Last one I posted was in the beginning of this thread.
And now Vic stupid and incorrect claim that I don't post a source is forever debunked.
Except your news article didn't actually back up your claim that anyone was trying to "ban people from the internet." But that's fine, we have one example of nausi sharing an actual news article, that he probably didn't read, and certainly didn't help him make the point he was attempting. However,
Nope, I provide sources quite frequently.
This remains a hilarious, dreadfully inaccurate claim. Especially since thats the only "source" he has posted in this current thread, and it said something completely different that what he was trying to claim. I'm definitely closer to the truth when I say nausi never posts sources than he is when he tries to say he posts them "frequently."
He gets sources, he simply dismisses them as “conspiracy or “right wing” when they counter his argument because he lives in a bubble where his belief in something makes it true.
Still not even remotely factual.