Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
Let me hold your cute little hand back, who exactly are you giving this obvious unrelated information to? I mean I see the product of your two stunning degrees, you've obviously retained so much.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were breed for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are breed for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
what about dog breeders?
not really trying to correct you on this one but I'm just a bit curious.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
Let me hold your cute little hand back, who exactly are you giving this obvious unrelated information to? I mean I see the product of your two stunning degrees, you've obviously retained so much.
Plants are living, vegetarians mercilessly slaughter billions of potatoes annually.
Any product containing a thresher-harvested means (IE Wheat) Contains approximately 3% animal protein, mostly the result of small animals decimated by the blades of the thresher harvesting.
A natural vegetarian diet does not provide the required nutrition to the human body, particularly hard hit is the brain. I won't bore you with the biochemistry, but when the asteroid hits, Vegetarians will die before the fatties. (Only human technology allows a full vegetarian diet, mostly focused around a particularly nutritious type of algae)
The only legitimate reason to be a Vegetarian, is so your wank tastes sweeter, yes, it does work.
Yes more vegetables harvested the more worms that die in the process.
Guess its ok to kill worms. They are also not killed humanly. Most of the time having there body cut into lots of pieces.
Oh and here I thought his point was plants are living creatures.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were breed for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are breed for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
what about dog breeders?
not really trying to correct you on this one but I'm just a bit curious.
That's cool, they still breed, just with a different goal. And not for food in this case.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were breed for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are breed for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
what about dog breeders?
not really trying to correct you on this one but I'm just a bit curious.
That's cool, they still breed, just with a different goal. And not for food in this case.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were breed for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are breed for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
what about dog breeders?
not really trying to correct you on this one but I'm just a bit curious.
That's cool, they still breed, just with a different goal. And not for food in this case.
C'mon, you've eaten a few in your day. Don't play coy.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were breed for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are breed for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
Got that? Cool. Return to your seat.
what about dog breeders?
not really trying to correct you on this one but I'm just a bit curious.
That's cool, they still breed, just with a different goal. And not for food in this case.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
You aren't one of those crazies that thinks the holocaust didn't happen right?
That's pretty much the same concept except instead of food it's labor and death.
Do you not believe that slavery existed?
I'm pretty sure man *** itself over quite a few different times.
But man *** everything.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were bred for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are bred for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
I heard humans don't produce much desirable meat. All tough muscle and fat.
I do agree with you, humans are grossly overpopulated, especially in India and China. It wouldn't hurt anything if 50% of them were killed off. Including every Muslim on this planet.
And something you prolife experts should keep in mind, those animals wouldn't even have life if it weren't for humans. They were bred for food, they're raised to be for food, get over it.
Only someone wasting their time on two degrees couldn't notice the fact it is not about prolife, and not six or seven words later make the amazing discovery that animals that are bred for food, are raised for food.
Let me hold your hand and walk you to the front of the short bus for a little.
Breed = Controlling reproduction to maximize offspring.
Raise = To care for and assure they yield the highest profit when slaughter time comes.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
I heard humans don't produce much desirable meat. All tough muscle and fat.
I do agree with you, humans are grossly overpopulated, especially in India and China. It wouldn't hurt anything if 50% of them were killed off. Including every Muslim on this planet.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
I heard humans don't produce much desirable meat. All tough muscle and fat.
I do agree with you, humans are grossly overpopulated, especially in India and China. It wouldn't hurt anything if 50% of them were killed off. Including every Muslim on this planet.
Genocide? I like the way you think set the plan in motion.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
Yes and another way to look at it. If we didnt eat meat we would be chopping down more forests etc for planting vegetables.
We should start killing off and eating humans to control their reproduction while nourishing the fortunate percentage of our species that benefits from it. It would make sense if you go by our basic primitive instincts. The weak would die, the fortunate would flourish, and the natural balance would be kept because our population would be controlled. Since the "farmed humans" would just be raised to a level where an efficient amount of meat could be harvested vs. time it takes to raise them, we wouldn't need to let them live in humane conditions. We could cut off their hands and feet so they couldn't fight and force feed them.
Same logic as a lot of people are using in here. Why not apply it everywhere?
Yes and another way to look at it. If we didnt eat meat we would be chopping down more forests etc for planting vegetables.
Pushing more animals to extinction.
Regardless of what mankind does they are going to leave a damaging biological footprint.
Does this damage really harm the earth as much as it's said that it does? Who knows.
I like plants because I need oxygen.
By the way. *** you for claiming that eating plants is wrong when YOU IN FACT EAT PLANTS...
But isn't that what vegans are doing?
Humans eat meat, we have been doing it for years.
Now we start saying that eating meat is wrong and must change to eating nothing but veggies.
Next thing we know, eating veggies is wrong, because veggies are living creatures (which is what animals are by the way, and the main argument in why we shouldn't eat meat) and deserve to live!
The earth is almost 8000 miles in diameter.
Small?
No.
Small, as in habitable areas suitable and appealing to and for human life and other animals in their natural undisturbed habitat, it is.
Our underwater adventures are eventually going to improve.
I don't know about the near future since I guess it's morbidly difficult to stop an oil spill but maybe someday.
