|
|
SE wants you to bring along "gimp" players...
By ScaevolaBahamut 2013-07-09 18:20:15
Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2013-07-09 18:41:10
Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear Piss awful is an extreme and is vague.
If you can't find someone with worse gear shitting all over someone with much better gear, you aren't looking hard enough.
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1837
By Valefor.Applebottoms 2013-07-09 18:50:58
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear Piss awful is an extreme and is vague.
If you can't find someone with worse gear shitting all over someone with much better gear, you aren't looking hard enough. I don't think his wording of "gimp" was to be taken like this, but as being "gimp" is about the player and how they act.
Having ***gear and wanting to learn and grow with better gear leads to a better player, thus losing the "gimp" status.
Having awesome gear and not being able to utilize it correctly while making fun of others constantly nets you the "gimp" status, with not being able to lose it.
Least that's what I got out of it. The ability to learn is whether you're gimp or not.
[+]
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2013-07-09 19:03:39
Valefor.Applebottoms said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear Piss awful is an extreme and is vague.
If you can't find someone with worse gear shitting all over someone with much better gear, you aren't looking hard enough. I don't think his wording of "gimp" was to be taken like this, but as being "gimp" is about the player and how they act.
Having ***gear and wanting to learn and grow with better gear leads to a better player, thus losing the "gimp" status.
Having awesome gear and not being able to utilize it correctly while making fun of others constantly nets you the "gimp" status, with not being able to lose it.
Least that's what I got out of it. The ability to learn is whether you're gimp or not. I would go further and say that what makes someone not gimp is the ability to learn and apply what he/she has learned.
Some people learn but never take this extra step. They often use the excuse of being lazy, or that they don't care about a 2% increase and such.
[+]
By Sieha1 2013-07-09 21:18:27
Opportunity to gain gear is sometimes an issue. I was working full time and going to school. I didn't really have the time to farm gil or join a great ls, but I did do some Dynamis.
Personally I would say I was a better player than most that were there, which was mostly fodder members back then. My gear was not as good but I was still able to use better skill and understanding of the game even without the gear.
There are some limitations like you couldn't solo an Ix without something like wlegs or gaiters but other things were not like that.
By ScaevolaBahamut 2013-07-09 21:54:30
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Valefor.Applebottoms said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear Piss awful is an extreme and is vague.
If you can't find someone with worse gear shitting all over someone with much better gear, you aren't looking hard enough. I don't think his wording of "gimp" was to be taken like this, but as being "gimp" is about the player and how they act.
Having ***gear and wanting to learn and grow with better gear leads to a better player, thus losing the "gimp" status.
Having awesome gear and not being able to utilize it correctly while making fun of others constantly nets you the "gimp" status, with not being able to lose it.
Least that's what I got out of it. The ability to learn is whether you're gimp or not. I would go further and say that what makes someone not gimp is the ability to learn and apply what he/she has learned.
Some people learn but never take this extra step. They often use the excuse of being lazy, or that they don't care about a 2% increase and such.
except learning lessons and putting them in practice inevitably involves getting more gear, so your attitude sets up a convenient little Catch 22 where you can say that gear doesn't equal skill while simultaneously viewing bad gear as prima facie evidence of poor skill
in this way you allow yourself the moral high ground of saying you value skill and not gear without ever having to actually act on it and give somebody with shitty gear and no resume the benefit of the doubt
note that i am not judging you for this; (i assume) you are a grown-up and can play video games with whomever you please. just don't be a hypocrite about it
in any case, give me my one (1) example, or stop deflecting, admit to judging people solely based on arbitrary gear distinctions, and join me in criticizing SE for the super duper shitty decision to leave the gearing of random people who just want to gear up and be left alone in the hands of elitists such as yourself
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6052
By Leviathan.Comeatmebro 2013-07-10 05:30:31
There are some limitations like you couldn't solo an Ix without something like wlegs or gaiters def a gimp
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2013-07-10 07:08:35
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Valefor.Applebottoms said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Edit: Actually, it is very possible for someone to become ungimp with determination and a little help from friends. However it is the person, we saw that when relics and emps rained from the sky. Gear doesnt make the player, it only helps them.
maybe, but please name one (1) example of a player who had just piss-awful gear that you would hold up as a good player against all criticism
explain how that player is good in a way that does not involve his/her gear Piss awful is an extreme and is vague.
