Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking?

Afania forgetting that going to the dark side gonna mangle her eyes into being chimpanzee eyes with non-functioning eyelids.

smh

Alfania went to the dark side of smell, if any

Or brown side

Hey look, this guy looks like an average grandpa!



non-functioning eyelids? What non-functioning eyelids? :D

The fact you have to state "my" AI means that AI is nothing more than a glorified yes-man/woman that will input the response you want to see.

Yes, you need certain level of media literacy skill to avoid the yes man issues from AI. That's why I suggested you not to use it.

In the case of my AI though, it did make many strong arguments on Light being evil despite I try to lure it to a different path. That's why in the end I can slightly agree that Light's narcissist personality can count as evil.

But the lawful argument from AI quickly crumbled the moment I asked AI exactly what lawful means. So lawful argument is noticably weaker.

If you don't have media literacy skill then you not get much from AI. I don't think it's a pure yes man like you said.

AI is a yes-man. You guided it towards the result you wanted. I didnt /shrug

You conveniently ignored the arguments provided in my post for Light's aligntment. It seems you have a different understanding of what "lawful" means.

I did get the opinion of an auhtor friend who's been playing DnD for as long as I remember, and he didn't bat an eye describing Light as lawful evil. And we had a nice discussion about the alignment system (a topic I was never into, but I engaged in according to your definitions, to have common ground and make this fruitful)

But in any case, what matters is the "evil" alignment. If you finally begun to see that this is a reasonable position, then my job here is done. :)

See the post above, it's WAY less of a yes man than you give credit for IMO.



Did you also remind him that Light also changed his personal code multiple times in the story? Like how it went from "killing criminals is okay" to "killing or hurting non-criminal that threatened me is okay".

Some people could forget that ....but that's the key thing that doesn't belong to lawful.

The whole point of Light-kun's story is that anyone, even someone with the best intentions in the world, will be corrupted by absolute power.

See when Light purposefully lost his memories of ever owning the death note. He reverted back to the law abiding high school kid that would not dream of killing someone.

Then when he gets his memories back first thing he does is kill L, a non criminal.

He became corrupted by the death note's power. As anyone would.

I wouldnt

And if you disagree...

Please give me your name

My name is
Pantafer Nando

That's fair, and I would say that I view him as predominantly lawful evil till he started going predominantyl chaotic later on

Oh hey, it's La Noire! I played this game recently.

But the "doubt" option is changed to "bad cop" in the remastered version.

Bad cop!

But the question was sin not evil.

Religions define what sins are. Civilizations define what is unlawful. Evil is subjective.

He still doesn't get it. That's what I mean by arguing with Nynja is frivalous. To people like Nynja, words don't mean anything so they'll pick and choose when a word's meaning is applicable.

I'll give another example of psychopathy. If someone doesn't like being called something. If you continue to call them the thing they don't like, then your the ***. It's the simple. It's disresectful. It's like why did we have Malcom X and the black panthers movement? White people couldn't be respectful. White people refused to stop calling them a slur so eventually they became violent.

Have you ever read the Jean Paul Sartre quote?

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

That's people like Nynja in a nutshell. It's the crux of why you can't argue with them and shouldn't bother to even have a discussion with them. You're wasting your breath. They'll indulge you. They'll entertain you with a conversation so long as you never really push back on anything they have to say or any of their ideology because they aren't the ones seeking to convince their opposition in earnest. They're the ones that use fear, intimidation, and force to push through the agenda regardless of what others may think or feel. That's why they're psychoic. When they're parsing for support they'll use flowery language and dog whistles. They'll outright lie to you. They'll misrepesent their opposition. They'll project their faults onto the opposition. Like Oh I'm not in the files it was those other guys!

I don't know if it speaks more to the failings of the education system or if it's symptomatic of our gradual descent into idiocracy. It's like when the kids use AI to do their homework. They think they understand what psychopathy is because they read it off google. Like what would bring is to water crops with Brondo?

I can type out a wall of text in minutes and the backroom joke is that you guys think it's AI.

How do you measure empathy?
Do we do a blood test or do we observe behavioral patterns? If someone was a psychopath capable of maintaining relationships, then how do you know they're unempathetic? It only comes across as holier than thou because it made you feel bad enough to try to construct a reubuttle.

I never said I was capable of indulging in the dark triad. That's part of the point.

Everyone lies (machiavellianism) (speak no evil)
Everyone's selfish (narcissistic) (here no evil)
Everyone's blind (psychopathic) (see no evil)

Some people are integrous enough that they can acknowledge their own unconscious biases and work on it. Other people lack that same level of integrity of self-accountability. That's when the cross the line. You guys were making jedi memes. Neither the sith nor the jedi were correct. The way of the bendu, the way of the gray, is the true path. You cannot have too much light. Order stifles freedom. The light scorches the earth. You cannot have too much dark. For without light, life cannot grow.

I never finished it. Twice :/

This is why I find it hard to accept Light into my evil army....

Why do we need a justice ideology as justification for power? Why can't we just say "yeah, I like power because I like good stuff".

Light is a character that needs justification to act.

If I have death note, I wouldn't even use it to kill criminals, that's dumb move in my eyes. I'd use it to blackmail people and get power and money. No justification needed except "because I want that". THIS is the true philosophy of evil.

Use death note for justice, even if it is a twisted version of justice? Ridiculous!


Light Yagami should be OUT! He doesn't deserve a spot in evil alignment no matter what other people said! ;<

I am evil, so I am allowed to use AI however I want ;)

I agree. Light is a schoolkid with a God complex. He was never evil to begin with, nor was he "evil" later. Just corrupted by power.

Finally, someone understand the philosophy of evil ;)

I worked so hard to preach it, it feels nice to get some results finally ;)

I use AI for good and titties.... and to make the tittie bounce...

Afania you didn't teach me ***. I was always evil. Just hide it until it's time to strike ;).