The Liberal Media Collection.

Only blacks/hispanics loot.

When white people destroy a town after a poor hockey result it's called job creation. Think of all the cars that will be bought, all the lamp posts that will be replaced and all the public displays that needed to be revamped anyway!

lolhockey

>:(

#handsupdon'tloot

lmao.

Sometimes I wish I could get on FOX to ask the panel how they manage to make it through the day when any random white guy could be a rapist, mass shooter or serial killer.

I mean you're all wearing suits and seem charismatic. Thats EXACTLY how serial killers carry themselves. Perhaps white America should keep its serial killer problem in check...

etc

edit: that reminds me, I need to get a new suit.

I hope the media can keep the country focused on gun control, illegal immigration and refugees for another year. If a republican was in the WH this is all we would be hearing about.

Those graphs are deceptive Alti.

The first one starts at 1940 and plainly shows that there were no student loans until 1993. Personally I had student loans from 1979 through 1983.

Others are what are called gee wiz graphs. They do not start at 0 in order to exaggerate the curve.

For instance the Y axis on the worker's share of the economy one goes from 0.42 to 0.48. Had it gone from 0 to 1 that graph would be a flat line.

A book you should read: How to Lie with Statistics

No, if you look at the Y axis on the student loan graph, it clearly shows that the first line above 0 is $100 billion. Since all student loans at that time until just after 1990 was very minimal (probably less than $1 billion in total, that's why the line is flat.

It's not that there were no student loans out there, it's that they were so small compared to today that it seems like it's flat and at zero.

What that graph is portraying is that the amount of student loans outstanding literally skyrocketed from 2008 onward. That graph is not being dishonest, it's actually a fairly accurate portrayal of what it's showing, which is skyrocketing student loan debt.

Heck, just by saying this you clearly understand nothing about statistics.

This thread has a clear liberal bias !

It's really hard to take the rest of your post seriously when you say stuff like this. Tsk tsk.

Psh, everyone knows Spurs > all.

The only graph that's really telling is the money printing one. Liberals' paradise.

Interesting word to use. If you would have used misleading you would have been totally wrong. But deceptive leaves room for doubt. Do I doubt these graph?

I doubt every graph, no matter what it says or where it comes from. The entire point is these are fairly accurate and if a republican was in the WH this is all we would be hearing about. Not to mention everything coming from the White house regarding the issues presented in those graphs is the total opposite!

The #1 read book by climate scientists.

Assuming they can read. I mean, they lied about their data, we can't exactly trust them with anything else, right?

Rwad the book guys.

Its slim, easy, and has been used as a college textbook for over half a century. I first read it in 1961.

You are assuming I don't know what it says.

lol'd

You have a great track record with statistics.

Fixed for clarity's sake.

10% of the time you're right every time.