TTOF - Seriously A Serious Linkshell, Guys |
||
TTOF - Seriously a serious linkshell, guys
Offline
Posts: 1073
powernap! tree sucks ***, though seeing vlor freak out at every wkr makes it somewhat bearable
There's a difference between freaking out and getting annoyed at player stupidity. You don't need to be strutting around too much Ben.
Alas, poor Phaffi, your Razorfurry will have to wait for another day.
Off to a good start: The moment where you can see his spirits fall: Womp womp. Offline
Posts: 1073
Lakshmi.Vlorsutes said: » There's a difference between freaking out and getting annoyed at player stupidity. You don't need to be strutting around too much Ben. you complain a lot. also are annoying and homo. go rub maple syrup on your mullet and shove a hockey puck up your *** Lakshmi.Rooks said: » Ben would say that's Vlorsutes since he's such a downer. ^_^ Lakshmi.Vlorsutes said: » There's a difference between freaking out and getting annoyed at player stupidity. You don't need to be strutting around too much Ben. Lakshmi.Rooks said: » Oh, that's what Ben needs, a stimulant. You know how ritalin seems to have an opposite effect on children from adults? omg i hate you all welcome back
benjamus said: » you complain a lot. also are annoying and homo. go rub maple syrup on your mullet and shove a hockey puck up your *** You're just precious. Looks like some Sparklely hate to me ^_^ Offline
Posts: 1073
lol NOT !!! what happened to our peerless leader? does art need a spankin?
I keep seeing Art's post disappearing, reappearing, then disappearing again. everything ok in modland? do u ned a doctor? I am quite vexed as well.
Offline
Posts: 1073
I think Vlor got his hands on Art's account and posted racist gangster dating videos. Naw meen niiga?!
Put simply, there was a mix up on a video posted. Arte was topic banned due to this mix up, but because it was a video, not an image, the topic ban was reversed and the video undeleted. After a few minutes of confusion, I assumed I had undeleted the video so I deleted it again. >.>
EDIT: Actually, what is the difference between an inappropriate image being posted vs. an inappropriate video? Genuinely curious! I would imagine that, with the inappropriate video, you can choose to not watch it and it's not immediately out there in the open. With an inappropriate image, it is what it is. There's no choosing not to see it.
Thus they're stricter on the images. That and any searches on Google could show said images coming from here, which they probably consider bad for business. Lakshmi.Stepth said: » EDIT: Actually, what is the difference between an inappropriate image being posted vs. an inappropriate video? Genuinely curious! For one.. What Vlor said. For two, Google scans the images posted here fairly regularly and rate the site. The site has gotten such a bad rating in the past that ads were pulled, rules were rewritten, the mods of that time went and removed many, MANY images (I still run across them) and we got lucky and were granted the ads back which according to Scragg "never happens." Oddly enough despite Google owning Youtube, they don't seem to scan videos. However certain rules still stand; no nudity (cartoon or otherwise), no videos containing RL footage of another user without consent, etc. Anna Ruthven said: » Lakshmi.Stepth said: » EDIT: Actually, what is the difference between an inappropriate image being posted vs. an inappropriate video? Genuinely curious! For one.. What Vlor said. For two, Google scans the images posted here fairly regularly and rate the site. The site has gotten such a bad rating in the past that ads were pulled, rules were rewritten, the mods of that time went and removed many, MANY images (I still run across them) and we got lucky and were granted the ads back which according to Scragg "never happens." Oddly enough despite Google owning Youtube, they don't seem to scan videos. However certain rules still stand; no nudity (cartoon or otherwise), no videos containing RL footage of another user without consent, etc. And I just got done editing my post with something along those lines. Lakshmi.Vlorsutes said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Lakshmi.Stepth said: » EDIT: Actually, what is the difference between an inappropriate image being posted vs. an inappropriate video? Genuinely curious! For one.. What Vlor said. For two, Google scans the images posted here fairly regularly and rate the site. The site has gotten such a bad rating in the past that ads were pulled, rules were rewritten, the mods of that time went and removed many, MANY images (I still run across them) and we got lucky and were granted the ads back which according to Scragg "never happens." Oddly enough despite Google owning Youtube, they don't seem to scan videos. However certain rules still stand; no nudity (cartoon or otherwise), no videos containing RL footage of another user without consent, etc. And I just got done editing my post with something along those lines. Also, if you are curious about the video above, it's my personal opinion that videos containing racial and homophobic slurs should be prohibited, but it was undeleted by the mod who deleted it in the first place and I'd rather not step on their toes. Consider it pending deletion for now. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|