Coruscanti Testing |
||
Coruscanti Testing
There is, but he wasn't using that.
Offline
Posts: 18
off handing coruscanti with mandau. sorry its hard to make out but what is goin on in that attack is the mandau proc'd first then right after coruscanti proc'd. as you can see it wasnt a triple attack set proc. and as i was watching the attack i saw the higherr dmg coming from coruscanti.
Odin.Graywind said: » Sylow, here's the image you requested from Fahkyu, found it off the site he referenced. 273 DMG no crit -> 648 Crit -> 780 Crit. Offline
Posts: 18
your right. going out to play with the dagger some more today ill post screen shots if i get anything useful.
I figured it could only be Mandau or Set Proc.
Your sample size is way too large to not notice a hit that high. That'd be one massively skewed random-number-generator event.
It would be even worse because I didn't know about the extra attacks detail tab until Motenten mentioned it.
So Crimy and I literally. Watched. Every. Single. Attack. Happen.
Necro Bump Detected!
[100 days between previous and next post]
Greetings Everyone,
I would like to start this replay by stating the fact I recently acquired Coruscanti and tried my own testing. Though I’m not a professional analyst or hardcore gamer like some of you guys ( <3 Sylow) so please bare with my Armature Vocabulary. This is a breakdown for the conditions I put the test to: • Coruscant equipped in Main hand alone as a DNC. • Support Job was White Mage to eliminate the benefits of any other mele Jobs. • Engaged with Bluffalo without any gear except the main hand weapon only SABER DANCE was used for Double Attack. • Blufalo checked Tough before engaging. • No support buffs were added via Crour except HP and MP for survival needs. • No food or magic buffs were added except Haste. Herewith are the data extracted from the whole test: DAMAGE TYPE CONDITION 45 NORMAL 43 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 138 CRITICAL 48 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 40 NORMAL 26 NORMAL 40 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 40 NORMAL 31 NORMAL 42 NORMAL 44 NORMAL 46 NORMAL 44 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 46 NORMAL 46 NORMAL 35 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 90 CRITICAL 48 NORMAL 107 PROC DOUBLE ATTACK 33 NORMAL 102 CRITICAL 48 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 82 PROC DOUBLE ATTACK 40 NORMAL 58 NORMAL 86 CRITICAL 75 CRITICAL 48 NORMAL 49 NORMAL 87 CRITICAL 99 CRITICAL 46 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 89 CRITICAL 51 * 47 NORMAL 55 * 36 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 97 PROC DOUBLE ATTACK 38 NORMAL 57 * 30 NORMAL 76 CRITICAL 96 CRITICAL 52 * 74 NORMAL 111 PROC DOUBLE ATTACK 80 CRITICAL 49 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 49 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 47 NORMAL 73 NORMAL 94 CRITICAL 44 NORMAL 56 * 48 NORMAL 106 CRITICAL 81 CRITICAL 42 NORMAL 48 NORMAL 51 * 46 NORMAL 32 NORMAL 75 CRITICAL 44 NORMAL 52 * 79 CRITICAL 49 NORMAL 86 CRITICAL 33 NORMAL 79 CRITICAL 108 CRITICAL 90 CRITICAL 75 PROC DOUBLE ATTACK 108 CRITICAL 48 NORMAL This is an overall chart of the damage output the whole period. Herewith is the percentage of Critical Hits obtained throughout the fight: Please note that the percentage was calculated this way: Total hits=89 Critical hits acquired=21 Percentage=21/89= 4.24% Please note that the percentage was calculated this way: Total hits=89 ODSD acquired=5 Percentage=5/89= 0.06% NOW IF SE WRITES 5% CRITICAL HITS THEN: The error margin =100%-(4.24/5)=15% So the true percentage of Coruscanti Proc =0.06*15%=0.09% proc rate. I hope this helps somehow. A sample size of about ~1000 attacks is really needed.
The most important thing is to see whether or not it still forces onto all hits if it procs on one of them, but I don't think it is based on what you've already posted unless it never proced on a double attack (highly possible for such a small sample size) Seems like they may hae kept the original 10% proc rate that I estimated for occuring on a multi-attack and just made it a normal effect. Oh I see, was just noticing the ODSD without critical hits.
I mean it does proc as you can see from chart but your absolutely right more hits are needed just was afraid that each monster will have different status to mess up the analysis. Thanks for the feedback. If what you say is the closest to being accurate then most of these procs happened without double attack.
it was not that easy to follow up with double attack animation, maybe video recording would have helped.
Necro Bump Detected!
[86 days between previous and next post]
That's not a Coruscanti proc, that's a THF AF3+2 set bonus proc. It triples damage. If you have Twashtar with the Aftermath up, you can get a 6x damage bonus proc on a SA/TA, netting you ~20k damage with the right Atma/gear.
Lakshmi.Byrth said: » That's not a Coruscanti proc, that's a THF AF3+2 set bonus proc. It triples damage. This is still the right answer, fun to see those big numbers though :3 with twash and af3 u can see huge SATA numbers often on the rocs in altepa aby
Necro Bump Detected!
[157 days between previous and next post]
So possibly a silly question and I guess really situational... But given the dex bonus of a Eva dagger, wouldn't most the time losing the evasion lost versus the damage gain isn't worth off handing this weapon when using rudras storm? You gain dex slightly helping damage and get Eva? Though guess if only DDing this wins? But then again change jobs?
Shiva.Tedril said: » So possibly a silly question and I guess really situational... But given the dex bonus of a Eva dagger, wouldn't most the time losing the evasion lost versus the damage gain isn't worth off handing this weapon when using rudras storm? You gain dex slightly helping damage and get Eva? Though guess if only DDing this wins? But then again change jobs? dex bonus from an evade dagger...? huh? Agi adds to evasion, not Dex~
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|