If you can't find someone with worse gear shitting all over someone with much better gear, you aren't looking hard enough. I don't think his wording of "gimp" was to be taken like this, but as being "gimp" is about the player and how they act.
Having ***gear and wanting to learn and grow with better gear leads to a better player, thus losing the "gimp" status.
Having awesome gear and not being able to utilize it correctly while making fun of others constantly nets you the "gimp" status, with not being able to lose it.
Least that's what I got out of it. The ability to learn is whether you're gimp or not. I would go further and say that what makes someone not gimp is the ability to learn and apply what he/she has learned.
Some people learn but never take this extra step. They often use the excuse of being lazy, or that they don't care about a 2% increase and such.
except learning lessons and putting them in practice inevitably involves getting more gear, so your attitude sets up a convenient little Catch 22 where you can say that gear doesn't equal skill while simultaneously viewing bad gear as prima facie evidence of poor skill
in this way you allow yourself the moral high ground of saying you value skill and not gear without ever having to actually act on it and give somebody with shitty gear and no resume the benefit of the doubt
note that i am not judging you for this; (i assume) you are a grown-up and can play video games with whomever you please. just don't be a hypocrite about it
in any case, give me my one (1) example, or stop deflecting, admit to judging people solely based on arbitrary gear distinctions, and join me in criticizing SE for the super duper shitty decision to leave the gearing of random people who just want to gear up and be left alone in the hands of elitists such as yourself I value both equally, ideally, I just have the objectivity to understand that gear allows for a certain margin where skill doesn't. Either you can do something or you cannot. Gear will sometime allow to do something, but not always, it's a minority. This is why I won't decline someone who can do something properly even without the best gear, as he still qualify as "good enough".
Because of this, I usually do not decline people based on their gear, but based on their actual abilities (and attitude). If they're good with ***gear, they're welcome. All about being positive and applying your progress, that's how you get gear, not by not applying what you learn, then you're just getting carried, you're not worth anything.
Only examples I can give you involve myself, so I'm not sure if it's a good example. I also don't like talking about it, I had to erase about 5 versions now so I'll keep it short.
Would be easier if we had known each other at some point in the game, but to keep it short and simple, my PLD alone is proof that I cannot possibly limit someone based solely on his gear.
I was the worst possibly geared PLD of Unicorn endgame between 2007 and 2009 yet I was picked over any Aegis, Homam, W legs etc (all of which I didn't have a single piece of). I'll always believe that someone can be good despite his gear, there are just situations where a minimum is required and I won't accept anything below that (my standards are lower than you think, don't worry) unless I can carry the whole thing myself, in which case I do not care at all.
I place more value on someone's attitude and ability to apply what he learns, stay positive, than his actual gear. Give me someone with absolutely ***gear but an inflexible positive attitude and I'll help shape this guy into the next best thing, anytime.
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »There are some limitations like you couldn't solo an Ix without something like wlegs or gaiters def a gimp ^
The windows are large enough to not need any speed +.
By ScaevolaBahamut 2013-07-10 07:48:10
so people picked you because they already knew you and could vouch for the head on your shoulders
was pld your best-geared job at the time
By Sieha1 2013-07-10 11:09:34
Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: »There are some limitations like you couldn't solo an Ix without something like wlegs or gaiters def a gimp
The windows are large enough to not need any speed +.
Still needed some from of movement speed increase to get them to the pinning rooms and get rid of the adds. Also allows for actual nuking vs just bio to death.
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2013-07-10 11:47:43
so people picked you because they already knew you and could vouch for the head on your shoulders
was pld your best-geared job at the time SAM was.
