|
|
Pics that make you LOL
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 16303
By Ramuh.Sagittario 2011-08-27 15:21:10
This pic does not make me lol, it makes me q_q because I can't figure it out ;-;;;;;
By slipispsycho 2011-08-27 15:21:30
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake. A-***-men.
This pic does not make me lol, it makes me q_q because I can't figure it out ;-;;;;; Similar things are shot at a specific angle to give the illusion that it's an unbroken chain.. However I can't see how at any angle that would work here <_< I'd be curious for the explanation myself.
 Phoenix.Fredjan
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2326
By Phoenix.Fredjan 2011-08-27 15:27:24
yeah, that's a really weird angle. it's like if the dice were suspended in the air or something...
edit: I think it's photoshopped
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 33979
By Bismarck.Dracondria 2011-08-27 15:31:44
It's one of these
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34
By Siren.Corellon 2011-08-27 15:37:35
I made this because I think it's funny. Sorry if you are offended.
Jeanne Calment
Not offended, disappointed. 1. It's Genesis 6:3. 2. It's specifically to the evils of the people prior to the great flood with the exception of Noah and his family and in no way represents the people of today as far as we know. Took me all of 5 seconds to find out it was the wrong verse and 15 seconds to find the correct verse and connotation.
Edit: For the record I still thought it was funny and wouldn't have cared if the scripture wasn't wrong.
I fudged the scripture on purpose to see how long it would take for someone to correct me, and how they would do it. The idea that the statement applies only to the "wicked" people prior to the flood is your interpretation, not a fact. Be careful about speaking of the Bible as if you are an authority on it, as even theologians disagree on many issues. But I'm glad you found it at least a bit funny. I'm sad you didn't see through my trolling though lol.
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake.
It makes sense if you dissect it. The scripture is correct, but one part of the verse is not. I made the picture because I honestly do find it funny, but I also had a hypothesis that if I added the verse mistake, someone would post about it with some degree of condescension, despite the fact that the error does not cause the scripture or the woman's age to be incorrect, and use that to discredit the joke. I believe my theory was correct, considering he was "disappointed" that one number was off, and then used an interpretation of the scripture to say the joke is invalid. It was just a personal experiment.
By Artemicion 2011-08-27 15:40:28
サーバ: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 996
By Asura.Kaisuko 2011-08-27 15:40:45
Who cares. More lols please.
[+]
Phoenix.Fredjan
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2326
By Phoenix.Fredjan 2011-08-27 15:44:53
Who cares. More lols please. 
these pics have been posted here before. >_>
サーバ: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 33979
By Bismarck.Dracondria 2011-08-27 15:46:00
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23653
By Shiva.Flionheart 2011-08-27 16:05:06
I made this because I think it's funny. Sorry if you are offended.
Jeanne Calment
Not offended, disappointed. 1. It's Genesis 6:3. 2. It's specifically to the evils of the people prior to the great flood with the exception of Noah and his family and in no way represents the people of today as far as we know. Took me all of 5 seconds to find out it was the wrong verse and 15 seconds to find the correct verse and connotation.
Edit: For the record I still thought it was funny and wouldn't have cared if the scripture wasn't wrong.
I fudged the scripture on purpose to see how long it would take for someone to correct me, and how they would do it. The idea that the statement applies only to the "wicked" people prior to the flood is your interpretation, not a fact. Be careful about speaking of the Bible as if you are an authority on it, as even theologians disagree on many issues. But I'm glad you found it at least a bit funny. I'm sad you didn't see through my trolling though lol.
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake.
It makes sense if you dissect it. The scripture is correct, but one part of the verse is not. I made the picture because I honestly do find it funny, but I also had a hypothesis that if I added the verse mistake, someone would post about it with some degree of condescension, despite the fact that the error does not cause the scripture or the woman's age to be incorrect, and use that to discredit the joke. I believe my theory was correct, considering he was "disappointed" that one number was off, and then used an interpretation of the scripture to say the joke is invalid. It was just a personal experiment.
No-ones ever heard that excuse before.
[+]
サーバ: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3012
By Fenrir.Leoheart 2011-08-27 16:18:02
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34
By Siren.Corellon 2011-08-27 16:18:44
I made this because I think it's funny. Sorry if you are offended.
Jeanne Calment
Not offended, disappointed. 1. It's Genesis 6:3. 2. It's specifically to the evils of the people prior to the great flood with the exception of Noah and his family and in no way represents the people of today as far as we know. Took me all of 5 seconds to find out it was the wrong verse and 15 seconds to find the correct verse and connotation.
