E3 2013 |
||
|
E3 2013
Microsoft in charge of charging 100$ more for actually less.
So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either.
also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power and help substantially with load times ect. Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Microsoft in charge of charging 100$ more for actually less.
Shiva.Gib said: » So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either. also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power. Xbox One is behind on every single thing when it comes to hardware, basically. Only thing it's "up to date" with is the HDD size. CREMSteve said: XB1 - 3GB RAM reserved for OS, 5GB available for games - 2 CPU cores reserved for OS, 6 available for games - 10% of GPU reserved for OS, 90% available for games - Change channels and watch TV through the console (through pre-arranged partnerships, none confirmed as of yet) - Blu-ray/DVD optical drive - "Snap" mode allows for seamless transition between games, movies, TV, etc. - Kinect 2 mandatory for console to operate - Mandatory installs for all software (requires console to be online) - Software tied to LIVE ID - No Backwards Compatibility - HDMI in/out only - 4K TV compatible - Smartglass second screen - Cross-game video and audio chat via Skype app - Exclusive launch lineup of Forza 5 - 3rd party launch lineup of Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag, Call of Duty: Ghosts - LIVE will continue to exist as it did this gen, with all online multiplayer and entertainment features behind a paywall (pricing not yet announced) - Games can be suspended and resumed, even after turning off console - System has constant access to the "Cloud", which could be theoretically used to offload AI routines and the like to take load off of the CPU - Controller now features force feedback triggers (awesome), internal AA batteries, improved d-pad, Start + Select renamed to Menu and View - Headset not included, and not compatible with previous gen headsets - Achievement system carries over from 360 - Releasing in North America in 2013 - Region-locked PS4 - Separate chip for Encoding/Decoding and various other tasks - Blu-ray/DVD optical drive - Will not play CDs - There is a dedicated Share button on the controller. You can send snippets of recorded video straight to a friend and even invite them to watch your game, or allow them to take over your gameplay if you want them to. - Backwards Compatibility through on-board Gaikai streaming (likely subscription-based, not likely available at launch) - All PS4 software remote playable on PS VITA through Gaikai streaming (voodoo magic) - Sharing and social functions controllable via iPad - HDMI, RCA and Optical outputs - 4K TV compatible - VITA second screen - Cross-game video, text and audio chat via OS - Exclusive launch lineup of inFAMOUS: Second Son, Killzone: Shadow Fall, Drive Club and Knack - 3rd party launch lineup of Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag, Call of Duty: Ghosts - Games can be suspended and resumed, even after turning off console - Dual Shock 4 features much beefier size, tighter analog sticks, proper R2 triggers, and multi-touch touchpad, internal speaker and a light bar for motion control and identifying players - Compatible with previous gen peripherals including headsets, keyboards and PS Move (not compatible with Dual Shock 3) - Trophy system carries over from PS3 - Headset included - Releasing in North America and Europe in 2013 Honestly I wouldn't get too riled up about Gib. He tends to go against the grain of mainstream thought on most things. Shiva.Gib said: » also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power and help substantially with load times ect. ![]() K? :D Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Shiva.Gib said: » So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either. also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power. Xbox One is behind on every single thing when it comes to hardware, basically. Only thing it's "up to date" with is the HDD size. cause theoretically PS3 destroyed XBox360 in terms of just raw numbers, but you wouldn't know that looking at 95% of the games. Especially mutli platform games Shiva.Gib said: » Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Shiva.Gib said: » So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either. also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power. Xbox One is behind on every single thing when it comes to hardware, basically. Only thing it's "up to date" with is the HDD size. cause theoretically PS3 destroyed XBox360 in terms of just raw numbers, but you wouldn't know that looking at 95% of the games. Especially mutli platform games It has nothing to do with the actual hardware. The bottom line is: