Voidwatch .. BLM Owns? :D
Voidwatch .. BLM owns? :D
k BLM's get back to your job a stun ***^^
[+]
wtf lol
I for one would not risk having a T6 VWNM chase down the back line jobs and hit them all with an AoE due to a missed or resisted stun, but have fun stroking your BLM epeens.
Quetzalcoatl.Generic said: »
k BLM's afk and on event ***^^
Ftfy
Odin.Llewelyn said: »
I for one would not risk having a T6 VWNM chase down the back line jobs and hit them all with an AoE due to a missed or resisted stun, but have fun stroking your BLM epeens.
[+]
Odin.Llewelyn said: »
I for one would not risk having a T6 VWNM chase down the back line jobs and hit them all with an AoE due to a missed or resisted stun, but have fun stroking your BLM epeens.
And that's basically what it comes down to, isn't it.
Can it be done? Can BLM go epic, ride the hate line, do everything correct and come off as one of the top DDs on the parse without putting any risk on the alliance? Sure, of course.
Do you want to risk it? I wouldn't, but that's just me.
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Well you're contradicting yourself.
It's not that you're simply saying that the odds of getting a temp item you want is slim. It's that you're arguing the case against NQ procs, and your justification for doing so is because you argue that DDs should be popping temps so the odds of getting a good temp item is slim.
And then you make another set of statements that arguing for hitting NQ weaknesses elsewhere.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If you're going to try to make an argument, you should retain some level of consistency.
It's not that you're simply saying that the odds of getting a temp item you want is slim. It's that you're arguing the case against NQ procs, and your justification for doing so is because you argue that DDs should be popping temps so the odds of getting a good temp item is slim.
And then you make another set of statements that arguing for hitting NQ weaknesses elsewhere.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If you're going to try to make an argument, you should retain some level of consistency.
Where did I say that we shouldn't try to proc? Please, point out where I said we shouldn't try to proc, so I can admit I'm wrong, and let you bask in the glory of it all.
Strategic positioning R hard
Some camps it's almost unavoidable. Regardless, weakened BLMs can sometimes hurt as well.
Quetzalcoatl.Mitosis said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Well you're contradicting yourself.
It's not that you're simply saying that the odds of getting a temp item you want is slim. It's that you're arguing the case against NQ procs, and your justification for doing so is because you argue that DDs should be popping temps so the odds of getting a good temp item is slim.
And then you make another set of statements that arguing for hitting NQ weaknesses elsewhere.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If you're going to try to make an argument, you should retain some level of consistency.
It's not that you're simply saying that the odds of getting a temp item you want is slim. It's that you're arguing the case against NQ procs, and your justification for doing so is because you argue that DDs should be popping temps so the odds of getting a good temp item is slim.
And then you make another set of statements that arguing for hitting NQ weaknesses elsewhere.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If you're going to try to make an argument, you should retain some level of consistency.
Where did I say that we shouldn't try to proc? Please, point out where I said we shouldn't try to proc, so I can admit I'm wrong, and let you bask in the glory of it all.
Edit: Oh! You must be talking about this:
Quetzalcoatl.Mitosis said: »
Only if it's an NM you know your going to have trouble handeling or if you're getting really unlucky with staggers (PUP BST etc).
Generally you wouldn't even need to use this, as the DD's should be generating alot more hate than you (again, Gnostic's).
Mostly, I was being a smart ***, but there is some truth to it.
Generally you wouldn't even need to use this, as the DD's should be generating alot more hate than you (again, Gnostic's).
Mostly, I was being a smart ***, but there is some truth to it.
Note the bold.
I'm not looking for glory. This is called projection; knock it off.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
I'm not looking for glory. This is called projection; knock it off.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
Also, I don't parse my BLM, and my friends/LS mates that parse, don't care about the BLM's dmg, they are mostly looking at their dmg output compared to the other melee jobs. So I really couldn't care about "A couple more points on the parse" It's about helping the fight go a bit faster.
ridiculous? and proc'ing an nq for a slim chance at a tp wing for abit more on the parse is not ridiculous? I don't even..
Still, if you wanna see ridiculous, how about 80% of your agrument, BLM shouldn't nuke for dmg! I nuke naked! Just. Wow.
Still, if you wanna see ridiculous, how about 80% of your agrument, BLM shouldn't nuke for dmg! I nuke naked! Just. Wow.
[+]
I would not be surprisd if you expected a blm to proc at like 1-3%
Edit: Only for Pil would I agree with that lol
Edit: Only for Pil would I agree with that lol
Starkzz said: »
I would not be surprisd if you expected a blm to proc at like 1-3%
Edit: Only for Pil would I agree with that lol
Edit: Only for Pil would I agree with that lol
Stun shield > ??? > profit
Not sure how your assuming 20min Pil, so cool story Chief
Starkzz said: »
Not sure how your assuming 20min Pil, so cool story Chief
That was more of a direct comment on his Pil's
tyvm sir ! ^.~
Troy is pretty shitty yeah
Quetzalcoatl.Mitosis said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
I'm not looking for glory. This is called projection; knock it off.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
And you wouldn't make an argument if you weren't trying to argue it. If you didn't mean to argue against proc'ing NQ, you wouldn't have gone on a tangent trying to trivialize the benefits of proc'ing NQ.
And all for what? A couple more points on the parse? That's just ridiculous.
Also, I don't parse my BLM, and my friends/LS mates that parse, don't care about the BLM's dmg, they are mostly looking at their dmg output compared to the other melee jobs. So I really couldn't care about "A couple more points on the parse" It's about helping the fight go a bit faster.
Well given that I directly referenced your double speak just a few posts up, and you continue to pretend that I didn't notice it, it's obvious you're not reading my posts anymore.
At this point, I don't know what's going on in your head. Maybe you're just trying to save face or you feel like I stepped on your epeen, but it's not my business to continue this with you. If you have nothing new to add, then let's end it here.
Starkzz said: »
Troy is pretty shitty yeah
Elvaan BLM, Come at me bro.
P.S fu haxi
Starkzz said: »
P.S fu haxi
brb BLMing on Elvaan and SAM/WARing on Taru
lol I love you guys :D
Quetzalcoatl.Generic said: »
Average Joe AKA Hume
Cool story broseph
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.