dress code is a thing) or if she simply hid behind religion, but it went from this little conflict to: "we are against muslims/burqa".

This is merely escalation. Back then, I literally lived among families of muslims and was even doing the ramadan with them while I'm not even muslim myself and I can tell you that everyone in the city laughed at this, some were even ashamed fo the woman's attitude, and then the journalists/politics, because the woman was going against rules and using religion as a shield.
Then, people added the fact that the burqa can be something to hide weapons and so on, which was fueled by the insecurity that could be witnessed in other countries and in our own.

This is merely a little incident blown our of proportion. As for the muslim/African countries, this wasn't done because of religion, it was a matter of territories.

If you really want to give 2 "religions/races" that French people dislike for a reason or another (slightly or full force), jews and romes (east europe immigrants) are the ones to mention. Jews is because of history, romes are because of current days. Muslims are fine, though they are kind of a minority, so they will obviously be the target of some hate here and there, same as everywhere.

"Can't be stopped for many reasons".

Yes, indeed, it can't.

Why? Well, simple:

- America has the army domination, it is suicide to attack them. The same way, it is suicide to deny them too hard on a lot of things, they have to roam free to some extent (full extent more or less, see NSA and other ***).

- Israel is protected by US, their freedom goes beyond theirs as US is a puppet of Israel anyway. As for proper explanations about this, people do it far better than me regularly in various documentaries and other analysis. There is a specific French guy who very often explains the reasons for what has been happening there ever since the state was created.

- China is, well, they're the true masters. They already are #1 and we cannot avoid being swallowed by them in the future. It's all a matter of maths here, nuclear weapons aren't even in the formula.

Forgive me for the lack of 20000 wikipedia/various websites links, as some people on these forums that know me can tell, I dislike giving everything on a platter. If I speak even a little about something, it's because I've paid attention to it even slightly, that's something I expect from anyone I talk to.

Also, don't take what I say literally, it makes your argumentation/position poor. Bla bla "written things, hard to tell sarcasm" bla bla.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-02-10 20:02:45  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Here we go, Aman is going to start arguing his Fox News talking points, demanding we prove him wrong, while offering absolutely nothing of substance himself.

I'm sorry what? Are you denying that North Korea has nukes or that they have nukes and aren't a threat to anyone? Your Fox New Derangement Syndrome is beyond amusing. No matter what the subject, when presented with a contrary opinion, your reaction is the typical liberal reaction, disengage and start shouting FOX NEWS FOX NEWS FOX NEWS.

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

It is irresponsible to blow off a nuclear dictatorship as nothing especially one in dire need of money.

Way to do exactly what I said. Post empty air, Good job doggie.

To be fair, you do bring up Fox News way too often.

To be fair, a good portion of the time a google search of one of his talking points yields a fox news or associated source word for word.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 20:22:59  
Odin.Jassik said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Here we go, Aman is going to start arguing his Fox News talking points, demanding we prove him wrong, while offering absolutely nothing of substance himself.

I'm sorry what? Are you denying that North Korea has nukes or that they have nukes and aren't a threat to anyone? Your Fox New Derangement Syndrome is beyond amusing. No matter what the subject, when presented with a contrary opinion, your reaction is the typical liberal reaction, disengage and start shouting FOX NEWS FOX NEWS FOX NEWS.

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

It is irresponsible to blow off a nuclear dictatorship as nothing especially one in dire need of money.

Way to do exactly what I said. Post empty air, Good job doggie.

To be fair, you do bring up Fox News way too often.

To be fair, a good portion of the time a google search of one of his talking points yields a fox news or associated source word for word.

At least you admit to not knowing ***and constantly having to google your arguments for the sake of arguing with someone that you really, really want to disagree with. Get over me. I'm out of your league. ;)
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 20:24:11  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
After he made that crap up about Obama not having a law license based on his fox news blogs, it's justified.

It's too early to be drunk already Vic. Take it easy.
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-02-10 20:25:11  
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »
romes
They're typically referred to as Romany in English. Although it's a safe bet that 75% or more don't recognize that name and only know the pejorative Gypsies.

Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »
- China is, well, they're the true masters. They already are #1 and we cannot avoid being swallowed by them in the future. It's all a matter of maths here, nuclear weapons aren't even in the formula.
Except in terms of population (which mechanized warfare does a lot to make less relevant -- our unmanned drones make it almost silly to have footsoldiers when we could just grab a 14-year-old Call of Duty player), I would be dubious giving China this much credit. Beijing is notorious for cooking the books and their superiority is far from assured. On the other hand, as they become more Westernized and lose the trappings of socialist fascism, it may well become moot. The one mercy is that the Middle Kingdom is literally convinced they're the center of the universe and tend to have only limited interest in conquest as a result.

Also, why on earth would kids get out of school during Ramadan? I'm not an expert on Islam, but in spite of going to a Roman Catholic school, we had a Muslim girl in my class and she didn't skip. She was bitchy as hell from hunger (and her own delightful personality), though.
Offline
Posts: 42698
By Jetackuu 2014-02-10 20:25:27  
There's a difference between quoting word for word Fox partisan garbage (what you neocons do) vs people who research subjects they're not experts in before they just spew ***out of their mouths (again, also what you neocons do).

Just sayin'

edit: translated: there's nothing wrong with using google.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-02-10 20:32:17  
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2014-02-10 20:37:11  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

So, he is a neocon spammer that uses Fox News for his arguments and is always wrong, satisfied?
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-02-10 20:41:58  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

So, he is a neocon spammer that uses Fox News for his arguments and is always wrong, satisfied?

I'd rather you attack his arguments head on instead of using buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing in a real discussion.
[+]
Offline
サーバ: Ultros
Game: FFXIV
user: Serj
Posts: 2204
By Ciri Zireael 2014-02-10 20:43:14  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
I'd rather you attack his arguments head on instead of using buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing in a real discussion.

What you just said is literally what every single post in P&R consists of. Hell, it's 95% of politics.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Zeig
Offline
サーバ: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Zeig
Posts: 1619
By Ragnarok.Zeig 2014-02-10 20:55:01  
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »
Now, you have these muslim kids who are allowed to skip school during ramadan
That's allowed in all of France? That sounds generous lol, because even in Saudi Arabia (not gonna say in all Muslim countries) students have to go to school during Ramadan (although the work/school hours are cut down by like 25%).
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2014-02-10 21:04:08  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

So, he is a neocon spammer that uses Fox News for his arguments and is always wrong, satisfied?

I'd rather you attack his arguments head on instead of using buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing in a real discussion.

I think we all wish he would make an actual argument.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42698
By Jetackuu 2014-02-10 21:04:52  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

I use the term as it's more acceptable than the terms I want to use.

It has nothing to do with anything else as it's an accurate description.
[+]
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-02-10 21:11:43  
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

So, he is a neocon spammer that uses Fox News for his arguments and is always wrong, satisfied?

I'd rather you attack his arguments head on instead of using buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing in a real discussion.

I think we all wish he would make an actual argument.

Ah, the clever art of deflection. Your wit has foiled me again!
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-02-10 21:17:57  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Although it's hard to tell if Vic says "Fox News" as much as Jet says "neocon". Broken records all around.

So, he is a neocon spammer that uses Fox News for his arguments and is always wrong, satisfied?

I'd rather you attack his arguments head on instead of using buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing in a real discussion.

I think we all wish he would make an actual argument.

Ah, the clever art of deflection. Your wit has foiled me again!

I get where you're coming from, but you have to understand that the posters have largely dismissed any and every point that he could make. He's a troll, plain and simple.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2014-02-10 21:24:19  
I'm a troll for saying that a nuclear dictatorship controlled by an insecure loose cannon is dangerous? You replied to that with insults but no counter argument? You are the troll, brah.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-02-10 21:28:28  
Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
I'm a troll for saying that a nuclear dictatorship controlled by an insecure loose cannon is dangerous? You replied to that with insults but no counter argument? You are the troll, brah.

Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

It's too early to be drunk already Vic. Take it easy.

Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
At least you admit to not knowing ***and constantly having to google your arguments for the sake of arguing with someone that you really, really want to disagree with. Get over me. I'm out of your league. ;)

Phoenix.Amandarius said: »
If I were President I would delay the employer mandate in Obamacare until a month after the 2016 Presidential election.

Sorry strike that. Obama just did with the stroke of a pen. I wonder what the law will be tomorrow.


Phoenix.Amandarius said: »

*knock knock* Hello McFly, anyobody in there?

Antagonistic trolling, and that's just this page. Go ahead and cry to a mod like every time someone calls you on your crap.
First Page 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 11
Log in to post.