I built the reputation faster than I built either job. At some point jobs became irrelevant, people would let me do anything and everything (literally).
Feels good when you build such trust, but it's tiring when you always have to deal with delusional people who judge you on your gear or simply judge you because they think they are badass and you are automatically trash compared to them, no matter what you wear, no matter what you do.
This is what killed my FFXI, and that's why I could never be like that toward someone else in-game.
By Drjones 2013-07-10 11:51:45
Given the kinds of mouth breathers you run into, it's not really surprising that people would assume every unknown player wears their pants on their head and thus judge them solely by their gear.
Leviathan.Starcade
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 85
By Leviathan.Starcade 2013-07-10 22:52:06
Yeah, clearly people do not/cannot have differing opinions on where to "draw the line" between right and wrong.
I'd go further than that, in this day and age, sir. I think we have gotten to a point that, for more than a few people in RL, there is no such thing, nor distinction, as right and wrong.
This just gives another vehicle for that degree of misconduct.
But keep rationalizing it to yourself. Social acceptance is more important than actually doing anything right...
AFK killing newborn children - after all, I already cheated in a video game, so why the hell not, right?
And PLEASE try to explain away your use of ffxiah's services as being within SE's rules... after you try, we can go rape some nuns together.
*** off, for the first part.
Second part, you can probably drop that in the same realm of FFXIclopedia -- which some of you have tried to use to shut me up as well.
Speaking of the "*** off" department:
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You are out of reality, completely.
Whose *** reality? Certainly not the truth. Of course, I guess that's the real crux of this, isn't it? That we can recreate the truth and impose it on everybody else to suit our own criminal ends, isn't that right?
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You don't grasp the scale of FFXI, it is a game, a mere game.
Wrong.
WRONG.
WRONG!
It stopped being "just a mere game" when people were spending a month's salary to hack the *** Internet so they could control gameplay.
You do realize that, at least at one point, half the characters on this game (at the very least) are/were RMT, and that most of the relevant top-level players were basically RMTing in one form or another, do you not?
Sorry, but you use that as justification, and I'm not going to buy it.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You also do not realize who SE is, what is their position and what they actually want. The only times you'll see SE issue lawyer stuff is when a NDA is breached or when serious information are leaked.
Which is exactly what known RMT sites have been doing (not unakin to where Square-Enix has had to sue for damages for counterfeit RL merchandise) for years now, with the full assent and encouragement of the (about 2009 and onward) playerbase.
These are sites that have been known to advertise on the game for years now.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »I don't remember them unleashing lawyers in any other situation.
Because you choose to be blind and delusional.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »We could ask BG, they probably experienced a lot more from them (I only know of these 2 kind of situations).
BG is the biggest virus in this game. The continued allowance of the North American playerbase to rely on them as leaders of the playerbase is one of the main reasons North American players largely stand ignored by Square-Enix.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »The bottom line is, you are as much of a cancer to this game/community as the people you're pointing the finger at.
Then you had better have me banned.
No joke. And then you will probably have to go further (court action, etc.).
The fact is that the playerbase in 2013 does not want to play the game under the Terms of Service. Moreover, not unlike this article I read on Yahoo! today, you want to destroy the positive work of all other players except for yourselves.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »These people I'm talking about are the ones posting SSs of themselves with GM flag and so on. Those are idiots of the highest caliber for various reasons (you can use the functions without having the icon, I know it makes you look like a peasant, but ya), but they're merely the extreme on the other side of yours. You're playing the holy white knight, they're playing the stupid peasant.
Some of us HAVE TO. We know what we are capable of otherwise.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »Saying that these shitters are as much idiots in real life because they cheat in a video game is stupid. Internet persona, do you know what they are?
Yes, and I'd suggest you educate yourself on how far the Internet persona intertwines with the RL attitudes of many scum on the Internet.
Start with a 2008 New York Times Magazine article about trolldom and how little they care for life itself.
