Riot 4: Rocky Vs. Ivan
Riot 4: Rocky vs. Ivan
So we can leave other threads alone, by all means, riot on!
Pulling from the other thread:
If that is true, then I was wrong. If there were barricades in place, then, yes, it was officially closed, and I'm sorry.
I can only go by what the official record states, because I don't trust mainsteam media to get anything right. But hey, a broken clock is right 2 times a day.
Asura.Eiryl said: »
Quote:
The Washington State Patrol said the driver may have entered the freeway going southbound through an off-ramp to avoid barriers that were in place.
I can only go by what the official record states, because I don't trust mainsteam media to get anything right. But hey, a broken clock is right 2 times a day.
It was reported from the start that that particular stretch of the freeway was closed, and had been regularly closed at that hour to allow for legal, non violent, protests.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
It was reported from the start that that particular stretch of the freeway was closed, and had been regularly closed at that hour to allow for legal, non violent, protests.
[+]
Search the Seattle Times, KIRO, or the Seattle Stranger for the day after it happened. That would be first reporting.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
[+]
The whole thing just doesn’t make any sense for a driver who was not under the influence and/or not a complete moron. Watching the video, I think the placement of the car barricade actually exacerbated the problem, though. Instead of blocking off the road completely, they left that outside edge open just enough for someone to pass at high speeds, and it’s a frickin’ van so it obscure his view of the protestors.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Search the Seattle Times, KIRO, or the Seattle Stranger for the day after it happened. That would be first reporting.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
So, I wouldn't know this ***at all, and I give no *** to research it tbh.
Only thing I know about that happened in Seattle is the SPAZ ***that went down, got a bunch of people murdered, and the mayor finally let the police do their job and tear down that ***.
The mayor only did something about it when they took the fight to her house. It’s easy to look the other way until you’re the one in the crosshairs.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Search the Seattle Times, KIRO, or the Seattle Stranger for the day after it happened. That would be first reporting.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
So, I wouldn't know this ***at all, and I give no *** to research it tbh.
Only thing I know about that happened in Seattle is the SPAZ ***that went down, got a bunch of people murdered, and the mayor finally let the police do their job and tear down that ***.
See thats the problem right there, and you admitted it. You're not willing to put forth the minimum required effort. You just want to argue.
I don't pretend, nor claim, nor even insinuate that I know everything, everywhere, all the time.
I did look at several articles regarding the incident on July 4th in Seattle. I did not see anywhere that implied anything other than XX person hit YY person. I didn't even find any articles that stated HOW it happened.
And I was looking for articles that specifically state if the highway was closed legally or not.
Honestly, I think you just want to start an online fight. By all means, go for it. That doesn't mean I have to play by your rules.
I did look at several articles regarding the incident on July 4th in Seattle. I did not see anywhere that implied anything other than XX person hit YY person. I didn't even find any articles that stated HOW it happened.
And I was looking for articles that specifically state if the highway was closed legally or not.
Honestly, I think you just want to start an online fight. By all means, go for it. That doesn't mean I have to play by your rules.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Search the Seattle Times, KIRO, or the Seattle Stranger for the day after it happened. That would be first reporting.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
And the Seattle Times does have a paywall, one that allows 3? free articles / month.
Quote:
So, I wouldn't know this ***at all, and I give no *** to research it tbh.
Even foxnews said
You're full of ***. You didn't "find any site that said it" because you chose to ignore it every time you found it to look for a site that didn't.
Quote:
Authorities have closed I-5 several times amid the unrest
You're full of ***. You didn't "find any site that said it" because you chose to ignore it every time you found it to look for a site that didn't.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
You gave many *** and much inaccurate commentary about it though.
I was only going by what I saw. I'm sorry if I didn't care enough to call the police department directly for an interview to make sure I got all my facts straight before reporting to this website.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
ou used to be one of the best researchers on this board. What happened?
Asura.Eiryl said: »
Even foxnews said
You're full of ***. You didn't "find any site that said it" because you chose to ignore it every time you found it to look for a site that didn't.
Quote:
Authorities have closed I-5 several times amid the unrest
You're full of ***. You didn't "find any site that said it" because you chose to ignore it every time you found it to look for a site that didn't.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
You gave many *** and much inaccurate commentary about it though.
I was only going by what I saw. I'm sorry if I didn't care enough to call the police department directly for an interview to make sure I got all my facts straight before reporting to this website.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
ou used to be one of the best researchers on this board. What happened?
[+]
Literally just to argue. You already know the answer.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
You gave many *** and much inaccurate commentary about it though.
I was only going by what I saw. I'm sorry if I didn't care enough to call the police department directly for an interview to make sure I got all my facts straight before reporting to this website.
Garuda.Chanti said: »
ou used to be one of the best researchers on this board. What happened?
Look, I was wrong. I admitted it. We can move on to the next issue or we can continue to beat this dead horse. It's your call.
[+]
“Literally just to argue” is the point of this forum, Eiryl.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
“Literally just to argue” is the point of this forum, Eiryl.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
I get it, you want me to do or say something that will get me banned again. Fine, keep trucking man, you have my full support.
Isn't it a bit paranoid to believe that others want to get you banned? Truth is, no one can get you banned...only you can get yourself banned. The onus of maintaining an active account in P&R rests with you.
[+]
Arguing in bad faith just to argue is very much NOT the point.
If you're just going to *** your way through it every single time use reddit.
If you're just going to *** your way through it every single time use reddit.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
So, I wouldn't know this ***at all, and I give no *** to research it tbh.
So, do we want to continue to beat this dead horse? Or shall we talk about something else?
Do it without me then.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
So, do we want to continue to beat this dead horse? Or shall we talk about something else?
Why would we bother changing the subject, your argument for any and all topics is "I won't look, I don't care, that didn't happen, I'm right, fite me" *** is the point in that.
Not sure why y'all are acting like "arguing in bad faith" is a new concept around here. Don't even pretend you're not guilty of it.
[+]
You opinion is that "the left" which is everyone that isn't KN you and saeval is arguing in "bad faith".
The actual fact is KN literally just said in no uncertain terms "I literally just argued in bad faith"
The actual fact is KN literally just said in no uncertain terms "I literally just argued in bad faith"
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
So, I wouldn't know this ***at all, and I give no *** to research it tbh.
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.