This locked?
NVM, Darki just got owned, as you were.
Drugwars |
||
Drugwars
This locked?
NVM, Darki just got owned, as you were. Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Fenrir.Schutz said: I can only forsee things getting worse. I can't imagine the Mexican drug cartels deciding to go into another legitimate industry and beating their swords into plowshares, should the US legalise drugs. :p I suspect they would like to hold onto what power and influence they have attained in the areas they control. Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Mexico is not the US's problem. Honestly competition is all that needs to happen for the ball to start rolling. EDIT: Legal competition. I never said it was the US's problem. I was just indicating that a strong Mexican federal government crackdown was the most viable internal solution. The most viable external solution would be for Americans to stop buying drugs from Mexico, whether that means buying drugs locally-made or just not doing them LOL whichever it takes to stop giving money to the cartels to make them so strong. Fenrir.Schutz said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Fenrir.Schutz said: I can only forsee things getting worse. I can't imagine the Mexican drug cartels deciding to go into another legitimate industry and beating their swords into plowshares, should the US legalise drugs. :p I suspect they would like to hold onto what power and influence they have attained in the areas they control. It would be in their best interest to turn their operations into a legitimate business. The less crime they have to commit to move their product, the better off they are. Schutz you really from the US? Why don't you use Z's?
Diabolos.Sovereign said: Quetzalcoatl.Volkom said: legalizing drugs help fight against cartels? probably but is it morally right? you're *** kidding me, right? Morality shouldnt even enter into the concept. Especially not in a tolerance-driven government such as the United States. A government that legalizes pornography and alcohol (two major "immoral" industries) really has no place to assume that drugs fall under a separate set of rules. Something like that should be left up to the judgement and responsibility of the end-user. If you dont like it, avoid it. The concept is very simple. Make them legalized for medical purposes? either way making them legal probably will be a good thing. Marijuana comes to mind, it may lower crime. I mean if it was legalized what is the point in selling it? Just look at it like alcohol. If someone is high behind the wheel of a car or in public, or some place that requires etiquette. The simple solution would be to bring them to jail and fine them. Even if legal people can get addicted and should still need rehab and other services. I would only be open to the possibility of decriminalizing marijuana I would never vote to completely legalize it. There is a big difference.
Gilgamesh.Tweeek said: I would only be open to the possibility of decriminalizing marijuana I would never vote to completely legalize it. There is a big difference. I do not mean to turn the country like canada just do something where it stops crime =x. well it's already a state issue rather than federal issue as being "medically legal" it's been this way for some time. I used to have a card back in 2001 and even then people had been getting cards for like 2-3 years.
Carbuncle.Arona said: Fenrir.Schutz said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Fenrir.Schutz said: I can only forsee things getting worse. Not if they can cow the local government in border areas to leave them alone. Then they can operate any way they like. I remember reading this newsstory a while back... http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/world/mexico/stories/DN-mexsecurity_29bus.ART0.State.Edition1.26c2674.html ...it's to the point where private multinational firms working in the border areas look to themselves to provide security, and hope that the cartels continue to not target them because they are "too big" (i.e. don't have local capitals that can be targeted for intimidation and extortion.) If the local government cannot protect regular citizens or private industry, then the cartels are free to act more openly in whatever they do. EDIT: Gilgamesh.Tweeek said: Schutz you really from the US? Why don't you use Z's? Fenrir.Schutz said: If the local government cannot protect regular citiZens or private industry, then the cartels are free to act more openly in whatever they do. I used a "z" there. :p Fenrir.Schutz said: Carbuncle.Arona said: Fenrir.Schutz said: Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Fenrir.Schutz said: I can only forsee things getting worse. Not if they can cow the local government in border areas to leave them alone. Then they can operate any way they like. I remember reading this newsstory a while back... http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/world/mexico/stories/DN-mexsecurity_29bus.ART0.State.Edition1.26c2674.html ...it's to the point where private multinational firms working in the border areas look to themselves to provide security, and hope that the cartels continue to not target them because they are "too big" (i.e. don't have local capitals that can be targeted for intimidation and extortion.) If the local government cannot protect regular citizens or private industry, then the cartels are free to act more openly in whatever they do. EDIT: Gilgamesh.Tweeek said: Schutz you really from the US? Why don't you use Z's? Fenrir.Schutz said: If the local government cannot protect regular citiZens or private industry, then the cartels are free to act more openly in whatever they do. I used a "z" there. :p After legalization the cartels would not have to bribe/intimidate anyone to move their products. They would now be in competition with other legit businesses dealing with that industry. If they cannot adapt, they will not survive. Fenrir.Schutz said: Gilgamesh.Tweeek said: Schutz you really from the US? Why don't you use Z's? Fenrir.Schutz said: If the local government cannot protect regular citiZens or private industry, then the cartels are free to act more openly in whatever they do. I used a "z" there. :p i dont think anyone says citisen though >< from any Country Fenrir.Schutz said: I always felt the situation facing Mexico and Russia where organised crime has such a tremendously strong presence mirrors the pre-Depression US mobwars of the 1920's and 1930's. At the time, mob organisations were so strong and prevelant they effectively "owned" certain cities in the US, and it took a lot of federal government pressure (essentially flat out warfare, targeting kingpin figures, attacking financial backers, uprooting corrupt law enforcement agents, etc.) and many years to finally reverse the situation. Many of the "untouchable" mob bosses were finally brought in through the use of accountants to track their actions, as an indication of the extent law enforcement had to go. I really get the impression that such strong-handed action must be (eventually) taken by the Mexican and Russian governments to target the threat and hedge out their control over territory. For certain, the US drug-using population fuels the problem in the first place, but the cartels are so indemic now to the local economies that they are emboldened to overtly attack authority figures and oppress locals to protect their holdings. I can only forsee things getting worse. Fenrir.Schutz said: I can't imagine the Mexican drug cartels deciding to go into another legitimate industry and beating their swords into plowshares, should the US legalise drugs. :p I suspect they would like to hold onto what power and influence they have attained in the areas they control. I was just asking cause you write like UK Carbuncle.Arona said: After legalization the cartels would not have to bribe/intimidate anyone to move their products. They would now be in competition with other legit businesses dealing with that industry. If they cannot adapt, they will not survive. wtf do you think they will do to their competition? forget all about their intimidation tactics? Gilgamesh.Tweeek said: Carbuncle.Arona said: After legalization the cartels would not have to bribe/intimidate anyone to move their products. They would now be in competition with other legit businesses dealing with that industry. If they cannot adapt, they will not survive. wtf do you think they will do to their competition? forget all about their intimidation tactics? You must be assuming that they would be able to use their intimidation tactics on ALL their competition without recourse? Assuming a full national legalization of drugs, you don't think that major corporations are gonna get into that industry. Maybe I have a little too much faith in our national security to think that some cartels are gonna even try to intimidate them. It would be easier/cheaper for them to legitimize their operations. Everyone who has posted has failed to realize how much money alcohol/Tobacco companies pay towards our government, the influence they have is powerful enough to make sure it will stay illegal preventing further competition for them.