I got better in Riker's Island than I got from some of you ***.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »People like Vigor and you are examples of dangerous people online due to their real life attitude and personality. You are more of a danger in real life than this guy I don't want to name since the previous paragraph because he's an idiot cheating in a video game.
And that's why I have to white knight. Don't like it? Call the cops.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »The fact that other players are involved is only a moral issue. I'm not saying I'm ok with shitting over other players, I'm merely saying that even if you do so, it's not a crime, it's a violation in a video game.
Actually, it is a crime, since Square-Enix claims absolute ownership of all in FFXI. You may wish to acquaint yourself with theft law in California, sir.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You may want to get off your horse already. SE doesn't care about your knight attitude and unless you are getting women/men in your bedroom thanks to this, you're wasting your time, nobody cares about your holy crusade.
Then, basically, the Anakin Skywalker approach works. Make them care.
Of course, this game will probably die first, and may well take the entire franchise with it.
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »I'm not even gonna argue any of your points, it's endless. My answers were "closed answers", there were no answers possible from you, they were all dead ends. The fact that you argue dead ends is proof that you cannot participate in any kind of discussion.
*** off.
You know I'm right, and that's it.
Leviathan.Starcade
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 85
By Leviathan.Starcade 2013-07-10 22:59:29
Gimp isnt gear its the person, once a gimp always a gimp. Otherwise I am sure you will be fine.
Then throw them out of FFXI under Game Disruption.
Such a "gimp" (in your eyes) is going to hinder every other player on the server (at minimum, which they play with -- and I'd well make a case for every player on the server).
This is more and more true as the functional level of the game becomes well past 100 with the new areas.
Asura.Domz
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 631
By Asura.Domz 2013-07-10 22:59:42
Leviathan.Starcade said: »*** off.
You know I'm right, and that's it.
well that's certainly a way to have an intelligent conversation with others.
By Castoth 2013-07-10 23:00:46
Either Starcade is trolling in a manner not seen in years, or he legitimately needs to find a psychiatrist.
[+]
Leviathan.Starcade
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 85
By Leviathan.Starcade 2013-07-10 23:05:58
Leviathan.Starcade said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You don't grasp the scale of FFXI, it is a game, a mere game. Wrong.
WRONG.
WRONG! Please calm down my friend.
Sorry, the guy's a twit and he's badly misleading people.
This game stopped being just a game when people could make shittons of money out of gimping the rest of the playerbase.
That kind of clique-ish behavior can kill people.
Leviathan.Starcade
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 85
By Leviathan.Starcade 2013-07-10 23:07:03
Leviathan.Starcade said: »*** off.
You know I'm right, and that's it.
well that's certainly a way to have an intelligent conversation with others.
Presuming I believe them to be intelligent -- and that they aren't the same to me...
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2013-07-11 00:16:08
Rather than reading your post and answering it, I looked for a fitting image in Google real quick.
I think it says it all. Have a good day, champ. Don't stop believing in your dreams, Starcade, they might become real one day.
Best quotes:
Quote: *** off, for the first part. Quote: Whose *** reality? Certainly not the truth. Of course, I guess that's the real crux of this, isn't it? That we can recreate the truth and impose it on everybody else to suit our own criminal ends, isn't that right? Quote: Wrong.
WRONG.
WRONG!
It stopped being "just a mere game" when people were spending a month's salary to hack the *** Internet so they could control gameplay.
You do realize that, at least at one point, half the characters on this game (at the very least) are/were RMT, and that most of the relevant top-level players were basically RMTing in one form or another, do you not?
Sorry, but you use that as justification, and I'm not going to buy it. Quote: BG is the biggest virus in this game. The continued allowance of the North American playerbase to rely on them as leaders of the playerbase is one of the main reasons North American players largely stand ignored by Square-Enix. Quote: Then you had better have me banned.
No joke. And then you will probably have to go further (court action, etc.). Quote: And that's why I have to white knight. Don't like it? Call the cops. Quote: Actually, it is a crime, since Square-Enix claims absolute ownership of all in FFXI. You may wish to acquaint yourself with theft law in California, sir. Quote: *** off.
