Sylph.Rebo said:
Remora.Dodu said:
In what way is your eyeballing any more reliable than Wiki's 8 year-old testing, which was followed up whenever the enhancement on AF2 was tested?
Also, you think that defense has any bearing on whether or not you should use Counterstance. The less defense you generally have, the less Counterstance is hindering your ability to take a hit.
Like I said, no idea what you're talking about.
Also, you think that defense has any bearing on whether or not you should use Counterstance. The less defense you generally have, the less Counterstance is hindering your ability to take a hit.
Like I said, no idea what you're talking about.
Quote:
Also, you think that defense has any bearing on whether or not you should use Counterstance. The less defense you generally have, the less Counterstance is hindering your ability to take a hit.
Are you fkn srs! HAHAHAHA Maybe if you actually played the game I would be more interested in your misinformed findings, but seeing as this quote pretty much relieves me of defending anything to you anymore i'd say good day sir. HAHAHAHAHAHA
No idea why I'm actually responding to this, but alright. Counterstance strips you of all your native DEF, leaving you with whatever DEF is generated by your VIT. Are you a PLD with 600 DEF and 80 VIT? You just lost 560 DEF. Are you a RNG with 300 DEF and 60 VIT? You just lost 270 DEF. Addition and subtraction are hard bro.