Xbox One is 100$ more expensive for lesser hardware and a worse concept, linked to the hardware. Shiva.Gib said: » So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either. OK so i'll explain just a tiny bit before i shut my eyes for good. The difference between The Ram is not necessarily a good thing for either side. DDR3 Ram is faster on uptake than GDDR5 ram, but GDDR5 ram is much more potent graphics and video data handling. The reason why Microsoft chose to go with DDR3 ram is pretty clear, they have layers of Operating systems in their next console and they need it to be as quick and responsive as possible, for this DDR3 ram is pretty much a must. GDDR5 Ram is going to allow the ps4 to bring much better level memory for video processing and graphics/video data handling. tldr;#1= Microsoft decided to sacrifice some of their pure raw Graphics/Gaming capabilities from a technical standpoint in order to help make their other Console "Quirks" work in their new console. As for Graphics; Comparing to storebought gpu's might not seem far, but Pure Teraflop video data values don't lie. The difference between those cards are being similar to the difference between The Teraflop Values given from the values that these next gen consoles are able to hit. As you can clearly see, The xbox one falls short here by a much larger margin than it seems (go lookup the difference between the two in Teraflop Values, Google is your fren) So this leads me into Tldr#2= Microsoft decided to sacrifice some of their pure raw Graphics/Gaming capabilities from a technical standpoint in order to help make their other Console "Quirks" work in their new console. That being said, Good night, Do some Shiva.Arana said: » Honestly I wouldn't get too riled up about Gib. He tends to go against the grain of mainstream thought on most things. ![]() Shhhhhhhhhut upppp Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Shiva.Gib said: » Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: » Shiva.Gib said: » So basically I'm seeing the main difference being DDR3 and DDR5 ram, that's not going to be a huge difference and there are a lot of factors that could even that playing field that we don't know. I.E. High MHz on XBoxs Ram and Low on PS4's ect. Also comparing custom GPUs to store bought GPUs, which isn't fair either. also, no one is adding in the fact that Xbox One can do server side computing in a cloud environment, which could theoretically give a lot more power. Xbox One is behind on every single thing when it comes to hardware, basically. Only thing it's "up to date" with is the HDD size. cause theoretically PS3 destroyed XBox360 in terms of just raw numbers, but you wouldn't know that looking at 95% of the games. Especially mutli platform games It has nothing to do with the actual hardware. The bottom line is: Xbox One is 100$ more expensive for lesser hardware and a worse concept, linked to the hardware. ughh guess i'm not done. Pretty much this; The Ps3 used a different CPU Called the "Cell" it made it incredibly hard from a Developers standpoint to reprogram all of their utilities and graphic engine program to work with this, so rather than starting from the ground up and making a game purely for ps3 to handle it's better graphics power. most games just copy+pasta after building it either on pc or more frequently on the xbox 360. yes, that's right, the reason why most games look exactly the same or even sometimes WORSE on ps3, was because it was literally just a paste from what was made for the 360, because of how hard and costly it was to develop for the PS3 Cell Processor. edit- would like to add something important to this point. These next gen consoles are now on the same playing field in terms of how they are being programmed. They are essentially all programed for PC then ported over to the console and the only restriction is hardware. Let me say that again rq; The only retriction for games this generation will be hardware There WILL be a noticable difference this time around for an xbox one port version a ps4 version. Or even the PC version. Because these games will be tailered to run on the hardware of those consoles, you WILL (I guess "should" would be the more proper word here) notice a difference. Again, as always, I keep hearing "Higher Number = Auto Win"
consoles are not black and white like that Shiva.Gib said: » Again, as always, I keep hearing "Higher Number = Auto Win" consoles are not black and white like that read.my.post.please.jeebus. If you still don't understand after all that typing from my eyes barely open, then my hats off to you good sir. spend ALL THE MONEYSSSS The only true lead Xbone has at this point is the lead Xbox 360 brought it. Once that is used up all that Xbone will have to rely on is its sub par hardware and outrageous restrictions.
