Random Politics & Religion #30

言語: JP EN DE FR
2010-06-21
New Items
users online
フォーラム » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #30
Random Politics & Religion #30
First Page 2 3 ... 27 28 29 ... 65 66 67
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:13:41  
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Nausi said: »
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Nausi said: »
forge yearbooks

Even fox news retracted themselves from the forgery claim.
Prove it.

Just google it, they corrected the story to say she wrote the notes below his signature. I guess they should fire that fox news reporter right!?!?

You google I don't give a ***if you want to prove it to me then do it and stop telling me what to do Donny !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:15:25  
It's really not that interesting he either wins or doesn't what exactly is there to discuss. You can't go to jail cause some nobody accuses you of something. You need evidence trial etc.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 9772
By Zerowone 2017-12-12 10:17:49  
fonewear said: »
It's really not that interesting he either wins or doesn't what exactly is there to discuss. You can't go to jail cause some nobody accuses you of something. You need evidence trial etc.

Tell that to the people who chant “Lock her up”.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:19:06  
Zerowone said: »
fonewear said: »
It's really not that interesting he either wins or doesn't what exactly is there to discuss. You can't go to jail cause some nobody accuses you of something. You need evidence trial etc.

Tell that to the people who chant “Lock her up”.

I rather discuss net neutrality and see if people have the basic concept of the word "neutral" and page after page of definitions. All while claiming to be internet experts.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-12-12 10:36:09  
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:40:48  
fonewear said: »
That sounds terrible what did you make a wooden block ?

I have a few hobbies. They're boring and no one here cares, but I enjoy them and I only gift with them on request. So nuts to you!
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:41:49  
fonewear said: »
What did fox news ever do to you ? You guys are going off the deep end.

Molested me in high school and I have a signed yearbook to prove...it...

wait.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:42:20  
fonewear said: »
Welcome back Vic they let you out early cause of good behavior ?

Nobody who frequents this dank hole is getting out of anywhere for good behavior ever.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:43:16  
Ramyrez said: »
fonewear said: »
That sounds terrible what did you make a wooden block ?

I have a few hobbies. They're boring and no one here cares, but I enjoy them and I only gift with them on request. So nuts to you!

Nuts...hmmm...

YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:45:24  
As a white male aged 18-49 I propose beer and gum.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17598
By Viciouss 2017-12-12 10:46:32  
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:47:15  
No one signed my year book does that mean I raped someone too ?
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:47:50  
fonewear said: »
No one signed my year book does that mean I raped someone too ?

No one has ever tried to sexually harass or molest me, and I know a family-friend priest who actually is pretty heavily rumored to have been one of "those" priests.

Is...is it me? Wasn't I good enough for anyone to make a pass at? I've gotta be honest, I'm feeling a little rejected right now because apparently I'm the only person never to have been objectified.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-12-12 10:48:09  
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?
[+]
 Odin.Slore
Offline
サーバ: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Slore
Posts: 1350
By Odin.Slore 2017-12-12 10:48:28  
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?

Because he signed it that means he assaulted here? Gotcha, I am going to jail then for sure because I signed a bunch of yearbooks.
[+]
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
サーバ: Garuda
Game: FFXI
user: Chanti
Posts: 11133
By Garuda.Chanti 2017-12-12 10:48:57  
Thanks everyone and a happy Hanukkah to all of you too.



Now who has chocolate coins and wants to spin?
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2017-12-12 10:49:46
 Undelete | Link | 引用 | 返事
 
Post deleted by User.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:51:06  
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Thanks everyone and a happy Hanukkah to all of you too.



Now who has chocolate coins and wants to spin?

I don't have a menorah but I'm sure I can find a candle to light.
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:51:33  
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Now who has chocolate coins and wants to spin?

I buy them and put them in stockings for Christmas.

It makes me feel like a pirate looting someone else's holiday for a different one, neither of which I celebrate accurately nor appropriately.

Yo-ho-ho-ho.

[+]
Offline
Posts: 12129
By Nausi 2017-12-12 10:51:43  
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Nausi said: »
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?

It doesn't matter if the yearbook is fake, the threat is real!
Are the Russians secretly involved in electing Roy Moore?
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:51:44  
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Nausi said: »
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?

It doesn't matter if the yearbook is fake, the threat is real!

This sounds like an argument for fake ***. I don't care if they are fake they look real !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:53:34  
Odin.Slore said: »
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Anna Ruthven said: »
Basically, the signature and whatnot was Moore, the "D.A." by his name was a notation to remind her just who the *** Roy Moore was, he was actually an assistant D.A. at that time.
She now claims the signature was Moore and the rest was her notation. BUT this is not consistent with the statement she originally provided when she first presented the yearbook.

At that time she claimed Moore wrote the whole thing. This is not true, she forged the document. Forgery does not need to include the "entire document".

Its too bad he still signed her yearbook and sexually assaulted her, huh?

Because he signed it that means he assaulted here? Gotcha, I am going to jail then for sure because I signed a bunch of yearbooks.

You better burn those yearbook before you run for government !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 17598
By Viciouss 2017-12-12 10:55:30  
Nausi said: »
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?

You never believed any of the women anyway because they are accusing Republicans. All the Dems are guilty, but the Republicans did nothing wrong in your fantasy land.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:57:19  
Ramyrez said: »
fonewear said: »
No one signed my year book does that mean I raped someone too ?

No one has ever tried to sexually harass or molest me, and I know a family-friend priest who actually is pretty heavily rumored to have been one of "those" priests.

Is...is it me? Wasn't I good enough for anyone to make a pass at? I've gotta be honest, I'm feeling a little rejected right now because apparently I'm the only person never to have been objectified.

I would research this but I'm afraid I'd end up in jail...
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:58:37  
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?

You never believed any of the women anyway because they are accusing Republicans. All the Dems are guilty, but the Republicans did nothing wrong in your fantasy land.

Correct!
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:59:11  
Viciouss said: »
Nausi said: »
Well, if she lied about the notation (she did), why should anyone believe her about the signature?

You never believed any of the women anyway because they are accusing Republicans. All the Dems are guilty, but the Republicans did nothing wrong in your fantasy land.

None of them are guilty and its women's fault for being so god damn tantalizing.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 10:59:25  
See the thing about accusations are they don't prove anything beyond the reasonable doubt. It's a new concept but one that seems to work.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 10:59:51  
fonewear said: »
Ramyrez said: »
fonewear said: »
No one signed my year book does that mean I raped someone too ?

No one has ever tried to sexually harass or molest me, and I know a family-friend priest who actually is pretty heavily rumored to have been one of "those" priests.

Is...is it me? Wasn't I good enough for anyone to make a pass at? I've gotta be honest, I'm feeling a little rejected right now because apparently I'm the only person never to have been objectified.

I would research this but I'm afraid I'd end up in jail...

Why? The priest never ended up there. You're pretty safe.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2017-12-12 11:00:51  
I'm not really in the mood to look up child molester maybe tomorrow
[+]
Offline
Posts: 24505
By Ramyrez 2017-12-12 11:01:37  
fonewear said: »
See the thing about accusations are they don't prove anything beyond the reasonable doubt. It's a new concept but one that seems to work.




[+]
First Page 2 3 ... 27 28 29 ... 65 66 67
Log in to post.