Edit: For the record I still thought it was funny and wouldn't have cared if the scripture wasn't wrong.
I fudged the scripture on purpose to see how long it would take for someone to correct me, and how they would do it. The idea that the statement applies only to the "wicked" people prior to the flood is your interpretation, not a fact. Be careful about speaking of the Bible as if you are an authority on it, as even theologians disagree on many issues. But I'm glad you found it at least a bit funny. I'm sad you didn't see through my trolling though lol.
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake.
It makes sense if you dissect it. The scripture is correct, but one part of the verse is not. I made the picture because I honestly do find it funny, but I also had a hypothesis that if I added the verse mistake, someone would post about it with some degree of condescension, despite the fact that the error does not cause the scripture or the woman's age to be incorrect, and use that to discredit the joke. I believe my theory was correct, considering he was "disappointed" that one number was off, and then used an interpretation of the scripture to say the joke is invalid. It was just a personal experiment.
No-ones ever heard that excuse before.
I guess I'll attempt one final time to explain the joke-within-a-joke.
The mentality that one small error in a work causes the entire thing to be questionably valid is rejected by the Christian community when it comes to the Bible. Example: the word "virgin" is misused in the Bible: it is an incorrect translation of the Hebrew word "almah," meaning young woman.
The irony: someone creates a picture that has a passage from the Bible in it, and the scripture is correct, but merely the verse cited is wrong. Christian comes along and discredits the work over it.
It's a completely futile attempt to explain, I know.
Edit: This is absolutely the last thing I will say on the subject, I promise. Feel free to insult me, I deserve it at this point >_>
 Phoenix.Novaria
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 776
By Phoenix.Novaria 2011-08-27 16:19:16
Bismarck.Dracondria said: »
I played through that game SPECIFICALLY because I enjoyed listening to the banter...lol
Phoenix.Fondue
サーバ: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2713
By Phoenix.Fondue 2011-08-27 16:21:40
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23653
By Shiva.Flionheart 2011-08-27 16:30:12
I made this because I think it's funny. Sorry if you are offended.
Jeanne Calment
Not offended, disappointed. 1. It's Genesis 6:3. 2. It's specifically to the evils of the people prior to the great flood with the exception of Noah and his family and in no way represents the people of today as far as we know. Took me all of 5 seconds to find out it was the wrong verse and 15 seconds to find the correct verse and connotation.
Edit: For the record I still thought it was funny and wouldn't have cared if the scripture wasn't wrong.
I fudged the scripture on purpose to see how long it would take for someone to correct me, and how they would do it. The idea that the statement applies only to the "wicked" people prior to the flood is your interpretation, not a fact. Be careful about speaking of the Bible as if you are an authority on it, as even theologians disagree on many issues. But I'm glad you found it at least a bit funny. I'm sad you didn't see through my trolling though lol.
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake.
It makes sense if you dissect it. The scripture is correct, but one part of the verse is not. I made the picture because I honestly do find it funny, but I also had a hypothesis that if I added the verse mistake, someone would post about it with some degree of condescension, despite the fact that the error does not cause the scripture or the woman's age to be incorrect, and use that to discredit the joke. I believe my theory was correct, considering he was "disappointed" that one number was off, and then used an interpretation of the scripture to say the joke is invalid. It was just a personal experiment.
No-ones ever heard that excuse before.
I guess I'll attempt one final time to explain the joke-within-a-joke.
The mentality that one small error in a work causes the entire thing to be questionably valid is rejected by the Christian community when it comes to the Bible. Example: the word "virgin" is misused in the Bible: it is an incorrect translation of the Hebrew word "almah," meaning young woman.
The irony: someone creates a picture that has a passage from the Bible in it, and the scripture is correct, but merely the verse cited is wrong. Christian comes along and discredits the work over it.
It's a completely futile attempt to explain, I know.
Edit: This is absolutely the last thing I will say on the subject, I promise. Feel free to insult me, I deserve it at this point >_>
I understand your reasoning, I just don't believe you.
 Bahamut.Aeronis
サーバ: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1838
By Bahamut.Aeronis 2011-08-27 16:32:24
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34
By Siren.Corellon 2011-08-27 16:33:10
I made this because I think it's funny. Sorry if you are offended.
Jeanne Calment
Not offended, disappointed. 1. It's Genesis 6:3. 2. It's specifically to the evils of the people prior to the great flood with the exception of Noah and his family and in no way represents the people of today as far as we know. Took me all of 5 seconds to find out it was the wrong verse and 15 seconds to find the correct verse and connotation.
Edit: For the record I still thought it was funny and wouldn't have cared if the scripture wasn't wrong.