yeah I know, I read your post, lazy programing caused bad ports, that's common knowledge
I'm saying comparing two parts of hardware in an entire console and demeaning one superior is grey area logic at best Shiva.Gib said: » yeah I know, I read your post, lazy programing caused bad ports, that's common knowledge I'm saying comparing two parts of hardware in an entire console and demeaning one superior is grey area logic at best re read, and i'm officially done trying to get through to you. spend all your damn money idgaf lol. play what you want to play at the end of the day it's your money. but at the end of the day PS4>XBONE (lame name to boot) Shiva.Arana said: » The only true lead Xbone has at this point is the lead Xbox 360 brought it. Once that is used up all that Xbone will have to rely on is its sub par hardware and outrageous restrictions. I swear being a Steam gamer for going on 8 years, It's hilarious to see people freak out over this stuff. It's the future, once everyone goes digital *which it will and soon* EVERYTHING is going to be like this. enjoy your discs while you can, such an archaic technology anyways Fairy.Ghaleon said: » Shiva.Gib said: » yeah I know, I read your post, lazy programing caused bad ports, that's common knowledge I'm saying comparing two parts of hardware in an entire console and demeaning one superior is grey area logic at best re read, and i'm officially done trying to get through to you. spend all your damn money idgaf lol. play what you want to play at the end of the day it's your money. but at the end of the day PS4>XBONE (lame name to boot) Cause we know better more power equal better games. I mean that's why the vastly inferior 3DS is totally tanking compared to the vastly more powerful hand held juggernaut that is called the PS Vita! Also I will agree Xbox One is a terrible name. Cause all I can think about is "Real Player One" and anyone from the 56k days knows how great that piece of bloatware was Shiva.Gib said: » Fairy.Ghaleon said: » Shiva.Gib said: » yeah I know, I read your post, lazy programing caused bad ports, that's common knowledge I'm saying comparing two parts of hardware in an entire console and demeaning one superior is grey area logic at best re read, and i'm officially done trying to get through to you. spend all your damn money idgaf lol. play what you want to play at the end of the day it's your money. but at the end of the day PS4>XBONE (lame name to boot) Cause we know better more power equal better games. I mean that's why the vastly inferior 3DS is totally tanking compared to the vastly more powerful hand held juggernaut that is called the PS Vita! But hey, you did buy the Wii U when it has no games so far. You like to counter your own logic/argument so far. Going to enjoy the sun, we've completed the circle by now. ![]() ![]() Oh boy, leaving with a smile. No, you see, I'm not poor, and I'm a gamer that's why I have all the systems. Well cept for a vita, cause...I might be able to afford it, I don't really feel like throwing money away.
the point I'm making is numbers out of context of the whole don't make something superior. and I hope that's not his official twitter, cause with the bashing and grammar errors, it sounds like a 12 year old is writing that. Really excited for the upcoming Vita support tbh. The games they showcased look pretty damn good, and I already get a lot of use out of mine (minority I supposed) via its current library and as a media device.
Shiva.Arana said: » Speaking of Vita ![]() when 3DS was on shaky ground, Nintendo busted serious *** to get to being the amazing handheld it is today. Sony is just like "Eh, whatever if it takes off it takes off if it doesn't.... meeehhhhh" Valefor.Prothescar said: » Really excited for the upcoming Vita support tbh. The games they showcased look pretty damn good, and I already get a lot of use out of mine (minority I supposed) via its current library and as a media device. I get a lot of use out of mine as well. To each their own I guess. Valefor.Prothescar said: » Really excited for the upcoming Vita support tbh. The games they showcased look pretty damn good, and I already get a lot of use out of mine (minority I supposed) via its current library and as a media device. cause they did Remote play with PS3 and PSP, it was pretty god awful from what I remember. Did you watch the conference or?
Looks like I missed all the fun.
But man, the liberation of consumer freedom from the shackles of DRM/Online connection Sony gave over MS with the $100 shorter price tag just sealed the deal. Not to mention the KH3/FF15 exclusivity. To be fair though, used games in the retail market is a dire issue to publishers and developers while Gamestop has had a free ride for ages over it, greatly diminishing the return to those that actually bring us the games. However, the manner in which to remedy that in a consumer friendly manner was utterly shat on by MS, which is quite unfortunate. But alas, it is a complex problem, with no clear solution as the consumers will have many demands and ultimatums at hand. I suppose this will have to be stretched out and resolved in future generations of consoles. But Sony was smart to leave things be and give the freedom to the users above all. YouTube Video Placeholder Odin.Cyprias said: » Valefor.Prothescar said: » Really excited for the upcoming Vita support tbh. The games they showcased look pretty damn good, and I already get a lot of use out of mine (minority I supposed) via its current library and as a media device. I get a lot of use out of mine as well. To each their own I guess. I get a lot of use out of my vita as well however 95% of me playing it is older games. I own 2 vita games, AC Liberation (got the bundle) and Ragnarok. However I have like 30 Ps1, Psp etc games. All FF available, twisted metal, chrono trigger/ cross stuff like that. Depending on the level of support and function the Vita will have with the PS4, I'm definitely in for getting one. Especially since the game lineup is slowly but surely expanding with a respectable library, including the HD re-releases of FFX and X-2.
My only real complaint is the stupid overpriced proprietary flash memory chips /sigh. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||