You know I'm right, and that's it. Quote: This game stopped being just a game when people could make shittons of money out of gimping the rest of the playerbase.
That kind of clique-ish behavior can kill people.
Waking up to this makes my sides hurt.
[+]
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 113
By Asura.Alucardr 2013-07-11 11:37:28
People who think that you learn a job from 1-99, still in 2013, are the real gimps of this game.
By volkom 2013-07-11 11:43:24
People who think that you learn a job from 1-99, still in 2013, are the real gimps of this game. what?
Valefor.Sehachan
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2013-07-11 11:47:12
I cannot describe how bewildered I am at Starcade's posts. I am not one to just throw around "the person is trolling" whenever I see something I don't like, but I cannot possibly imagine this guy being real. If he is, well I guess it's not his fault for being in the 2 digits.
By Drjones 2013-07-11 11:59:16
I cannot describe how bewildered I am at Starcade's posts. I am not one to just throw around "the person is trolling" whenever I see something I don't like, but I cannot possibly imagine this guy being real. If he is, well I guess it's not his fault for being in the 2 digits. He's not trolling. The man legitimately needs professional help.
Look up "starcade debbie gibson" sometime. Dude's not right in the head.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan
サーバ: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2013-07-11 12:07:22
....................
Cerberus.Conagh
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3189
By Cerberus.Conagh 2013-07-11 12:11:44
Leviathan.Starcade said: »Leviathan.Starcade said: »Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »You don't grasp the scale of FFXI, it is a game, a mere game. Wrong.
WRONG.
WRONG! Please calm down my friend.
Sorry, the guy's a twit and he's badly misleading people.
This game stopped being just a game when people could make shittons of money out of gimping the rest of the playerbase.
That kind of clique-ish behavior can kill people.
Usually I'm the troll on forums. But I feel in this instance, I need to pass the Baton to you.
You state "when people could make shittons of money out fo gimping the rest of the player base" Might I point out - Strategy guides allowing gimps without the required IQ / time / patience to see EXACTLY how to do stuff. Money right there.
Gaming magazines that released cheats to make money out sales, by showing people how to make games easier ERGO gimping their ability.. this is with like 100 % of all games out there in any damn country.
If you can refute this as making money out of showing players how to get more for less, the same principle with RMT's in FFXI I would like to see your logic. Because then I might begin to understand your point.
Leviathan.Kincard
サーバ: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1442
By Leviathan.Kincard 2013-07-11 12:15:16
He's not trolling. The man legitimately needs professional help.
Look up "starcade debbie gibson" sometime. Dude's not right in the head.
I've only ever heard a thing or two about Starcade before and never really paid attention, but now that I've actually taken the time to read this stuff, I can't help but be pleased that the XI community has slowly eaten away someone's sanity like a particularly malignant cancer. I've seen righteous anger, I've seen rampant narcissism, but I've never seen such a beautiful case of raving dementia. This is highlight of my XI experience. I can quit the game now.
By Drjones 2013-07-11 12:19:52
He was like that before FFXI though.
By ScaevolaBahamut 2013-07-11 12:22:27
Quote: It stopped being "just a mere game" when people were spending a month's salary to hack the *** Internet so they could control gameplay.
define "a month's salary"
Alexander.Carrelo
サーバ: Alexander
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3706
By Alexander.Carrelo 2013-07-11 12:22:39
Look up "starcade debbie gibson" sometime. Dude's not right in the head.
[+]
...but it just doesn't happen very often.
I'm sure you've heard: Why redo an NM for a KI you already have?
Does the following make sense?
Multiply the xp/cruor/gil/plasm for every person who doesn't have the KI/Kill? So, 18 people go fight Ceizak T5 and 6 people don't have the KI, then maybe he'll drop 6 x 1000 plasm = 6k plasm? (as an example)
Thoughts?
-Felgarr
|
|