Fenrir.Schutz said: I always felt the situation facing Mexico and Russia where organised crime has such a tremendously strong presence mirrors the pre-Depression US mobwars of the 1920's and 1930's. At the time, mob organisations were so strong and prevelant they effectively "owned" certain cities in the US, and it took a lot of federal government pressure (essentially flat out warfare, targeting kingpin figures, attacking financial backers, uprooting corrupt law enforcement agents, etc.) and many years to finally reverse the situation. Many of the "untouchable" mob bosses were finally brought in through the use of accountants to track their actions, as an indication of the extent law enforcement had to go. I really get the impression that such strong-handed action must be (eventually) taken by the Mexican and Russian governments to target the threat and hedge out their control over territory. For certain, the US drug-using population fuels the problem in the first place, but the cartels are so indemic now to the local economies that they are emboldened to overtly attack authority figures and oppress locals to protect their holdings. I can only forsee things getting worse. Funny thing is what started the mafia's in the 1920-1930 was prohibition in a way drugs are like alcohol Pandemonium.Spicyryan said: Funny, I am watching Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas right now. Legalization of drugs? Yes, please legalize every last drug. The people who do not use them suffer more from them being illegal. People need to realize morality is just opinions and that they have no right what so ever to tell anyone what they can or can not put in their body. People should be educated about drugs, but no one should tell me or anyone else I can not use them. Oh, and *** Mexico. Fenrir.Mankey said: Everyone who has posted has failed to realize how much money alcohol/Tobacco companies pay towards our government, the influence they have is powerful enough to make sure it will stay illegal preventing further competition for them. This kills people more than drugs would.... Fenrir.Mankey said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Fenrir.Mankey said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Diabolos.Sovereign said: Quetzalcoatl.Volkom said: legalizing drugs help fight against cartels? probably but is it morally right? you're *** kidding me, right? Morality shouldnt even enter into the concept. Especially not in a tolerance-driven government such as the United States. A government that legalizes pornography and alcohol (two major "immoral" industries) really has no place to assume that drugs fall under a separate set of rules. Something like that should be left up to the judgement and responsibility of the end-user. If you dont like it, avoid it. The concept is very simple. how the hell is porn immoral? edit: also the morals of most deities (based on their books) are *** up to no end, and you can have morals without a belief in a higher being so get off your religion high horse America is #1 consumer of pure Columbian cocaine, Brazil is #2.
I see where the problem is... Bahamut.Stanflame said: Diabolos.Sovereign said: Quetzalcoatl.Volkom said: legalizing drugs help fight against cartels? probably but is it morally right? you're *** kidding me, right? Morality shouldnt even enter into the concept. Especially not in a tolerance-driven government such as the United States. A government that legalizes pornography and alcohol (two major "immoral" industries) really has no place to assume that drugs fall under a separate set of rules. Something like that should be left up to the judgement and responsibility of the end-user. If you dont like it, avoid it. The concept is very simple. Make them legalized for medical purposes? either way making them legal probably will be a good thing. Marijuana comes to mind, it may lower crime. I mean if it was legalized what is the point in selling it? Just look at it like alcohol. If someone is high behind the wheel of a car or in public, or some place that requires etiquette. The simple solution would be to bring them to jail and fine them. Even if legal people can get addicted and should still need rehab and other services. Ifrit.Kungfuhustle said: America is #1 consumer of pure Columbian cocaine, Brazil is #2. I see where the problem is... lol Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Fenrir.Mankey said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Fenrir.Mankey said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Diabolos.Sovereign said: Quetzalcoatl.Volkom said: legalizing drugs help fight against cartels? probably but is it morally right? you're *** kidding me, right? Morality shouldnt even enter into the concept. Especially not in a tolerance-driven government such as the United States. A government that legalizes pornography and alcohol (two major "immoral" industries) really has no place to assume that drugs fall under a separate set of rules. Something like that should be left up to the judgement and responsibility of the end-user. If you dont like it, avoid it. The concept is very simple. how the hell is porn immoral? edit: also the morals of most deities (based on their books) are *** up to no end, and you can have morals without a belief in a higher being so get off your religion high horse |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|