I fudged the scripture on purpose to see how long it would take for someone to correct me, and how they would do it. The idea that the statement applies only to the "wicked" people prior to the flood is your interpretation, not a fact. Be careful about speaking of the Bible as if you are an authority on it, as even theologians disagree on many issues. But I'm glad you found it at least a bit funny. I'm sad you didn't see through my trolling though lol.
No-one buys the whole "I WAS TROLLING U ALL ALONG" act. Just admit the mistake.
It makes sense if you dissect it. The scripture is correct, but one part of the verse is not. I made the picture because I honestly do find it funny, but I also had a hypothesis that if I added the verse mistake, someone would post about it with some degree of condescension, despite the fact that the error does not cause the scripture or the woman's age to be incorrect, and use that to discredit the joke. I believe my theory was correct, considering he was "disappointed" that one number was off, and then used an interpretation of the scripture to say the joke is invalid. It was just a personal experiment.
No-ones ever heard that excuse before.
I guess I'll attempt one final time to explain the joke-within-a-joke.
The mentality that one small error in a work causes the entire thing to be questionably valid is rejected by the Christian community when it comes to the Bible. Example: the word "virgin" is misused in the Bible: it is an incorrect translation of the Hebrew word "almah," meaning young woman.
The irony: someone creates a picture that has a passage from the Bible in it, and the scripture is correct, but merely the verse cited is wrong. Christian comes along and discredits the work over it.
It's a completely futile attempt to explain, I know.
Edit: This is absolutely the last thing I will say on the subject, I promise. Feel free to insult me, I deserve it at this point >_>
I understand your reasoning, I just don't believe you.
Well, touché sir, that's fair enough :)
[+]
サーバ: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23653
By Shiva.Flionheart 2011-08-27 16:35:04
Don't feel bad, I don't believe anyone about anything :(
By Artemicion 2011-08-27 16:44:51
This went from being amusing to downright hilarious.
[+]
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34
By Siren.Corellon 2011-08-27 16:54:16
Yes, everyone is getting trolled :)
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 482
By Odin.Gosuapple 2011-08-27 17:09:12
If you took an alien who knew nothing about our culture, showed him this thread, and asked "What do you think happens on Earth if you admit on the internet that you made a mistake?" I wonder what he'd say...
Ramuh.Krizz
サーバ: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
Posts: 23561
By Ramuh.Krizz 2011-08-27 17:12:37
[+]
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2215
By Siren.Thoraeon 2011-08-27 17:14:32
サーバ: Siren
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34
By Siren.Corellon 2011-08-27 17:21:16
By Artemicion 2011-08-27 17:36:09
サーバ: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2269
By Cerberus.Wolfshadow 2011-08-27 20:46:49
Due to the new forum rules, the old thread is being nuked. It's over 900 pages long, and there are numerous offending posts in it. And by numerous, I mean probably at LEAST one per page. Not including quotes.
Take the time to read through the below forum rules if you already have not. Remember, intentionally bypassing the profanity filter is not allowed.
Forum.Rules said: We are implementing a global profanity filter for all users under 13, and for users not logged in. As we no longer ask for birthdays at registration, this means it will apply to all new users as well. (You can no longer verify your age, and the profanity filter option has not been added to account options yet.)
- Slurs based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or similar protected statuses are not permitted, even in jest, or even by members of the same group.
- All sexual content now falls under "American network television" rules. While this naturally involves a certain gray area, if you won't see it on standard television (not cable), don't post it. (If you're not sure, don't post it.)
- Overly hostile and repeat attacks against a given user which would normally fall under harassment policies in-game will no longer be allowed.
- Posting any personal real-life identifiable information or images about a particular user without their permission is not allowed, unless they have previously posted it here.
- Player Warnings are no longer permitted. (This includes posting it in an already existing thread.)
- Do not link to or advertise external sites for blatant 3rd party hacks and tools that would probably get you immediately banned from FFXI/XIV. Guildwork Client and Windower are ok.
- These policies apply to all sections of the site: forum, item and player comments, screenshots, avatars, etc. Images violating any of the above rules will be removed if discovered by an admin or mod.
I will lock the other thread for now to give users time to save their favorites. It will be trashed this afternoon or tomorrow.
Edit: Do not expect a moderator to take the time to edit your post to remove a single image bypassing the profanity filter. If that is done, it is as a courtesy, not a requirement. If you are derailing or attacking someone, you risk your post being deleted regardless of including a picture in it.
Those that bypass the profanity filter risk being topicbanned. There is a profanity list. If you can't take the time to read it, then don't post images.
|
|
